ATTACHMENT_F_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 38 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Integrated Governance Support Services (IGSS) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- ED-FSA-16-R-1234
About this file
Attachment F
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 31
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT F Past Performance Questionnaire
EVALUATION SURVEY OF CONTRACTOR’S PAST PERFORMANCE FORM
You have been reported as having recent experience with the provider of resources supporting Information Technology Governance support services to assist with delivering quality solutions where services include:
1. Assist with providing Loans Segment Planning
2. Assist with providing Loans Segment Execution
3. Assist with providing Loans Segment Program Management
The U.S. Dept. of Education/Federal Student Aid (FSA) is evaluating proposals for Information Technology Governance support services. To help FSA evaluate the Vendor’s past performance, would you please fill out this short survey and identify yourself at the bottom of the form. Please return it electronically via email to: FSAEAT@ed.gov. Questionnaire surveys are requested by 2:00PM, EST, August 30, 2016. Thank you in advance for your assistance.
Name of Contractor:
Contract No.:
Rating Instructions: In the column on the far right circle the number which corresponds to the performance rating for each category in the box on the left. Factors to be considered in evaluating each category are shown in the middle column. Circle the average score that best reflects all the factors considered, using a scale of 0 to 5, 5=Outstanding, 4=Excellent, 3=Good, 2=Fair, 1=Poor, and 0=Unsatisfactory (use N/A for not observed or inapplicable to your contract):
| QUALITY |
| Compliance with contract requirements |
Staff were knowledgeable and training appropriately
Technical expertise; understanding of technical issues
Professionalism of key personnel
Accuracy in diagnosing problems
Reliability N/A
Additional Comments
TIMELINESS OF
RESPONSE
Adherence to milestones
Response was timely
Response was appropriate
Contractor-caused delays/problems
Timely administration/billing and submission of accurate reports N/A
Additional Comments
| COST |
| Effectiveness of contract management |
Project management and resource allocation; cost containment
Cost of the contract versus the value and timeliness of services and products received
N/A
Additional Comments
| BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP |
| Courtesy |
Effectiveness of solutions provided to your needs
Responsiveness to problems associated with contractor’s behavior, activities or attitude
Any awards to contractor for quality of work or termination’s for default or convenience Business-like concern for the interests of the customer/end-user
Prompt notification of problems; close, professional working relationships to solve issues
Maintaining qualified staff
(Please cite specifically in the Additional Comments) N/A
Additional Comments
Overall, on a scale of 0-5, how satisfied were you with this service contractor? _____
Please give us an idea of the size and scope of the contract you described above:
Total dollar award -
Length of contract -
Name:
Your Function:
Organization:
(Contracting Officer, Program Manager, etc.)
Fax:
Email:
Phone:
PAGE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .