Amendment_0002.pdf

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. Name and Title of Signer (Type or Print) 16A. Name and title of Contracting Officer (Type or Print)

15B. Contractor/Offeror 15C. Date Signed 16B. United States of America

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. Date Signed

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070 30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

PREVIOUS EDITIONS UNUSABLE Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. Contract ID Code Page of Pages

1 9

2. Amendment/Modification No. 3. Effective Date 4. Requisition/Purchase Req. No. 5. Project No. (if applicable)

0002 January 12, 2017 NWWE0000-16-00101

6. Issued By Code AJ930073 7. Administered By (If other than Item 6) Code SEE BLOCK 6

NOAA/EASTERN REGION ACQUISITION

200 GRANBY STREET

SUITE 815

NORFOLK, VA 23510

8. Name and Address of Contractor (No., Street, County, and Zip Code) (X) 9A. Amendment of Solicitation No.

X

EA-133W-17-RP-0101

9B. Date (See Item 11)

December 20, 2016

10A. Modification of Contract/Order No.

10B. Date (See Item 13)

Code Facility Code

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended x is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDG-

MENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT

IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. Accounting and Appropriation Data (if required)

1. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACT/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. This change order is issued pursuant to: (Specify authority) The changes set forth in item 14 are made in the Contract Order No. in item 10A.

B. The above numbered Contract/Order is modified to reflect the administrative changes (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.)

Set fourth item 14, pursuant to the authority of FAR 43.103 (b)

C. This supplemental agreement is entered into pursuant to authority of:

D. Other (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, X is required to sign this document and return 1 copy to the issuing office.

14. Description of Amendment/Modification (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

A. Amendment 0002 to Request for Proposals (RFP) EA-133W-17-RP-0101 is hereby issued answer questions received by prospective offerors, make changes to the solicitation as a result of questions received, and replace a Statement of

Work Attachment.

**NOTE: The Government reserves the right not to answer all questions or those deemed not appropriate.**

1. Question: Is the current incumbent contractor Independent Technology, Inc. (INTECH)?

Answer: The incumbent contractor is Independent Technology, Inc. under contract number DG-133W-12-CN-0056.

2. Question: Is the scope of work included in solicitation EA-133W-17-RP-0101 consistent with the scope of work reflected in

INTECH's current contract DOCDG133W12CN0056 and INTECH former contract DOCDG133W06CN0098?

Answer: This solicitation is for the re-compete of contract number DG-133W-12-CN-0056.

3. Question: Is the USG willing to provide a summary of the historical maintenance and logistics data per NOAA site covered under this solicitation?

Answer: The only historical data available is included in the solicitation as Attachment 5C, Historical Utilization of Spare

Parts & Assemblies.

4. Question: Would the USG consider extending the due date for proposal responses?

Answer: The Government has considered this request and is not extending the due date for proposals at this time.

5. Question: Reference RFP, page 2, Section B.2- Price Schedule. CLIN 0001 has been identified for Transition In Services over a 2 month period of time. How did the USG determine that 2 months was adequate for this Transition In? Does the current incumbent contract scope include a Transition Out Plan? If yes, what is the period of performance reflected in this

Transition Plan?

Answer: The Government determined that 2 months was a reasonable Transition In time based on the SOW requirements and past experience.

6. Question: Reference RFP, pages 2,3,4,5 & 6, Section B.2- Price Schedule. Can the USG provide clarification on services to be rendered in CLINs X0002 and X0003? One interpretation is that logistic services are not to be included in CLIN X0002 and are only included CLIN X0003, which would indicate that there are 52 sites (476-424 = 52) that receive ONLY logistics support. An alternate interpretation is that Logistics support is included in both CLINs which would indicate that 900 sites

(424+476 = 900) receive logistics support while only the 424 sites covered under CLINs X0002 receive both logistics and maintenance support services.

Answer: The number of sites stated for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) is an estimate, as this solicitation will result in an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract. The correct interpretation is that CLIN X0002 includes both

Maintenance and Logistics support for an estimated 424 unique sites, while CLIN X0003 includes only Logistics support for an estimated 476 unique sites. Reference attachment 1A1 for sites that apply to CLIN X0002 and attachment 1A2 for sites that apply to CLIN X0003. There is no overlap between the sites listed in attachment 1A1 and 1A2. Changes to the solicitation are within this amendment to clarify CLINS X0002.

7. Question: Reference RFP, page 9, 3.1 Government Furnished Data. Can the USG provide a complete list of the Government

Furnished Data (GFD) to be provided under this contract?

Answer: GFD to be transferred to the contractor includes, but is not limited to, the following:

1. Original Equipment Manufacturer Operator and Maintenance manuals for all brands of NWR transmitters maintained under this solicitation including:

a. CEC (WR300B, WR1000B)

b. Crown - IREC (WRG100, WRG300, WRG1000)

c. Armstrong (G100, G300, G1000)

d. Armstrong (G300B, G1000B)

e. Nautel (NG300, NG1000)

2. Remote Interface software packages for all the transmitters listed above.

3. ROAMS programming software package, and ROAMS programming documentation.

Changes to the solicitation to incorporate this list of Government-Furnished Data are within this amendment.

8. Question: Reference RFP, page 10, 3.5 NWR Transmitter Spare Parts and Spare Assemblies. Is the USG willing to provide offerors with annual historical data on the number of spare parts and assemblies (listed in Attachments 1C2a, 1C2b, 1C2c, 1C2d, 1C2e) replaced versus repaired in support of this contract?

Answer: Attachment 5C, Historical Utilization of Spare Parts & Assemblies, which provides a recent one year summary of parts and assemblies utilized under the current contract is the only usage data available to be provided in this solicitation.

9. Question: Reference RFP, page 11, 3.7 ROAMS Spare Parts Inventory. Is the USG willing to provide offerors with annual historical data on the number of spare ROAMS parts and assemblies (listed in Attachment 1C5) replaced versus repaired in support of this contract?

Answer: The Government does not track the usage of ROAMS spare parts under the current contract, and therefore, cannot provide that data.

10. Question: Reference RFP, page 13, 4.1.5 Required Maintenance Services. Is the USG willing to provide offerors with annual historical data on the number of un-repairable transmitter assemblies?

Answer: The Government does not track the number of un-repairable transmitter assemblies under the current contract, and therefore, cannot provide that data.

11. Question: Reference RFP, page 13, 4.1.6 Warranty Maintenance and Parts Support for Contract Maintained transmitter

Systems. Solicitation states "The Contractor shall be responsible for all warranty parts tracking." Is the current Warehouse

Management System (WMS) used to track warranty Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) or is it owned and maintained by the current incumbent contractor? Is it the intent of the USG for the successful offeror under this solicitation to provide a contractor owned system to manage warranty data?

Answer: Under the current contract, the contractor provides and uses their own inventory management software tools, and the same is expected under this solicitation. The Government will not be providing any inventory management software to the awardee of the subsequent contract.

12. Question: Reference RFP, page 13, 4.1.6 Warranty Maintenance and Parts Support for Contract Maintained transmitter

Systems. Solicitation states "NWR transmitter warranty expiration dates for Contractor maintained systems are listed in

Attachment 1Al.". Please confirm the USG will revise/update this list to reflect any additional equipment purchases made after solicitation release and contract award.

Answer: The Government will provide updates, if any, to the warranty expiration dates in attachment 1A1 following contract award.

13. Question: Reference RFP, page 13, 4.2.1 Site Outage and Restoration. Is the USG willing to provide offerors with annual historical data on the number of site outages caused by lightning strikes?

Answer: For calendar year 2016, there were 19 transmitter repair actions associated with lightning strikes. Not all of these strikes caused outages, but they did all require repairs to be performed on the transmitters.

14. Question: Reference RFP, page 16, 5.1.1 Response to Routine Requests. Is the USG willing to provide offerors with historical data on the number of Routine logistics Support Requests?

Answer: The Government does not track the number of Routine logistics requests under the current contract, and therefore, cannot provide that data.

15. Question: Reference RFP, page 16, 5.1.1 Response to Routine Requests. When Spare Parts are shipped to site will the defective part in question be returned to the contractor to attempt repair?

Answer: Yes, the sites requesting the parts are required to send back the defective parts to the contractor for repair and re-use.

16. Question: Reference RFP, page 16, 5.1.1 Response to Routine Requests. Will the EOD quantities be adjusted on spare parts and assemblies (listed in Attachments 1C2a, 1C2b, 1C2c, 1C2d, 1C2e) when parts returned from site for Routine Logistics

Support Requests are deemed unrepairable? If not, is it the intent of the USG that these parts will be covered under the requirements for service as identified under section 3.5?

Answer: EOC quantities of spare parts and assemblies will not be reduced if returned defective parts are deemed unrepairable. The contractor would need to procure replacement parts for any parts deemed unrepairable, so as to keep the

EOC stock at the same level as when the contract was awarded.

17. Question: Reference RFP, page 16, 5.1.2 Response to Emergency Requests. Is the USG willing to provide offerors with annual historical data on the number of Emergency logistics Support Requests?

Answer: The Government does not track the number of Emergency logistics requests under the current contractor, and therefore, cannot provide that data.

18. Question: Reference RFP, page 16, 5.1.2 Response to Emergency Requests. When Spare Parts are shipped to site, please confirm the defective part in question will be returned to the contractor to attempt repair? Should contractor include shipping costs in proposed pricing estimates?

Answer: Yes, the sites requesting the parts are required to send back the defective parts to the contractor for repair and re-use. Per the RFP section 5.1.2, “the Contractor shall bear all shipping costs associated with emergency logistics support requests.”, so yes, the contractor should include these costs in their proposal. However, the contractor only pays for shipment of the parts to the requestor; they are not responsible for the cost of return shipment of the defective part to the contractor.

19. Question: Reference RFP, page 16, 5.1.2 Response to Emergency Requests. Will the EOD quantities be adjusted on spare parts and assemblies (listed in Attachments 1C2a, 1C2b, 1C2c, 1C2d, 1C2e) when parts utilized for Emergency Logistics

Support Requests are deemed unrepairable? If not, is it the intent of the USG that these parts will be covered under the requirements for service as identified under section 3.5?

Answer: EOC quantities of spare parts and assemblies will not be reduced if returned defective parts are deemed unrepairable. The contractor would need to procure replacement parts for any parts deemed unrepairable, so as to keep the

20. Question: Reference RFP, page 16, 5.2 Repair and Technical Consulting Services for Attachment 1A2 sites. Is the USG willing to provide annual historical data on number of Repair and Technical Consulting Service Requests?

Answer: The Government does not track the number of these requests under the current contract, and therefore, cannot provide that data.

21. Question: Reference RFP, page 16, 5.2 Repair and Technical Consulting Services for Attachment 1A2 sites. Will EOD quantities be adjusted should assemblies (listed in Attachments 1C2a, 1C2b, 1C2c, 1C2d, 1C2e) received be deemed beyond repair? If not, is it the intent of the USG that these parts will be covered under the requirements for service as identified under section 3.5?

Answer: EOC quantities of spare parts and assemblies will not be reduced if returned defective parts are deemed unrepairable. The contractor would need to procure replacement parts for any parts deemed unrepairable, so as to keep the

22. Question: Reference RFP, page 20, Site Activity Report- NWR 6.2.4 Site Activity Report NWWS and GNC-A. Is the USG willing to provide offerors copies of the most recent contract year Site Activity Reports for full maintenance sites?

Answer: The previous contract for NWWS and GNC-A support did not require Site Activity Reports, so no reports are available to be provided.

23. Question: Reference RFP, page 26, 8.1 Contractor Transition Services. The solicitation indicates that "The Contractor shall be responsible for the shipping costs of all GFP listed in Attachments 1C1 through 1C8. The GFP will be provided FOB origin by the Government from the incumbent contractor location(s)". In order to provide fair and reasonable shipping cost estimates, is the USG able to provide the current incumbent locations and/or identify the location of the incumbent's warehouse/storage facility?

Answer: The incumbent contractor’s warehouse is located in Rochester, NY. This location should be used for preparing shipping cost estimates of GFP.

24. Question: Reference RFP, page 26, 8.1 Contractor Transition Services. Please confirm that the existing incumbent will only ship equipment that is currently being used in the field or used to support actively deployed assets.

Answer: The incumbent will be preparing all GFP equipment listed in Attachments 1C1 through 1C8 for shipment to the new contractor, and all of that equipment is being used in support of actively deployed NWR transmitter assets.

25. Question: Reference RFP, page 26, 8.1 Contractor Transition Services. Solicitation includes Federal Acquisition Regulation

(FAR) 52.222-17 which includes language indicating if the incumbent is not awarded a follow on contract, in order to comply with EO 13495, the successor Contractor's obligation to offer employment to SCA covered employees shall continue for 90 days after the successor contractor’s first date of performance on the contract (52.222-17 ii (3) (iii) ). Would the USG consider extending the Transition In period to 90 days?

Answer: No, the Government will not extend the duration of the Transition In period.

26. Question: Reference RFP, page 37, H.6 CAR 1352.237-75 Key Personnel (APR 2010). Please confirm that resumes for Key

Personnel should be included in Volume II - Technical Proposal.

Answer: Resumes are not required. However, Key Personnel requirements should be addressed in Volume II- Technical

Proposal.

27. Question: Reference RFP, page 51, Volume I. Business Proposal Signature Authority. Can the USG clarify what information is to be included in this section?

Answer: A signed SF1449 dictating signature authority for the offeror.

28. Question: Reference RFP, page 51, Volume I. Business Proposal RFP Schedule B. Solicitation indicates that the Business

Volume should include "RFP Pages 2 and 3: "B.2 Pricing Schedule" completed by the Offeror". Please confirm that the

Business Volume should only include Schedule B pricing for Ordering Period One only which is on Page 2 and 3.

Answer: The Business Volume should include all pages that correspond to the pricing schedule. The solicitation is changed within this amendment to reflect this correction.

29. Question: Reference RFP, page 52, L.1 CAR 1352.215-70 Proposal Preparation (APR 2010) "Font sizes must be no smaller than Times New Roman, size 10 type." Is offeror able to use alternate fonts/sizes for graphics if the fonts/sizes are legible and clear?

Answer: Font sizes must be no smaller than Times New Roman, size 10 type.

30. Question: Reference RFP, page 54, Volume II – Technical Proposal, a) III. "The Technical Proposal shall not exceed 59 pages. Any pages in excess of 59 will be disregarded, and will not be included in the proposal evaluation." Please clarify what is included in the 59 pages, i.e. Cover Page, Table of Contents. Appendices, Resumes, etc.

Answer: The 59 page limit does not include the Cover Page, Table of Contents, Appendices or Resumes. The solicitation has been changed within this amendment to reflect the appropriate changes.

31. Question: Reference RFP, page 54, Section L- Instructions, conditions and notices to Offerors. The Government states, "Relevant past performance is performance under contracts or efforts within the past five years prior to the solicitation closing date…" but the solicitation also states "To demonstrate its past performance, the offeror shall identify up to three (3) of its most relevant contracts or efforts within the past three (3) years of the posting of the solicitation." Please provide clarification on whether the USG is seeking past performance within three or five years.

Answer: Past performance submissions shall be within three years of the posting of the solicitation. The solicitation is changed within this amendment to reflect this correction.

32. Question: Reference RFP, page 54, Evaluation Factors- Factor 1. Evaluation criteria includes offeror's plans to minimize staff turnover. In order to adequately and comprehensively address the proposed approach, can the USG indicate what percent of the total existing incumbent workforce is covered under EO 13495?

Answer: The Government does not have this information at this time.

33. Question: Reference RFP, page 54, Evaluation Factors- Factor 2. Is the offeror permitted to use the Past Performance of a major subcontractor team member for one of the three examples included in the Technical Proposal since the past performance of subcontractors may be considered as part of the evaluation criteria (page 58, Section M.3 (a))?

Answer: Yes, Offerors are permitted to submit past performance of subcontractors as part of their past performance submission.

34. Question: Reference Attachment 1A1- NWR Transmitter Systems to be Contractor Maintained, Lines 239-299. On March

07, 2016, National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Weather Service, Raleigh Weather Forecast

Office (WFO) Raleigh, North Carolina released solicitation number EA-133W-16-RQ-0198 for maintenance services similar to the scope of work reflected in current solicitation EA-133W-17-RP-0101. Was a contract awarded under this solicitation?

If yes, please confirm the sites covered under this contract are not included in this solicitation's scope.

Answer: Solicitation EA-133W-16-RQ-0198 was only for the Raleigh WFO NWR site for maintenance under a unique condition. This site is not part of this solicitation’s scope.

35. Question: Reference Amendment #1, Department of Labor (DOL) Wage Determination (WD). Are any of the existing incumbent employees are covered under Executive Order (EO) 13495, Non-displacement of Qualified Workers Under Service

Contracts?

Answer: The Government does not have this information at this time.

36. Question: Reference Amendment #1, DOL WD. If NOAA is seeking a Phase In Plan that includes the recruitment of incumbent personnel, does the current incumbent contract include a Phase Out Plan that accommodates or allows for successor contractors to interview and negotiate bona fide express offers of employment to each qualified employee?

Answer: No, the current contract does not include a Phase Out Plan. The solicitation is changed within this amendment to incorporate FAR Clause 52.237-3, Continuity of Services.

37. Question: Reference Amendment #1, DOL WD. Has the current incumbent contractor provided the current contracting officer with a certified list of the names of all service employees and subcontractors that have supported the existing current contract, including anniversary dates of employment, for each service employee under the contract and subcontracts, consistent with 48 CFR 22.1204 (a) ?

Answer: This information will be provided in accordance with FAR SubPart 22.1204(a) Nondisplacement of Qualified

Workers Under Service Contracts, Certified Service Employee Lists, after award of the contract.

38. Question: Reference RFP, page 28, Paragraph 11. In order for the Offeror to adequately staff the Help Desk and Preventive

Maintenance Services, it is requested the Government provide the empirical transaction data over the most recent 12 months that the current Help Desk has experienced from Customer calls.

Answer: Approximately 5 total calls have been received over the past 12 month period requesting service support from the

NWWS and GNC-A help desk.

39. Question: Reference RFP, page 53, Paragraph L.1 (b) Format and Content, 2 nd

Bullet: Signature Authority. Does the

Government intend on the “Signature Authority” being Blocks 30A & 30B of the SF1449?

Answer: Yes.

40. Question: Reference RFP, page 53, Paragraph L.1 (b) Format and Content, 6 th Bullet. Does the government intend on this being by Reference thru just stating that or should offers provide the direct link to their company’s SAM site?

Answer: Offerors should provide the direct link to their company’s System of Award Management (SAM) Site.

41. Question: Reference, page10, paragraphs 3.2/3.4/3.5 ; Page 11, paragraph 3.6; Page 13, paragraph 4.1.5; Page15, paragraph

4.3; Page 16, paragraphs 5.1.1 & 5.1.2; Page18, paragraphs 6.1.2 & 6.1.5; Page 26, paragraphs 8.1 & 8.1.2. Please clarify the terminology used for how costs and expenses are to be paid under the contract. The term “contractor’s expense” , the term

“cost [ ] shall be borne by the contractor”, and the term “Contractor shall bear all [ ] costs”, as contrasted to “paid by the

Government” and the term “Government will bear all costs”. We understand this to mean that for those items carrying the term “contractor’s expense” the contractor pays for the items (e.g., parts, shipment, etc) through the contract, similarly the terms “cost [ ] shall be borne by the contractor” and “Contractor shall bear all shipping costs” the contractor pays for these items (e.g., parts, shipment, etc) through the contract. For those items carrying the term “paid by the Government” and

“Government will bear all costs”, the Government pays for the item directly or through a separate line item in the contract. Is this a correct understanding?

Answer: The understanding stated in the question is correct. For all RFP sections designated as “contractor’s expense” , “cost [ ] shall be borne by the contractor”, and “Contractor shall bear all [ ] costs”, the contractor shall pay for these items under the terms of the fixed priced CLIN’s they are associated with. For RFP sections designated as “paid by the

Government” and “Government will bear all costs”, these are shipping costs that will be paid by the Government under Time and Materials CLINs 1010, 2010, 3010, 4010 and 5010.

B. As a result of the questions received, the following changes are made to Request for Proposals (RFP) #EA-133W-17-

RP-0101:

Under Section C- Statement of Work, 3.1 Government Furnished Data, the following language is added:

GFD to be transferred to the contractor includes, but is not limited to, the following:

1. Original Equipment Manufacturer Operator and Maintenance manuals for all brands of NWR transmitters maintained, including:

a. CEC (WR300B, WR1000B)

b. Crown - IREC (WRG100, WRG300, WRG1000)

c. Armstrong (G100, G300, G1000)

d. Armstrong (G300B, G1000B)

e. Nautel (NG300, NG1000)

2. Remote Interface software packages for all the transmitters listed above.

3. ROAMS programming software package, and ROAMS programming documentation.

Under Section L.1, CAR 1352.215-70 Proposal Preparation (APR 2010),(b)(i)(b) Format and Content, 3 rd bullet is hereby changed-

From:

RFP Pages 2 and 3: "B.2 Pricing Schedule" completed by the Offeror.

To:

RFP Pages 2 through 7: "B.2 Pricing Schedule" completed by the Offeror.

Under Section L.1, CAR 1352.215-70 Proposal Preparation (APR 2010),(b)(ii)(b)(II) Evaluation Factor 2—Past

Performance, first paragraph is hereby changed-

The offeror shall demonstrate relevant past performance or affirmatively state that it possesses no relevant past performance.

Relevant past performance is performance under contracts or efforts within the past five years prior to the solicitation closing date that is the same as or similar to, the scope and magnitude of the work described by this solicitation.

The offeror shall demonstrate relevant past performance or affirmatively state that it possesses no relevant past performance.

Relevant past performance is performance under contracts or efforts within the past three years of the posting of the solicitation that is the same as or similar to, the scope and magnitude of the work described by this solicitation.

Under Section L.1, CAR 1352.215-70 Proposal Preparation (APR 2010),(a)general instructions, the following sentence is removed-

Any material submitted, including appendices and attachments, that exceeds the page limitations specified will not be considered during the evaluation process.

Under Section L.1, CAR 1352.215-70 Proposal Preparation (APR 2010),(b)(ii)(a)General,(III), is hereby changed-

(III) The Technical Proposal shall not exceed 59 pages. Any pages in excess of 59 will be disregarded, and will not be included in the proposal evaluation.

(III) The Technical Proposal shall not exceed 59 pages. Any pages in excess of 59 will be disregarded, and will not be included in the proposal evaluation. The 59 page limit does not include the Cover Page, Table of Contents, Appendices or

Resumes.

Under Section B.2, Pricing Schedule, the description of Supplies/Services for CLINS 0002, 1002, 2002, 3002 and 4002 are hereby changed-

Contractor Maintained Transmitter Sites and Maintenance Support Services in accordance with Statement of Work (SOW).

Contractor Maintained and Logistics Supported Transmitter Sites and Maintenance Support Services in accordance with Statement of

Work (SOW).

Under Section C. Statement of Work, 4. Contractor Maintained Transmitter sites is hereby changed-

4. CONTRACTOR MAINTAINED TRANSMITTER SITES

4. CONTRACTOR MAINTAINED AND LOGISTICS SUPPORTED TRANSMITTER SITES

Under Section I. Contract Clauses, the following clause is added:

I.34 FAR 52.237-3 Continuity of Services (JAN 1991)

C. SOW Attachment 5c – Historical Utilization of Spare Parts & Assemblies is removed and replaced with SOW

Attachment 5c – Historical Utilization of Spare Parts & Assemblies attached with this amendment.

D. The closing date and time remains unchanged. All proposals are due January 30, 2017 at 1:00pm EST.