DRAFT_Attachment 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 1 MB Posted

Attached to
DRAFT - USAFA Event Support Request For Quote
Solicitation number
FA700024Q0060
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire related to a federal contract opportunity for Event Support Services at the U.S. Air Force Academy (USAFA). The requirement is to provide trained personnel, equipment, materials, supervision, and other items and services necessary to support intercollegiate home athletic events and other special events at USAFA facilities.

The questionnaire requests information on the contractor's performance in areas such as providing qualified personnel, quality control, problem resolution, schedule adherence, and cost control. It also asks the respondent to provide an overall performance rating and indicate whether they would award another contract to the contractor. The contract information includes the contract number, type, period of performance, and dollar value. The questionnaire is part of the source selection process for a competitive 8(a) set-aside contract requirement.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Controlled Unclassified Information When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Attachment 5 - Event Support Services Solicitation: Past Performance Questionnaire

Controlled Unclassified Information Page 1 of 6

The 10th Contracting Squadron of the United States Air Force Academy is in the process of competitively selecting a source for a Athletic Department Event Support Services requirement. The Event Support Services requirement is to provide trained personnel, equipment, materials, supervision, and other items and services necessary to provide Event Venue Support to the U.S. Air Force Academy (USAFA) Department of Athletics, as well as for other special events held on USAFA. Event support includes intercollegiate home football games at Falcon Stadium, and other intercollegiate home sporting events held at the Cadet Field House, Cadet Gym, and outdoor sports venues. It also covers support for Parades, I-Day, Special Protocol Events, and Graduation week culminating in Graduation Day.

This service requires supervisory oversight and management of patron access to include patron/bag screening, ticket taking, ushering/crowd control, traffic/coning/signage management, parking management, oversight and access to the Falcon Stadium Press Box, and Falcon Stadium East Club.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.

Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later than 12 Sep 2024. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of negotiations.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed to kenneth.helgeson.3@us.af.mil and melinda.lingley@us.af.mil. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official source selection records.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

Christian A. Cornell III Contracting Officer

10 CONS/PKB

1 Atch Past Performance Questionnaire DRAFT

Attachment 5 - Event Support Services Solicitation: Past Performance Questionnaire

Controlled Unclassified Information Page 2 of 6

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

H. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

I. Description of work performed:

J. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

K. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor

Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last three (3) years, please complete separate Past Performance Questionnaire forms for those contracts as well.

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

DRAFT

Controlled Unclassified Information Page 3 of 6

C. Geographic description of work performed under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address:

D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

E. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

Controlled Unclassified Information Page 4 of 6

The Contractor: E V S M U N/A

1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

2. Demonstrated the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.

4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.

5. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

6. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

7. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.

8. Identified problems as they occurred.

Controlled Unclassified Information Page 5 of 6

The Contractor: E V S M U N/A

9. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.

10. Displayed initiative to solve problems.

11. Developed realistic contract schedules.

12. Met established contract schedules.

13. Was responsive to contract changes.

14. Provided adequate project supervision.

15. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.

16. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task, when required for contract modifications.

17. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.

Controlled Unclassified Information Page 6 of 6

The Contractor: E V S M U N/A

18. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?

19. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?

If yes, explain.

EXPLANATION:

☐ Yes

☐ No

20. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain.

EXPLANATION:

☐ Yes

☐ No

Additional remarks:

[click and pick the date]

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Mailing Address:

10 CONS/PKB

8110 Industrial Dr.

USAFA, CO 80840

E-Mail to: kenneth.helgeson.3@us.af.mil and melinda.lingley@us.af.mil,

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .