Attachment_J-7.docx

DOCX document 33 KB Posted

Attached to
Operation of the Keystone Job Corps Center
Solicitation number
DOL-ETA-15-R-00072
Issued by

About this file

Attachment J-7

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Keystone_Vehicle_Log.xls XLS spreadsheet
Keystone_RFP_walkthru_Questions_and_answers.docx DOCX document
Updated_2015_utility_usagecost.xls XLS spreadsheet
Keystone_Residential_Advisors_CBA_2010-2013_signed_(2)_pdf_-_Adobe_Acrobat_Pro.pdf PDF
Keystone_Professionals_CBA_2010-2013_signed_pdf_-_Adobe_Acrobat_Pro.pdf PDF
Keystone_Maintenance_CBA_2009-2012_signed.pdf PDF
Basis_for_Award.docx DOCX document
Attachment_J-2.pdf PDF
Attachment_J-13.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_J-4.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_J-10.pdf PDF
Attachment_J-12.pdf PDF
Attachment_J-3.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_J-14.pdf PDF
Attachment_J-6.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_J-1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_J-9_Volume_II.pdf PDF
Attachment_J-9_Volume_I.pdf PDF
Attachment_J-8.pdf PDF
Attachment_J-11.pdf PDF
KEYSTONE_RFP.docx DOCX document
Show all 21

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Past Performance Questionnaire

To Whom It May Concern:

The _______________ Company is currently responding to the U. S. Department of Labor RFP # DOL-ETA-15-R-00072 for the procurement of the operation of the Keystone Job Corps Center.

The U. S. Department of Labor is placing increased emphasis in their procurements on past performance as a source selection factor. They are requiring that clients of entities responding to their solicitations be identified and their participation in the evaluation process be requested. Therefore, we are requesting that you provide the following information regarding our performance on the contract identified below. Please complete Sections B through F of this Questionnaire and return it directly to the address shown below no later than the posted closing date on the solicitation.

ATTN: Paul H. Desilets Contracting Specialist Office of Contracts Management (OCM)

U.S. DOL – ETA

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., RM 4636 Washington, D.C. 20210 Office: (202) 693-3854 desilets.paul@dol.gov

By my signature below, I authorize you to respond to any additional inquiries by the U. S. Department of Labor regarding our performance on the referenced contract.

(Signature) (Date)

(Title)

Past Performance

A. Contract Identifying Information:

Offeror:

Project Title & Contract Number:

Contracting Officer:

Phone No.

Project Manager:
Phone No.

Address:

FAX No.

Work Performance Period: _____________________ to ______________________

Contract Value: $

Brief Summary of Statement of Work:

B. Outcomes vs. Goals:

1. Were there measurable performance goals or outcomes associated with this contract? If yes, describe:

Yes No

For the following questions, where applicable, check the adjectival rating which most closely represents your assessment of the contractor's performance: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory

2.How effective was the contractor in achieving those outcomes? (Explain any rating below Satisfactory)
Exceptional

Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

C. Cost Control: How well has the contractor:

1.Performed all contracted services within the budget?
Exceptional

Very Good Satisfactory

2.Submitted complete and accurate financial reports and invoices?
Exceptional

Very Good Satisfactory

3. Has a draft or final audit report disclosed questioned or disallowed costs? If yes, indicate:

period covered by audit disallowed or recommended for disallowance disallowed costs as a % of audited funds Yes No

Comments: (Explain any ratings below Satisfactory)

Summary Adjectival Rating of Cost Control Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory

D. Timeliness of Performance: How well has the contractor:

1.Completed contract requirements and submitted reports and schedules according to specified time frames?
ExceptionalMarginal
Very GoodUnsatisfactory

Satisfactory

2.Responded to technical direction and requests in a timely manner?
ExceptionalMarginal
Very GoodUnsatisfactory

Satisfactory

Comments: (Explain any ratings below Satisfactory)

Summary Adjectival Rating of Timeliness of Performance
ExceptionalMarginal
Very GoodUnsatisfactory

Satisfactory

E. Business Relations: To what extent has the contractor:

1.Been pro-active in contract monitoring and review?
ExceptionalMarginal
Very GoodUnsatisfactory

Satisfactory

2.Demonstrated a responsive and cooperative working relationship with the Contracting Officer and Project staff?
ExceptionalMarginal
Very GoodUnsatisfactory

Satisfactory

3.Promptly notified the Contracting Officer of potential problems?
ExceptionalMarginal
Very GoodUnsatisfactory

Satisfactory

4.Used effective approaches and provided technical expertise and resources to solve contract problems?
ExceptionalMarginal
Very GoodUnsatisfactory

Comments: (Explain any ratings below Satisfactory)

Summary Adjectival Rating of Business Relations

ExceptionalMarginal
Very GoodUnsatisfactory

F. Customer Satisfaction: To what extent has the contractor:

1. Been effective in tailoring the program to meet the needs of the customers?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

2. Shown flexibility in operating the program to meet changing program needs and emphases?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal

Comments: (Explain any ratings below Satisfactory)

Summary Adjectival Rating of Customer Satisfaction

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal

Additional Comments:

Name & Title of Individual Completing Information:

Phone No.

SUMMARY PAST EXPERIENCE CONFIRMATION

B. Outcomes vs. Goals

C. Cost Control

D. Timeliness of Performance

E. Business Relations

F. Customer Satisfaction

Verified by: ___________________________________________Date:____________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .