Past_Performance_Survey.docx
DOCX document 21 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Human Resources and Professional Development Support Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- DJA-14-AHDQ-Q-0043
About this file
Past Performance Survey
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE SURVEY
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (When Filled In)
A. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Contractor’s Name:
Project Title or Brief Description of Work:
Contract Number Provided by Offeror:
Contract Dollar Amount: $
Types of work performed:
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ___________________________
Contractor performed as the (1) Prime Contractor (2) Sub-Contractor _____________________
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION (Point of Contact, Agency and Address):
POC Name:
Address:
Agency:
Phone: Fax: ______________ Email Address:
C. EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: Vernessa.younger@atf.gov
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the letter on the scale that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF U OR M.
| ATF Solicitation DJA-14-AHDQ-Q-0043 | - 4 - | Attachment I |
| U | ||
| M | ||
| N | ||
| S | ||
| VG | ||
| E |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Neutral |
| Satisfactory |
| Very Good |
| Exceptional |
| Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective. |
| No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive. |
| Performance met contract requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner |
QUALITY OF SERVICE (Circle Response)
| 1 |
| Contractor's ability to meet minimum quality standards specified for performance |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 2 |
| Contractor's ability to effectively control the quality of services provided |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 3 |
| Contractor's compliance with contractual terms and conditions |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 4 |
| Overall rating of contractor's quality of service |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE (Circle Response)
| 1 |
| Contractor's ability to meet specific response times and scheduled timeframes for completion of specific tasks. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 2 |
| Contractor's responsiveness/timeliness for providing |
administrative reports/documentations required by contract.
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 3 |
| Contractor's timeliness in responding to emergency services |
requirements.
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 4 |
| Overall rating of contractor's responsiveness/timeliness. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
BUSINESS RELATIONS (Circle Response)
| 1 |
| Contractor's ability to identify problems and potential problems and promptly notify the Contracting Officer |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 2 |
| Contractor's ability to correct problems and prevent or mitigate potential problems in a timely manner. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 3 |
| Contractor's willingness to improve and correct noncompliance issues or concerns. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 4 |
| Contractor's ability to use effective approaches and provide |
technical expertise and resources to solve contract problems.
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 5 |
| Extent to which the contractor has demonstrated reasonable |
and cooperative behavior.
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 6 |
| Contractor's working relationship with the Contracting Officer, |
quality assurance personnel, and customers.
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 7 |
| Contractor's flexibility in satisfying the requirements of its |
customers.
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 8 |
| Extent to which the contractor provided prompt and courteous service when responding to customer complaints. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 9 |
| Overall rating of business relations. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL (Circle Response)
| 1 |
| Contractor's ability to select and retain cooperative and effective key personnel, such as the contract manager and quality control personnel. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 2 |
| Extent key personnel were knowledgeable about contractual |
requirements.
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 3 |
| Contractor's ability to meet appropriate staffing levels with |
qualified personnel in order to provide required services.
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 4 |
| Overall rating of contractor's management of key personnel. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL, SAFETY, HEALTH, AND SECURITY REQUIREMENTS (Circle Response)
| 1 |
| Has the contractor ever received any Notices of Violations for |
noncompliance with environmental laws or regulations?
YES
NO
| 2 |
| Contractor's compliance with safety requirements. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 3 |
| Contractor's compliance with security requirements. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
CONTRACTUAL CONSIDERATIONS (Circle Response)
| 1 |
| Has an election ever been made not to exercise an option or |
continue relations due to contractor's poor performance?
YES
NO
| 2 |
| Has a Contract Discrepancy Report ever been issued? |
| YES |
NO
| 3 |
| Has a Cure Notice or Show Cause Notice ever been issued? |
| YES |
NO
| 4 |
| Extent to which the contractor provided reliable, supportable |
cost estimates or proposals.
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 5 |
| Overall rating of contractor's performance under this contract. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 6 |
| Would you hire this contractor again? |
| YES |
NO
WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF
FACTOR 1, PAST PERFORMANCE? (Circle Response)
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .