Dalton 1 FUP & DNR.pdf

PDF 13 MB Posted

Attached to
ITB 2525N125 Northern Region Aggregate Stockpile
Solicitation number
ITB 2525N125 Northern Region Aggregate Stockpile
Issued by
Farm Loop CDP, Alaska

About this file

This document is a Statewide Material Site Inventory report for multiple material sites along the Dalton Highway in Alaska, prepared by the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (DOT&PF) and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). The report details several material sites (MS 65-3-018-2, MS 65-9-037-2, MS 65-9-045-2, and MS 65-9-099-2) originally developed during the construction of the Dalton Highway and Alyeska Pipeline in the 1970s. These sites are active, open material extraction locations used for DOT&PF highway maintenance and construction projects, with each site containing significant quantities of sand, gravel, and rock materials. The sites are managed under various material sale contracts and free use permits, with expiration dates ranging from 2010 to 2014.

The inventory reports provide comprehensive geological and operational details for each site, including location coordinates, access routes, vegetation characteristics, material classifications, groundwater conditions, and potential material usability. Most sites are classified as fluvial or borrow pit types, with material quality assessments indicating they are suitable for producing concrete and paving aggregates, base course, and other construction materials. The reports note potential expansion areas and estimated material quantities, with some sites containing over 600,000 cubic yards of available material. Each site has unique characteristics, such as permafrost conditions, overburden depths, and environmental considerations, which are crucial for future extraction planning. The documents emphasize that while these sites are currently active, users should verify all information prior to using the data for design or construction purposes.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
ITB 2525N125 Amendment 3.pdf PDF
Tok 2 FUP & DNR.pdf.crdownload CRDOWNLOAD file
ITB 2525N125 Amendment 2.pdf PDF
Fairbanks FUP & DNR.pdf PDF
Dalton 2 FUP & DNR.pdf PDF
Tok 2 FUP & DNR.pdf PDF
ITB 2525N125 Amendment 1.pdf PDF
Tazlina FUP & DNR.pdf PDF
Tok 1 FUP & DNR.pdf PDF
ITB 2525N125 Northern Region Aggregate Stockpile.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Page-1

STATEWIDE MATERIAL SITE INVENTORY

MATERIAL SITE

INSPECTION REPORT

Federal Project No. STP-000S(530)

AKSAS Project No. 76174

DALTON HIGHWAY

MS 65-3-018-2

39 Mile Quarry

November 25, 2009

CONTENTS PAGE

COVER SHEET

LOCATION MAP

SITE MAP

INSPECTION FORM ....................................................................................... 4 thru 10

CATEGORY:

ACTIVE – OPEN

According to information found in the DOT&PF EDMS system in January 2009 and DNR case file abstracts, this site lies on State of Alaska lands managed by DNR. The site was originally developed for construction of the Dalton Highway Road in the 1970’s.

DOT&PF is operating under a material sale contract (ADL 413805) which currently expires August 31, 2014. A new material sale application (ADL 418456) by DOT&PF on June 24, 2008 was referenced in the DNR case file abstracts. An existing access road connects the site to the Dalton Highway. The access road right-of-way is referenced in the material site contract. The site appeared to contain significant quantities of rock and should be retained by DOT&PF for future use.

MATERIAL SITE INSPECTION FORM

PREPARED BY:

R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. Page 4 MS-65-3-018-2

1. MS_ID

Enter the full material site number e.g.. 65-9-045-2

2. DATE_INSPECT

Date of field inspection

3. FLD INSPEC_ORG

Name of inspector / Organization or Company

4. REGION

5. LOCATION

Name of Highway

6. MILEPOST

List the closest main highway milepost

7. NAME

Enter commonly used name (s), e.g. Hess pit, Gobblers Knob, Midway. List all that apply separated by commas.

8. MAINT_DIST/STAT Station Highway Maintenance District and Station, for locations not on highways select other.

9. QUAD

U.S.G.S. Quad. Map

10. TOWNSHIP T#S R#E Meridian /RANGE Section

11. COOR_UTM 12. COOR_STATE_PLANE

ZONE ZONE

UTM WGS84 - Meters

13. BOROUGH TAX ID NO.

14. DNR_LAND_USE_PLAN

15. CATEGORY (To be filled in the office)

15a. CLASSIFICATION

15b. STATUS

IF OTHER IS SELECTED FOR A SECTION, EXPLAIN IT IN SECTION 44. NOTES.

IF AN ANSWER IS UNKNOWN SELECT "UNKNOWN" OR LEAVE BLANK

65-3-018-2

8/10/2009

AARON BANKS / R&M CONSULTANTS

NORTHERN

SEVEN MILE

DALTON HIGHWAY

INTERIOR/DALTON

7,296,911

391,122EASTING

ACTIVE

39 MILE QUARRY

LIVENGOOD

District

NORTHING

D-5

T11N R9W

EASTING 1,733,812

THIS REPORT IS BASED ON A REVIEW OF EXISTING DATA AND BRIEF FIELD INSPECTIONS. THUS THE

DATA CONTAINED HEREIN SHOULD BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AND USED FOR PLANNING

PURPOSES ONLY. USERS OF THIS DATA SHOULD VERIFY THE INFORMATION PRIOR TO USING IT FOR

DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES.

FM

Alaska State Plane NAD83 - Survey Feet

DALTON HIGHWAY MASTER PLAN

4,304,001

Enter Name of Facility or Secondary Route Name (i.e.Kotzebue Airport, Nash Road, etc.)

OPEN

UNORGANIZED

NORTHING

PREPARED BY:

R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. Page 5 MS-65-3-018-2

16. POTENTIAL_STATUS

Estimated quantity of material in the site at the time of inspection.

The pit has not been mined (used only for new sites).

17. PRESENT_USERS

17a. PRESENT_USER_1

17b. PRESENT_USER_2

17c. PRESENT_USER_3

18. PERMITTED _ACREAGE

Area within site permit or R.O.W. boundaries, from permit application or property plat.

19.

Area within an existing pit, excluding spoil berms lying outside the pit, access roads etc. Explain below.

20. ACREAGE_COMP_METHOD

Method used to determine developed acreage.

21. EST_QUAN_AVAIL

Estimated quantity available (b.c.y.), may be based on acreage computed above plus expansion area.

Explain computation assumptions and calculations below.

OTHER The site does not fit any of the categories above. Explain in Section 44, Notes.

There appeared to be no useable material in the site.

There appeared to be less than 25,000 c.y. available within the developed site.

There appeared to be greater than 25,000 c.y. available within the developed site.

EXPANDABLE

SIGNIFICANT

DEVELOPED_ACREAGE

SIGNIFICANT

375,000

DOT&PF CONSTRUCTION

There may be useable material left in the pit but it is not available.

NONE

Assuming the existing pit can be deepened an additional 10 feet without encountering water problems, there was approx. 142,000 c.y. (14.2 acres x 10 feet x 1,000 c.y. per acre-foot) of material available. Spoil berms may have to be moved to obtain this quantity. Assuming an average 3 feet of overburden and a 23-foot working depth there was approx. 226,000 c.y. (11.3 acres x 20 feet x 1,000 c.y. per acre-foot) of material available in a potential expansion area on the ridge to the southwest of the site. There is no geotechnical information for the remainder of the area within the site limits and it is not known if there are additional available materials. There appears to be potential material between the existing pit and the highway to the east, outside the site limits.

UNKNOWN

UNDEVELOPED

CLOSED

Includes existing pit both within and outside site limits.

ROUGH ESTIMATE

LIMITED

There was limited material within the developed site, but there appeared to be significant material outside existing site limits.

FROM MAP/PHOTO

DOT&PF MAINTENANCE

PREPARED BY:

R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. Page 6 MS-65-3-018-2

22. ACCESS_TYPE

NONE No access road has been built.

EXISTING ROAD / OPEN Drivable. May have gate.

EXISTING ROAD / REVEG Can be reopened with little effort.

EXISTING ROAD / CLOSED W/BERMS Can be reopened with little effort.

EXISTING ACCESS / REMOVED Can be reopened with much effort.

SNOW ROAD Can only be accessed during winter.

ICE ROAD Requires crossing river or lake ice in the winter.

BARGE Material can only be moved by barge.

OTHER

23. ACCESS_LENGTH

Approx. length from edge of pit to highway/secondary route (ft.)

24. VEGETATION

25. TYPE_1 26. TYPE_2

Dominant type Subordinate type General Types of Materials Available

Bedrock sources requiring blasting Soils or soft bedrock (rippable), above water table Requires production below the water table Sand/gravel bars in active channels

27. OB_CLASS_1 28.

New Site or expansion Area Existing Pit (Spoil) A site may have both. Data should be based on actual subsurface exploration, otherwise unknown.

Estimated average depth over the area.

NONE 3 TO 6 FT. UNKNOWN

<3 FT. >6 FT. OTHER

29. OB_TYPE_1 30. OB_TYPE_2

New Site or expansion Area Existing Pit (Spoil) A site may have both.

SILT PEAT SOLID WASTE OTHER

COLLUVIUM SPOIL UNKNOWN

RIVER BAR

QUARRY

BORROW PIT

BAILING

Enter data in Type_2 only if two types of material site available

SILT

BORROW PIT

The site does not fit any of the categories above. Describe in Section 44, Notes.

SPOIL

Vegetation outside of the developed pit consisted of intermixed and moderately dense spruce and birch forest with a maximum size of 30 ft. high by 10 in. diameter.

<3 FT. OB_CLASS_2

EXISTING ROAD / OPEN

3 TO 6 FT.

PREPARED BY:

R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. Page 7 MS-65-3-018-2

31. MAT_TYPE_1 32. MAT_TYPE_2

Dominant type Subordinate type

Bedrock sources requiring blasting Bedrock sources requiring ripping Water deposited sand and gravel, includes glaciofluvial ` Glacial till Talus slopes, etc.

Sand Dunes, etc.

Silt deposits, loess, fluvial, etc.

33. PERMAFROST_1

New Site or Expansion Area

34. PERMAFROST_2

Existing Site

DETECTED IN MOST TEST HOLES

DETECTED IN SOME TEST HOLES

DETECTED IN IMMEDIATE VICINITY

DETECTED IN NO TEST HOLES

DATA OUTDATED

UNKNOWN

OTHER

35. GROUNDWATER

BEDROCK

FLUVIAL

WEATHER. BEDROCK

Groundwater was noted in two of seven boreholes drilled in the existing pit floor (to max. ~26 feet in depth) during June 2001, at depths of approx. 10 and 20 feet. Ponding to a depth of approximately 2 ft. was observed within the existing pit in August 2009.

DETECTED IN NO TEST HOLES OR PITS

UNKNOWN

GLACIAL

SILT

COLLUVIAL

EOLIAN

WEATHER. BEDROCK

PREPARED BY:

R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. Page 8 MS-65-3-018-2

36. LITHOLOGY_1 37. LITHOLOGY_2

Dominant type

IGNEOUS ROCK Undifferentiated Igneous Rocks GRANITIC Granite/Monzonite/Granodiorite DIORITE/GABBRO Diorite/Gabbro BASALT Dark colored fine-grained Igneous Rocks GREENSTONE Altered Volcanic Rocks w/green tint

METAMORPHIC ROCK Undifferentiated Metamorphic Rocks SCHIST/PHYLLITE Includes rocks ranging from slate to schist GNEISS Includes hard schistose rocks

MARBLE

CATACLASTIC Incl. Valdez Formation Rocks, Kenai Penn.

MÉLANGE Incl. McHugh Formation Rocks, Kenai Penn.

SEDIMENTARY ROCK Undifferentiated Sedimentary Rocks

CONGLOMERATE

SANDSTONE Includes greywacke, etc.

SHALE/MUDSTONE

LIMESTONE

FLUVIAL River and stream deposits (floodplain), includes outwash.

ALLUVIAL Alluvial / Debris Fan deposits GLACIOFLUVIAL Eskers, kames, etc.

GLACIAL Till COLLUVIAL Talus, etc.

EOLIAN Sand Dunes, etc.

SILT Loess, fluvial silts, etc.

OTHER Explain in Section 44.

38. MATERIAL_CLASSIFICATION

ASTM Classification, generally they should range from coarse to fine.

38a. 38c. 38e. 38g.

38b. 38d. 38f. 38h.

Subordinate type

BASALT

PREPARED BY:

R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. Page 9 MS-65-3-018-2

39. COBBLES_AND_BOULDERS

Test Boring Callout / ASTM Classification, either a. or b. and c. (Can use ranges i.e. 0 to 20)

39a. CONTAINS

39b. Est. % by VOL. (Est. From Visual Observations)

39c. MAX. SIZE (in.) (Observed Size)

40. AGG_TEST_RESULTS

Year of test or report- Test result / Year of test or report- Test Results

40a. SG APP COARSE 40b. SG APP FINE 40c. ABSORPTION CRSE 40d. ABSORPTION FINE 40e. NORDIC ABRASION 40f. L.A. ABRASION 40g. DEGRADATION (T-13) 40h. NASO4 LOSS COARSE 40i. NASO4 LOSS FINE

41. POTENTIAL_USABILITY

Best known potential use of the material, based on records, exploration and laboratory data.

CONCRETE AGGREGATE PRODUCED The site has produced concrete aggregate PAVING AGGREGATE PRODUCED The site has produced paving aggregate CRUSHED PRODUCTS PRODUCED Base, Surface Coarse, Subbase, etc. has been produced.

TYPE A AND B MATERIAL AVAILABLE 0 to 10 percent passing 200 TYPE C AVAILABLE Compactable material TYPE C NOT AVAILABLE Uncompactable material (Lower Kuskokwim and Yukon River, etc.)

UNKNOWN

OTHER Explain in Section 44.

42. SPECIAL_PROBLEMS

Special problems encountered or anticipated with use of the material, based on records, exploration and laboratory data.

ORGANIC CONTENT The material is very difficult to compact.

HIGHLY WEATHERED GRAVEL The gravel is highly weathered and may break down when handled.

BREAKS DOWN UNDER USE Material breaks down on grade.

SENSITIVE TO WATER CONTENT Material is sensitive to water content, i.e.. some glacial tills, soft bedrock.

VARIABLE MATERIAL Deposit contains mixture of suitable and unsuitable material.

POSSIBLE CONTAMINATION Site may be contaminated by petroleum products or hazardous materials.

CONTAINS ASBESTOS Site contains naturally occurring asbestos.

POTENTIAL ASBESTOS Site in area where naturally occurring asbestos is mapped.

ACID ROCK DRAINAGE Site contains rock susceptible to producing acid rock drainage.

OTHER Explain in Section 44, Notes.

1995-41, 12, 28, 34, 14 / 2001- 41 1995- 13, 13, 14, 13, 15 / 2001- 16

TYPES A AND B MATERIAL AVAILABLE

PREPARED BY:

R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. Page 10 MS-65-3-018-2

43. RIPRAP

Class II or larger. Does not include production for erosion control riprap for ditches or culverts.

PREVIOUS PRODUCTION There is a record of production.

POSSIBLE FURTHER INVESTIGATION NEEDED The site is a bedrock quarry containing hard rock NOT POSSIBLE The site has soft rock or soil.

UNKNOWN

OTHER Explain in Section 44, Notes.

44. NOTES

Note number of item being discussed.

NOT POSSIBLE

39. Pieces of slightly weathered bedrock to 6 ft. in diameter were observed within the existing pit.

jrowland Typewritten Text 2003 Jesse Reinikainen, DOT&PF

Page-1A

MS 65-9-037-2

Bonanza Creek Site

November 20, 2009

COVER SHEET................................................................................................ 1A & 1B

LOCATION MAP

SITE MAP .....................................................................................................3A thru 3C

INSPECTION FORM AREA “A”.................................................................... 4 thru 10

INSPECTION FORM AREA “B” .................................................................. 11 thru 17

INSPECTION FORM EXPANSION AREA ................................................. 18 thru 24

CATEGORY:

ACTIVE – OPEN

According to information found in the DOT&PF EDMS system in January 2009 and data in the BLM case file abstracts, this site lies on Federal lands managed by BLM. The site has been divided into three parts; a bedrock quarry labeled Area “A”; an existing pit in the floodplain labeled Area “B”; and a proposed expansion west of the highway. Area “A” (MS 89-3) was originally developed for construction of the Dalton Highway and Alyeska Pipeline in the 1970’s. It is presently a joint-use site, used for Alyeska operations and maintenance (OMS 89-3) and for DOT&PF Dalton Highway maintenance and reconstruction (MS 65-9-037-2). Generally, Area “A” is operated under a mining plan prepared by Alyeska dated 2002 that shows separate working areas for both Alyeska and DOT&PF. The Alyeska permit (F-094458) presently expires on August 09, 2010.

MS 65-9-037-2

Page-1B

DOT&PF is operating under a FUP (F-093001) which currently expires December 31, 2010.

DOT&PF has developed Area “B” in the floodplain of Bonanza Creek which is covered under the same DOT&PF permit. Golder drilled a proposed expansion to Area “B” on the east side of the highway in 2003. A large expansion area downstream to the west was drilled at the same time. Additional areas for expansion are available on the west side of the highway. Alyeska Access Road 89-APL/AMS-4 connects Area “A” to the Dalton Highway. DOT&PF access right-of-way is included in the permit. The site appeared to contain significant quantities of sand and gravel and should be retained by DOT&PF for future use. It is also a potentially significant source of aggregates in an area with limited material suitable for producing aggregates.

PREPARED BY:

R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. Page 4 MS-65-9-037-2 AREA "A"

1. MS_ID

Enter the full material site number e.g.. 65-9-045-2

2. DATE_INSPECT

Date of field inspection

3. FLD INSPEC_ORG

Name of inspector / Organization or Company

4. REGION

5. LOCATION

Name of Highway

6. MILEPOST

List the closest main highway milepost

7. NAME

Enter commonly used name (s), e.g. Hess pit, Gobblers Knob, Midway. List all that apply separated by commas.

8. MAINT_DIST/STAT Station Highway Maintenance District and Station, for locations not on highways select other.

9. QUAD

U.S.G.S. Quad. Map

10. TOWNSHIP T#S R#E Meridian /RANGE Section

11. COOR_UTM 12. COOR_STATE_PLANE

ZONE ZONE

UTM WGS84 - Meters

13. BOROUGH TAX ID NO.

14. DNR_LAND_USE_PLAN

15. CATEGORY (To be filled in the office)

15a. CLASSIFICATION

15b. STATUS

IF OTHER IS SELECTED FOR A SECTION, EXPLAIN IT IN SECTION 44. NOTES.

IF AN ANSWER IS UNKNOWN SELECT "UNKNOWN" OR LEAVE BLANK

65-9-037-2 AREA "A"

8/6/2009

AARON BANKS / R&M CONSULTANTS

NORTHERN

JIM RIVER

DALTON HIGHWAY

INTERIOR/DALTON

7,396,048

603,751EASTING

ACTIVE

BETTLES

District

NORTHING

C-2

BONANZA CREEK SITE, MS 89-3, OMS 89-3

T21N R14W

EASTING 1,545,800

5 & 8

THIS REPORT IS BASED ON A REVIEW OF EXISTING DATA AND BRIEF FIELD INSPECTIONS. THUS THE

DATA CONTAINED HEREIN SHOULD BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AND USED FOR PLANNING

PURPOSES ONLY. USERS OF THIS DATA SHOULD VERIFY THE INFORMATION PRIOR TO USING IT FOR

DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES.

FM

Alaska State Plane NAD83 - Survey Feet

DALTON HIGHWAY MASTER PLAN

4,629,744

Enter Name of Facility or Secondary Route Name (i.e.Kotzebue Airport, Nash Road, etc.)

OPEN

UNORGANIZED

PREPARED BY:

R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. Page 5 MS-65-9-037-2 AREA "A"

16. POTENTIAL_STATUS

Estimated quantity of material in the site at the time of inspection.

The pit has not been mined (used only for new sites).

17. PRESENT_USERS

17a. PRESENT_USER_1

17b. PRESENT_USER_2

17c. PRESENT_USER_3

18. PERMITTED _ACREAGE

Area within site permit or R.O.W. boundaries, from permit application or property plat.

19.

Area within an existing pit, excluding spoil berms lying outside the pit, access roads etc. Explain below.

20. ACREAGE_COMP_METHOD

Method used to determine developed acreage.

21. EST_QUAN_AVAIL

Estimated quantity available (b.c.y.), may be based on acreage computed above plus expansion area.

Explain computation assumptions and calculations below.

OTHER The site does not fit any of the categories above. Explain in Section 44, Notes.

There appeared to be no useable material in the site.

There appeared to be less than 25,000 c.y. available within the developed site.

There appeared to be greater than 25,000 c.y. available within the developed site.

EXPANDABLE

SIGNIFICANT

DEVELOPED_ACREAGE

SIGNIFICANT

600,000

ALYESKA

There may be useable material left in the pit but it is not available.

NONE

Assuming that the existing pit can be deepened an average of 20 feet there was approx. 214,000 c.y. (10.7 acres x 20 feet x 1,000 c.y. per acre-foot) of material available. Assuming an average 4 feet of overburden and a 40 foot mining depth there was approx.

371,000 c.y. (10.3 acres x 36 feet x 1,000 c.y. per acre-foot) of material available. The reclaimed area reportedly contained a construction waste site and was excluded from the available area.

UNKNOWN

UNDEVELOPED

CLOSED

Includes both DOT&PF and Alyeska areas of existing pit.

ROUGH ESTIMATE

LIMITED

There was limited material within the developed site, but there appeared to be significant material outside existing site limits.

PREPARED BY:

R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. Page 6 MS-65-9-037-2 AREA "A"

22. ACCESS_TYPE

NONE No access road has been built.

EXISTING ROAD / OPEN Drivable. May have gate.

EXISTING ROAD / REVEG Can be reopened with little effort.

EXISTING ROAD / CLOSED W/BERMS Can be reopened with little effort.

EXISTING ACCESS / REMOVED Can be reopened with much effort.

SNOW ROAD Can only be accessed during winter.

ICE ROAD Requires crossing river or lake ice in the winter.

BARGE Material can only be moved by barge.

OTHER

23. ACCESS_LENGTH

Approx. length from edge of pit to highway/secondary route (ft.)

24. VEGETATION

25. TYPE_1 26. TYPE_2

Dominant type Subordinate type General Types of Materials Available

Bedrock sources requiring blasting Soils or soft bedrock (rippable), above water table Requires production below the water table Sand/gravel bars in active channels

27. OB_CLASS_1 28.

New Site or expansion Area Existing Pit (Spoil) A site may have both. Data should be based on actual subsurface exploration, otherwise unknown.

Estimated average depth over the area.

NONE 3 TO 6 FT. UNKNOWN

<3 FT. >6 FT. OTHER

29. OB_TYPE_1 30. OB_TYPE_2

New Site or expansion Area Existing Pit (Spoil) A site may have both.

SILT PEAT SOLID WASTE OTHER

COLLUVIUM SPOIL UNKNOWN

RIVER BAR

QUARRY

BORROW PIT

BAILING

Enter data in Type_2 only if two types of material site available

SILT

QUARRY BORROW PIT

The site does not fit any of the categories above. Describe in Section 44, Notes.

SPOIL

1,500

Vegetation within undisturbed portions of Area "A" consisted of birch and spruce trees to 25 ft. high by 8 in. in diameter.

Vegetation within the reclaimed portion of the existing pit consisted of birch, spruce, and willow brush to 20 ft. high.

3 TO 6 FT. OB_CLASS_2

<3 FT.

PREPARED BY:

R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. Page 7 MS-65-9-037-2 AREA "A"

31. MAT_TYPE_1 32. MAT_TYPE_2

Dominant type Subordinate type

Bedrock sources requiring blasting Bedrock sources requiring ripping Water deposited sand and gravel, includes glaciofluvial ` Glacial till Talus slopes, etc.

Sand Dunes, etc.

Silt deposits, loess, fluvial, etc.

33. PERMAFROST_1

New Site or Expansion Area

34. PERMAFROST_2

Existing Site

DETECTED IN MOST TEST HOLES

DETECTED IN SOME TEST HOLES

DETECTED IN IMMEDIATE VICINITY

DETECTED IN NO TEST HOLES

DATA OUTDATED

UNKNOWN

OTHER

35. GROUNDWATER

BEDROCK

FLUVIAL

BEDROCK

Depth to groundwater in Area "A" is unknown.

DATA OUTDATED

DETECTED IN SOME TEST HOLES OR PITS

GLACIAL

SILT

COLLUVIAL

EOLIAN

PREPARED BY:

R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. Page 8 MS-65-9-037-2 AREA "A"

36. LITHOLOGY_1 37. LITHOLOGY_2

Dominant type

IGNEOUS ROCK Undifferentiated Igneous Rocks GRANITIC Granite/Monzonite/Granodiorite DIORITE/GABBRO Diorite/Gabbro BASALT Dark colored fine-grained Igneous Rocks GREENSTONE Altered Volcanic Rocks w/green tint

METAMORPHIC ROCK Undifferentiated Metamorphic Rocks SCHIST/PHYLLITE Includes rocks ranging from slate to schist GNEISS Includes hard schistose rocks

MARBLE

CATACLASTIC Incl. Valdez Formation Rocks, Kenai Penn.

MÉLANGE Incl. McHugh Formation Rocks, Kenai Penn.

SEDIMENTARY ROCK Undifferentiated Sedimentary Rocks

CONGLOMERATE

SANDSTONE Includes greywacke, etc.

SHALE/MUDSTONE

LIMESTONE

FLUVIAL River and stream deposits (floodplain), includes outwash.

ALLUVIAL Alluvial / Debris Fan deposits GLACIOFLUVIAL Eskers, kames, etc.

GLACIAL Till COLLUVIAL Talus, etc.

EOLIAN Sand Dunes, etc.

SILT Loess, fluvial silts, etc.

OTHER Explain in Section 44.

38. MATERIAL_CLASSIFICATION

ASTM Classification, generally they should range from coarse to fine.

38a. 38c. 38e. 38g.

38b. 38d. 38f. 38h.

SCHIST/PHYLLITE

GRANITIC

PREPARED BY:

R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. Page 9 MS-65-9-037-2 AREA "A"

39. COBBLES_AND_BOULDERS

Test Boring Callout / ASTM Classification, either a. or b. and c. (Can use ranges i.e. 0 to 20)

39a. CONTAINS

39b. Est. % by VOL. (Est. From Visual Observations)

39c. MAX. SIZE (in.) (Observed Size)

40. AGG_TEST_RESULTS

Year of test or report- Test result / Year of test or report- Test Results

40a. SG APP COARSE 40b. SG APP FINE 40c. ABSORPTION CRSE 40d. ABSORPTION FINE 40e. NORDIC ABRASION 40f. L.A. ABRASION 40g. DEGRADATION (T-13) 40h. NASO4 LOSS COARSE 40i. NASO4 LOSS FINE

41. POTENTIAL_USABILITY

Best known potential use of the material, based on records, exploration and laboratory data.

CONCRETE AGGREGATE PRODUCED The site has produced concrete aggregate PAVING AGGREGATE PRODUCED The site has produced paving aggregate CRUSHED PRODUCTS PRODUCED Base, Surface Coarse, Subbase, etc. has been produced.

TYPE A AND B MATERIAL AVAILABLE 0 to 10 percent passing 200 TYPE C AVAILABLE Compactable material TYPE C NOT AVAILABLE Uncompactable material (Lower Kuskokwim and Yukon River, etc.)

UNKNOWN

OTHER Explain in Section 44.

42. SPECIAL_PROBLEMS

Special problems encountered or anticipated with use of the material, based on records, exploration and laboratory data.

ORGANIC CONTENT The material is very difficult to compact.

HIGHLY WEATHERED GRAVEL The gravel is highly weathered and may break down when handled.

BREAKS DOWN UNDER USE Material breaks down on grade.

SENSITIVE TO WATER CONTENT Material is sensitive to water content, i.e.. some glacial tills, soft bedrock.

VARIABLE MATERIAL Deposit contains mixture of suitable and unsuitable material.

POSSIBLE CONTAMINATION Site may be contaminated by petroleum products or hazardous materials.

CONTAINS ASBESTOS Site contains naturally occurring asbestos.

POTENTIAL ASBESTOS Site in area where naturally occurring asbestos is mapped.

ACID ROCK DRAINAGE Site contains rock susceptible to producing acid rock drainage.

OTHER Explain in Section 44, Notes.

1999- 2.70, 2.73, 2.77

1999- 2.3, 9.9, 1.4, 0.7, 3.1 1981- 41 / 1999- 37, 35, 36, 41, 42 1981- 49 / 1999- 54, 17, 27, 49, 30

1999- 2.82

PREPARED BY:

R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. Page 10 MS-65-9-037-2 AREA "A"

43. RIPRAP

Class II or larger. Does not include production for erosion control riprap for ditches or culverts.

PREVIOUS PRODUCTION There is a record of production.

POSSIBLE FURTHER INVESTIGATION NEEDED The site is a bedrock quarry containing hard rock NOT POSSIBLE The site has soft rock or soil.

UNKNOWN

OTHER Explain in Section 44, Notes.

44. NOTES

Note number of item being discussed.

POSSIBLE-FURTHER INVESTIGATION NEEDED

28. Limited spoil/overburden berms were observed during the 2009 site inspection along the western perimeter of the existing pit.

43. A small amount of oversize reject (>3 feet dia.) material was piled along the access road.

PREPARED BY:

R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. Page 11 MS-65-9-037-2 AREA "B"

1. MS_ID

Enter the full material site number e.g.. 65-9-045-2

2. DATE_INSPECT

Date of field inspection

3. FLD INSPEC_ORG

Name of inspector / Organization or Company

4. REGION

5. LOCATION

Name of Highway

6. MILEPOST

List the closest main highway milepost

7. NAME

Enter commonly used name (s), e.g. Hess pit, Gobblers Knob, Midway. List all that apply separated by commas.

8. MAINT_DIST/STAT Station Highway Maintenance District and Station, for locations not on highways select other.

9. QUAD

U.S.G.S. Quad. Map

10. TOWNSHIP T#S R#E Meridian /RANGE Section

11. COOR_UTM 12. COOR_STATE_PLANE

ZONE ZONE

UTM WGS84 - Meters

13. BOROUGH TAX ID NO.

14. DNR_LAND_USE_PLAN

15. CATEGORY (To be filled in the office)

15a. CLASSIFICATION

15b. STATUS

Enter Name of Facility or Secondary Route Name (i.e.Kotzebue Airport, Nash Road, etc.)

OPEN

UNORGANIZED

NORTHING

Alaska State Plane NAD83 - Survey Feet

DALTON HIGHWAY MASTER PLAN

4,629,744

THIS REPORT IS BASED ON A REVIEW OF EXISTING DATA AND BRIEF FIELD INSPECTIONS. THUS THE

DATA CONTAINED HEREIN SHOULD BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AND USED FOR PLANNING

PURPOSES ONLY. USERS OF THIS DATA SHOULD VERIFY THE INFORMATION PRIOR TO USING IT FOR

DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES.

FM T21N R14W

EASTING 1,545,800

5 & 8

ACTIVE

BETTLES

District

NORTHING

C-2

BONANZA CREEK SITE, BONANZA CREEK EAST

INTERIOR/DALTON

7,396,048

603,751EASTING

NORTHERN

JIM RIVER

DALTON HIGHWAY

65-9-037-2 AREA "B"

8/6/2009

AARON BANKS / R&M CONSULTANTS

IF OTHER IS SELECTED FOR A SECTION, EXPLAIN IT IN SECTION 44. NOTES.

IF AN ANSWER IS UNKNOWN SELECT "UNKNOWN" OR LEAVE BLANK

PREPARED BY:

R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. Page 12 MS-65-9-037-2 AREA "B"

16. POTENTIAL_STATUS

Estimated quantity of material in the site at the time of inspection.

The pit has not been mined (used only for new sites).

17. PRESENT_USERS

17a. PRESENT_USER_1

17b. PRESENT_USER_2

17c. PRESENT_USER_3

18. PERMITTED _ACREAGE

Area within site permit or R.O.W. boundaries, from permit application or property plat.

19.

Area within an existing pit, excluding spoil berms lying outside the pit, access roads etc. Explain below.

20. ACREAGE_COMP_METHOD

Method used to determine developed acreage.

21. EST_QUAN_AVAIL

Estimated quantity available (b.c.y.), may be based on acreage computed above plus expansion area.

Explain computation assumptions and calculations below.

ROUGH ESTIMATE

LIMITED

There was limited material within the developed site, but there appeared to be significant material outside existing site limits.

FROM MAP/PHOTO

DOT&PF MAINTENANCE

There appeared to be little minable material remaining in the existing pit in Area B. Assuming the east Golder expansion area had an average 4 feet of overburden and a 30-foot working depth there was approx. 315,000 c.y. (12.1 acres x 26 feet x 1,000 c.y. per acre-foot) of material available. The Golder test holes terminated at 30 feet but the gravel may extend deeper.

UNKNOWN

UNDEVELOPED

CLOSED

Includes pond and work areas surrounding the site.

NONE

There may be useable material left in the pit but it is not available.

SIGNIFICANT

320,000

DOT&PF CONSTRUCTION

SIGNIFICANT

DEVELOPED_ACREAGE

EXPANDABLE

OTHER The site does not fit any of the categories above. Explain in Section 44, Notes.

There appeared to be no useable material in the site.

There appeared to be less than 25,000 c.y. available within the developed site.

There appeared to be greater than 25,000 c.y. available within the developed site.

PREPARED BY:

R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. Page 13 MS-65-9-037-2 AREA "B"

22. ACCESS_TYPE

NONE No access road has been built.

EXISTING ROAD / OPEN Drivable. May have gate.

EXISTING ROAD / REVEG Can be reopened with little effort.

EXISTING ROAD / CLOSED W/BERMS Can be reopened with little effort.

EXISTING ACCESS / REMOVED Can be reopened with much effort.

SNOW ROAD Can only be accessed during winter.

ICE ROAD Requires crossing river or lake ice in the winter.

BARGE Material can only be moved by barge.

OTHER

23. ACCESS_LENGTH

Approx. length from edge of pit to highway/secondary route (ft.)

24. VEGETATION

25. TYPE_1 26. TYPE_2

Dominant type Subordinate type General Types of Materials Available

Bedrock sources requiring blasting Soils or soft bedrock (rippable), above water table Requires production below the water table Sand/gravel bars in active channels

27. OB_CLASS_1 28.

New Site or expansion Area Existing Pit (Spoil) A site may have both. Data should be based on actual subsurface exploration, otherwise unknown.

Estimated average depth over the area.

NONE 3 TO 6 FT. UNKNOWN

<3 FT. >6 FT. OTHER

29. OB_TYPE_1 30. OB_TYPE_2

New Site or expansion Area Existing Pit (Spoil) A site may have both.

SILT PEAT SOLID WASTE OTHER

COLLUVIUM SPOIL UNKNOWN

EXISTING ROAD / OPEN

3 TO 6 FT.

SPOIL

Vegetation within the undisturbed portion of the site was dominated by black spruce with scattered birch. The eastern boundary of the site was bounded by an expansive tussock field.

3 TO 6 FT. OB_CLASS_2

The site does not fit any of the categories above. Describe in Section 44, Notes.

BORROW PIT BAILING

Enter data in Type_2 only if two types of material site available

SILT

BAILING

QUARRY

BORROW PIT

RIVER BAR

PREPARED BY:

R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. Page 14 MS-65-9-037-2 AREA "B"

31. MAT_TYPE_1 32. MAT_TYPE_2

Dominant type Subordinate type

Bedrock sources requiring blasting Bedrock sources requiring ripping Water deposited sand and gravel, includes glaciofluvial ` Glacial till Talus slopes, etc.

Sand Dunes, etc.

Silt deposits, loess, fluvial, etc.

33. PERMAFROST_1

New Site or Expansion Area

34. PERMAFROST_2

Existing Site

DETECTED IN MOST TEST HOLES

DETECTED IN SOME TEST HOLES

DETECTED IN IMMEDIATE VICINITY

DETECTED IN NO TEST HOLES

DATA OUTDATED

UNKNOWN

OTHER

35. GROUNDWATER

WEATHER. BEDROCK

COLLUVIAL

EOLIAN

GLACIAL

SILT

DATA OUTDATED

DETECTED IN SOME TEST HOLES OR PITS

FLUVIAL

FLUVIAL

The existing pit was flooded during the 2009 site inspection. Groundwater was observed at between 5 and 9 feet in the expansion area drilled by Golder in 2004.

BEDROCK

PREPARED BY:

R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. Page 15 MS-65-9-037-2 AREA "B"

36. LITHOLOGY_1 37. LITHOLOGY_2

Dominant type

IGNEOUS ROCK Undifferentiated Igneous Rocks GRANITIC Granite/Monzonite/Granodiorite DIORITE/GABBRO Diorite/Gabbro BASALT Dark colored fine-grained Igneous Rocks GREENSTONE Altered Volcanic Rocks w/green tint

METAMORPHIC ROCK Undifferentiated Metamorphic Rocks SCHIST/PHYLLITE Includes rocks ranging from slate to schist GNEISS Includes hard schistose rocks

MARBLE

CATACLASTIC Incl. Valdez Formation Rocks, Kenai Penn.

MÉLANGE Incl. McHugh Formation Rocks, Kenai Penn.

SEDIMENTARY ROCK Undifferentiated Sedimentary Rocks

CONGLOMERATE

SANDSTONE Includes greywacke, etc.

SHALE/MUDSTONE

LIMESTONE

FLUVIAL River and stream deposits (floodplain), includes outwash.

ALLUVIAL Alluvial / Debris Fan deposits GLACIOFLUVIAL Eskers, kames, etc.

GLACIAL Till COLLUVIAL Talus, etc.

EOLIAN Sand Dunes, etc.

SILT Loess, fluvial silts, etc.

OTHER Explain in Section 44.

38. MATERIAL_CLASSIFICATION

ASTM Classification, generally they should range from coarse to fine.

38a. GW-GM 38c. GW 38e. 38g.

38b. GP-GM 38d. GP 38f. 38h.

FLUVIAL

PREPARED BY:

R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. Page 16 MS-65-9-037-2 AREA "B"

39. COBBLES_AND_BOULDERS

Test Boring Callout / ASTM Classification, either a. or b. and c. (Can use ranges i.e. 0 to 20)

39a. CONTAINS

39b. Est. % by VOL. (Est. From Visual Observations)

39c. MAX. SIZE (in.) (Observed Size)

40. AGG_TEST_RESULTS

Year of test or report- Test result / Year of test or report- Test Results

40a. SG APP COARSE 40b. SG APP FINE 40c. ABSORPTION CRSE 40d. ABSORPTION FINE 40e. NORDIC ABRASION 40f. L.A. ABRASION 40g. DEGRADATION (T-13) 40h. NASO4 LOSS COARSE 40i. NASO4 LOSS FINE

41. POTENTIAL_USABILITY

Best known potential use of the material, based on records, exploration and laboratory data.

CONCRETE AGGREGATE PRODUCED The site has produced concrete aggregate PAVING AGGREGATE PRODUCED The site has produced paving aggregate CRUSHED PRODUCTS PRODUCED Base, Surface Coarse, Subbase, etc. has been produced.

TYPE A AND B MATERIAL AVAILABLE 0 to 10 percent passing 200 TYPE C AVAILABLE Compactable material TYPE C NOT AVAILABLE Uncompactable material (Lower Kuskokwim and Yukon River, etc.)

UNKNOWN

OTHER Explain in Section 44.

42. SPECIAL_PROBLEMS

Special problems encountered or anticipated with use of the material, based on records, exploration and laboratory data.

ORGANIC CONTENT The material is very difficult to compact.

HIGHLY WEATHERED GRAVEL The gravel is highly weathered and may break down when handled.

BREAKS DOWN UNDER USE Material breaks down on grade.

SENSITIVE TO WATER CONTENT Material is sensitive to water content, i.e.. some glacial tills, soft bedrock.

VARIABLE MATERIAL Deposit contains mixture of suitable and unsuitable material.

POSSIBLE CONTAMINATION Site may be contaminated by petroleum products or hazardous materials.

CONTAINS ASBESTOS Site contains naturally occurring asbestos.

POTENTIAL ASBESTOS Site in area where naturally occurring asbestos is mapped.

ACID ROCK DRAINAGE Site contains rock susceptible to producing acid rock drainage.

UNKNOWN

OTHER Explain in Section 44, Notes.

1999- 2.70, 2.71, 2.71, 2.71 / 2004- 2.70, 2.69

TYPES A AND B MATERIAL AVAILABLE

1999- 31, 32 / 2004-30, 34

1999- 0.5, 0.4 / 2004- 0.9, 0.7 1999- 37, 59 / 2004-66, 77

1999- 2.67, 2.69, 2.68, 2.68, 2.70, 2.70 / 2004- 2.69, 2.71

1999-2.8, 2.0 / 2004-2.5, 1.6

PREPARED BY:

R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. Page 17 MS-65-9-037-2 AREA "B"

43. RIPRAP

Class II or larger. Does not include production for erosion control riprap for ditches or culverts.

PREVIOUS PRODUCTION There is a record of production.

POSSIBLE FURTHER INVESTIGATION NEEDED The site is a bedrock quarry containing hard rock NOT POSSIBLE The site has soft rock or soil.

UNKNOWN

OTHER Explain in Section 44, Notes.

44. NOTES

Note number of item being discussed.

NOT POSSIBLE

28/30. Significant spoil/overburden berms were noted during the 2009 site inspection along the south and east perimeter of the existing pit.

PREPARED BY:

R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. Page 18 MS-65-9-037-2 EXPANSION AREA

1. MS_ID

Enter the full material site number e.g.. 65-9-045-2

2. DATE_INSPECT

Date of field inspection

3. FLD INSPEC_ORG

Name of inspector / Organization or Company

4. REGION

5. LOCATION

Name of Highway

6. MILEPOST

List the closest main highway milepost

7. NAME

Enter commonly used name (s), e.g. Hess pit, Gobblers Knob, Midway. List all that apply separated by commas.

8. MAINT_DIST/STAT Station Highway Maintenance District and Station, for locations not on highways select other.

9. QUAD

U.S.G.S. Quad. Map

10. TOWNSHIP T#S R#E Meridian /RANGE Section

11. COOR_UTM 12. COOR_STATE_PLANE

ZONE ZONE

UTM WGS84 - Meters

13. BOROUGH TAX ID NO.

14. DNR_LAND_USE_PLAN

15. CATEGORY (To be filled in the office)

15a. CLASSIFICATION

15b. STATUS

IF OTHER IS SELECTED FOR A SECTION, EXPLAIN IT IN SECTION 44. NOTES.

IF AN ANSWER IS UNKNOWN SELECT "UNKNOWN" OR LEAVE BLANK

65-9-037-2 EXPANSION AREA

8/6/2009

AARON BANKS / R&M CONSULTANTS

NORTHERN

JIM RIVER

DALTON HIGHWAY

INTERIOR/DALTON

7,396,048

603,751EASTING

ACTIVE

BETTLES

District

NORTHING

C-2

BONANZA CREEK WEST

T21N R14W

EASTING 1,545,800

5 & 8

THIS REPORT IS BASED ON A REVIEW OF EXISTING DATA AND BRIEF FIELD INSPECTIONS. THUS THE

DATA CONTAINED HEREIN SHOULD BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AND USED FOR PLANNING

PURPOSES ONLY. USERS OF THIS DATA SHOULD VERIFY THE INFORMATION PRIOR TO USING IT FOR

DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES.

FM

Alaska State Plane NAD83 - Survey Feet

DALTON HIGHWAY MASTER PLAN

4,629,744

Enter Name of Facility or Secondary Route Name (i.e.Kotzebue Airport, Nash Road, etc.)

UNDEVELOPED

UNORGANIZED

PREPARED BY:

R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. Page 19 MS-65-9-037-2 EXPANSION AREA

16. POTENTIAL_STATUS

Estimated quantity of material in the site at the time of inspection.

The pit has not been mined (used only for new sites).

17. PRESENT_USERS

17a. PRESENT_USER_1

17b. PRESENT_USER_2

17c. PRESENT_USER_3

18. PERMITTED _ACREAGE

Area within site permit or R.O.W. boundaries, from permit application or property plat.

19.

Area within an existing pit, excluding spoil berms lying outside the pit, access roads etc. Explain below.

20. ACREAGE_COMP_METHOD

Method used to determine developed acreage.

21. EST_QUAN_AVAIL

Estimated quantity available (b.c.y.), may be based on acreage computed above plus expansion area.

Explain computation assumptions and calculations below.

OTHER The site does not fit any of the categories above. Explain in Section 44, Notes.

There appeared to be no useable material in the site.

There appeared to be less than 25,000 c.y. available within the developed site.

There appeared to be greater than 25,000 c.y. available within the developed site.

EXPANDABLE

SIGNIFICANT

DEVELOPED_ACREAGE

SIGNIFICANT

1,700,000

There may be useable material left in the pit but it is not available.

NONE

Assuming the west Golder expansion area had an average of 2 feet of overburden and a 28-foot working depth there was approx.1,772,000 c.y. (61.5 acres x 28 feet x 1,000 c.y. per acre-foot) of material available. The Golder test holes terminated at 30 feet but the gravel may extend deeper. There are additional potential expansion areas downstream to the west.

UNKNOWN

UNDEVELOPED

CLOSED

ROUGH ESTIMATE

LIMITED

There was limited material within the developed site, but there appeared to be significant material outside existing site limits.

NONE

PREPARED BY:

R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. Page 20 MS-65-9-037-2 EXPANSION AREA

22. ACCESS_TYPE

NONE No access road has been built.

EXISTING ROAD / OPEN Drivable. May have gate.

EXISTING ROAD / REVEG Can be reopened with little effort.

EXISTING ROAD / CLOSED W/BERMS Can be reopened with little effort.

EXISTING ACCESS / REMOVED Can be reopened with much effort.

SNOW ROAD Can only be accessed during winter.

ICE ROAD Requires crossing river or lake ice in the winter.

BARGE Material can only be moved by barge.

OTHER

23. ACCESS_LENGTH

Approx. length from edge of pit to highway/secondary route (ft.)

24. VEGETATION

25. TYPE_1 26. TYPE_2

Dominant type Subordinate type General Types of Materials Available

Bedrock sources requiring blasting Soils or soft bedrock (rippable), above water table Requires production below the water table Sand/gravel bars in active channels

27. OB_CLASS_1 28.

New Site or expansion Area Existing Pit (Spoil) A site may have both. Data should be based on actual subsurface exploration, otherwise unknown.

Estimated average depth over the area.

NONE 3 TO 6 FT. UNKNOWN

<3 FT. >6 FT. OTHER

29. OB_TYPE_1 30. OB_TYPE_2

New Site or expansion Area Existing Pit (Spoil) A site may have both.

SILT PEAT SOLID WASTE OTHER

COLLUVIUM SPOIL UNKNOWN

RIVER BAR

QUARRY

BORROW PIT

BAILING

Enter data in Type_2 only if two types of material site available

SILT

BORROW PIT BAILING

The site does not fit any of the categories above. Describe in Section 44, Notes.

The expansion areas supported a forest of predominantly black spruce interspersed with a few birch trees to a maximum height of approximately 30 ft.

<3 FT. OB_CLASS_2

PREPARED BY:

R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. Page 21 MS-65-9-037-2 EXPANSION AREA

31. MAT_TYPE_1 32. MAT_TYPE_2

Dominant type Subordinate type

Bedrock sources requiring blasting Bedrock sources requiring ripping Water deposited sand and gravel, includes glaciofluvial ` Glacial till Talus slopes, etc.

Sand Dunes, etc.

Silt deposits, loess, fluvial, etc.

33. PERMAFROST_1

New Site or Expansion Area

34. PERMAFROST_2

Existing Site

DETECTED IN MOST TEST HOLES

DETECTED IN SOME TEST HOLES

DETECTED IN IMMEDIATE VICINITY

DETECTED IN NO TEST HOLES

DATA OUTDATED

UNKNOWN

OTHER

35. GROUNDWATER

BEDROCK

FLUVIAL

FLUVIAL

Groundwater was reported in test borings ranging from 6 to 13 ft. below the ground surface.

DETECTED IN SOME TEST HOLES OR PITS

GLACIAL

SILT

COLLUVIAL

PREPARED BY:

R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. Page 22 MS-65-9-037-2 EXPANSION AREA

36. LITHOLOGY_1 37. LITHOLOGY_2

Dominant type

IGNEOUS ROCK Undifferentiated Igneous Rocks GRANITIC Granite/Monzonite/Granodiorite DIORITE/GABBRO Diorite/Gabbro BASALT Dark colored fine-grained Igneous Rocks GREENSTONE Altered Volcanic Rocks w/green tint

METAMORPHIC ROCK Undifferentiated Metamorphic Rocks SCHIST/PHYLLITE Includes rocks ranging from slate to schist GNEISS Includes hard schistose rocks

MARBLE

CATACLASTIC Incl. Valdez Formation Rocks, Kenai Penn.

MÉLANGE Incl. McHugh Formation Rocks, Kenai Penn.

SEDIMENTARY ROCK Undifferentiated Sedimentary Rocks

CONGLOMERATE

SANDSTONE Includes greywacke, etc.

SHALE/MUDSTONE

LIMESTONE

FLUVIAL River and stream deposits (floodplain), includes outwash.

ALLUVIAL Alluvial / Debris Fan deposits GLACIOFLUVIAL Eskers, kames, etc.

GLACIAL Till COLLUVIAL Talus, etc.

EOLIAN Sand Dunes, etc.

SILT Loess, fluvial silts, etc.

OTHER Explain in Section 44.

38. MATERIAL_CLASSIFICATION

ASTM Classification, generally they should range from coarse to fine.

38a. GW-GM 38c. GW 38e. 38g.

38b. GP-GM 38d. GP 38f. 38h.

PREPARED BY:

R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. Page 23 MS-65-9-037-2 EXPANSION AREA

39. COBBLES_AND_BOULDERS

Test Boring Callout / ASTM Classification, either a. or b. and c. (Can use ranges i.e. 0 to 20)

39a. CONTAINS

39b. Est. % by VOL. (Est. From Visual Observations)

39c. MAX. SIZE (in.) (Observed Size)

40. AGG_TEST_RESULTS

Year of test or report- Test result / Year of test or report- Test Results

40a. SG APP COARSE 40b. SG APP FINE 40c. ABSORPTION CRSE 40d. ABSORPTION FINE 40e. NORDIC ABRASION 40f. L.A. ABRASION 40g. DEGRADATION (T-13) 40h. NASO4 LOSS COARSE 40i. NASO4 LOSS FINE

41. POTENTIAL_USABILITY

Best known potential use of the material, based on records, exploration and laboratory data.

CONCRETE AGGREGATE PRODUCED The site has produced concrete aggregate PAVING AGGREGATE PRODUCED The site has produced paving aggregate CRUSHED PRODUCTS PRODUCED Base, Surface Coarse, Subbase, etc. has been produced.

TYPE A AND B MATERIAL AVAILABLE 0 to 10 percent passing 200 TYPE C AVAILABLE Compactable material TYPE C NOT AVAILABLE Uncompactable material (Lower Kuskokwim and Yukon River, etc.)

UNKNOWN

OTHER Explain in Section 44.

42. SPECIAL_PROBLEMS

Special problems encountered or anticipated with use of the material, based on records, exploration and laboratory data.

ORGANIC CONTENT The material is very difficult to compact.

HIGHLY WEATHERED GRAVEL The gravel is highly weathered and may break down when handled.

BREAKS DOWN UNDER USE Material breaks down on grade.

SENSITIVE TO WATER CONTENT Material is sensitive to water content, i.e.. some glacial tills, soft bedrock.

VARIABLE MATERIAL Deposit contains mixture of suitable and unsuitable material.

POSSIBLE CONTAMINATION Site may be contaminated by petroleum products or hazardous materials.

CONTAINS ASBESTOS Site contains naturally occurring asbestos.

POTENTIAL ASBESTOS Site in area where naturally occurring asbestos is mapped.

ACID ROCK DRAINAGE Site contains rock susceptible to producing acid rock drainage.

UNKNOWN

OTHER Explain in Section 44, Notes.

2004- 2.71, 2.61

2004- 4.1, 2.5 2004- 0.5, 0.6

2004- 77, 77, 77 2004- 35, 35, 34

TYPES A AND B MATERIAL AVAILABLE

2004- 2.71, 2.72

UNKNOWN

PREPARED BY:

R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. Page 24 MS-65-9-037-2 EXPANSION AREA

43. RIPRAP

Class II or larger. Does not include production for erosion control riprap for ditches or culverts.

PREVIOUS PRODUCTION There is a record of production.

POSSIBLE FURTHER INVESTIGATION NEEDED The site is a bedrock quarry containing hard rock NOT POSSIBLE The site has soft rock or soil.

UNKNOWN

OTHER Explain in Section 44, Notes.

44. NOTES

Note number of item being discussed.

NOT POSSIBLE

39a. No cobbles or boulders were reported in test borings advanced at the site in 2004.

MS 65-9-045-2

Jim River Pit #3

November 19, 2009

COVER SHEET

LOCATION MAP

SITE MAP ........................................................................................................ 3A & 3B

INSPECTION FORM ....................................................................................... 4 thru 10

CATEGORY:

ACTIVE – OPEN

According to information found in the DOT&PF EDMS system in January 2009 and BLM case file abstracts, this site lies on Federal lands managed by BLM. The site (MS 92-3.1) was originally developed for construction of the Dalton Highway and Alyeska Pipeline in the 1970’s. It is presently a joint-use site, used for Alyeska operations and maintenance (OMS-92-3.1) and for DOT&PF Dalton Highway maintenance and reconstruction (MS 65-9-045-2). Generally, the site is operated under a mining plan prepared by Alyeska dated 2002 that shows separate working areas for Alyeska and DOT&PF. The Alyeska permit (F-095107) presently expires on June 04, 2012. DOT&PF is currently operating under a FUP (F-093007) which expires December 31, 2010. Access Road 92-AMS-6A connects the site to the Dalton Highway. Access road right-of-way is included in the permit. The Jim River Solid Waste Disposal Site (FF-078201) lies along the access road in what used to be Material Site MS 65-9-045-2B. The permit for the disposal site expired in 2007. The present material site lies in an area that used to be MS 65-9-045-2A. The site appeared to contain significant quantities of sand and gravel and should be retained by DOT&PF for future use.

PREPARED BY:

R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. Page 4 MS-65-9-045-2

1. MS_ID

Enter the full material site number e.g.. 65-9-045-2

2. DATE_INSPECT

Date of field inspection

3. FLD INSPEC_ORG

Name of inspector / Organization or Company

4. REGION

5. LOCATION

Name of Highway

6. MILEPOST

List the closest main highway milepost

7. NAME

Enter commonly used name (s), e.g. Hess pit, Gobblers Knob, Midway. List all that apply separated by commas.

8. MAINT_DIST/STAT Station Highway Maintenance District and Station, for locations not on highways select other.

9. QUAD

U.S.G.S. Quad. Map

10. TOWNSHIP T#S R#E Meridian /RANGE Section

11. COOR_UTM 12. COOR_STATE_PLANE

ZONE ZONE

UTM WGS84 - Meters

13. BOROUGH TAX ID NO.

14. DNR_LAND_USE_PLAN

15. CATEGORY (To be filled in the office)

15a. CLASSIFICATION

15b. STATUS

IF OTHER IS SELECTED FOR A SECTION, EXPLAIN IT IN SECTION 44. NOTES.

IF AN ANSWER IS UNKNOWN SELECT "UNKNOWN" OR LEAVE BLANK

65-9-045-2

8/3/2009

AARON BANKS / R&M CONSULTANTS

NORTHERN

JIM RIVER

DALTON HIGHWAY

INTERIOR/DALTON

7,421,959

608,409EASTING

ACTIVE

JIM RIVER PIT #3, MS 92-3.1, OMS 92-3.1

BETTLES

District

NORTHING

D-2

T24N R14W

EASTING 1,565,158

THIS REPORT IS BASED ON A REVIEW OF EXISTING DATA AND BRIEF FIELD INSPECTIONS. THUS THE

DATA CONTAINED HEREIN SHOULD BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AND USED FOR PLANNING

PURPOSES ONLY. USERS OF THIS DATA SHOULD VERIFY THE INFORMATION PRIOR TO USING IT FOR

DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES.

FM

Alaska State Plane NAD83 - Survey Feet

DALTON HIGHWAY MASTER PLAN

4,713,932

Enter Name of Facility or Secondary Route Name (i.e.Kotzebue Airport, Nash Road, etc.)

OPEN

UNORGANIZED

PREPARED BY:

R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. Page 5 MS-65-9-045-2

16. POTENTIAL_STATUS

Estimated quantity of material in the site at the time of inspection.

The pit has not been mined (used only for new sites).

17. PRESENT_USERS

17a. PRESENT_USER_1

17b. PRESENT_USER_2

17c. PRESENT_USER_3

18. PERMITTED _ACREAGE

Area within site permit or R.O.W. boundaries, from permit application or property plat.

19.

Area within an existing pit, excluding spoil berms lying outside the pit, access roads etc. Explain below.

20. ACREAGE_COMP_METHOD

Method used to determine developed acreage.

21. EST_QUAN_AVAIL

Estimated quantity available (b.c.y.), may be based on acreage computed above plus expansion area.

Explain computation assumptions and calculations below.

OTHER The site does not fit any of the categories above. Explain in Section 44, Notes.

There appeared to be no useable material in the site.

There appeared to be less than 25,000 c.y. available within the developed site.

There appeared to be greater than 25,000 c.y. available within the developed site.

EXPANDABLE

SIGNIFICANT

DEVELOPED_ACREAGE

SIGNIFICANT

600,000

DOT&PF CONSTRUCTION

There may be useable material left in the pit but it is not available.

ALYESKA

NONE

For estimating purposes the site was divided up into 3 sections. The southern edge of the pit was estimated to have an average of 25 feet of material under about 5 feet of overburden plus existing spoil berms. There was approx. 238,000 c.y. of material available (9.5 acres x 25 feet x 1,000 c.y per acre-foot). The northern edge of the pit also had an estimated average 25 feet of material under about 5 feet of overburden plus existing spoil berms. There was approx. 320,000 c.y. of material available (12.8 acres x 25 feet x 1,000 c.y per acre-foot). Deepening the pit floor between these two sections was estimated to make approx. 58,000 c.y. of additional material available (5.8 acres x 10 feet x 1,000 c.y per acre-foot).

UNKNOWN

UNDEVELOPED

CLOSED

Includes the existing pit, enlarged since photo on site map was taken. Excludes the solid waste site near the road.

ROUGH ESTIMATE

LIMITED

There was limited material within the developed site, but there appeared to be significant material outside existing site limits.

PREPARED BY:

R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. Page 6 MS-65-9-045-2

22. ACCESS_TYPE

NONE No access road has been built.

EXISTING ROAD / OPEN Drivable. May have gate.

EXISTING ROAD / REVEG Can be reopened with little effort.

EXISTING ROAD / CLOSED W/BERMS Can be reopened with little effort.

EXISTING ACCESS / REMOVED Can be reopened with much effort.

SNOW ROAD Can only be accessed during winter.

ICE ROAD Requires crossing river or lake ice in the winter.

BARGE Material can only be moved by barge.

OTHER

23. ACCESS_LENGTH

Approx. length from edge of pit to highway/secondary route (ft.)

24. VEGETATION

25. TYPE_1 26. TYPE_2

Dominant type Subordinate type General Types of Materials Available

Bedrock sources requiring blasting Soils or soft bedrock (rippable), above water table Requires production below the water table Sand/gravel bars in active channels

27. OB_CLASS_1 28.

New Site or expansion Area Existing Pit (Spoil) A site may have both. Data should be based on actual subsurface exploration, otherwise unknown.

Estimated average depth over the area.

NONE 3 TO 6 FT. UNKNOWN

<3 FT. >6 FT. OTHER

29. OB_TYPE_1 30. OB_TYPE_2

New Site or expansion Area Existing Pit (Spoil) A site may have both.

SILT PEAT SOLID WASTE OTHER

COLLUVIUM SPOIL UNKNOWN

RIVER BAR

QUARRY

BORROW PIT

BAILING

Enter data in Type_2 only if two types of material site available

SILT

BORROW PIT

The site does not fit any of the categories above. Describe in Section 44, Notes.

SPOIL

2,100

The undisturbed portion of the site was vegetated with spruce trees to 20 ft. high by 4 in. in diameter, spaced about 3 feet apart. Along the margins of the active pit, grasses had begun to revegetate the spoil berms.

3 TO 6 FT. OB_CLASS_2

3 TO 6 FT.

PREPARED BY:

R&M CONSULTANTS, INC. Page 7 MS-65-9-045-2

31. MAT_TYPE_1 32. MAT_TYPE_2

Dominant type Subordinate type

Bedrock sources requiring blasting Bedrock sources requiring ripping Water deposited sand and gravel, includes glaciofluvial ` Glacial till Talus slopes, etc.

Sand Dunes, etc.

Silt deposits, loess, fluvial, etc.

33. PERMAFROST_1

New Site or Expansion Area

34. PERMAFROST_2

Existing Site

DETECTED IN MOST TEST HOLES

DETECTED IN SOME TEST HOLES

DETECTED IN IMMEDIATE VICINITY

DETECTED IN NO TEST HOLES

DATA OUTDATED

UNKNOWN

OTHER

35. GROUNDWATER

BEDROCK

FLUVIAL

FLUVIAL

Groundwater was encountered at 16 to 21 feet below the…

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .