Cost_Formula-reward_average_cost_for_RFP.docx

DOCX document 15 KB Posted

Attached to
Church St Bridge Rehabilitation
Solicitation number
2027-RFQ-CNH-389
Issued by
New Haven County, Connecticut

About this file

This document is a cost formula guide related to the Church St Bridge Rehabilitation project, a Statements of Qualifications (SOQ) solicitation issued by the City of New Haven, Connecticut for bridge-rehabilitation design and related construction-phase services. The document explains scoring methodologies used in evaluating proposals, specifically detailing how the "Reward Low Cost" formula calculates point allocations based on cost comparisons among submissions.

The cost formula methodology presented uses the equation: Lowest overall cost divided by the proposal's cost equals the percentage of possible points awarded. Under this scoring approach, the lowest-cost proposal receives the maximum points available, while higher-cost proposals receive proportionally fewer points based on their cost relative to the lowest bid. For example, a proposal costing $100 receives 30 points (100% of available points), a proposal at $200 receives 15 points (50% of available points), and a proposal at $500 receives 6 points (20% of available points). However, it is important to note that according to the related SOQ opportunity description, cost will not be an evaluation factor at the initial selection stage for the Church St Bridge Rehabilitation project, meaning this cost formula would not apply to the current solicitation but represents a general scoring methodology reference document.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Church_St_Bridge_Rehabilitation_(Addendum_#1_Revision).pdf PDF
Church_St_Bridge_Rehabilitation.pdf PDF
RFQ_ARC_BRIDGE_CONCEPT_PLAN-72726.pdf PDF
conceptual_isometric_arch.jpg JPG image
Site_Survey.pdf PDF
Church_St_Bridge_(00951)_2025_inspection_report.pdf PDF
Church_St_bridge_construction_as-built_1960.pdf PDF
Church_St_bridge_rehabilitation_as-built_1997_(substructure_&_superstructure_replacement,_reuse_existing_deep_foundation_elements).pdf PDF
Borings_and_Wingwall_Construction_Plans_at_SE_corner_of_Church_St_Bridge.pdf PDF
Geotechnical_Report_-_Service_Dr._between_Temple_St._and_Congress_Ave..pdf PDF
Conceptual_rendering_.jpg JPG image
ARPA_Contractor_Agreement_(More_Than_$100000)_(MPB)_(TEMPLATE_11-26-24_UPDATE).pdf PDF
ARPA_Subrecipient_Subaward_Agreement_($100000_OR_LESS)_(MPB)_(TEMPLATE_11-26-24_UPDATE).pdf PDF
ARPA_Contractor_Agreement_($100000_OR_LESS)_(MPB)_(TEMPLATE_11-26-24_UPDATE).pdf PDF
ARPA_Subrecipient_Subaward_Agreement_(More_Than_$100000)_(MPB)_(TEMPLATE_11-26-24_UPDATE).pdf PDF
Sample_Eval_Criteria_and_Rating_Plan.docx DOCX document
9a-Exhibit__RFP_Standard_Form_of_Agreement_-_City_of_New_Haven.pdf PDF
9b-Exhibit__RFP_Standard_Terms_Part_II_-_City_of_New_Haven.pdf PDF
Evaluation_Criteria_for_OpenGov.docx DOCX document
Show all 19

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

A Closer Look at Cost Formulas The scoring methods Reward Average Cost and Reward Low Cost rely on cost formulas to track and calculate point values. Reward Low Cost, for example, uses this equation to determine how many points each individual submission should receive:

Lowest overall cost / Proposal's cost = X% of the possible points Expand the tabs to see Reward Low Cost in action.

Proposal A costs $100. How many points will it receive?

$100 (Lowest Proposal) / $100 (Proposal A) = 100% of 30 points

30 points awarded Proposal B costs $200. How many points will it receive?

$100 (Lowest Proposal) / $200 (Proposal B) = 50% of 30 points 15 points awarded Proposal C costs $500. How many points will it receive?

$100 (Lowest Proposal) / $500 (Proposal C) = 20% of 30 points 6 points awarded

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .