Cost_Formula-reward_average_cost_for_RFP.docx

DOCX document 15 KB Posted

Attached to
Redevelopment of former Quinnipiac Real World STEM School – 805 Quinnipiac Avenue, 460 Lexington Avenue, and 3-5 Runo Terrace New Haven, CT 06513
Solicitation number
2025-RFP-CNH-292
Issued by
New Haven County, Connecticut

About this file

This file is an instructional document explaining cost formula methodologies used in RFP scoring, specifically addressing the "Reward Low Cost" and "Reward Average Cost" evaluation approaches that may be applied to the City of New Haven's redevelopment proposal for the former Quinnipiac Real World STEM School site. The document details how the Reward Low Cost formula calculates point allocations by dividing the lowest proposal cost by each individual proposal's cost to determine the percentage of available points awarded, with proposals demonstrating progressively lower scores as their costs increase relative to the lowest bid. This scoring methodology would be used to evaluate the financial proposals submitted by respondents in connection with the adaptive reuse or redevelopment of the 2.5-acre, 29,771 square foot property located at 460 Lexington Avenue, 805 Quinnipiac Avenue, and 3-5 Runo Terrace in New Haven's Fair Haven Heights neighborhood, with proposals due by January 20, 2026.

The cost formula methodology outlined in this file establishes the framework for how financial considerations will factor into the overall evaluation of respondent qualifications and project viability. Under this approach, respondents submitting lower-cost proposals receive proportionally higher scores within the cost evaluation category, incentivizing cost-effective solutions while maintaining the city's ability to assess proposals on multiple evaluation criteria including design quality, financing strategy, market viability, community engagement, and alignment with New Haven's legislative priorities of job creation, public safety, affordable housing, and health equity advancement. The application of this formula ensures transparent and objective cost-based scoring regardless of the total number of submissions or the absolute dollar amounts proposed.

View the file

Other files

Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

A Closer Look at Cost Formulas The scoring methods Reward Average Cost and Reward Low Cost rely on cost formulas to track and calculate point values. Reward Low Cost, for example, uses this equation to determine how many points each individual submission should receive:

Lowest overall cost / Proposal's cost = X% of the possible points Expand the tabs to see Reward Low Cost in action.

Proposal A costs $100. How many points will it receive?

$100 (Lowest Proposal) / $100 (Proposal A) = 100% of 30 points

30 points awarded Proposal B costs $200. How many points will it receive?

$100 (Lowest Proposal) / $200 (Proposal B) = 50% of 30 points 15 points awarded Proposal C costs $500. How many points will it receive?

$100 (Lowest Proposal) / $500 (Proposal C) = 20% of 30 points 6 points awarded

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .