CFO Audit Past Performance Questionaire.pdf

PDF 218 KB Posted

Attached to
Chief Financial Officers Audit
Solicitation number
W56ZTN24R0009
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire related to a Request for Proposal (RFP) issued by the U.S. Army Contracting Command - Aberdeen Proving Ground (ACC-APG) for Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Audit support services. The RFP number is W56ZTN-24-R-0009 and it has a NAICS code of 561990 with a $16.5 million size standard. The questionnaire is intended to collect information on an offeror's past and current performance on similar federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts. The respondent is asked to rate the offeror's performance across several criteria, including compliance with requirements, project management, timeliness of deliverables, cost control, and customer satisfaction. The completed questionnaire is to be returned within 15 days to the identified Contracting Officer points of contact. This questionnaire is part of the evaluation process for the CFO Audit support services contract, which has a 5-year period of performance and requires monthly work to be performed at Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
CFO Audit Amendment 2.pdf PDF
CFO Audit Amendment.pdf PDF
Installation Geospatial Data Layer Inventory.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CFO Audit Support QASP.docx DOCX document
TE 4 Special Services and Events CFOA Audit Readiness Support.docx DOCX document
W56ZTN24R0009 CFO Audit Solicitation.pdf PDF
TE 5 Forms CFOA Audit Readiness Support.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DATE: 17 April 2024

CCAP-MDT

SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) Number W56ZTN-24-R-0009

Dear Sir/Ma’am.

The US Army Contracting Command – Aberdeen Proving Ground (ACC-APG), Tenant Division, Facilities Branch is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate Offeror’s on subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the Offeror’s provide information about their past performance on same or similar federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code 561990 All Other Support Services. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.

Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation.

Please complete the enclosure and return to the below point of contact (POC), no later than 15 days after receipt of request, whichever occurs first. Your questionnaire may be submitted electronically to both POC: Ms. Samantha Hayes, samantha.c.hayes.civ@army.mil and Ms. Amy Bowen, amy.m.bowen.civ@army.mil.

Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the above POC or the undersigned.

Sincerely, Amy M. Bowen Contracting Officer

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

U.S. ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND - ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND

TENANT CONTRACTING DIVISION

6472 INTEGRITY COURT, BLDG 4401

ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MD 21005

mailto:samantha.c.hayes.civ@army.mil mailto:amy.m.bowen.civ@army.mil.

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM

Contractor: Contract No.:

Subcontract No. (if applicable):

POC: Title:

(Name) (E.G. PCO/ACO/TM)

(Agency, Telephone No., E-mail Address & Fax Number)

The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past three years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following ratings shall be used in your response.

Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor’s name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)

Acceptable Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

Acceptable Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

Acceptable Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

Acceptable Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

Acceptable Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

Signature Date

Typed or Printed Name

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

A. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
B. ACQUISITION STRATEGY
A. BASIS FOR AWARD (Section M) EVALUATION
B. FACTORS AND SUB-FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED
C. EVALUATION APPROACH
D. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION (Section L) INSTRUCTIONS
B. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE ORGANIZATIONAL ELEMENTS.
B. DEFINITIONS
C. RATING METHOD
D. PROPOSAL EVALUATION
E. COMMUNICATIONS AND SECURING SOURCE SELECTION MATERIALS.
C. EVALUATION POLICIES
MEMBERS AND ADVISORS OF THE SOURCE SELECTION ORGANIZATION (SSO)
AGREEMENT
TERMS
CERTIFICATION
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .