CA ERFO PLUMAS NF 23N18(1) Final Pavement Memo.pdf
PDF 449 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CA ERFO PLUMAS NF 23N18(1), Frazier Creek Bridge
- Solicitation number
- 6982AF22B000029
About this file
This memorandum provides pavement structural recommendations for the CA ERFO PLUMAS NF 23N18(1) Frazier Creek Bridge replacement project. The project includes replacing the burned bridge with a prefabricated steel bridge and reconstructing up to 150 feet of asphalt roadway approaches on both ends. The memorandum recommends 3 inches of asphalt concrete over 6 inches of crushed aggregate base for the approaches. The steel bridge deck will be filled with asphalt in two lifts. Recommended pay items include roadway aggregate, asphalt concrete pavement, and Caltrans specification 85 gyration asphalt mixes. The project aims to reduce sediment from reaching Frazier Creek by overlaying the bridge and a short section of roadway.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Memorandum
Subject: CA ERFO PLUMAS NF 23N18(1)
Frazier Creek Bridge Final Pavement Recommendations
Date: January 31, 2022
From: Robert Norick
Through:
Pavement & Materials Engineer
Mike Voth Pavement & Materials Team Lead
To: Mike Daigler, PM Joshua Kaplan, Lead Designer
Project Description:
This memorandum provides the pavement structural section recommendations for the CA ERFO PLUMAS NF 23N18(1) Frazier Creek Bridge in Plumas County, California.
The Frazier Creek Bridge is located approximately 45 miles northeast of the Town of Oroville along Bucks Lake Road within the Plumas National Forest. The bridge is located on Forest Route 23N18, just southeast of Bucks Lake Road, and crosses Frazier Creek. Page 3 includes a location map for the bridge. The previous timber bridge was destroyed by fire in 2020 and will be replaced with a prefabricated bridge with rolled steel girders, structural steel decking, and asphalt fill.
Geotechnical Investigation:
On November 4-5, 2021, CFL’s Geotechnical Group conducted a geotechnical investigation for the project consisting of two geotechnical borings, one at each bridge abutment (27 and 47 foot depths), using a truck mounted hollow stem auger. Standard penetration tests (SPT) and sampling were performed at both borings at 5-foot intervals, in addition to, bulk subgrade samples for the top 5 feet. CFL personnel logged the findings including depth of boring and subgrade soils, SPT data, visual soil classification, and aggregate base and asphalt thicknesses. SPT and bulk subgrade samples were collected and submitted to the CFLHD lab for testing to determine the soil classifications. The investigation found 4 inches of asphalt on 6 inches of aggregate base over a silty sand subgrade; “good” quality subgrade material. Based upon Exhibits 11.4.2.B and 11.4.2.C of CFLHD’s supplement to the PDDM, the resilient modulus (MR) of “good” subgrade soils can be estimated to be 8,000 psi.
Pavement Recommendations:
The two-way average daily traffic (ADT) along the forest route is estimated to be less than 100 with a minimal number of trucks; i.e. a “low” traffic level. According to PDDM Section 11.2.1.2, a minimum of 50,000 ESALs shall be used for the design of paved roads. Based upon 50,000 ESALs, the subgrade resilient moduli (MR), and the PDDM pavement design criteria, the 1993 AASHTO procedure requires 20-year pavement Structural Numbers (SN) of 1.85. After evaluating alternatives, the following pavement structural sections are recommended for the project.
Frazier Creek Bridge Deck
Corrugated steel decking with asphalt fill in 2 lifts as follows.
First asphalt lift to fill steel decking corrugations.
Second asphalt lift to extend 1.5 inch minimum above steel decking.
Frazier Creek Bridge Approaches (SN = 1.92)
3 inches of Asphalt Concrete Pavement (SN = 3” x 0.44 = 1.32”) 6 inches of Crushed Aggregate Base (SN = 6” x 0.10 = 0.60”)
Additional recommendations include a tack coat applied to the steel decking and between asphalt lifts (subsidiary to asphalt).
Recommended Pay Items for this Project:
Item Number Item Description Unit
30202-2000 Roadway Aggregate, Method 2 Ton 40301-0100 Asphalt Concrete Pavement, Type 1 Ton
The pay items above are to be constructed using the FP-14. CFLHD’s standard Special Contract Requirements (SCRs) related to pavements and materials are expected to be used apart from a 403 SCR to incorporate Caltrans 85 gyration asphalt mixes (see attached). Any additional SCRs may be developed as needed.
Frazier Creek Bridge Vicinity Map
Section 403. — ASPHALT CONCRETE
Description
403.01 Add the following:
Use an Asphalt binder that would be specified for the project location and is designated according to AASHTO M 320.
Construction Requirements
403.02 Composition of Mix (Job-Mix Formula). Add the following:
The CO may perform mix design-verification testing to confirm the mix meets the contract requirements. If verification testing is required, submit a loose mix sample to the CO 14 days prior to placement.
(a) Type I. Delete the subsection and Table 403-1 and substitute the following:
Submit a state department of transportation JMF used locally and approved within the past 12 months for approval at least 30 days before production. For each proposed JMF, submit a production certification conforming to state department of transportation specifications and conforming to design parameters (a), (b), or (c) for the type of mix submitted and conforming to design parameter (d) in Table 403-1.
Table 403-1
Asphalt Concrete Mix Requirements Design Parameters Specification
(a) Volumetric hot asphalt concrete pavement (AASHTO M 323, AASHTO R 35, and AASHTO T 312)
Gyratory compaction level Volumetric properties at 0.3 to 3 million ESAL’s (AASHTO M 323)
8, 85, 130 see Table 401-1
(b) Hveem (AASHTO T 246 and AASHTO T 247) Stabilometer, minimum Percent Air Voids (1)
3.0 – 5.0
(c) Marshall (AASHTO T 245)
Stability, pounds (kilonewtons), minimum Flow, 0.01 inches (0.25 millimeters) Percent Air Voids (1) Compaction, number of blows each end of test specimen
2000 (8.9)
8 - 16
3.0 – 5.0
(d) Moisture Susceptibility (AASHTO T 283)
Tensile strength ratio, minimum
0.80
(1) The percent of air voids are based on AASHTO T 166, AASHTO T 209 and AASHTO T 269.
403.09 Compacting. Add the following:
For HMA, do not roll the mix after the surface cools below 175 ºF (80°C).
Along forms, curbs, headers, walls, and other places not accessible to the rollers, compact the mix with alternate equipment to obtain the required compaction.
403.12 Acceptance. Add the following:
During production placement of the mix, sample loose mix and compacted cores according to Table 403-2 and submit to the CO for acceptance. Materials that do not meet the approved job-mix formula are considered unacceptable.
Delete Table 403-2 and substitute the following:
Table 403-2
Sampling, Testing, and Acceptance Requirements
Material or
Product (Subsection)
Type of Acceptance (Subsection)
C ha ra ct er is tic
T es t M et ho ds
Sp ec ifi ca tio ns
Sampling Frequency
Point of Sampling Sp lit
Sa m pl e
Reporting Time
R em ar ks
Mix Design Asphalt concrete mixture Type I
(403.02(a))
Measured and tested for conformance
(106.04)
Job-mix formula
Subsection 403.02(a)
When requested by the CO.
Flowing mix stream (bin or belt discharge) or behind the paver before compaction.
Yes Before approval of job-mix formula
Tested by the
CO
Production Asphalt concrete, Type I
(403.02(a))
Measured and tested for conformance
(106.04)
Job-mix formula
Density (1)
Maximum specific gravity
Subsection 403.02
AASHTO
T 166
AASHTO T
209 (2)
1 per 700 tons
(650 metric tons)
Behind the paver before compaction.
In-place after Compacting
Behind the paver before compaction
Yes
Deliver cores to
CO
for testing
Surface Tolerance
Straightedge measurement Subsection
403.11
Continuously, after compaction
Finished pavement surface
No −
Placement temperature
− First load and as determined by
CO
thereafter
Hauling vehicle before dumping, or windrow before pickup
No Upon completion of measurement
Table 403-2 (continued)
Sampling, Testing, and Acceptance Requirements
Material or Product
(Subsection)
Type of Acceptance (Subsection)
C ha ra ct er is tic
T es t M et ho ds
Sp ec ifi ca tio ns
Sampling Frequency
Point of Sampling Sp lit
Sa m pl e
Reporting Time
R em ar ks
Production Process control (153.03)
Gradation at the plant
AASHTO
T 27 & T 11
Contractor determined
Cold feed or hot bins as applicable
No 24 hours
Moisture content of aggregates
AASHTO
T 255
" Stockpile No " −
Density ASTM D2950
1 per 500 feet
(150 meters)
In-place after compacting
No " −
Asphalt concrete, Type II
(403.02(b))
Measured and tested for conformance
(106.04)
" " 3 per 700 tons
(650 metric tons)
In-place after compacting
No " −
(1) Dry cores to constant mass at 125±5°F (52±3 °C) or vacuum dry, ASTM D7227 before testing. For asphalt concrete Type I, cut two 6-inch (150-millimeter) diameter side by side cores. Remove them with a core retriever and fill and compact the core holes with asphalt concrete mixture. Label the cores and protect them from damage due to handling and temperature. Submit one core for verification testing. Dry the other core to constant mass at 125±5 °F (52±3 °C) or vacuum dry it according to ASTM D7227 before performing the core density and measuring the thickness. Use
62.245 pounds per cubic foot (997.1 kilograms per cubic meter) to convert specific gravity to density. Use AASHTO T 166 regardless of the volume of water absorbed. Use the average maximum specific gravity value (AASHTO T 209) of the first three samples to determine the percent compaction of each Lot.
(2) Do not use the dry back method (Section 11 of AASHTO T 209).
| CA ERFO PLUMAS NF 23N18(1) Final Pavement Memo |
| CA ERFO PLUMAS NF 23N18(1) 403 SCR |
| Section 403. — ASPHALT CONCRETE |
| 2022-01-31T17:54:50-0700 | |
| ROBERT E NORICK |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .