C05_FY26_BMRD_Stocking Survey Data Form.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 24 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 1240BG26Q0088
About this file
This is a Stocking Survey Data Form template used by the USDA Forest Service to collect and evaluate reforestation monitoring data on the Malheur National Forest. The form captures contractor-collected field data on planted and naturally regenerated trees across multiple survey plots, measuring metrics such as species composition, tree viability, tree height, and ground cover conditions (rock, grass, vegetation/shrub percentages). Data collection includes tracking of individual tree counts by species code (Ponderosa Pine, Douglas-fir, Western Larch, Grand Fir, Western White Pine, Lodgepole Pine, and others), classification of trees as viable or non-viable, and calculation of Trees Per Acre (TPA) for both planted and natural regeneration components.
The form establishes a quality assurance and scoring methodology wherein Forest Service Inspector-collected data serves as the foundation baseline, with contractor performance evaluated against this standard on a per-plot basis and then averaged across units. Scoring is calculated as a percentage, with a maximum score of 100 percent possible; any contractor data points falling outside accepted variance thresholds relative to Forest Service measurements result in proportional point reductions. The template includes sections for unit-level narrative descriptions of non-stocked areas, soil conditions, weather damage, stocking level explanations, animal damage impacts, and photographic documentation requirements. The form supports the broader BPA Call Order (1240BG26Q0088) issued against the Land Management Integrated Resources (LMIR) BPA for natural regeneration and reforestation stocking survey services.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| C06.3_FY26 BlackButte Nat Regen Stocking Surveys VIcinity Map.pdf | ||
| C01_LMIR BPA Call_MalheurForestWideStockingSurveys_REQ1174908.pdf | ||
| C03_Fire_Protection_and_Suppression.pdf | ||
| E07.2_EmiCVicinity.pdf | ||
| E07.3_HCVicinity.pdf | ||
| E08.2_FY26_BMRD_Stocking Survey_SOI.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| E08_FY26_BMRD Stocking Survey SOW.docx | DOCX document | |
| C06.1_FY26 BlackButte Nat Regen Stocking Surveys SOW.docx | DOCX document | |
| C06.2_FY26 BlackButte Nat Regen Stocking Surveys Project Area Map.pdf | ||
| C02_WD_77-0079_Rev.82_05.13.2026.pdf | ||
| E08.1_FY26_BMRD_Stocking Survey_DUIS.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| E07_HC Emic YJ Stocking SOW 2026.doc | DOC document | |
| E07.1_HC Emic YJ Stocking Survey_SOI 2026.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| C06_FY26 BlackButte Nat Regen Stocking Surveys DUIS.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Example & Instructions
| Point Value | 1/spp | 1/tree | 1/tree | 1/tree | 1/tree | 1 | 1/tree | 1/tree | 1/tree | 1/tree | 1/tree | 1/tree | 1 | 1/line item | 1/line item | 1 | Total | |||||||
| Unit# | Plot # | Species Planted | Total Planted (Live & Dead) | Viable Trees | Non-Viable Trees | Planted Dead (PD) | Avg. Total Height <=1ft | Avg. Total Height 1.1ft-4.5ft | Avg. Total Height >4.5ft | PP Nat. >6in. | DF Nat. >6in. | WL Nat. >6 in. | GF Nat. >6in. | LP Nat >6in. | WWP Nat >6in. | % Rock | % Grass | % Veg & Shrub | Planted Viable TPA | Natural Viable TPA | Total Unit TPA | Remarks | ||
| Contractor-Collected Data | 30 | 7 | PIPO | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 150 | 100 | 250 | Rocky soils, ceanothus competition | ||||||
| 30 | 7 | PSME | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 | ||||||||||||
| 30 | 7 | LAOC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 | ||||||||||||
| 3 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 28 | |||||||||||||
| FS-Collected Data | 30 | 7 | PIPO | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 150 | 150 | 300 | Rocky soils, ceanothus competition | |||||
| 30 | 7 | PSME | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 50 | ||||||||||||
| 30 | 7 | LAOC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 50 | ||||||||||||
| 3 | 10 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 36 | ||||||||||||
| Scoring will be done on a per plot basis and then averaged across each unit. The toal point value of FS-Collected Data is the foundation - a score >100% is not possible. | The final contractor score for this plot was 28 --> (28/36)*100 = | 78% |
If the Contractor-collected data does not lie within the accepted variance of the Forest Service Inspector's data, the corresponding point value will be reduced accordingly.
In this example, the cells highlighted in yellow delineate metrics the contractor did not accurately measure compared with the Forest Service Inspector's data.
Planted Tree Cells
Natural Tree Cells
Abiotic Factors Cells
Auto-Calculated Field
Unit Summary Sheet Unit Summary
Describe any significant nonstocked areas within a unit:
Describe overall soil conditions in the unit:
Identify any weather damage observed:
Provide possible explanation for low stocking levels:
Describe animal damage in the unit and the effect on stocking:
*Attach photos of unit*
Stocking Survey Data Form
| Point Value | 1/spp | 1/tree | 1/tree | 1/tree | 1/tree | 1 | 1/tree | 1/tree | 1/tree | 1/tree | 1/tree | 1/tree | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Unit# | Plot # | Species Planted | Total Planted (Live & Dead) | Viable Trees | Non-Viable Trees | Planted Dead (PP) | Avg. Total Height <=1ft | Avg. Total Height 1.1ft-4.5ft | Avg. Total Height >4.5ft | PP Nat. >6in. | DF Nat. >6in. | WL Nat. >6 in. | GF Nat. >6in. | LP Nat >6in. | WWP Nat >6in. | % Rock | % Grass | % Veg & Shrub | Planted Viable TPA | Natural Viable TPA | Total Unit TPA | Remarks |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
Lists
| Species | Code | |
| Ponderosa Pine | PIPO | |
| Douglas-fir | PSME | |
| Western Larch | LAOC | |
| Grand Fir/White Fir | ABGR | |
| Western White Pine | PIMO | |
| Lodgepole Pine | PICO | |
| Englemann Spruce | PIEN | uncommon, Crockets Knob |
| Whitebark Pine | PIAL | unlikely, Crockets Knob |
| Subalpine Fir | ABLA | uncommon, Crockets Knob |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .