Bridge Inspection Report_3450-003P.pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted

Attached to
Rock Creek Park - Joyce Road Bridge
Solicitation number
693C73-24-B-000010
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Bridge Inspection Report for the Joyce Road Bridge over the Luzon Branch in Rock Creek Park, Washington, D.C. The report provides a detailed assessment of the condition of the concrete tee beam bridge, which is in poor condition and scheduled for replacement in the near future under Project PRA-ROCR 15(2). Key issues identified include widespread deterioration of the structural concrete, wearing surface deterioration, bearing device deterioration, scour at the south abutment, and erosion along the retaining wall. The report includes a load rating summary, structure inventory and appraisal data, condition assessments, recommendations, and cost estimates for maintenance, rehabilitation, and reconstruction. The total estimated reconstruction cost is $3,500,000.

The related federal contract opportunity is for the replacement of the Joyce Road Bridge under Solicitation Number 693C73-24-B-000010. The project consists of replacing the bridge, modifying existing walls, adding rip rap, and performing other miscellaneous work. The project is expected to cost between $2,000,000 and $5,000,000, and the bid documents are expected to be issued on or about May 1, 2024. The solicitation is restricted to certified Small Business Concerns only.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Results of Bid Opening - Project NP ROCR 15(2).pdf PDF
FP14_Eng.pdf PDF
ADV Bidders Qualifications Form.doc DOC document
Geotechnical Report.pdf PDF
IFB Solicitation - NP ROCR 15(2).pdf PDF
Plans - NP ROCR 15(2).pdf PDF
Categorical Exclusion Form (NEPA).pdf PDF
VETS-4212 Form.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

JOYCE ROAD BRIDGE AT MILITARY ROAD

JOYCE ROAD OVER LUZON BRANCH

ROCK CREEK PARK

LOOKING NORTH TOWARD 16TH STREET

STRUCTURE NO. 3450-003P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 7/13/2023

EAST (UPSTREAM) SIDE

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration FLH Office of Bridges and Structures Bridge Inspection Program 22001 Loudoun County Parkway, Building E2, Suite 200 Ashburn, VA 20147 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 3450-003P

JOYCE ROAD BRIDGE AT MILITARY ROAD INSPECTION DATE: 07/13/2023

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUDNATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1 - CONCRETE

04 - TEE BEAM

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

6 - BITUMINOUS

0 - UNKNOWN

6 - N/A

1 - CONCRETE

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .

MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

DECK WIDTH:

CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

YEAR BUILT:

YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .

SKEW ANGLE:

FRACTURE CRITICAL:

40.0 FT (12.2 M)

40 FT (12.2 M)

37.0 FT (11.3 M)

22.0 FT (6.7 M)

40 °

N

LOCATION

ROCK CREEK PARK

STATE: .............................. 113 - DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FACILITY CARRIED: ......... JOYCE ROAD

FEATURE INTERSECTED: LUZON BRANCH

MILE POINT: .. 0.35 (KM PT 0.56)

LOCATION: .... 0.3 MILES TO BEACH DRIVE.

INSPECTION TEAM: S. Hanny, O. Tariq

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

Osama Tariq

REPORT REVIEW:

Marcus Miller

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 01/12/2024

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete tee beam bridge is in poor condition and is scheduled for replacement in the near future under Project PRA-ROCR 15(2). The main problem is widespread deterioration of the structural concrete, as evident by the concrete core samples taken in March 2014. In addition, deterioration of the asphalt wearing surface (including cracking and holes up to 5" deep along the east gutterline) allows runoff to migrate under the pavement onto the concrete superstructure, thereby exacerbating the deterioration.

Additional problems include paint deterioration and rusting of the bearing devices, deterioration of the vertical joint filler material at both abutments, scour at the south abutment with the top of the footing exposed, and scour and erosion along the retaining wall.

It should also be noted that vagrant activity is evident under the structure. Inspectors and maintenance personnel should use caution when visiting the bridge.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 3450-003P

JOYCE ROAD BRIDGE AT MILITARY ROAD INSPECTION DATE : 07/13/2023

PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

B

Item No.

Maintenance Recommendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

58.10,60.

6,61.4

REMOVE AND CUT BACK TREES AND VEGETATION

GROWTH AROUND STRUCTURE TO FACILITATE

INSPECTION.

1 LS 5000 5000

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : 5000

Item No.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

REHAB RECONSTR

58,59,60 REPLACE STRUCTURE.

1 LS 3500000 3500000

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : 3500000

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .. 3500000

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3450-003P

58. DECK

1. DECK SLAB

4. RIDEABILITY

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

8. UTILITIES

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.OTHER:

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.ALIGNMENT

11.OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

61. CHANNEL

1. ALIGNMENT

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING

9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:

222. APPROACHES

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

223. RETAINING WALL

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

P

G

F

F

P

G

F

P

P

N

N

N

F

N

N

G

G

N

F

G

G

F

N

1- SUFF

3 - LOW

N

N

N

F

F

P

G

N

G

G

F

F

G

F

N

2. EXPANSION JOINTS P

3. WEARING SURFACE F

N 9 FT

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLEN

EXCELLENT CONDITION9

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6

FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“ MM NENT” FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

Structure is closed to

FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0

SAND, ROCKVEGETATION

03 - CONCRETE FTG

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS F

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS F

5. FOUNDATIONS 03 - CONCRETE FTG F

6. WINGWALLS G

7. WEEP HOLES F

8. EXPANSION JOINTS P

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR F

10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11.SLOPE PROTECTION N

12.OTHER N

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:

B. TRANSITIONS:

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:

N

N

PIER(S) TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS N

N

N

N

N

N

N

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is 14.PILE BENTS required and none is provided.

15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

16.FOUNDATIONS

17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19.OTHER

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3450-003P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

58.1 WIDESPREAD MODERATE LONGITUDINAL AND RANDOM CRACKING WITH HEAVY EFFLORESCENCE AND WATER LEAKAGE, AND SOME RUST STAINING AND EXPOSED REBAR ON DECK UNDERSIDE AND OVERHANGS, PRIMARILY BETWEEN BEAMS #2

THROUGH #6.

TWO DECK CORES TAKEN ON 3/11/2014, ABOVE BEAM #5 AT ABOUT 10' FROM NORTH END AND 7' FROM EAST CURB. CORE SAMPLES SHOW POOR CONCRETE COHESION AND WEAK BONDING TO ASPHALT PAVEMENT. MINOR UNDERMINING OF

ASPHALT PAVEMENT ALSO EVIDENT.

58.2 MINOR ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS AND VEGETATION GROWTH IN EXPANSION JOINT; JOINT IS JAMMED WITH PACK RUST BETWEEN ARMOR ANGLES. MINOR RUSTING AND PITTING OF ARMOR ANGLES; MINOR SNOW PLOW DAMAGE. EVIDENCE OF

MOISTURE SEEPAGE THROUGH JOINT.

58.3

58.5

58.7

222.4

MINOR LONGITUDINAL AND MAP CRACKING OF ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE IN SOUTHBOUND LANE AND ALONG EAST EDGE.

MODERATE TO SEVERE SPALLING (UP TO 5"D) OF EAST GUTTER, PRIMARILY NEAR SOUTH END AND AT NORTH APPROACH;

DETERIORATION AND UNDERMINING OF WEARING SURFACE NEAR SOUTH END (EVIDENCE OF ADVANCED WATER LEAKAGE DAMAGE TO SUPERSTRUCTURE AT THIS LOCATION) AND OF APPROACH PAVEMENT AT NORTH EXPANSION JOINT. MINOR

CRACKING AND SPALLING OF APPROACH CURBS.

MODERATE ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS WITH VEGETATION GROWTH IN BOTH CURBLINES.

58.6 MINOR DETERIORATION OF GROUT PADS UNDER RAIL POSTS; NO NEOPRENE PADS PRESENT UNDER RAIL POST BASE PLATES.

MINOR RUSTING OF WASHERS AT ANCHOR BOLTS. TOP RAIL LOOSE ON WEST RAILING AT RAIL POSTS #2 AND #3 FROM NORTH

END.

MINOR VEGETATION ALONG NORTH END OF WEST RAILING; MODERATE AT EAST RAILING. TREE REMOVED AT EAST RAILING

OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT; STUMP REMAINS.

58.8 UTILITY PIPE OPEN IN CENTER OF SOUTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL.

58.10 VEGETATION OVERHANGS BOTH SIDES OF STRUCTURE.

59.1 SEVERE DETERIORATION OF PAINT WITH MODERATE RUSTING AND MINOR SECTION LOSS ON BEARING DEVICES AT NORTH

ABUTMENT.

59.2 WIDESPREAD MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING (UP TO 1/32"W) OF CONCRETE TEE BEAMS WITH EFFLORESCENCE; MODERATE TO SEVERE ON BEAMS #4, #5, AND #6. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF BEAMS. MINOR SPALL ON BEAM #1 NEAR MIDSPAN.

MINOR SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON BOTTOM OF BEAM #6, NORTH END.

BEAMS ARE CLOSE TO OR TOUCHING BACKWALL AT NORTH ABUTMENT, LEAVING NO ROOM FOR EXPANSION; MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND RUST STAINING, DELAMINATION, AND SPALLING OF BEAM ENDS.

59.6 MODERATE TO SEVERE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND RUST STAINING, DELAMINATION, AND SPALLING OF END

DIAPHRAGMS AT NORTH ABUTMENT, PRIMARILY BETWEEN BEAMS #2 THROUGH #6.

WIDESPREAD GRAFFITI ON SUPERSTRUCTURE AND SUBSTRUCTURE.

60.1 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING (UP TO 1/32"W) OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS; EFFLORESCENCE AT SOUTH ABUTMENT.

60.3 HEAVY ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS AND TRASH FROM VAGRANTS ON BEARING SEATS AT NORTH ABUTMENT. MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE ALONG HORIZONTAL CONSTRUCTION JOINT AT SOUTH ABUTMENT BETWEEN BACKWALL AND BREASTWALL.

60.4 MINOR SPALLING (10'L TOTAL X UP TO FULL WIDTH X 1"D) OF TOP OF NORTH ABUTMENT BACKWALL, SOME PARTIALLY PATCHED WITH ASPHALT WITH MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH. SPALL ALLOWS RUNOFF TO MIGRATE UNDER ASPHALT PAVEMENT.

MODERATE HORIZONTAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTH ABUTMENT BACKWALL NEAR TOP BETWEEN BEAMS #2 THROUGH #6. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTH ABUTMENT BACKWALL, PRIMARILY EXTENDING

FROM BEAM BOTTOM FLANGES.

60.5 MINOR TO MODERATE SCALING (UP TO 2"D) OF SOUTH ABUTMENT FOOTING AND SOUTHEAST WINGWALL STEP FOOTING.

60.6 MINOR CRACKING OF WINGWALL MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS WITH EFFLORESCENCE. HEAVY VEGETATION GROWTH ON

NORTHEAST WINGWALL; MODERATE ON NORTHWEST.

60.7 ONLY ONE WEEP HOLE VISIBLE AT NORTH ABUTMENT; MINOR LOSS OF FILL.

60.8 MODERATE TO SEVERE DETERIORATION OF JOINT FILLER MATERIAL AT ALL VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINTS. VEGETATION

GROWTH IN VERTICAL JOINT BETWEEN NORTH ABUTMENT AND NORTHEAST WINGWALL.

60.9

61.1

90 DEGREE TURN IN DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL. CHANNEL DIRECTED AGAINST SOUTH ABUTMENT; MODERATE SCOUR WITH TOP OF FOOTING EXPOSED. SOUTHEAST WINGWALL FOOTING TOP FACE EXPOSED 10'L; STEP FOOTING EXPOSED FULL LENGTH UP

TO 2'H.

MINOR EROSION AT END OF NORTHEAST WINGWALL.

61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

61.4 SEVERAL SMALL TREES GROWING IN CHANNEL ALONG BOTH WINGWALLS AT NORTH ABUTMENT.

222.4 MINOR TO MODERATE TRANSVERSE AND MAP CRACKING (UP TO 1/2"W) OF NORTH APPROACH PAVEMENT WITH VEGETATION GROWTH; ASPHALT PATCHING AT CENTERLINE ALONG EXPANSION JOINT. MINOR RANDOM CRACKING AND TRANSVERSE CRACK ON SOUTH APPROACH PAVEMENT OVER END OF STRUCTURE; MINOR DETERIORATION OF ASPHALT PATCH IN

SOUTHBOUND LANE.

222.5

222.6

NO SIDEWALKS AT APPROACHES. UP TO 7" DROP-OFF AT APPROACH SHOULDERS. RUNOFF FROM NORTHEAST SHOULDER GOES ONTO BRIDGE THROUGH OPEN JOINT IN CURB. MINOR EROSION (1-1/2'L X 1-1/2'W X 1'D) ON WEST SHOULDER OF SOUTH

APPROACH.

222.7 "WEIGHT LIMIT 15 TONS" SIGN ON EAST SIDE OF SOUTH APPROACH AND WEST SIDE OF NORTH APPROACH; NORTH SIGN CAN

BE ROCKED BY HAND.

11' - 3" VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGN ON WEST SHOULDER AT NORTH APPROACH - THIS SIGN IS FOR A BRIDGE THAT IS SOUTH

OF NPS BRIDGE.

DC BRIDGE PLAQUE (STR. # 239) ON NORTHEAST WINGWALL.

222.8 STRUCTURE ON MODERATE HORIZONTAL CURVE.

223.1 MINOR EFFLORESCENCE ON RETAINING WALLS. TREES GROWING ALONG DOWNSTREAM RETAINING WALL.

223.3 MODERATE SCALING (UP TO 1/2"D) OF UPSTREAM RETAINING WALL STEP FOOTING.

223.4 MODERATE SCOUR ALONG RETAINING WALL WITH STEP FOOTINGS EXPOSED APPROXIMATELY 60'L X UP TO 18"H.

36.A

36.B

RAILING HEIGHT OF 3'-1" DOES NOT MEET AASHTO MINIMUM HEIGHT SPECIFICATION OF 3'-6" FOR PEDESTRIAN BARRIERS.

WEST RAILING NOT CONNECTED TO SOUTH APPROACH RAILING. NO APPROACH RAILING PRESENT AT NORTH APPROACH OR

AT SOUTH APPROACH, EAST SIDE.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 3450-003P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 10 9 17 15

HS 13 12 22 20

TYPE 3 12 11 20 18

TYPE 3S2 19 17 31 28

TYPE 3-3 22 20 37 34

DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 11/30/2015

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: SHEAR

REMARKS: BRIDGE IS CURRENTLY POSTED FOR 15 TONS. SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 3450-003P

JOYCE ROAD BR DGE AT MILITARY ROAD INSPECTION DATE: 07/13/2023

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: ROCK CREEK PARK

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............JOYCE ROAD BRIDGE AT MILITARY

ROAD

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........3450-003 P

2 - NATIONAL CAPITAL(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 003P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................PARK

(211) PROJECT NO(S):

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........NONE

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

113 - DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

11001 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

00000

1 6 4 00015 0

LUZON BRANCH

JOYCE ROAD

3450003P0000000

0 3 MILES TO BEACH DRIVE.

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

0 35 (KM PT: 0.56 )

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........1 - CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 04 - TEE BEAM (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............001 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............40 FT ( 12.2 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 40.0 FT ( 12.2 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 0 - UNKNOWN A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 0 - UNKNOWN B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... YES

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. P - POSTED FOR LOAD

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............13 TONS ( 11.8 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 2 - 20.0-29.9% BELOW LEGAL LOADS

(3-5 TONS)

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............22 TONS ( 20 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 07/13/2023 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 3450-003P

JOYCE ROAD BR DGE AT MILITARY ROAD INSPECTION DATE: 07/13/2023

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 38° 57'48.19" N (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 77°02 '19 93" W (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 37.0 FT ( 11.3 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 1 MI ( 2 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............2100 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 40 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2019 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................2310 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2039 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 6 0 FT ( 1.8 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 RIGHT:.................................. 6 0 FT ( 1.8 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:...... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 6 - ALUMINUM

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 3 91 FT ( 1.19 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... 4 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............4 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 6 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N

(61) CHANNEL:................................6 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 6 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 5 - SCOUR WITHIN LIMITS OF

FOOTING OR PILES

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................6 (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 3 - CONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 0 0 N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: B - MAJOR

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 5000

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 0

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 3500000

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

https://57'48.19

Inspector: Osama Tariq Structure Number: 3450003P0000000

Inspection Date: 07/13/2023 Facility Carried: JOYCE ROAD

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD MILITARY ROAD

PHOTO 4

Description WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO 6

Description DETERIORATION OF EXPANSION JOINT AT NORTH END OF STRUCTURE; ALSO NOTE

SPALLING OF TOP OF ABUTMENT BACKWALL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF EXPANSION JOINT AT NORTH END OF STRUCTURE;

SOUTHBOUND LANE SHOWN; ALSO NOTE TYPICAL SPALLING OF TOP OF ABUTMENT

BACKWALL

PHOTO 8

Description TYPICAL SPALLING OF EAST GUTTER; GUTTER NEAR SOUTH END OF STRUCTURE

SHOWN; NOTE DETERIORATION AND UNDERMINING OF WEARING SURFACE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description TYPICAL SPALLING OF EAST GUTTER; GUTTER AT NORTH APPROACH SHOWN; NOTE

DETERIORATION AND UNDERMINING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT AT EXPANSION JOINT

PHOTO 10

Description TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF GROUT PADS UNDER RAIL POSTS; RAIL POST #4 FROM

NORTH ABUTMENT ON EAST RAILING SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description VEGETATION GROWTH AT SOUTH END OF EAST RAILING

PHOTO 12

Description TYPICAL CRACKING OF NORTH APPROACH PAVEMENT WITH VEGETATION GROWTH; 20'

FROM STRUCTURE SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description TYPICAL DROP-OFF FROM SIDEWALKS AT APPROACH SHOULDERS; EAST SHOULDER AT

NORTH APPROACH SHOWN

PHOTO 14

Description EROSION ON WEST SHOULDER AT SOUTH APPROACH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description GENERAL VIEW OF LOAD POSTING, NORTH APPROACH; NOTE SIGN CAN BE ROCKED BY

HAND

PHOTO 16

Description VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGN ON WEST SHOULDER AT NORTH APPROACH FOR BRIDGE

SOUTH OF NPS BRIDGE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO 18

Description TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND LEAKAGE ON DECK UNDERSIDE; DECK

BETWEEN BEAMS #5 AND #6 AT NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 19

Description TYPICAL EXPOSED REBAR ON DECK UNDERSIDE; DECK BETWEEN BEAMS #6 AND #7 AT

SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO 20

Description TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF PAINT WITH RUSTING AND SECTION LOSS ON BEARING

DEVICES AT NORTH ABUTMENT; BEAM #2 SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 21

Description TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF BEAMS WITH EFFLORESCENCE; BEAM #5 NEAR

NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO 22

Description TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF BEAM ENDS AT NORTH ABUTMENT; BEAM #5 SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 23

Description TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF END DIAPHRAGMS AT NORTH ABUTMENT; DIAPHRAGM

BETWEEN BEAMS #4 AND #5 SHOWN

PHOTO 24

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT; NOTE TYPICAL GRAFFITI ON SUPERSTRUCTURE

AND SUBSTRUCTURE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 25

Description TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS; NORTH ABUTMENT

SHOWN

PHOTO 26

Description TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS ON NORTH ABUTMENT BEARING SEATS; SEAT

BETWEEN BEAMS #2 AND #3 SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 27

Description EFFLORESCENCE ALONG HORIZONTAL CONSTRUCTION JOINT AT SOUTH ABUTMENT

BETWEEN BACKWALL AND BREASTWALL

PHOTO 28

Description TYPICAL HORIZONTAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTH ABUTMENT

BACKWALL NEAR TOP BETWEEN BEAMS #2 THROUGH #6; BACKWALL BETWEEN BEAMS

#5 AND #6 SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 29

Description TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF JOINT FILLER MATERIAL AT VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINTS;

NORTHWEST WINGWALL SHOWN

PHOTO 30

Description SCOUR WITH EXPOSED SOUTH ABUTMENT FOOTING

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 31

Description EXPOSED SOUTHEAST WINGWALL AND RETAINING WALL STEP FOOTING; ALSO NOTE

SCALING OF STEP FOOTING

PHOTO 32

Description TREES GROWING ALONG DOWNSTREAM RETAINING WALL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 33

Description UPSTREAM CHANNEL

PHOTO 34

Description DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .