BRDCOM-S3826-reference-questionnaire-2026 NSBDE.pdf
PDF 187 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Lobbying Services
- Solicitation number
- BRDCOM-S3826
- Issued by
- Nevada
About this file
This is a reference questionnaire form issued by the Nevada State Purchasing Division, Department of Administration, on behalf of the Nevada State Board of Dental Examiners for Solicitation Number BRDCOM-S3826 regarding Lobbying Services. The questionnaire is designed to be completed by current or former clients of proposing vendors or subcontractors to provide feedback on their experience with similar projects of comparable size and scope. The completed reference questionnaire must be submitted to the single point of contact, A.L. Higginbotham at ahigginbotham@dental.nv.gov, no later than May 5, 2026, with the solicitation number included in the subject line. References are requested to provide candid responses without returning the form to the proposing vendor, with all responses designated as confidential business information pursuant to Nevada Revised Statutes 333.020 and 333.333.
The questionnaire requires references to rate vendors on thirteen evaluation criteria using a 1-10 scale, where ratings of 0 indicate poor or inadequate performance, 1-3 indicate below average performance, 4-6 indicate average performance, 7-9 indicate above average performance, and 10 indicates exceptional performance. The evaluation criteria include vendor knowledge and expertise, flexibility relative to changes in scope and timelines, satisfaction with delivered materials and products, staff dynamics and interaction, schedule adherence and timeliness of deliverables, customer service and issue resolution capabilities, billing accuracy and timeliness, ability to resolve service-related problems, flexibility in meeting business requirements, and local office responsiveness where applicable. References must also provide narrative responses identifying the capacity in which they worked with the vendor, the most satisfying aspects of the vendor's services, and their likelihood of recommending the vendor to others in the future.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Scope of Work - Lobbying ServicesBRDCOM-S3826.pdf | ||
| InsReqForContracts~1.docx | DOCX document | |
| Terms-and-conditions-for-services~2.pdf | ||
| Cost Schedule BRDCOM-S3822~1.pdf | ||
| Certification-regarding-lobbying~1.pdf | ||
| BRDCOM-S3826-request-for-proposals-2026-~1.pdf | ||
| standard-form-contract2~1.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Nevada State Purchasing Division Department of Administration 515 E Musser St Ste 300 Carson City, NV 89701 purchasing.nv.gov nevadaepro.com
Revised 2024-10 Page 1 of 2
Reference questionnaire
Due Date
Solicitation number
Single point of contact name
Single point of contact email
Proposing vendor or subcontractor
Client providing the reference
Client contact name and title
Client telephone and email
Period of performance
1. CLIENT REFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS
1.1. As part of a formal solicitation the State of Nevada has requested vendors provide references from current and/or former clients for projects of similar size and scope. This reference questionnaire is to provide a client reference for the proposing vendor or subcontractor above. Once you have completed the reference questionnaire, please submit to the single point of contact via email, with the solicitation number in the subject line, no later than the due date above.
1.2. The State requests all questions be answered. If an answer is not known, please answer as ‘U/K’. If the question is not applicable, please answer as ‘N/A’. If additional space is needed to answer a question or provide a comment, please attach additional pages. If attaching additional pages, please place your company/organization name on each page and reference the appropriate RFP number.
1.3. Do not return the completed reference questionnaire to the proposing vendor. To allow for candid responses, completed reference questionnaires are designated as confidential business information by the Administrator pursuant to NRS 333.020(5(b) and not public information pursuant to NRS 333.333. In addition to the reference questionnaire, the State may contact references for further clarification.
1.1. Where a rating is requested, please provide a rating between 1-10. For all items, please provide any comments you feel would be helpful to the State in evaluation below each item. Poor or inadequate performance: 0; Below average performance: 1-3; Average performance: 4-6; Above average performance: 7-9; Exceptional performance: 10.
2. EVALUATION ITEMS
2.1. In what capacity have you worked with this vendor in the past? (no rating) https://purchasing.nv.gov/ https://nevadaepro.com/ https://www.leg.state.nv.us/nrs/nrs-333.html#NRS333Sec020 https://www.leg.state.nv.us/nrs/nrs-333.html#NRS333Sec020 https://www.leg.state.nv.us/nrs/nrs-333.html#NRS333Sec333
Page 2 of 2 Reference questionnaire
2.2. Vendor’s knowledge and expertise, rating:
2.3. Vendor’s flexibility relative to changes in scope and timelines, rating:
2.4. Your satisfaction with delivered materials, rating:
2.5. Dynamics and interaction between the vendor and your staff, rating:
2.6. Your satisfaction with products developed by the vendor, rating:
2.7. Was the schedule met and deliverables timely? Rating:
2.8. Overall customer service and timeliness in response and issue resolution, rating:
2.9. Accuracy and timeliness of billing, rating:
2.10. Vendor’s ability to quickly and thoroughly resolve a service-related problem, rating:
2.11. Vendor’s flexibility in meeting business requirements, rating:
2.12. Response time and customer service of local office, if applicable, rating:
2.13. Likelihood of recommending this vendor to others in the future, rating:
2.14. Which aspects of this vendor’s services are you most satisfied with? (no rating)
2.15. Would you recommend this vendor to your organization again? (no rating)
| 1. Client reference instructions |
| 1.1. As part of a formal solicitation the State of Nevada has requested vendors provide references from current and/or former clients for projects of similar size and scope. This reference questionnaire is to provide a client reference for the proposi... |
| 1.2. The State requests all questions be answered. If an answer is not known, please answer as ‘U/K’. If the question is not applicable, please answer as ‘N/A’. If additional space is needed to answer a question or provide a comment, please attach add... |
| 1.3. Do not return the completed reference questionnaire to the proposing vendor. To allow for candid responses, completed reference questionnaires are designated as confidential business information by the Administrator pursuant to NRS 333.020(5(b) a... |
| 1.1. Where a rating is requested, please provide a rating between 1-10. For all items, please provide any comments you feel would be helpful to the State in evaluation below each item. Poor or inadequate performance: 0; Below average performance: 1-3;... |
| 2. Evaluation items |
| 2.1. In what capacity have you worked with this vendor in the past? (no rating) |
| 2.2. Vendor’s knowledge and expertise, rating: |
| 2.3. Vendor’s flexibility relative to changes in scope and timelines, rating: |
| 2.4. Your satisfaction with delivered materials, rating: |
| 2.5. Dynamics and interaction between the vendor and your staff, rating: |
| 2.6. Your satisfaction with products developed by the vendor, rating: |
| 2.7. Was the schedule met and deliverables timely? Rating: |
| 2.8. Overall customer service and timeliness in response and issue resolution, rating: |
| 2.9. Accuracy and timeliness of billing, rating: |
| 2.10. Vendor’s ability to quickly and thoroughly resolve a service-related problem, rating: |
| 2.11. Vendor’s flexibility in meeting business requirements, rating: |
| 2.12. Response time and customer service of local office, if applicable, rating: |
| 2.13. Likelihood of recommending this vendor to others in the future, rating: |
| 2.14. Which aspects of this vendor’s services are you most satisfied with? (no rating) |
| 2.15. Would you recommend this vendor to your organization again? (no rating) |
| text2: |
| 1: |
| 2: |
| 3: |
| 4: |
| 5: |
| 6: |
| 7: |
| 8: |
| 9: |
| 10: |
| 211: |
| 12: |
| 13: |
| 14: |
| 15: |
| rating2: |
| 2: |
| 3: |
| 4: |
| 5: |
| 6: |
| 7: |
| 8: |
| 9: |
| 10: |
| 11: |
| 12: |
| 13: |
| Due-date: 5/5/2026 |
| Solicitation-number: BRDCOM-S3826 |
| POC-name: A.L. Higginbotham |
| POC-email: ahigginbotham@dental.nv.gov |
| Proposing-vendor-or-subcontractor: |
| Client-providing-the-reference: |
| Client-contact-name-and-title: |
| Client-telephone-and-email: |
| Period-of-performance: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .