BPM007007 Evaluation Report.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 40 KB Posted

Attached to
Government Relations Services
Solicitation number
BPM007007
Issued by
Maricopa County, Phoenix City, Arizona

About this file

This is an Evaluation Report for Solicitation #BPM007007, Government Relations Services, issued by the State of Arizona Department of Education (ADE). The evaluation assessed proposals using a 1,000-point rating scale across three criteria: Method of Approach (460 points maximum), Experience and Expertise (290 points maximum), and Cost (250 points maximum). The solicitation was posted on June 24, 2025, with proposals due by June 27, 2025. The evaluation document does not specify site visits, bidders' conferences, award dates, or contract term details; however, it indicates that proposals were evaluated during a competitive procurement process with multiple offerors submitting responses for consideration.

The Strongin Group LLC was the evaluated offeror, receiving a total score of 785 out of 1,000 points. The firm scored 337.50 points in Method of Approach (rated as Meets Expectations), 197.50 points in Experience and Expertise (rated as Meets Expectations), and a perfect 250 points in Cost. The evaluation highlighted the offeror's strong understanding of ADE's legislative agenda, extensive experience collaborating with the agency, comprehensive legislative tracking capabilities, and senior-level staffing assignments. The rating definitions indicate that proposals meeting expectations receive 50-75% of available points, while those exceeding expectations receive 100% of points. The evaluation document does not specify pricing details, set-asides, incumbent information, or contract funding sources, though the perfect cost rating suggests the offeror's pricing proposal was evaluated favorably against the agency's budget parameters.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
BPM007007_Requirements_Document_Government_Relations_Services.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT VIII DESIGNATION_OF_CONFIDENTIAL_FORM.pdf PDF
Affidavit.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT IX PARTICIPATION_IN_BOYCOTT_OF_ISRAEL.pdf PDF
BPM007007_Special_and_Standard_Instructions_to_Offerors.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT III Price Sheet.pdf PDF
BPM007007_Special_and_Standard_Instructions_to_Offerors_v2.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT VI CONFORMANCE_STATEMENTS_DEVIATIONS_AND_EXCEPTIONS__FORM.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT IV OFFER_AND_ACCEPTANCE_-_STRONGIN_GROUP_.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT I QUESTIONNAIRE_ADE.pdf PDF
BPM007007 Contract Award and Executive Summary Determination.pdf PDF
CERTIFICATE_OF_LIABILITY_INSURANCE.pdf PDF
Solicitation_Amendment_No._1 (1).pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT_X_FORCED_LABOR_OF_ETHNIC_UYGHURS.pdf PDF
Tim_McCain_SPO_Form_120_-_Procurement_Disclosure_Statement__rev_08-14__-_Signed.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT VII PROPRIETARY_SUBMITTALS.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT V.pdf PDF
BPM007007 Award Letter(001).pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT_IV_OFFER_AND_ACCEPTANCE_-_STRONGIN_GROUP(001).pdf PDF
Solicitation_Amendment_No._1.pdf PDF
BPM007007_Solicitation_Attachment_Government_Relation_Services.docx DOCX document
Attachment II OFFEROR_S_REFERENCE.pdf PDF
One Offer Received Determination.pdf PDF
Maria_Syms_SPO_Form_120_-_Procurement_Disclosure_Statement__rev_0_-_Copy.pdf PDF
Show all 24

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Evaluation Report

hiddenEVALUATION REPORT
Solicitation # BPM007007
Government Relations Services
Rating Definitions for Criteria 1 and 2
Exceeds Expectations = Proposal meets all requirement(s) outlined in the RFP but also provides innovative or exceptional responses. (100% of Points)
Meets Plus = The response fully addresses the requirement(s) of the RFP but also indicates a superior or well thought out service that exceeds expectations relating to the Scope of Work. (75% of points)
Meets Expectations = Proposal meets requirement(s) outlined in the RFP. (50 - 75% of points)
Below Expectation = Proposal doesn’t fully meet or doesn’t completely address requirement(s) of the RFP. (25 - 50% of points)
Unacceptable = Elements of the proposal that are unacceptable to the State. (0 - 25% points)
Offerors
The Strongin Group LLC
1. Method of Approach
(460 Points Maximum)Rating:PointsRating:PointsRating:Points
Meets Expectations337.50
Comments:STRENGTHS: The Offeror's response demonstrates a strong understanding of ADE agenda through a well established history of collaboration. The Offeror's exensive experience with ADE's legislative agenda reflects a deep familirarity with the agency's priorities and policy landscape. The Offeror's response describes their efforts to halt or reshape harmful legslation to the future of ADE.The Offeror will focus on budget priorities and prevent detrimental bills which demonstrate excellent strategic alignment. The Offeror's response demonstrates a well-developed and strategic plan for serving as a liaison with government entities. The Offeror's relations drive approach is a notable strength that enhances their ability to navigate complex stakeholder environments. The Offeror also displayed excellent knowledge of external organizations and key relationships indicating a high level of preparedness and insight that exceeds the expectations. The Offeror’s response demonstrates a comprehensive and proactive approach to legislative tracking. Their detailed plan includes daily bill monitoring and real-time analysis, which are critical to supporting ADE’s responsiveness to evolving legislative developments. The emphasis on timely communication with stakeholders further enhances their ability to keep key parties informed and engaged. The Offeror’s response presents a well-developed plan for effectively communicating ADE’s legislative interests. Their demonstrated experience in representing ADE during legislative meetings highlights a strong understanding of the agency’s priorities and protocols. Additionally, the emphasis on preparing high-quality briefing materials and supporting documents reflects a proactive and strategic approach to stakeholder engagement. The Offeror’s response presents a well-structured and proactive plan for consistent meeting attendance and responsiveness. Their approach to engaging ADE staff with external stakeholders is particularly strong, ensuring that internal teams remain well-informed on legislative developments. Additionally, the plan outlines effective collaboration with ADE subject matter experts (SMEs), demonstrating a clear commitment to internal alignment and informed decision-making. The Offeror’s response outlines a clear and proactive plan for responding to inquiries in a timely manner. The inclusion of real-time alerts for time-sensitive situations demonstrates a strong commitment to responsiveness and situational awareness. Additionally, the goal of maintaining a one-business day response time reflects a high standard of service and accountability. The Offeror's response demonstrates an adaptable approach with adequate flexibility built into the proposal to accommodate evolving needs. The example provided clearly illustrates their ability to adjust effectively, reinforcing confidence in their capacity for future responsiveness. Their understanding of the complexities surrounding late-session bills further highlights their awareness of the dynamic legislative environment.
2. Experience and Expertise
(290 Points Maximum)Rating:PointsRating:PointsRating:Points
Meets Expectations197.50
Comments:STRENGTHS: The Offeror’s response provides a strong overview of prior legislative successes and relevant experience. The Strongin Group brings a wealth of institutional knowledge, including a proven track record of effective collaboration with the Arizona Department of Education (ADE). Their extensive experience working with this agency demonstrates a deep understanding of its legislative priorities and operational contex. The Offeror’s response includes resumes that reflect a highly qualified team with extensive experience in government affairs. The key individuals bring a strong track record of relevant expertise, demonstrating deep knowledge of legislative processes and stakeholder engagement. The Offeror’s entire response provides a detailed and well-articulated narrative highlighting their extensive experience. Their ability to assign senior-level professionals to support the agency demonstrates both depth of expertise and a strong commitment to high-quality service delivery. The clarity and strength of their explanation reflect a high level of capability and readiness, exceeding the expectations outlined in the RFP.
3. Cost (250 Points Maximum)PointsPointsPoints
250.00

Total Max. Points 1000 Total Score 785.00 Total Score 0.00 Total Score 0.00

X0AO

X0AO

X0AO

X0AO

X0AO

image4.emf image5.emf image1.emf image2.emf image3.emf

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .