BPM005267 Responsibility Responsiveness Form.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 16 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Master Agreement AZ|CTR067133
- Contract number
- CTR067133
- Issued by
- Arizona
About this file
This document is a Responsibility, Responsiveness, and Susceptibility Form for Solicitation BPM005238, focusing on Air Quality Specialized Technical Services. The form evaluates two offerors: Environmental Technology Inc and Williams & Co Consulting Inc (Energy & Environmental Advisors Inc), with the procurement being managed by Jeremiah Weiner, likely for a state or local government agency.
The solicitation appears to be for technical services related to air quality, with a comprehensive evaluation process that assesses offerors' legal qualifications, performance history, financial stability, and ability to meet contract requirements. Environmental Technology Inc submitted a complete offer and met all evaluation criteria, while Williams & Co Consulting Inc had deficiencies, specifically failing to provide financial documentation to prove financial stability. The document indicates a rigorous vendor selection process that examines multiple dimensions of contractor capability beyond just pricing, with a focus on verifying the offeror's capacity to successfully execute the proposed work.
View the file
Other files
Show all 45
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| Responsibility, Responsiveness and Susceptibility Form |
| Solicitation: BPM005238 |
| Description: AIR QUALITY SPECIALIZED TECHNICAL SERVICES |
| Procurement Officer: JEREMIAH WEINER |
| Need All of these to be "YES" (for Offer to be Responsible, Responsive, and Susceptible for award): | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Offeror # (Used During Evaluation) | Offeror Name | Exceptions (Y/N) [If Exceptions, note the Exceptions here and note any status updates to Offeror in response]Attachment 5B, Supplement #1 Tracker | |||||||||||||||||||||
| see Link to Tracker Template | Confidential (Y/N) [If Offeror Marked, then note what was marked Confidential and note any status updates to Offeror in response] | Offer $Amount | #References Provided | Subcontractor Name(s) | Offer contained all Attachment Forms (Y/N) [identify any missing/not completed Attachments] | Solicitation Amendments Acknowledged by Supplier (Y/N) | Completion Schedule Date Proposed | Ranking after Evaluation | Score after Evaluation | Offeror has not had a contract within the last five (5) years that was terminated for cause due to breach or similar failure to comply with the terms of the contract. | Offeror’s record of performance does not include factual evidence of failure to satisfy the terms of the Offeror’s agreements with any party to a contract. Factual evidence may consist of documented Contractor performance reports, customer complaints and/or negative references. | Offeror is legally qualified to contract with the State and the Offeror’s financial, business, personnel, or other resources, including subcontractors. | Offeror is legally qualified as neither the Contractor nor Key Personnel have been debarred, suspended or otherwise lawfully prohibited from participating in any public procurement activity, including but not limited to, being disapproved as a subcontractor of any public procurement unit or other governmental body. | Offeror promptly supplied all requested information concerning its responsibility. | Offer was sufficient to permit evaluation by the State, in accordance with evaluation criteria identified in solicitation or other necessary offer components. Necessary offer components include: attachments, documents/forms to be submitted with the offer, indication of the Offeror's intent to be bound, reasonable or acceptable approach to perform the Scope of Work, acknowledged Solicitation Amendments, references to include experience verification, adequacy of financial/business/personal or other resources to include stability including subcontractors and any other data specifically requested in Solicitation. | Offer was in conformance with the requirements contained in the Scope of Work, Terms and Conditions, and Instructions for the Solicitation including its Amendments and all documents incorporated by reference. | Offer does not limit the rights of the State. | Offer does not include nor is is Offer subject to unreasonable conditions, to include conditions upon the State necessary for successful Contract performance. The State shall be the sole determiner as to the reasonableness of a condition. | Offer does not materially change the contents set forth in the Solicitation, which includes the Scope of Work, Terms and Conditions, or Instructions. | Offeror did not provide misleading or inaccurate information. | |||
| N/A | Environmental Technology Inc | No | No | Submitted | Yes | None | N/A | N/A | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | T | Y | Y |
| N/A | Williams & Co Consulting Inc | |||||||||||||||||
| (Energy & Environmental Advisors Inc) (Company changed named without iniating name change process in APP ?) | N | N | Submitted | N | #3 Did not provide financial documentation to prove Financial Stability | N/A | N/A | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Enter "N/A" if does not apply
NOTES:
Rev. 12-18-2018 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ASK9RDqmlMxyGAqSRho4Ntqj5AXU44Eg/edit Sheet2
Sheet3
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .