BPM005267 BAFO Consensus Evaluation Report - Executed.pdf
PDF 301 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Master Agreement AZ|CTR067133
- Contract number
- CTR067133
- Issued by
- Arizona
About this file
This is an Evaluation Report for Solicitation No. BPM005267 for UST Inspections, involving an evaluation committee from a state procurement process. The document details the assessment of proposals from two offerors: Williams & Co. Consulting (Energy & Environmental Advisors, Inc.) and Environmental Technology. The evaluation was conducted by committee members including Joey Kiker, Jason Kocer, Stephen Johnson, and Procurement Officer Jeremiah Weiner, who ultimately recommended awarding the contract to Williams & Co. Consulting, Inc.
The solicitation appears to be for Air Quality Specialized Technical Services, with a total possible score of 1000 points across three evaluation criteria: Experience, Capacity, and Organization (450 points), Method of Approach (350 points), and Price Proposal (200 points). Williams & Co. Consulting scored 882 total points, receiving "Exceeds Expectations" for Experience and "Above Expectations" for Method of Approach, while Environmental Technology received "Below Expectation" ratings in both categories. The scoring methodology involved detailed rating definitions and a formula for calculating price points, with the final recommendation based on the most advantageous proposal to the state.
View the file
Other files
Show all 45
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
EVALUATION REPORT
Solicitation No. BPM005267 Description:
Rating Definitions for Criteria 1 and 2
Formula for Scoring Overall Price (Criteria 3)
Total Score
Weight
1 - Experience, Capacity, Organization, Expertise of Offeror's Key Personnel and Organization = 450 points
1.1 Experience, Capacity, Organization, Expertise of
Offeror's Key Personnel and Organization Exceeds Expectations 450 Below Expectation 112.5
Weight 2 - Offeror's Method of Approach = 350 points
350 2.1 Method of Approach Above Expectations 262.5 Below Expectation 87.5
Weight 3 - Offeror's Price Proposal = 200 points
200 169 200
Comments
Evaluator Name: Joey Kiker Date Date
Evaluator Name: Jason Kocer Date Date
Evaluator Name: Stephen Johnson
Procurement Officer: Jeremiah Weiner
As a participating member of the evaluation committee, I agree with the information provided in this document and concur that the consensus scoring is a complete and accurate reflection of the committee's agreement regarding the evaluation of the proposals received. This evaluation report accurately and completely reflects the opinion of the committee as a whole. In accordance with Solicitation Special Instructions to Offerors, Section 7.0 Award of Contract, contract will be awarded to the following responsible offeror whose offer is determined to be most advantageous to the State based on the Special Instructions to Offerors Section 6.5 Evaluation Criteria: Williams & Co. Consulting, Inc.
UST Inspections - BAFO
"UST Inspections" For each evaluation criteria that follows, a determination was made regarding how well the proposals satisfied the stated requirements. The rating definitions, found below, formed the basis for determining the scores assigned to each proposal. The comments fields were used to note strengths and weaknesses of the proposal.
Offerors Williams & Co Consulting (Energy & Environmental Advisors, Inc.)
Exceeds Expectations = Proposal is very detailed, indicates a clear understanding of the RFP and provides innovative or exceptional responses.
Above Expectations = Proposal meets all requirement(s) outlined in the RFP but also provides a response that goes beyond what is required.
Meets Expectations = Proposal meets requirement(s) outlined in the RFP.
Below Expectation = Proposal doesn’t fully meet or doesn’t completely address requirement(s) of the RFP
Environmental Technology
Unacceptable = Elements of the proposal that are unacceptable to the State.
Lowest Price / Offered Price X Maximum Points = Awarded Points
262.5
112.5
87.5
The members of the evaluation committee have completed their review of the proposals and any subsequent best and final offers received in response to Solicitation No. BPM005238, for Air Quality Specialized Technical Services, and have reached consensus. Based on the detailed evaluation of the individual proposals, it would be in the best interest of the State, to award a contract(s) to: Williams & Co. Consulting, Inc.
169 200
Rev. 12-18-2018
6/22/2023 6/21/2023
6/21/2023 6/22/2023
AREA 1
| 2023-06-23T08:50:25-0700 | |
| Digitally verifiable PDF exported from www.docusign.com |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .