7 PBS PPQ Word Format 2026 05 07.doc

file_0.jpg

PBS Past Performance Questionnaire July 2014

PBS PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor/Offeror to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR INFORMATION

Firm Name:

Address:

Phone Number: DUNs Number:

Contact Name Email Address: : Contact Phone Number:

2. GENERAL WORK INFORMATION

Work performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Please explain):

Percent (%) of project work performed:

If a subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. CONTRACT INFORMATION

Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please explain) Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable): Explain Differences:

4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Complexity of Work: High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

INSTRUCTIONS FOR CLIENTS COMPLETING THIS QUESTIONNAIRE: PBS requests that the client completes this questionnaire and submits it directly back to the offeror. The offeror will submit the completed questionnaire to PBS with their proposal, and may duplicate this questionnaire for future submission on PBS solicitations. Clients are highly encouraged to submit questionnaires directly to the offeror. However, questionnaires may be submitted directly to PBS. Please contact the offeror for PBS POC information. The government reserves the right to verify any and all information on this form.

Use the following adjective ratings and definitions in your evaluation of the Contractor’s performance.

RATING

DEFINITION

NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable No information or did not apply to your contract Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

CLIENT INFORMATION

Client Point of Contact Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number: Email Address:

Project Information Contract Type: Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Describe your role in the project:

Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

Client’s Signature:

Instructions: Please select the adjective rating that best reflects your evaluation of the contractor’s performance.

1. QUALITY:

E

VG

S M U N

(a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts.

file_1.bin file_2.bin file_3.bin file_4.bin file_5.bin file_6.bin

(b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance.

file_7.bin file_8.bin file_9.bin file_10.bin file_11.bin file_12.bin

(c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance.

file_13.bin file_14.bin file_15.bin file_16.bin file_17.bin file_18.bin

(d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance).

file_19.bin file_20.bin file_21.bin file_22.bin file_23.bin file_24.bin

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

E

VG

S M U N

(a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below.)

file_25.bin file_26.bin file_27.bin file_28.bin file_29.bin file_30.bin

(b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract.

file_31.bin file_32.bin file_33.bin file_34.bin file_35.bin file_36.bin

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

VG

S M U N

(a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project?

file_37.bin file_38.bin file_39.bin file_40.bin file_41.bin file_42.bin

(b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication).

file_43.bin file_44.bin file_45.bin file_46.bin file_47.bin file_48.bin

(c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

file_49.bin file_50.bin file_51.bin file_52.bin file_53.bin file_54.bin

(d) Overall customer satisfaction.

file_55.bin file_56.bin file_57.bin file_58.bin file_59.bin file_60.bin

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

VG

S M U N

(a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

file_61.bin file_62.bin file_63.bin file_64.bin file_65.bin file_66.bin

(b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort.

file_67.bin file_68.bin file_69.bin file_70.bin file_71.bin file_72.bin

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR - Continued

VG

S M U N

(c) Government Property Control.

file_73.bin file_74.bin file_75.bin file_76.bin file_77.bin file_78.bin

(d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel.

file_79.bin file_80.bin file_81.bin file_82.bin file_83.bin file_84.bin

(e) Utilization of Small Business concerns.

file_85.bin file_86.bin file_87.bin file_88.bin file_89.bin file_90.bin

(f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines.

file_91.bin file_92.bin file_93.bin file_94.bin file_95.bin file_96.bin

(g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes.

file_97.bin file_98.bin file_99.bin file_100.bin file_101.bin file_102.bin

(h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program).

file_103.bin file_104.bin file_105.bin file_106.bin file_107.bin file_108.bin

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

VG

S M U N

(a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

file_109.bin file_110.bin file_111.bin file_112.bin file_113.bin file_114.bin

(b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client.

file_115.bin file_116.bin file_117.bin file_118.bin file_119.bin file_120.bin

(c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, or a CMc/CMc at Risk Contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns).

file_121.bin file_122.bin file_123.bin file_124.bin file_125.bin file_126.bin

(d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? (If no, please explain in comment section below.)

Yes

No

(e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? (Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.)

(f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? (If yes, please explain in the comment section below.)

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

E

VG

S M U N

(a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.).

file_127.bin file_128.bin file_129.bin file_130.bin file_131.bin file_132.bin

(b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

file_133.bin file_134.bin file_135.bin file_136.bin file_137.bin file_138.bin

7. GENERAL

VG

S M U N

(a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

file_139.bin file_140.bin file_141.bin file_142.bin file_143.bin file_144.bin

(b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (If there were specific issues, please explain in the comments sections below file_145.bin file_146.bin file_147.bin file_148.bin file_149.bin file_150.bin

(c) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

file_151.bin file_152.bin file_153.bin file_154.bin file_155.bin file_156.bin

8. SUSTAINABILITY

Did this project include sustainable methods, materials, processes or certifications? (See Whole Building Design Guide for acceptable requirements. Link to guide WBDG Green Building Standards and Certification Systems.) (If yes, please explain in the comments section below.)

Yes No

9. SUMMARY

Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain in the comments section below.)

Yes No

COMMENTS SECTION

Please provide additional information below, and attach additional pages if necessary.

Please provide responses to the above questions (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Also please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):