B08(g) 00404798708 Past Performance Questionnaire Attachment 5.docx
DOCX document 23 KB Posted
- Attached to
- NAMA LOHO Exhibit Fabrication & Installation Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140P3020Q0017
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a federal contract opportunity. The past performance questionnaire is seeking input on a contractor's performance on a previous digital evidence management system contract. It requests ratings and commentary on the contractor's management, workforce, security clearances, quality control, timeliness, reporting, responsiveness, service support, flexibility, customer satisfaction, and professionalism.
The related federal contract opportunity is a solicitation from the Department of the Interior National Park Service for exhibit design, fabrication, and installation services at the National Mall & Memorial Park's Lockkeeper's House. The contractor will design a 10-15 minute visitor experience incorporating interpretive exhibits, audiovisual programs, lighting, and any facility alterations. The project value is between $975,000 to $1,200,000. The acquisition is set aside for small businesses in NAICS codes 541410 for interior design or 541490 for other specialized design. Offerors must have active SAM registration including representations and certifications. The award will be fixed price and based on best value tradeoff evaluation of price and non-price factors.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 29
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP Attachment #5 Past Performance Questionnaire
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
DIGITAL EVIDENCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (DEMS)
NOTICE: WHEN COMPLETED, THIS QUESTIONNAIRE WILL BE CONSIDERED SENSITIVE AND WILL NOT BE RELEASED TO THE OFFEROR.
I. Please provide the following information about yourself:
Name of Respondent and Role Relative to Contract (Buyer, Program Manager, etc.)
Name:
Role:
Agency or Business:
Address:
Telephone No.:
Email address:
II. Please provide the following information on the specific program:
Contractor/Business:
Contract Number:
Program Title and Brief Description:
Contractor’s Role in the Program:
Prime
Subcontractor
Vendor/Supplier
| Number of Years: |
| Basic: |
Option:
| Competitive Contract: |
| Yes: |
No:
III. General Information about this Contract Period of Performance of Contract or Effort Beginning Date (mm/yyyy)
Through (mm/yyyy)
Have there been any changes to the original schedule? If yes, please explain.
| Original Contract Dollar Value |
| $ |
| Current Contract Dollar Value |
| $ |
IV. The following section will require you to rate the past/present performance of the offeror. Should your response be other than “satisfactory,” please provide supporting documentation. If supporting documentation is not provided for ratings that are other than “satisfactory,” the ratings will be considered to be unsubstantiated and will be interpreted as satisfactory. To assist you in your evaluation, please use the following definitions:
E EXCEPTIONAL: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
V VERY GOOD: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
S SATISFACTORY: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
M MARGINAL: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
U UNSATISFACTORY: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N/A NOT APPLICABLE: Did not apply to this acquisition; or, questionnaire respondent has no knowledge of, and/or did not observe, the contractor’s performance in this area.
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
| N/A |
| U |
| N |
| S |
| V |
| E |
1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2. Hired, trained, and applied a qualified workforce to this effort.
3. Acquired appropriate security clearances for personnel, as required.
4. Provides effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
5. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
6. Provided accurate and complete reports, invoices, and documentation in a timely manner.
7. Provided timely and responsive service.
8. Offered responsive IT service support to resolve IT and equipment maintenance issues.
9. Demonstrated positive responsiveness to unscheduled requirements or contract changes.
10. Overall commitment to customer satisfaction.
11. Demonstrated professionalism and courtesy in dealing with customers.
12. How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance for this contract?
Additional Comments for 1-12: (please indicate number next to comment)
V. Miscellaneous Questions
18. Has action been initiated to cancel or terminate the contract for default? If yes, explain.
19. Have there been any disputes/claims relative to the contract? If yes, explain.
20. Describe the contractor’s or companies strong and/or weak points identified during the life of the contract.
21. If given a choice, would you award to this contractor again? If not, please explain.
22. Do you feel you “got what you paid for”? Please explain.
23. Additional Remarks.
The comments and information you’ve provided are invaluable to the source selection process. The Department of the Interior thanks you for taking the time to fill out this questionnaire.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .