B08_RFP_VOL_I.docx

PERRY’S VICTORY AND INTERNATIONAL PEACE MEMORIAL 140P2021R133

RESTORE NORTH AND SOUTH SEAWALLS

PEVI-200745

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)

VOLUME I

Proposal Submission Package

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE DENVER SERVICE CENTER

Revise the list below per the specific solicitation’s sections L and M.

For Technical Volume I:

(Include the following questionnaires if they are specifically required by section L or M of the solicitation)

1. Experience Questionnaire

2. Subcontractor Reference

3. Key Personnel Qualifications

4. Past Performance Questionnaire

For Business & Price Volume II:

1. SF 24 Bid Bond (include for competitive solicitations)

2. Contract Price Schedule (should match the price schedule shown in section “B” of the solicitation)

3. General References (include if needed for check of contractor responsibility)

4. Proposed Equals (include if project specifications lists products as brand name or equal)

5. Hazardous Materials Identification Listing

6. Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Include for Full and Open solicitations)

7. Report on Limitation on Subcontracting (Include for socio- economic sole source and set-aside solicitations)

Project Experience Questionnaire Solicitation: 140P2021R0133 Submit responses to the questions below that address experience relative to the elements noted under the Project Experience evaluation subfactor in solicitation section L. Limit submittals to the quantity of projects and timeframes required in the solicitation. Expand the response sections shown below as needed to adequately address each question (this questionnaire may be expanded to multiple pages if needed).

REFERENCED PROJECT INFORMATION

CONTRACTOR LIST

List Contractor(s) whose experience on the referenced project is being submitted for evaluation on this proposed project. If more than one contractor is listed (i.e. prime and subcontractors), provide information specific to that contractor.

Contractor Name

Role on Referenced Project (Prime or Sub)

Trade

Price (list for each contractor’s specific work) Performance Period (calendar days) (list for each contractor’s specific work)

Subcontractor

PROJECT EXPERIENCE QUESTIONS

1. Describe the project work performed by all contractors listed above.

Response

2. Identify which Project Experience elements listed in section L of the solicitation each contractor’s work addresses.

Response

3. Describe & provide reasons for any changes to the original price for the work described in question 2 above.

Response

4. Describe and provide reasons for any changes to the original schedule for the work described in question 2 above.

Response

5. Describe problems, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were encountered and how they were resolved. Describe how the offeror’s proposal accounts for similar issues.

Response

6. Describe the means and methods, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were successful. Would you implement the same means and methods on the proposed project? Why or why not?

Response

7. Provide any other additional project information you believe should be presented.

Response

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

INSTRUCTIONS: Offeror to complete Sections A and B and transmit questionnaire to reference. Reference to complete Sections C and D and transmit back to Contracting Officer listed in section E.

A. CONTRACTOR INFORMATION

B. CONTRACT INFORMATION

Brief description of the contract & work effort:

Scope of work description

C. REFERENCE:

D. EVALUATION

Exceptional Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Quality

Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Schedule (& Time Management)

Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Cost Control

Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Management

Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards)

Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Regulatory Compliance

Overall Recommendation:

Overall Comments:

E. RETURN:

image1.png