B08_Attachment_8_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 412 KB Posted
- Attached to
- YOSE- REHAB WELL HOUSES 2/6 AND 3/7
- Solicitation number
- 140P8524R0006
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire that is to be completed by the offeror and submitted with their technical proposal for RFP No. 140P8524R0002. It requests the offeror to provide information on a past contract, including the contract number, type, award amount, and performance dates. The agency (customer) information section is to be completed by the government's Technical Evaluation Panel. The questionnaire then provides a rating scale and evaluation criteria for assessing the offeror's past performance in areas such as quality, timeliness, and business relations. The related federal contract opportunity is for the rehabilitation of Well Houses 2/6 and 3/7 in Yosemite National Park, which is a $500,000 to $1,000,000 construction project set aside for small businesses under NAICS code 237110. Proposals are due by 12:00 PM PST on July 15, 2024.
View the file
Other files
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP No. 140P8524R0002 Section J – Attachment No. 8
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
(OFFEROR: COMPLETE SECTIONS I AND II AND SUBMIT WITH THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL)
I. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NO.:
CONTRACTOR ADDRESS: CONTRACT TYPE:
FIRM-FIXED-PRICE
COST REIMBURSEMENT
OTHER
ACTIVE COMPLETED
ROUTINE COMPLEX
DATES OF PERFORMANCE: AWARD AMOUNT $
TOTAL WITH MODS $
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
RFP No. 140P8524R0002 Section J – Attachment No. 8
II. AGENCY (CUSTOMER) IDENTIFICATION
AGENCY (CUSTOMER) NAME:
POC NAME/TITLE/PHONE:
***Government Use Only – The following to be completed by Technical Evaluation Panel***
III. PAST PERFORMANCE RATING
Rating Scale: E = Excellent references are excellent in all respects G = Good references indicate good performance on past projects A = Acceptable references indicate acceptable performance on past projects M = Marginal references indicate marginal performance on past projects U = Unacceptable references indicate unacceptable performance on past projects N = Neutral no performance information was provided or available
1. QUALITY: (circle applicable rating)
a. Conformance with contract requirements E G A M U N
b. Quality of workmanship (including subcontractors) E G A M U N
c. General oversight by project manager and superintendent E G A M U N
d. Coordination with and control of subcontractors E G A M U N
e. Compliance with Davis-Bacon wage rate and labor usage requirements E G A M U N
f. Avoidance of accidents/safety violations E G A M U N
2. TIMELINESS:
a. Adherence to project delivery schedules E G A M U N
b. Submission of change proposals E G A M U N
c. Response to technical direction and change orders E G A M U N
d. Response to correction of identified problems E G A M U N
e. Submission of timely/accurate/complete billings E G A M U N
f. Submission of materials/other submittals E G A M U N
3. BUSINESS RELATIONS:
a. Flexibility and cooperativeness in resolving problems E G A M U N
b. Tenacity and innovativeness in resolving problems E G A M U N
c. Relationships with subcontractors, including prompt payment E G A M U N
d. End user was satisfied with services performed E G A M U N
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .