B08_Attachment_4_-_Supplemental_Reports.pdf
PDF 13 MB Posted
- Attached to
- JELA 325250 335621 - Rehabilitate Cemetery
- Solicitation number
- 140PP027R0004
- Issued by
- Not on record
About this file
This file is a supplemental report attachment containing soil analysis results and a tree inventory assessment for Chalmette National Cemetery in Chalmette, Louisiana.
The document includes comprehensive soil testing data from the Texas A&M Soil, Water and Forage Testing Laboratory for fourteen lawn samples collected across various cemetery sections. Laboratory analyses indicate soil pH levels ranging from slightly acid to slightly alkaline (5.6–7.5), with textural classifications predominantly as loam or clay loam. Nutrient analysis shows generally adequate calcium and magnesium levels across all samples, with recommendations for nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium applications varying by location. Several samples required limestone applications (10–25 lbs/1,000 sq ft) to address acidity, notably samples CNA-07-87, CNA-09-115.122, CNA-10-118.119, CNA-13-166.172, and CNA-14-NORTH. The report recommends applying supplemental nitrogen fertilizer during specific growing seasons depending on grass species present. All soil samples were received September 8, 2025, with reports generated September 18, 2025.
The tree inventory assessment, prepared by Trinity Tree Consultants LLC in October 2025, documents approximately 159 trees across the cemetery grounds. The survey identifies twelve tree species, with Live Oak (Quercus virginiana) being predominant, along with Sweet Pecan, Magnolia varieties, Bald Cypress, American Sycamore, and other native species. Each tree received unique identification numbering, GPS coordinates, diameter at breast height (DBH) measurements, condition ratings, and treatment recommendations. Common issues identified include mechanical damage to tree bases from lawn equipment, root conflicts with cemetery infrastructure, included bark defects, and decay columns. The arborist recommends establishment of a comprehensive tree maintenance plan incorporating annual inspections, mulching at 2–4 inches depth around driplines, deep-root soil nutrient injections for Live Oaks every three years, and maintenance pruning on 2–4-year cycles to remove deadwood and mitigate safety risks.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT CT
M
AT
C H
L
IN
E
M
AT
C H
L
IN
E
LOCATION 1
LOCATION 2
- BETWEEN
SECTION 18
& 19
LOCATION 3
- MIDDLE OF
SECTION 31
LOCATION 4
- MIDDLE OF
SECTION
43A
LOCATION 5
- MIDDLE OF
SECTION 62
LOCATION 6
- BETWEEN
SECTION 74
& 75
LOCATION 7
- MIDDLE OF
SECTION 87
LOCATION 8
- MIDDLE OF
SECTION 106
LOCATION 9
- BETWEEN
SECTION 115
& 122
LOCATION 10
- BETWEEN
SECTION 118
AND 119
LOCATION 11
- MIDDLE OF
SECTION 147
LOCATION 12
- MIDDLE OF
SECTION 163
LOCATION 13
- MIDDLE OF
SECTION 166
LOCATION 14
- MIDDLE OF
SECTION 175
LOCATION 15
LOCATION 16 54'-8" OFF
FENCELINE
52'-5" OFF WALL
57'-3" OFF WALL
194'-7" OFF
FENCELINE
58' OFF WALL
34'-9" OFF
CORNER OF
WALL
AutoCAD SHX Text E137
AutoCAD SHX Text E136
AutoCAD SHX Text E135
AutoCAD SHX Text E134
AutoCAD SHX Text E133
AutoCAD SHX Text E132
AutoCAD SHX Text E131
AutoCAD SHX Text E130
AutoCAD SHX Text E129
AutoCAD SHX Text E128
AutoCAD SHX Text E127
AutoCAD SHX Text E126
AutoCAD SHX Text E125
AutoCAD SHX Text E124
AutoCAD SHX Text E123
AutoCAD SHX Text E122
AutoCAD SHX Text E121
AutoCAD SHX Text E119
AutoCAD SHX Text E118
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 181
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC.182
AutoCAD SHX Text W135
AutoCAD SHX Text W134
AutoCAD SHX Text W133
AutoCAD SHX Text W132
AutoCAD SHX Text W131
AutoCAD SHX Text W130
AutoCAD SHX Text W129
AutoCAD SHX Text W128
AutoCAD SHX Text W127
AutoCAD SHX Text W126
AutoCAD SHX Text W125
AutoCAD SHX Text W124
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 169
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 164
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 163
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 162
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 161
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 156
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 155
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 153
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 154
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 148
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 147
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 145
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 146
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 140
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 139
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 137
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 138
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 131
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 129
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 130
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 124
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 123
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC.125
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC.126
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 127
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 128
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 133
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 134
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC.136
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 135
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 141
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 142
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 144
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 143
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 149
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 150
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 152
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 151
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 157
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 158
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 160
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 159
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 165
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 166
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 168
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 167
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 173
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 174
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC.176
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 175
AutoCAD SHX Text E117
AutoCAD SHX Text E116
AutoCAD SHX Text E115
AutoCAD SHX Text E113
AutoCAD SHX Text E112
AutoCAD SHX Text E111
AutoCAD SHX Text E110
AutoCAD SHX Text E109
AutoCAD SHX Text E108
AutoCAD SHX Text E107
AutoCAD SHX Text E106
AutoCAD SHX Text E105
AutoCAD SHX Text E104
AutoCAD SHX Text E103
AutoCAD SHX Text E102
AutoCAD SHX Text E101
AutoCAD SHX Text E100
AutoCAD SHX Text E99
AutoCAD SHX Text E98
AutoCAD SHX Text E97
AutoCAD SHX Text E96
AutoCAD SHX Text E95
AutoCAD SHX Text E94
AutoCAD SHX Text E93
AutoCAD SHX Text E92
AutoCAD SHX Text E90
AutoCAD SHX Text E88
AutoCAD SHX Text E87
AutoCAD SHX Text E86
AutoCAD SHX Text E85
AutoCAD SHX Text E84
AutoCAD SHX Text W113
AutoCAD SHX Text W112
AutoCAD SHX Text W111
AutoCAD SHX Text W110
AutoCAD SHX Text W109
AutoCAD SHX Text W108
AutoCAD SHX Text W107
AutoCAD SHX Text W106
AutoCAD SHX Text W105
AutoCAD SHX Text W104
AutoCAD SHX Text W103
AutoCAD SHX Text W102
AutoCAD SHX Text W101
AutoCAD SHX Text W100
AutoCAD SHX Text W99
AutoCAD SHX Text W98
AutoCAD SHX Text W97
AutoCAD SHX Text W95
AutoCAD SHX Text W94
AutoCAD SHX Text W93
AutoCAD SHX Text W91
AutoCAD SHX Text W90
AutoCAD SHX Text W89
AutoCAD SHX Text W88
AutoCAD SHX Text W87
AutoCAD SHX Text W86
AutoCAD SHX Text W85
AutoCAD SHX Text W84
AutoCAD SHX Text W83
AutoCAD SHX Text W82
AutoCAD SHX Text W81
AutoCAD SHX Text W80
AutoCAD SHX Text W79
AutoCAD SHX Text W123
AutoCAD SHX Text W122
AutoCAD SHX Text W121
AutoCAD SHX Text W120
AutoCAD SHX Text W118
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 121
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC.122
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC.115
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC.116
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC.113
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC.114
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 120
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 119
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC.118
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC.117
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC.112
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC.111
AutoCAD SHX Text W77
AutoCAD SHX Text W76
AutoCAD SHX Text W75
AutoCAD SHX Text E83
AutoCAD SHX Text E80
AutoCAD SHX Text E79
AutoCAD SHX Text E78
AutoCAD SHX Text E77
AutoCAD SHX Text E76
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 132
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 170
AutoCAD SHX Text E120
AutoCAD SHX Text E114
AutoCAD SHX Text E91
AutoCAD SHX Text E89
AutoCAD SHX Text W78
AutoCAD SHX Text W92
AutoCAD SHX Text W96
AutoCAD SHX Text E81
AutoCAD SHX Text E82
AutoCAD SHX Text W119
AutoCAD SHX Text W114
AutoCAD SHX Text W117
AutoCAD SHX Text W116
AutoCAD SHX Text W115
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC.113
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC.114
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC.107
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC.108
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC.105
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC.106
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 99
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC.100
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 98
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 97
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 92
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 91
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 90
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 89
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 84
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 83
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 81
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 82
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 75
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 76
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 73
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 74
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC.112
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC.111
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC.110
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC.109
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC.104
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC.103
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC.102
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC.101
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 95
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 96
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 96
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 88
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 87
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 85
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 86
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 80
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 80
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 77
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 78
AutoCAD SHX Text W74
AutoCAD SHX Text W73
AutoCAD SHX Text W72
AutoCAD SHX Text W71
AutoCAD SHX Text W70
AutoCAD SHX Text W69
AutoCAD SHX Text W68
AutoCAD SHX Text W67
AutoCAD SHX Text W66
AutoCAD SHX Text W65
AutoCAD SHX Text W64
AutoCAD SHX Text W63
AutoCAD SHX Text W62
AutoCAD SHX Text W61
AutoCAD SHX Text W60
AutoCAD SHX Text W59
AutoCAD SHX Text W58
AutoCAD SHX Text W57
AutoCAD SHX Text W56
AutoCAD SHX Text W55
AutoCAD SHX Text W54
AutoCAD SHX Text W53
AutoCAD SHX Text W52
AutoCAD SHX Text W51
AutoCAD SHX Text W49
AutoCAD SHX Text W48
AutoCAD SHX Text W47
AutoCAD SHX Text E76
AutoCAD SHX Text E75
AutoCAD SHX Text E74
AutoCAD SHX Text E73
AutoCAD SHX Text E72
AutoCAD SHX Text E71
AutoCAD SHX Text E70
AutoCAD SHX Text E69
AutoCAD SHX Text E68
AutoCAD SHX Text E67
AutoCAD SHX Text E66
AutoCAD SHX Text E65
AutoCAD SHX Text E64
AutoCAD SHX Text E63
AutoCAD SHX Text E62
AutoCAD SHX Text E59
AutoCAD SHX Text E58
AutoCAD SHX Text E57
AutoCAD SHX Text E56
AutoCAD SHX Text E55
AutoCAD SHX Text E54
AutoCAD SHX Text E53
AutoCAD SHX Text E52
AutoCAD SHX Text E51
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 67
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 68
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 66
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 65
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 60
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 59
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 57
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 58
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 52
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 51
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 49
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 44A
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 43A
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 44
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 43
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 41
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 36
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 35
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 33
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 34
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 28
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 28
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 72
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 69
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 63
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 64
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 61
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 62
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 56
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 55
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 53
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 54
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 48
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 47
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 46A
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC 45
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 46
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 32
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 31
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 29
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 30
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 24
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 23
AutoCAD SHX Text E50
AutoCAD SHX Text E49
AutoCAD SHX Text E48
AutoCAD SHX Text E47
AutoCAD SHX Text E46
AutoCAD SHX Text E45
AutoCAD SHX Text E44
AutoCAD SHX Text E43
AutoCAD SHX Text E42
AutoCAD SHX Text E41
AutoCAD SHX Text E40
AutoCAD SHX Text E39
AutoCAD SHX Text E38
AutoCAD SHX Text E36
AutoCAD SHX Text E35
AutoCAD SHX Text E34
AutoCAD SHX Text E33
AutoCAD SHX Text E31
AutoCAD SHX Text E28
AutoCAD SHX Text E27
AutoCAD SHX Text E26
AutoCAD SHX Text E25
AutoCAD SHX Text E24
AutoCAD SHX Text E23
AutoCAD SHX Text E17
AutoCAD SHX Text E16
AutoCAD SHX Text E15
AutoCAD SHX Text E14
AutoCAD SHX Text W46
AutoCAD SHX Text W45
AutoCAD SHX Text W44
AutoCAD SHX Text W43
AutoCAD SHX Text W42
AutoCAD SHX Text W41
AutoCAD SHX Text W40
AutoCAD SHX Text W39
AutoCAD SHX Text W38
AutoCAD SHX Text W37
AutoCAD SHX Text W36
AutoCAD SHX Text W35
AutoCAD SHX Text W34
AutoCAD SHX Text W33
AutoCAD SHX Text W32
AutoCAD SHX Text W31
AutoCAD SHX Text W30
AutoCAD SHX Text W29
AutoCAD SHX Text W28
AutoCAD SHX Text W27
AutoCAD SHX Text W26
AutoCAD SHX Text W25
AutoCAD SHX Text W24
AutoCAD SHX Text W23
AutoCAD SHX Text W22
AutoCAD SHX Text W19
AutoCAD SHX Text W17
AutoCAD SHX Text W16
AutoCAD SHX Text W15
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 22
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 25
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 26
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 20
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 19
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 17
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 18
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 12
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 11
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 10
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 7
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 8
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 9
AutoCAD SHX Text E13
AutoCAD SHX Text E12
AutoCAD SHX Text E11
AutoCAD SHX Text E10
AutoCAD SHX Text E9
AutoCAD SHX Text E8
AutoCAD SHX Text E7
AutoCAD SHX Text E6
AutoCAD SHX Text E5
AutoCAD SHX Text E4
AutoCAD SHX Text E3
AutoCAD SHX Text E2
AutoCAD SHX Text E1
AutoCAD SHX Text
SE1
AutoCAD SHX Text S1
AutoCAD SHX Text S2
AutoCAD SHX Text S3
AutoCAD SHX Text S4
AutoCAD SHX Text S5
AutoCAD SHX Text W13
AutoCAD SHX Text W12
AutoCAD SHX Text W11
AutoCAD SHX Text W10
AutoCAD SHX Text W9
AutoCAD SHX Text W8
AutoCAD SHX Text W7
AutoCAD SHX Text W6
AutoCAD SHX Text W5
AutoCAD SHX Text W4
AutoCAD SHX Text W3
AutoCAD SHX Text W2
AutoCAD SHX Text W1
AutoCAD SHX Text
SW1
AutoCAD SHX Text S12
AutoCAD SHX Text S11
AutoCAD SHX Text S10
AutoCAD SHX Text S9
AutoCAD SHX Text S8
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 71
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 70
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 40
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 39
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 38
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 37
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 42
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 50
AutoCAD SHX Text E37
AutoCAD SHX Text S6
AutoCAD SHX Text S7
AutoCAD SHX Text W14
AutoCAD SHX Text E61
AutoCAD SHX Text E60
AutoCAD SHX Text E32
AutoCAD SHX Text E29
AutoCAD SHX Text E30
AutoCAD SHX Text W18
AutoCAD SHX Text W50
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 94
AutoCAD SHX Text
SEC. 45A
AutoCAD SHX Text
NO HEADSTONES
AutoCAD SHX Text W20
AutoCAD SHX Text W21
AutoCAD SHX Text E18
AutoCAD SHX Text E19
AutoCAD SHX Text E20
AutoCAD SHX Text E21
AutoCAD SHX Text E22
AutoCAD SHX Text
DATE:
AutoCAD SHX Text
DESIGNED:
AutoCAD SHX Text
TECH. REVIEW:
AutoCAD SHX Text
SUB SHEET NO.
AutoCAD SHX Text
PMIS/PKG NO.
AutoCAD SHX Text
DRAWING NO.
AutoCAD SHX Text
SHEET
AutoCAD SHX Text
OF
AutoCAD SHX Text
TITLE OF SHEET
AutoCAD SHX Text
SCHEMATIC DESIGN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
AutoCAD SHX Text
CHALMETTE NATIONAL CEMETERY
AutoCAD SHX Text
LEGEND
AutoCAD SHX Text
= MAJOR CONTOUR LINE
AutoCAD SHX Text
= MINOR CONTOUR LINE
AutoCAD SHX Text
= CULVERT
AutoCAD SHX Text
= FENCELINE
AutoCAD SHX Text
= ROOF OVERHANG
AutoCAD SHX Text
RCP= REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
AutoCAD SHX Text
CMP= CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
AutoCAD SHX Text
SMP= SMOOTH METAL PIPE
AutoCAD SHX Text X.X'
AutoCAD SHX Text
= INTERPOLATED SPOT ELEVATION
AutoCAD SHX Text
= EXISTING TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
= EXISTING HEADSTONES
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE TRUNK
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE CANOPY
AutoCAD SHX Text
SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION
AutoCAD SHX Text
LOCATION PLAN
AutoCAD SHX Text
SOIL SAMPLE
AutoCAD SHX Text
XX
AutoCAD SHX Text
JELA 335621
AutoCAD SHX Text 180459
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text 03/01/2025
AutoCAD SHX Text
STANTEC
AutoCAD SHX Text
STANTEC
AutoCAD SHX Text
STANTEC
AutoCAD SHX Text X
AutoCAD SHX Text
SCALE OF FEET
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text tewen Rectangle tewen Combining into one sample tewen Text Box
CNA-02-18
tewen Polygon tewen Text Box
CNA-GAR-01
tewen Polygon tewen Text Box
CNA-04-43A
tewen Polygon tewen Text Box
CNA-03-31
tewen Polygon tewen Text Box
CNA-05-62
tewen Polygon tewen Text Box
CNA-07-87
tewen Text Box
CNA-06-75.75
tewen Polygon tewen Polygon tewen Text Box
CNA-08-106
tewen Polygon tewen Text Box
CNA-09-115.122
tewen Text Box
CNA-10-118.119
125-136 tewen Polygon tewen Polygon tewen Polygon tewen Text Box
CNA-11-147.161
tewen Text Box
CNA-12-OAKS
tewen Rectangle tewen Rectangle tewen Arrow tewen Arrow tewen
CNA-14-NORTH
tewen Rectangle tewen Rectangle tewen
CNA-13-166.172
tewen Polygon
Soil, Water and Forage Testing Laboratory
Department of Soil and Crop Sciences
2478 TAMU
College Station, TX 77843-2478
Report generated for: (979)321-5960
Travis Ewen
Chalmette National Cemetery Visit our website: http://soiltesting.tamu.edu
55 Church St
NEW HAVEN, CT 6510
Printed on:
Chalmette, LA County not provided
Laboratory Number: 692112
Customer Sample ID: CNA-GAR-01
Crop Grown: LAWN
Analysis Results CL* Units pH 7.4 (6.2) - Slightly Alkaline
Conductivity 216 (-) umho/cm None Nutrient Recommended
Nitrate-N 8 (-) ppm** 0.6 lbs N/1000sqft
Phosphorus 36 (50) ppm 0.8 lbs P2O5/1000sqft
Potassium 98 (175) ppm 1.3 lbs K20/1000sqft
Calcium 3,501 (180) ppm 0 lbs Ca/1000sqft
Magnesium 387 (50) ppm 0 lbs Mg/1000sgft
Sulfur 57 (13) ppm 0 lbs S/1000sqft
Sodium 35 (-) ppm
Iron 47.20 (4.25) ppm
Zinc 7.21 (0.27) ppm
Manganese 7.37 (1.00) ppm
Copper 1.59 (0.16) ppm
Boron 2.27 (1.30) ppm
Limestone Requirement 0.00 lbs/1000sqft
Textural Analysis Test (hydrometer) Detailed Salinity Test (Saturated Paste Extract)
Sand 34 % pH 6.9
Silt 46 % Conductivity 1.06 mmhos/cm
Clay 20 % Sodium 21 ppm 0.896 meq/L
Textural Class: Potassium 12 ppm 0.299 meq/L
Calcium 205 ppm 10.230 meq/L
Organic Matter 7.22 % Magnesium 40 ppm 3.280 meq/L
SAR 0.34
SSP 6.10
*CL=Critical level is the point which no additional nutrient (excluding nitrate-N, sodium and conductivity) is recommended. **ppm=mg/kg
Nitrogen:
Methods: pH and conductivity/ 2:1; nitrate-N/Cd-red.; P, K, Ca, Mg, Na, S and B/Mehlich 3 by ICP; Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu/DTPA by ICP. ProAnalysisVer. 2.19j
Soil Analysis Report
9/18/2025
9/8/2025Sample received on:
ExLow VLow Low Mod High VHigh Excess.
lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
Area Represented:
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
Apply an additional 1 lb N/1000 sqft during late summer (St. Augustine grass), mid-summer and early fall (common bermuda grass and zoysia grass) and every 6-8 weeks for hybrid bermuda grass.
Online fertilizer calculators to determine appropriate fertilizers and application rates.
http://soiltesting.tamu.edu lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
Loam
CL*
http://soiltesting.tamu.edu/
2478 TAMU
College Station, TX 77843-2478
Report generated for: (979)321-5960
Travis Ewen
Chalmette National Cemetery Visit our website: http://soiltesting.tamu.edu
55 Church St
NEW HAVEN, CT 6510
Printed on:
Chalmette, LA County not provided
Laboratory Number: 692113
Customer Sample ID: CNA-02-18
Crop Grown: LAWN
Analysis Results CL* Units pH 7.2 (6.2) - Slightly Alkaline
Conductivity 246 (-) umho/cm None Nutrient Recommended
Nitrate-N 7 (-) ppm** 0.6 lbs N/1000sqft
Phosphorus 42 (50) ppm 0.4 lbs P2O5/1000sqft
Potassium 91 (175) ppm 1.4 lbs K20/1000sqft
Calcium 3,305 (180) ppm 0 lbs Ca/1000sqft
Magnesium 424 (50) ppm 0 lbs Mg/1000sgft
Sulfur 55 (13) ppm 0 lbs S/1000sqft
Sodium 44 (-) ppm
Iron 60.20 (4.25) ppm
Zinc 3.98 (0.27) ppm
Manganese 9.18 (1.00) ppm
Copper 1.31 (0.16) ppm
Boron 1.98 (1.30) ppm
Sand 32 % pH 6.7
Silt 46 % Conductivity 0.90 mmhos/cm
Clay 22 % Sodium 28 ppm 1.232 meq/L
Textural Class: Potassium 8 ppm 0.213 meq/L
Calcium 165 ppm 8.234 meq/L
Organic Matter 5.64 % Magnesium 37 ppm 3.050 meq/L
SAR 0.52
SSP 9.68
*CL=Critical level is the point which no additional nutrient (excluding nitrate-N, sodium and conductivity) is recommended. **ppm=mg/kg
Methods: pH and conductivity/ 2:1; nitrate-N/Cd-red.; P, K, Ca, Mg, Na, S and B/Mehlich 3 by ICP; Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu/DTPA by ICP. ProAnalysisVer. 2.19j
9/18/2025
9/8/2025Sample received on:
ExLow VLow Low Mod High VHigh Excess.
lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllll llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
Apply an additional 1 lb N/1000 sqft during late summer (St. Augustine grass), mid-summer and early fall (common llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
2478 TAMU
College Station, TX 77843-2478
Report generated for: (979)321-5960
Travis Ewen
Chalmette National Cemetery Visit our website: http://soiltesting.tamu.edu
55 Church St
NEW HAVEN, CT 6510
Printed on:
Chalmette, LA County not provided
Laboratory Number: 692114
Customer Sample ID: CNA-03-31
Crop Grown: LAWN
Analysis Results CL* Units pH 7.5 (6.2) - Slightly Alkaline
Conductivity 437 (-) umho/cm None Nutrient Recommended
Nitrate-N 10 (-) ppm** 0.4 lbs N/1000sqft
Phosphorus 35 (50) ppm 0.9 lbs P2O5/1000sqft
Potassium 99 (175) ppm 1.3 lbs K20/1000sqft
Calcium 3,519 (180) ppm 0 lbs Ca/1000sqft
Magnesium 472 (50) ppm 0 lbs Mg/1000sgft
Sulfur 55 (13) ppm 0 lbs S/1000sqft
Sodium 123 (-) ppm
Iron 40.30 (4.25) ppm
Zinc 3.36 (0.27) ppm
Manganese 6.12 (1.00) ppm
Copper 2.83 (0.16) ppm
Boron 2.22 (1.30) ppm
Sand 24 % pH 6.9
Silt 48 % Conductivity 1.65 mmhos/cm
Clay 28 % Sodium 96 ppm 4.156 meq/L
Textural Class: Potassium 7 ppm 0.191 meq/L
Calcium 253 ppm 12.625 meq/L
Organic Matter 5.93 % Magnesium 53 ppm 4.381 meq/L
SAR 1.43
SSP 19.46
*CL=Critical level is the point which no additional nutrient (excluding nitrate-N, sodium and conductivity) is recommended. **ppm=mg/kg
Methods: pH and conductivity/ 2:1; nitrate-N/Cd-red.; P, K, Ca, Mg, Na, S and B/Mehlich 3 by ICP; Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu/DTPA by ICP. ProAnalysisVer. 2.19j
9/18/2025
9/8/2025Sample received on:
ExLow VLow Low Mod High VHigh Excess.
lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
Apply an additional 1 lb N/1000 sqft during late summer (St. Augustine grass), mid-summer and early fall (common
Clay Loam
2478 TAMU
College Station, TX 77843-2478
Report generated for: (979)321-5960
Travis Ewen
Chalmette National Cemetery Visit our website: http://soiltesting.tamu.edu
55 Church St
NEW HAVEN, CT 6510
Printed on:
Chalmette, LA County not provided
Laboratory Number: 692115
Customer Sample ID: CNA-04-43A
Crop Grown: LAWN
Analysis Results CL* Units pH 7.0 (6.2) - Neutral
Conductivity 301 (-) umho/cm None Nutrient Recommended
Nitrate-N 9 (-) ppm** 0.5 lbs N/1000sqft
Phosphorus 36 (50) ppm 0.8 lbs P2O5/1000sqft
Potassium 117 (175) ppm 0.9 lbs K20/1000sqft
Calcium 3,471 (180) ppm 0 lbs Ca/1000sqft
Magnesium 470 (50) ppm 0 lbs Mg/1000sgft
Sulfur 54 (13) ppm 0 lbs S/1000sqft
Sodium 68 (-) ppm
Iron 77.30 (4.25) ppm
Zinc 3.35 (0.27) ppm
Manganese 6.38 (1.00) ppm
Copper 2.05 (0.16) ppm
Boron 1.78 (1.30) ppm
Sand 22 % pH 6.7
Silt 48 % Conductivity 1.09 mmhos/cm
Clay 30 % Sodium 45 ppm 1.954 meq/L
Textural Class: Potassium 9 ppm 0.235 meq/L
Calcium 183 ppm 9.132 meq/L
Organic Matter 6.70 % Magnesium 40 ppm 3.288 meq/L
SAR 0.78
SSP 13.37
*CL=Critical level is the point which no additional nutrient (excluding nitrate-N, sodium and conductivity) is recommended. **ppm=mg/kg
Methods: pH and conductivity/ 2:1; nitrate-N/Cd-red.; P, K, Ca, Mg, Na, S and B/Mehlich 3 by ICP; Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu/DTPA by ICP. ProAnalysisVer. 2.19j
9/18/2025
9/8/2025Sample received on:
ExLow VLow Low Mod High VHigh Excess.
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
Apply an additional 1 lb N/1000 sqft during late summer (St. Augustine grass), mid-summer and early fall (common lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
2478 TAMU
College Station, TX 77843-2478
Report generated for: (979)321-5960
Travis Ewen
Chalmette National Cemetery Visit our website: http://soiltesting.tamu.edu
55 Church St
NEW HAVEN, CT 6510
Printed on:
Chalmette, LA County not provided
Laboratory Number: 692116
Customer Sample ID: CNA-05-62
Crop Grown: LAWN
Analysis Results CL* Units pH 6.8 (6.2) - Slightly Acid
Conductivity 215 (-) umho/cm None Nutrient Recommended
Nitrate-N 5 (-) ppm** 0.7 lbs N/1000sqft
Phosphorus 31 (50) ppm 1.1 lbs P2O5/1000sqft
Potassium 87 (175) ppm 1.5 lbs K20/1000sqft
Calcium 2,388 (180) ppm 0 lbs Ca/1000sqft
Magnesium 332 (50) ppm 0 lbs Mg/1000sgft
Sulfur 39 (13) ppm 0 lbs S/1000sqft
Sodium 31 (-) ppm
Iron 60.70 (4.25) ppm
Zinc 3.37 (0.27) ppm
Manganese 9.67 (1.00) ppm
Copper 1.48 (0.16) ppm
Boron 1.08 (1.30) ppm
Sand 38 % pH 6.6
Silt 40 % Conductivity 0.87 mmhos/cm
Clay 22 % Sodium 20 ppm 0.888 meq/L
Textural Class: Potassium 9 ppm 0.221 meq/L
Calcium 151 ppm 7.535 meq/L
Organic Matter 4.08 % Magnesium 34 ppm 2.787 meq/L
SAR 0.39
SSP 7.77
*CL=Critical level is the point which no additional nutrient (excluding nitrate-N, sodium and conductivity) is recommended. **ppm=mg/kg
Methods: pH and conductivity/ 2:1; nitrate-N/Cd-red.; P, K, Ca, Mg, Na, S and B/Mehlich 3 by ICP; Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu/DTPA by ICP. ProAnalysisVer. 2.19j
9/18/2025
9/8/2025Sample received on:
ExLow VLow Low Mod High VHigh Excess.
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllll llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllllllllllllllllll
Apply an additional 1 lb N/1000 sqft during late summer (St. Augustine grass), mid-summer and early fall (common
2478 TAMU
College Station, TX 77843-2478
Report generated for: (979)321-5960
Travis Ewen
Chalmette National Cemetery Visit our website: http://soiltesting.tamu.edu
55 Church St
NEW HAVEN, CT 6510
Printed on:
Chalmette, LA County not provided
Laboratory Number: 692117
Customer Sample ID: CNA-06-74.75
Crop Grown: LAWN
Analysis Results CL* Units pH 6.9 (6.2) - Slightly Acid
Conductivity 217 (-) umho/cm None Nutrient Recommended
Nitrate-N 7 (-) ppm** 0.6 lbs N/1000sqft
Phosphorus 31 (50) ppm 1.1 lbs P2O5/1000sqft
Potassium 108 (175) ppm 1.1 lbs K20/1000sqft
Calcium 2,825 (180) ppm 0 lbs Ca/1000sqft
Magnesium 426 (50) ppm 0 lbs Mg/1000sgft
Sulfur 47 (13) ppm 0 lbs S/1000sqft
Sodium 56 (-) ppm
Iron 64.90 (4.25) ppm
Zinc 4.35 (0.27) ppm
Manganese 11.20 (1.00) ppm
Copper 2.04 (0.16) ppm
Boron 1.53 (1.30) ppm
Sand 30 % pH 6.8
Silt 46 % Conductivity 0.93 mmhos/cm
Clay 24 % Sodium 35 ppm 1.523 meq/L
Textural Class: Potassium 11 ppm 0.274 meq/L
Calcium 148 ppm 7.385 meq/L
Organic Matter 5.54 % Magnesium 37 ppm 3.074 meq/L
SAR 0.67
SSP 12.43
*CL=Critical level is the point which no additional nutrient (excluding nitrate-N, sodium and conductivity) is recommended. **ppm=mg/kg
Methods: pH and conductivity/ 2:1; nitrate-N/Cd-red.; P, K, Ca, Mg, Na, S and B/Mehlich 3 by ICP; Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu/DTPA by ICP. ProAnalysisVer. 2.19j
9/18/2025
9/8/2025Sample received on:
ExLow VLow Low Mod High VHigh Excess.
lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllllllll llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllllllllllllllllllllll
Apply an additional 1 lb N/1000 sqft during late summer (St. Augustine grass), mid-summer and early fall (common lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
2478 TAMU
College Station, TX 77843-2478
Report generated for: (979)321-5960
Travis Ewen
Chalmette National Cemetery Visit our website: http://soiltesting.tamu.edu
55 Church St
NEW HAVEN, CT 6510
Printed on:
Chalmette, LA County not provided
Laboratory Number: 692118
Customer Sample ID: CNA-07-87
Crop Grown: LAWN
Analysis Results CL* Units pH 6.1 (6.2) - Slightly Acid
Conductivity 125 (-) umho/cm None Nutrient Recommended
Nitrate-N 6 (-) ppm** 0.7 lbs N/1000sqft
Phosphorus 34 (50) ppm 0.9 lbs P2O5/1000sqft
Potassium 134 (175) ppm 0.7 lbs K20/1000sqft
Calcium 2,372 (180) ppm 0 lbs Ca/1000sqft
Magnesium 413 (50) ppm 0 lbs Mg/1000sgft
Sulfur 38 (13) ppm 0 lbs S/1000sqft
Sodium 31 (-) ppm
Iron 92.90 (4.25) ppm
Zinc 3.90 (0.27) ppm
Manganese 12.30 (1.00) ppm
Copper 1.96 (0.16) ppm
Boron 0.87 (1.30) ppm
Limestone Requirement 10.00 lbs/1000sqft
Sand 24 % pH 6.1
Silt 50 % Conductivity 0.47 mmhos/cm
Clay 26 % Sodium 16 ppm 0.683 meq/L
Textural Class: Potassium 10 ppm 0.247 meq/L
Calcium 76 ppm 3.797 meq/L
Organic Matter 4.23 % Magnesium 21 ppm 1.726 meq/L
SAR 0.41
SSP 10.59
*CL=Critical level is the point which no additional nutrient (excluding nitrate-N, sodium and conductivity) is recommended. **ppm=mg/kg
Methods: pH and conductivity/ 2:1; nitrate-N/Cd-red.; P, K, Ca, Mg, Na, S and B/Mehlich 3 by ICP; Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu/DTPA by ICP. ProAnalysisVer. 2.19j
9/18/2025
9/8/2025Sample received on:
ExLow VLow Low Mod High VHigh Excess.
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllll llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllll
Apply an additional 1 lb N/1000 sqft during late summer (St. Augustine grass), mid-summer and early fall (common llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
Silt Loam
2478 TAMU
College Station, TX 77843-2478
Report generated for: (979)321-5960
Travis Ewen
Chalmette National Cemetery Visit our website: http://soiltesting.tamu.edu
55 Church St
NEW HAVEN, CT 6510
Printed on:
Chalmette, LA County not provided
Laboratory Number: 692119
Customer Sample ID: CNA-08-106
Crop Grown: LAWN
Analysis Results CL* Units pH 6.6 (6.2) - Slightly Acid
Conductivity 138 (-) umho/cm None Nutrient Recommended
Nitrate-N 11 (-) ppm** 0.4 lbs N/1000sqft
Phosphorus 24 (50) ppm 1.5 lbs P2O5/1000sqft
Potassium 111 (175) ppm 1 lbs K20/1000sqft
Calcium 3,002 (180) ppm 0 lbs Ca/1000sqft
Magnesium 468 (50) ppm 0 lbs Mg/1000sgft
Sulfur 50 (13) ppm 0 lbs S/1000sqft
Sodium 42 (-) ppm
Iron 77.50 (4.25) ppm
Zinc 4.12 (0.27) ppm
Manganese 14.30 (1.00) ppm
Copper 1.64 (0.16) ppm
Boron 1.40 (1.30) ppm
Sand 26 % pH 6.4
Silt 44 % Conductivity 0.63 mmhos/cm
Clay 30 % Sodium 22 ppm 0.953 meq/L
Textural Class: Potassium 7 ppm 0.188 meq/L
Calcium 112 ppm 5.589 meq/L
Organic Matter 6.33 % Magnesium 29 ppm 2.409 meq/L
SAR 0.48
SSP 10.43
*CL=Critical level is the point which no additional nutrient (excluding nitrate-N, sodium and conductivity) is recommended. **ppm=mg/kg
Methods: pH and conductivity/ 2:1; nitrate-N/Cd-red.; P, K, Ca, Mg, Na, S and B/Mehlich 3 by ICP; Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu/DTPA by ICP. ProAnalysisVer. 2.19j
9/18/2025
9/8/2025Sample received on:
ExLow VLow Low Mod High VHigh Excess.
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
Apply an additional 1 lb N/1000 sqft during late summer (St. Augustine grass), mid-summer and early fall (common
2478 TAMU
College Station, TX 77843-2478
Report generated for: (979)321-5960
Travis Ewen
Chalmette National Cemetery Visit our website: http://soiltesting.tamu.edu
55 Church St
NEW HAVEN, CT 6510
Printed on:
Chalmette, LA County not provided
Laboratory Number: 692121
Customer Sample ID: CNA-09-115.112
Crop Grown: LAWN
Analysis Results CL* Units pH 5.6 (6.2) - Mod. Acid
Conductivity 158 (-) umho/cm None Nutrient Recommended
Nitrate-N 7 (-) ppm** 0.6 lbs N/1000sqft
Phosphorus 19 (50) ppm 1.8 lbs P2O5/1000sqft
Potassium 160 (175) ppm 0.2 lbs K20/1000sqft
Calcium 2,030 (180) ppm 0 lbs Ca/1000sqft
Magnesium 435 (50) ppm 0 lbs Mg/1000sgft
Sulfur 36 (13) ppm 0 lbs S/1000sqft
Sodium 35 (-) ppm
Iron 124.00 (4.25) ppm
Zinc 4.24 (0.27) ppm
Manganese 11.50 (1.00) ppm
Copper 1.21 (0.16) ppm
Boron 0.88 (1.30) ppm
Limestone Requirement 25.00 lbs/1000sqft
Sand 20 % pH 5.8
Silt 48 % Conductivity 0.43 mmhos/cm
Clay 32 % Sodium 17 ppm 0.718 meq/L
Textural Class: Potassium 12 ppm 0.294 meq/L
Calcium 68 ppm 3.408 meq/L
Organic Matter 5.73 % Magnesium 21 ppm 1.693 meq/L
SAR 0.45
SSP 11.74
*CL=Critical level is the point which no additional nutrient (excluding nitrate-N, sodium and conductivity) is recommended. **ppm=mg/kg
Methods: pH and conductivity/ 2:1; nitrate-N/Cd-red.; P, K, Ca, Mg, Na, S and B/Mehlich 3 by ICP; Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu/DTPA by ICP. ProAnalysisVer. 2.19j
9/18/2025
9/8/2025Sample received on:
ExLow VLow Low Mod High VHigh Excess.
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
Apply an additional 1 lb N/1000 sqft during late summer (St. Augustine grass), mid-summer and early fall (common lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
Silty Clay Loam
2478 TAMU
College Station, TX 77843-2478
Report generated for: (979)321-5960
Travis Ewen
Chalmette National Cemetery Visit our website: http://soiltesting.tamu.edu
55 Church St
NEW HAVEN, CT 6510
Printed on:
Chalmette, LA County not provided
Laboratory Number: 692122
Customer Sample ID: CNA-10-118.119
Crop Grown: LAWN
Analysis Results CL* Units pH 6.1 (6.2) - Mod. Acid
Conductivity 172 (-) umho/cm None Nutrient Recommended
Nitrate-N 6 (-) ppm** 0.7 lbs N/1000sqft
Phosphorus 30 (50) ppm 1.2 lbs P2O5/1000sqft
Potassium 222 (175) ppm 0 lbs K20/1000sqft
Calcium 2,537 (180) ppm 0 lbs Ca/1000sqft
Magnesium 482 (50) ppm 0 lbs Mg/1000sgft
Sulfur 44 (13) ppm 0 lbs S/1000sqft
Sodium 39 (-) ppm
Iron 127.00 (4.25) ppm
Zinc 3.95 (0.27) ppm
Manganese 8.79 (1.00) ppm
Copper 1.44 (0.16) ppm
Boron 1.49 (1.30) ppm
Sand 21 % pH 6.2
Silt 48 % Conductivity 0.66 mmhos/cm
Clay 31 % Sodium 18 ppm 0.788 meq/L
Textural Class: Potassium 20 ppm 0.517 meq/L
Calcium 111 ppm 5.539 meq/L
Organic Matter 7.05 % Magnesium 32 ppm 2.630 meq/L
SAR 0.39
SSP 8.31
*CL=Critical level is the point which no additional nutrient (excluding nitrate-N, sodium and conductivity) is recommended. **ppm=mg/kg
Methods: pH and conductivity/ 2:1; nitrate-N/Cd-red.; P, K, Ca, Mg, Na, S and B/Mehlich 3 by ICP; Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu/DTPA by ICP. ProAnalysisVer. 2.19j
9/18/2025
9/8/2025Sample received on:
ExLow VLow Low Mod High VHigh Excess.
lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
Apply an additional 1 lb N/1000 sqft during late summer (St. Augustine grass), mid-summer and early fall (common lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
2478 TAMU
College Station, TX 77843-2478
Report generated for: (979)321-5960
Travis Ewen
Chalmette National Cemetery Visit our website: http://soiltesting.tamu.edu
55 Church St
NEW HAVEN, CT 6510
Printed on:
Chalmette, LA County not provided
Laboratory Number: 692123
Customer Sample ID: CNA-11-147
Crop Grown: LAWN
Analysis Results CL* Units pH 5.8 (6.2) - Mod. Acid
Conductivity 155 (-) umho/cm None Nutrient Recommended
Nitrate-N 10 (-) ppm** 0.4 lbs N/1000sqft
Phosphorus 28 (50) ppm 1.3 lbs P2O5/1000sqft
Potassium 148 (175) ppm 0.4 lbs K20/1000sqft
Calcium 2,081 (180) ppm 0 lbs Ca/1000sqft
Magnesium 421 (50) ppm 0 lbs Mg/1000sgft
Sulfur 35 (13) ppm 0 lbs S/1000sqft
Sodium 28 (-) ppm
Iron 110.00 (4.25) ppm
Zinc 4.28 (0.27) ppm
Manganese 6.81 (1.00) ppm
Copper 1.51 (0.16) ppm
Boron 1.05 (1.30) ppm
Limestone Requirement 15.00 lbs/1000sqft
Sand 26 % pH 6.1
Silt 45 % Conductivity 0.29 mmhos/cm
Clay 29 % Sodium 8 ppm 0.362 meq/L
Textural Class: Potassium 8 ppm 0.206 meq/L
Calcium 47 ppm 2.320 meq/L
Organic Matter 4.89 % Magnesium 14 ppm 1.159 meq/L
SAR 0.27
SSP 8.93
*CL=Critical level is the point which no additional nutrient (excluding nitrate-N, sodium and conductivity) is recommended. **ppm=mg/kg
Methods: pH and conductivity/ 2:1; nitrate-N/Cd-red.; P, K, Ca, Mg, Na, S and B/Mehlich 3 by ICP; Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu/DTPA by ICP. ProAnalysisVer. 2.19j
9/18/2025
9/8/2025Sample received on:
ExLow VLow Low Mod High VHigh Excess.
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
Apply an additional 1 lb N/1000 sqft during late summer (St. Augustine grass), mid-summer and early fall (common lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
2478 TAMU
College Station, TX 77843-2478
Report generated for: (979)321-5960
Travis Ewen
Chalmette National Cemetery Visit our website: http://soiltesting.tamu.edu
55 Church St
NEW HAVEN, CT 6510
Printed on:
Chalmette, LA County not provided
Laboratory Number: 692124
Customer Sample ID: CNA-12-OAKS
Crop Grown: LAWN
Analysis Results CL* Units pH 6.6 (6.2) - Slightly Acid
Conductivity 165 (-) umho/cm None Nutrient Recommended
Nitrate-N 6 (-) ppm** 0.7 lbs N/1000sqft
Phosphorus 27 (50) ppm 1.4 lbs P2O5/1000sqft
Potassium 177 (175) ppm 0 lbs K20/1000sqft
Calcium 3,107 (180) ppm 0 lbs Ca/1000sqft
Magnesium 463 (50) ppm 0 lbs Mg/1000sgft
Sulfur 49 (13) ppm 0 lbs S/1000sqft
Sodium 42 (-) ppm
Iron 82.10 (4.25) ppm
Zinc 6.55 (0.27) ppm
Manganese 9.23 (1.00) ppm
Copper 1.70 (0.16) ppm
Boron 1.93 (1.30) ppm
Sand 30 % pH 6.5
Silt 41 % Conductivity 0.70 mmhos/cm
Clay 29 % Sodium 19 ppm 0.805 meq/L
Textural Class: Potassium 18 ppm 0.450 meq/L
Calcium 124 ppm 6.188 meq/L
Organic Matter 7.62 % Magnesium 31 ppm 2.573 meq/L
SAR 0.38
SSP 8.04
*CL=Critical level is the point which no additional nutrient (excluding nitrate-N, sodium and conductivity) is recommended. **ppm=mg/kg
Methods: pH and conductivity/ 2:1; nitrate-N/Cd-red.; P, K, Ca, Mg, Na, S and B/Mehlich 3 by ICP; Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu/DTPA by ICP. ProAnalysisVer. 2.19j
9/18/2025
9/8/2025Sample received on:
ExLow VLow Low Mod High VHigh Excess.
lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllll llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
Apply an additional 1 lb N/1000 sqft during late summer (St. Augustine grass), mid-summer and early fall (common llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
2478 TAMU
College Station, TX 77843-2478
Report generated for: (979)321-5960
Travis Ewen
Chalmette National Cemetery Visit our website: http://soiltesting.tamu.edu
55 Church St
NEW HAVEN, CT 6510
Printed on:
Chalmette, LA County not provided
Laboratory Number: 692125
Customer Sample ID: CNA-13-116.172
Crop Grown: LAWN
Analysis Results CL* Units pH 5.8 (6.2) - Mod. Acid
Conductivity 104 (-) umho/cm None Nutrient Recommended
Nitrate-N 4 (-) ppm** 0.8 lbs N/1000sqft
Phosphorus 25 (50) ppm 1.5 lbs P2O5/1000sqft
Potassium 226 (175) ppm 0 lbs K20/1000sqft
Calcium 2,326 (180) ppm 0 lbs Ca/1000sqft
Magnesium 489 (50) ppm 0 lbs Mg/1000sgft
Sulfur 38 (13) ppm 0 lbs S/1000sqft
Sodium 32 (-) ppm
Iron 115.00 (4.25) ppm
Zinc 3.53 (0.27) ppm
Manganese 5.52 (1.00) ppm
Copper 1.32 (0.16) ppm
Boron 1.01 (1.30) ppm
Limestone Requirement 20.00 lbs/1000sqft
Sand 27 % pH 6.0
Silt 40 % Conductivity 0.32 mmhos/cm
Clay 33 % Sodium 8 ppm 0.366 meq/L
Textural Class: Potassium 14 ppm 0.366 meq/L
Calcium 50 ppm 2.505 meq/L
Organic Matter 5.31 % Magnesium 15 ppm 1.258 meq/L
SAR 0.27
SSP 8.13
*CL=Critical level is the point which no additional nutrient (excluding nitrate-N, sodium and conductivity) is recommended. **ppm=mg/kg
Methods: pH and conductivity/ 2:1; nitrate-N/Cd-red.; P, K, Ca, Mg, Na, S and B/Mehlich 3 by ICP; Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu/DTPA by ICP. ProAnalysisVer. 2.19j
9/18/2025
9/8/2025Sample received on:
ExLow VLow Low Mod High VHigh Excess.
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllllllllllll
Apply an additional 1 lb N/1000 sqft during late summer (St. Augustine grass), mid-summer and early fall (common llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
2478 TAMU
College Station, TX 77843-2478
Report generated for: (979)321-5960
Travis Ewen
Chalmette National Cemetery Visit our website: http://soiltesting.tamu.edu
55 Church St
NEW HAVEN, CT 6510
Printed on:
Chalmette, LA County not provided
Laboratory Number: 692126
Customer Sample ID: CNA-14-NORTH
Crop Grown: LAWN
Analysis Results CL* Units pH 5.9 (6.2) - Mod. Acid
Conductivity 100 (-) umho/cm None Nutrient Recommended
Nitrate-N 5 (-) ppm** 0.7 lbs N/1000sqft
Phosphorus 26 (50) ppm 1.4 lbs P2O5/1000sqft
Potassium 159 (175) ppm 0.2 lbs K20/1000sqft
Calcium 2,392 (180) ppm 0 lbs Ca/1000sqft
Magnesium 466 (50) ppm 0 lbs Mg/1000sgft
Sulfur 39 (13) ppm 0 lbs S/1000sqft
Sodium 35 (-) ppm
Iron 121.00 (4.25) ppm
Zinc 4.61 (0.27) ppm
Manganese 5.57 (1.00) ppm
Copper 1.79 (0.16) ppm
Boron 1.12 (1.30) ppm
Sand 28 % pH 5.9
Silt 37 % Conductivity 0.42 mmhos/cm
Clay 35 % Sodium 15 ppm 0.670 meq/L
Textural Class: Potassium 10 ppm 0.245 meq/L
Calcium 71 ppm 3.533 meq/L
Organic Matter 4.52 % Magnesium 20 ppm 1.628 meq/L
SAR 0.42
SSP 11.03
*CL=Critical level is the point which no additional nutrient (excluding nitrate-N, sodium and conductivity) is recommended. **ppm=mg/kg
Methods: pH and conductivity/ 2:1; nitrate-N/Cd-red.; P, K, Ca, Mg, Na, S and B/Mehlich 3 by ICP; Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu/DTPA by ICP. ProAnalysisVer. 2.19j
9/18/2025
9/8/2025Sample received on:
ExLow VLow Low Mod High VHigh Excess.
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllllllllllllllllll
Apply an additional 1 lb N/1000 sqft during late summer (St. Augustine grass), mid-summer and early fall (common lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
Trinity Tree Consultants, LLC www.trinitytreeconsultants.com | (225) 337-0474
October 20, 2025
Mr. Travis Ewen, ASLA, WEDG Principal/Landscape Architect Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
RE: Jean Lafitte National Historical Park and Preserve, Chalmette Cemetery Tree Inventory
Introduction
Trinity Tree Consultants, LLC (Trinity) was contracted by Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. (Stantec) to assist with the assessment and management of the mature trees within Chalmette National Cemetery located in Chalmette, Louisiana. In preparation for site improvements and future development. Trinity’s role clearly, was to provide Arboricultural Consulting Guidance related to the health and integrity of the trees found on site.
The process of managing trees must begin with a proper, sound Arboricultural Assessment of the trees and the area surrounding the trees. Long-term management for proper tree care is difficult without a complete understanding or assessment of the trees and the environment immediately surrounding the trees.
Assignment
Trinity’s assignment for this effort was to perform the following tasks and provide the following information:
• Conduct a site visit to evaluate the trees and collect data related to the trees on site
(September 29, 2025)
• Complete a Tree Inventory for all trees on site, including tree number, tree species
(common and scientific name), estimated height, estimated canopy spread, DBH
(diameter at breast height), GPS (global positioning), and physically tagging each tree.
http://www.trinitytreeconsultants.com/
• Provide professional comments based on education, experience, and publicly available material on the physical condition and health, tree structure, and tree form for each tree.
• Provide a professional opinion using the culmination of observations, to record curative measures and treatment recommendations.
• Tag each tree with its Tree Number (October 1, 2025)
Site Description
The Chalmette National Cemetery is located in Chalmette, Louisiana (Photo 1 of the attached
Photolog, Attachment A). It is a 17.5-acre cemetery adjacent to the site that was once the battleground of the Battle of New Orleans (Photo 2 of the attached Photolog, Attachment A). The National
Cemetery has one main entrance, located on West St Bernard Highway. The main road, Military
Cemetery Road, has curbs on each side and “ends” in a loop back to the one entrance. There are a few buildings on the entrance end of the Military Cemetery Road and a monument at the opposite end of the road, in the cul-de-sac.
Tree Inventory and Evaluation
The Tree Inventory (TI) is a necessary step in the process of managing the trees at Chalmette National
Cemetery. The TI is the foundation of this process. The trees must be evaluated with an elevated level of scrutiny, and attention is given to arboricultural details. Trees have various needs, requirements, and sensitivities, which are highly dependent on species. Trinity’s Senior Arborist, Scott Courtright, is a highly trained Consulting Arborist who evaluated each tree and assessed the current health and condition of each of the trees. Mr. Courtright was assisted in the field by Mrs. Miranda Cooper, a Degreed Horticulturist, and a Louisiana Licensed Arborist. Conducting a TI will give the arborist important data, such as species, species composition, observations, observed issues, and stresses, which are all critical to guiding the project planned on-site forward.
Each subject tree was located (Photos 3-7 of the attached Photolog, see Attachment A) and given a unique tree identification number. There are approximately 159 trees of various species surveyed in the
Chalmette National Cemetery as part of this TI. Each tree was then marked with a tree tag and affixed to the tree using aluminum nails. (Photos 8-13 of the attached Photolog, Attachment A). Special detail was utilized when installing the tree tags to place each tag at DBH and on the “not visible to the public” side of the tree being tagged. Also, the nails utilized are aluminum tags, which are not toxic to the trees or the environment. Additionally, nails were driven into the tree approximately ½ the length of the nail to allow for future growth of the tree. The tags and the nails are considered semi-permanent and will need to be monitored and evaluated, and potentially replaced as time goes on, as squirrels will chew on the tags, the trees will grow, and the tags may get weathered. Hard tagging is an excellent way to assist field crews and staff in the management of the trees by properly assisting in the identification of trees and communicating any observed issues or needs for a specific tree.
In accordance with our Scope of Work, the inventory captured: a numerical tree identification, the tree species, the estimated height and crown spread of each tree, the DBH, the current condition, the Arborist observations (health rating and observations), any curative measure recommended for each tree, and an approximate GPS coordinate for each tree. Each tree’s location can be observed on the map section included in the Photolog (Photos 3-7, in Attachment A).
Each tree was inspected by Trinity’s Senior Consulting Arborist, and a detailed inventory and the findings of each tree is reported in Attachment B of this report. In general, the subject trees are along Military
Cemetery Road, with several placed strategically throughout and between cemetery plots.
The subject trees were measured to collect a DBH (Diameter at Breast Height). This is a standard measuring application in forestry and arboriculture. The DBH of the tree allows for a forester or an arborist to gain an understanding of the relative total size or to approximate the age class of a particular tree. This measure also creates a standard unit to judge the growth of the target tree, relative to a previous measure of the same tree. The DBH of each tree is reported in inches and is reported in Attachment B.
Each subject tree was given a rating. This rating is a general rating and not intended to be a specific diagnosis. The specific diagnosis is given in the Tree Diagnosis section of this document. The tree rating is based on the observations made by the Arborist while standing at ground level and walking around the tree. When determining the tree rating, the Arborist carefully examined the roots, the habit of the tree, the crown of the tree, the overall appearance of the tree, the health, the structural integrity of the tree, and any other external characteristics of the tree. Ratings are defined as:
Excellent- The subject tree is in normal, healthy condition, and appears to be stable and in no need of immediate care. Regular care and maintenance should be considered to maintain the current condition.
Good- The subject tree is in moderately healthy condition and appears to be stable; however, in need of some immediate care and maintenance. Plant health care practices should be followed to improve the condition of the tree. The subject tree should be monitored closely to ensure that the tree does not fall into a worse condition.
Fair- The subject tree is in an unhealthy condition. The subject tree appears sickly or weak and needs immediate care. The subject tree should be monitored closely and regularly.
Poor- The subject tree is in extremely unhealthy condition. It is doubtful that any curative measure can be prescribed. The subject tree is a strong candidate for removal.
Tree ratings are based on the observations of the Trinity Senior Consulting Arborist. It is also important to note that the evaluation of these trees was subjective. Another licensed consulting arborist may have assigned a different overall rating or condition on a tree than what Trinity did; this is why we have two arborists complete the survey to reduce the variation. Professional variation can occur because there is no standard metric or protocol; every arborist may differ slightly in their evaluation technique or personal judgment of a particular tree.
The site hosted a diverse cross-section of tree species. Properly identifying the species is critical to assessing the tree, diagnosing the issues that may exist or could develop, and properly prescribing curative treatment. The species observed as part of this inventory were:
Live Oak (Quercus virginiana)
Sweet Pecan (Carya illinoinensis)
Cow Oak (Quercus michauxii)
Southern Magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora)
Sweet Bay Magnolia (Magnolia virginiana)
Bald Cypress (Taxodium distichum)
American Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis)
Nuttall Oak (Quercus texana)
Red Maple (Acer rubrum var. drummondii)
Crape Myrtles (Lagerstroemia indica)
Black Gum (Nyssa sylvatica)
Native Persimmon (Diospyros virginiana)
A full list of trees inventoried and related data for each tree can be found in Appendix A. The mapped location of each tree can be found in the Photo log, Photos 3-7. Most trees inventoried were Live Oak
(Photo 14 of the attached Photo Log, Attachment A). This species dominates the landscape in South
Louisiana and most of the Coastal Plains states. The Live Oak is a strong tree that works well in urban or rural areas and can handle many environmental stresses. There are some issues observed for the specific subject trees, and some issues related to the developmental characteristics of these species.
Many of these trees are mature and have been on site for many years and decades. There are quite a few of the Live oaks that are very large, with a sprawling crown. Likewise, other trees are fairly young and may have been replanted after a natural disaster, storm, flood, or hurricane that caused a pre-existing tree to fail. There are several observations of conflict between the root system of a tree and the site infrastructure
(Photo 15 of the attached Photo Log, Attachment A). Roots sprawling out over a curb or pushing against the concrete are an issue and will need to be addressed.
Any damage noticed upon inspection of the tree was noted, whether by man or by nature. During this inventory, a common observation was damage to the basal area of many trees. This is likely caused by lawnmowers or string trimmers bumping into the trees at the root and root flare area (Photo 16 of the attached Photo Log, Attachment A). This is obviously caused by mechanical damage and can be prevented. Photo 17 of the attached Photo Log, Attachment A, shows a column of decay that was caused by either an incorrect cut of a large limb or a tear-out that was executed due to a tear-out. At either case, the column of decay has formed and is quite large, compromising the integrity of the tree. Photo 18 of the attached Photo Log, Attachment A, shows a tear out due to an included bark scenario. This is a fairly young tree, and inclusion should have been identified by the on-site Arborist prior to the failure and the tear-out. The tree has a major wound and the other two leaders in the crown are also included and separation has begun; the tree has been recommended for removal. Photo 19 of the attached Photo
Log, Attachment A, shows a headstone that has been nearly totally engulfed by the root system of a tree.
There is no known method of removing the headstone that will not harm the tree. This has occurred on-site often.
Conclusions
In conclusion, the Chalmette National Cemetery has many trees throughout the grounds, with a diverse species profile and a bit of an uneven-aged class of trees. There is always an opportunity to plant more trees, in specific locations with a thought for “right tree, right space” and consideration for future maintenance. The project required that a Tree Inventory be conducted that evaluated each tree at the site.
Trinity Tree Consultants, LLC deployed Senior Arborist Scott Courtright and assisted Arborist Miranda
Cooper to perform the Tree Inventory and evaluation of each tree. Each tree was evaluated, diagnosed, and a curative treatment was prescribed for the tree according to the current situation. In general, the trees observed as part of this inventory appeared stable and were experiencing a low to moderate level of stress, with few exceptions. Each tree was given a unique tree ID and tagged both with GPS coordinates and with physical hard tags placed on each tree. In general, Trinity observed and noted the need for regularly scheduled tree care and maintenance for all trees on site. A Tree maintenance Plan would include, but not be limited to:
• Tree Inspections – An Arborist to evaluate trees regularly (Annual is preferred, but no more than 3 years between Arborist evaluations)
• Plant Health Care – Trees utilize resources, and these resources must be restored when depleted.
Deep-root soil injections of macro and micro-nutrients is the preferred delivery method in soil for tree health care. This method delivers beneficial soil nutrients under high pressure that fractures soil particles to deliver an aqueous solution of nutrients and other soil bacteria/fungi
(mycorrhizae).
• Mulch – The proper mulching of trees may be the most beneficial and cost-effective portion of a Tree Health Care Plan. The root system of urban trees often grows in soils that are harsh and unfavorable for adequate root development and tree health/stability.
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .