B08_Attachment 0005_Combined Technical - Risk Ratings.pdf

PDF 136 KB Posted

Attached to
Army National Guard (ARNG) Chief Surgeon’s Office (CSG) for Centralized Credentialing and Privileging Services (Amendment 0002-01)
Solicitation number
W9133L22R1002
Issued by

About this file

This document provides details on a solicitation from the National Guard Bureau for centralized credentialing and privileging services to support the Army National Guard Chief Surgeon's Office. The solicitation number is W9133L22R1002 and proposals are due by May 30th, 2022. It includes pricing matrices, past performance questionnaires, question and answer logs, and color-coded ratings for technical proposals ranging from outstanding to unacceptable. The services requested are to support credentialing and privileging of Army National Guard healthcare professionals. The National Guard Bureau Directorate of Acquisitions is the contracting office issuing this request for proposals.

View the file

Other files

Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

W9133L22R1002 Army National Guard Attachment 0004 Centralized Credentialing and Privileging

Table 1: Combined Technical / Risk Ratings

Color Rating Adjectival Rating Description Blue Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful contract performance is low.

Purple Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful contract performance is low to moderate.

Green Acceptable Proposal indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful contract performance is no worse than moderate.

Yellow Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements and/or risk of unsuccessful contract performance is high.

Red Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation and, thus, contains one or more deficiencies and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable.

Proposal is unawardable.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .