B08 - ATTACHMENT 0002 - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE 24JUL24.pdf

Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) Form

The Offeror must complete Sections 2-A and 2-B for each Past Performance reference and send copies to the PPQ respondent(s) identified in 2-A in a timely manner. The Offeror shall include these documents with its proposal; however, the PPQ respondent will send the completed questionnaire directly to the POC identified in the PPQ Section 3-C below.

In order to assess potential contractors Army Contracting Command – Rock Island (ACC-RI) is obtaining past performance information with respect to each Offeror. The PPQ respondent will complete all sections of the PPQ Sections 3-A and 3-B. In addition to this questionnaire, you may receive a follow-up phone call or email to confirm or clarify information. This is a critical acquisition being conducted by ACC-RI and your support is sincerely appreciated.

Thank you for your time, effort, and cooperation in responding to this questionnaire. The completed questionnaire shall be submitted directly via email to Ms. Elizabeth Miller, Contract Specialist, elizabeth.m.miller174.civ@army.mil and Ms. Kelly Clifton, Contract

Specialist, kelly.k.clifton.civ@army.mil.

The subject line in the submission email shall clearly indicate: ‘[Offeror Name] W519TC- 24-R-0002 message shall originate from the PPQ respondent’s Government or corporate email address.

SECTION 1. GENERAL GUIDANCE

Please use the following rating in scoring the performance elements below (assessments should reflect only contractor-liable performance):

RATING DESCRIPTION

Excellent

The Offeror’s past performance far exceeds the customer's expectations and provided significant, unusual worthwhile features or benefits.

Good

The Offeror’s past performance exceeds the customer's expectations and provided significant, unusual worthwhile features or benefits.

Satisfactory The Offeror’s past performance met the customer's expectations and contract requirements.

Marginal

The Offeror’s past performance could have been improved.

The Offeror required major agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.

mailto:jaden.w.dellitt.civ@army.mil kelly.k.clifton Sticky Note Marked set by kelly.k.clifton

RATING DESCRIPTION

Unsatisfactory The Offeror’s past performance did not meet customer expectations and/or contract requirements.

SECTION 2. GENERAL INFORMATION

2-A RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION / POC

1. Name & Title:

2. Organization:

3. Address:

4. Phone No:

5. E-mail:

6. Date:

2-B CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

1. Offeror:

2. DoD Entity (CAGE) Code of

Evaluated Contractor:

3. Type of Instrument -

Contract/Order/Subcontract/Other:

4. If Subcontract identify Prime

Contractor:

5. Contract Identification Number:

6. Order Number (if applicable):

7. Project Title and Demil Description

(add rows if needed, up to 200 words):

8. Pricing Type (e.g., Fixed Price, Time and Materials, Cost Reimbursable):

9. Date of Award:

10. Date work effort/contract will end:

11. Initial Contract Dollar Value

(w/Options):

12. Current/Final Contract Dollar Value

(w/Options):

13 Period of Performance (including all options)

14. Place(s) of Performance:

15. Contracting Officer Contract information16. Technical COR Contact Information

SECTION 3. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.

3-A GENERAL INFORMATION

1.

Respondent’s Role (e.g., COTR, Contracting Officer) for evaluated contract and length of time in role:

2.

Has this contract been partially or completely terminated? If yes, explain and identify type of termination (e.g., default, convenience).

3.

What were the production quantity requirements for this contract and did the contractor meet those requirements?

4. Were there any changes in contract dollar amounts throughout the life of the contract; and if so, please explain (e.g., Government or Contractor caused):

5.

Were there any PQDRs/CARs issued on this contract; and if so, please explain how resolved.

6 Compliance with FAT (if applicable)?

3-B CONTRACT PERFORMANCE

Please rate this Contractor with respect to:

A. Meeting contract quality and delivery requirements including specifications, standards of good workmanship, and technical direction:

Rating Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

Check

Comment:

B. Contractor’s ability to deliver according to the agreed-to schedule. What were the causes of any schedule variances?

Rating Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

Check

Comment:

C. Contractor’s ability to identify and correct problems and prevent or mitigate potential problems in a timely manner:

Rating Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

Check

Comment:

D. Satisfaction level of work effort performed:

Rating Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

Check

Comment:

E. Contractor’s compliance with security requirements OSHA and EPA:

Rating Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

Check

Comment:

3-C. RETURN INFORMATION

When completed, please send electronically via email to: Ms. Elizabeth Miller, Contract Specialist, elizabeth.m.miller174.civ@army.mil and Ms. Kelly Clifton, Contract Specialist, kelly.k.clifton.civ@army.mil.

Thank you for your assistance.