B08_Att_07_PSP_Vol_I_Exp_140P8626R0002.docx
DOCX document 40 KB Posted
- Attached to
- REPLACE ROOFS AND VENTS FORT CRONKHITE, GOGA
- Solicitation number
- 140P8626R0002
About this file
This is a Project Experience Questionnaire template for federal contract solicitation 140P8626R0002, issued by the Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Golden Gate National Recreation Area, for roof and vent replacement work at Fort Cronkhite and gutter guard installation at Fort Barry. The questionnaire is a required submission document that allows offerors to demonstrate relevant experience on similar projects of comparable nature and scope.
The template requires offerors to provide detailed information on referenced projects including project title, location, period of performance, brief description, and project owner contact details. Offerors must list all prime contractors and subcontractors involved, their specific roles, original and final contract prices, and original and final performance periods in calendar days. The questionnaire includes seven substantive questions addressing: description of work performed by all contractors; alignment with Project Experience elements specified in Section L of the solicitation; reasons for any price changes; reasons for any schedule changes; problems encountered and resolution methods; successful means and methods and their applicability to the proposed project; and any additional relevant project information. The format is expandable to multiple pages as needed to adequately address each question and demonstrate contractor capability on the current roof and vent replacement requirement.
View the file
Other files
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Project Experience Questionnaire Solicitation: 140P8626R0002
Submit responses to the questions below that demonstrate your relevant experience successfully completing projects of a similar nature and scope as this requirement per the instructions provided in Section L of the Solicitation. Limit submittals to the quantity of projects and timeframes required in the solicitation. Expand the response sections shown below as needed to adequately address each question (this questionnaire may be expanded to multiple pages if needed).
| Offeror |
| Company Name |
REFERENCED PROJECT INFORMATION
| Project Title |
| Title |
| Project Location |
| City, State |
| Period of Performance: |
| MM/DD/YYYY – MM/DD/YYYY |
| Brief Project Description |
| Description |
| Project Owner |
| Company Name |
| POC: |
| First & Last Name |
| Phone: |
| (XXX) XXX-XXXX |
CONTRACTOR LIST
List Contractor(s) whose experience on the referenced project is being submitted for evaluation on this proposed project. If more than one contractor is listed (i.e. prime and subcontractors), provide information specific to that contractor.
| Contractor Name |
| Role on Referenced Project |
(Prime or Sub)
| Trade |
| Price |
(list for each contractor’s specific work) Performance Period (calendar days) (list for each contractor’s specific work)
| Original |
| Final |
| Original |
| Final |
| Sparky’s Electrical Company |
| Prime |
| Prime |
| $XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XX |
| XX |
| ABC Plumbing & Heating, Co |
| Subcontractor |
| Plumbing & Mechanical |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XXX |
| XXX |
Subcontractor
PROJECT EXPERIENCE QUESTIONS
1. Describe the project work performed by all contractors listed above.
Response
2. Identify which Project Experience elements listed in section L of the solicitation each contractor’s work addresses.
Response
3. Describe & provide reasons for any changes to the original price for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
4. Describe and provide reasons for any changes to the original schedule for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
5. Describe problems, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were encountered and how they were resolved. Describe how the offeror’s proposal accounts for similar issues.
Response
6. Describe the means and methods, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were successful. Would you implement the same means and methods on the proposed project? Why or why not?
Response
7. Provide any other additional project information you believe should be presented.
Response
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .