B08_Att_06_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 47 KB Posted

Attached to
DEEP CLEAN BARRY BAKER TUNNEL Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
140P8624Q0064
Issued by
Department of the Interior National Park Service Pacific West Region

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a federal contract opportunity. The questionnaire gathers information about the offeror's past performance on a previous contract, including ratings on quality of work, schedule and time management, cost control, management, small business subcontracting, and regulatory compliance. The reference is asked to provide an overall recommendation on the offeror's ability to perform similar contracts. The related federal contract opportunity is for deep cleaning of the Barry Baker Tunnel at the Golden Gate National Recreation Area, managed by the National Park Service Pacific West Region. The solicitation number is 140P8624Q0064 and the period of performance is not provided.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to DEEP CLEAN BARRY BAKER TUNNEL, newest first.
File Type Posted
Sol_140P8624Q0064_Amd_0001.pdf PDF
B08_Att_07_Site_Visit_Sign-In_Sheet_0001.pdf PDF
B08_Att_02_Quote_Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
B08_Att_03_Drawings_Maps_Figures.pdf PDF
B08_Att_01_Barry_Baker_Tunnel_Statement_of_Work.pdf PDF
B08_Att_04_Wage_Determinations_2015-5725__7-22-24.pdf PDF
Sol_140P8624Q0064.pdf PDF
B08_Att_05_Relevant_Experience_.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

INSTRUCTIONS: Offeror to complete Sections I and II and transmit questionnaire to reference.

Reference to complete Sections III and IV and transmit back to Contracting Specialist at robert_j_barnes@nps.gov.

I. CONTRACTOR INFORMATION:

Company Name
Company
Street Address
Address
City
City
State
State
Zip Code
XXXXX
DUNS Number
XXXXXXX
Point of Contact
Name, Email, Phone

II. CONTRACT INFORMATION:

Project Title
Title
Contract Number
XXXXXXXXXX
Contract Type
Firm Fixed Price / Time and Materials / Cost Reimbursable / Other
Awarded Contract Price
$X,XXX,XXX
Current / Final Price
$X,XXX,XXX
Contract Award Date
XX/XX/XXXX
Contract Completion Date
XX/XX/XXXX
Period of Performance
XX/XX/XXX – XX/XX/XXX
Project Location
Park or Street Address, City, State
Client / Owner
Company
Brief description of the contract and work effort:
Scope of Work Description

III. REFERENCE:

Name
First, Last
Position / Title
Title
Organization
Agency or Company
Phone Number
XXX-XXX-XXXX
Email Address
Email
Signature
Signature
Date
XX/XX/XXXX

IV. EVALUATION:

Rating
Definition
Satisfactory Confidence
Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
No Confidence
Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has little or no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
Neutral Confidence
No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.
Evaluation Area
Rating

Quality

Quality of workmanship (including subconsultants)?
Choose an item.
Quality of and adherence to quality control plan?
Choose an item.
Quality of informational and technical submittals?
Choose an item.
Overall Quality Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, and unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Schedule and Time Management

Met project schedule milestones?
Choose an item.
Responded to owner requests in a timely manner?
Choose an item.
Informational and technical deliverables submitted timely?
Choose an item.
Promptly addressed scheduling issues?
Choose an item.
Overall Schedule and Time Management Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, and unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Cost Control

Addressed design errors and omissions to minimize additional costs?
Choose an item.
Provided fair and reasonable pricing for contract modifications?
Choose an item.
Submitted accurate and complete invoices?
Choose an item.
Promptly paid subconsultants?
Choose an item.
Overall Cost Control Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, and unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Management

General oversight by project manager?
Choose an item.
Coordination with and control of subconsultants?
Choose an item.
Addressed location factors (especially remote locations)?
Choose an item.
Maintained good working relationship with owner representatives?
Choose an item.
Demonstrated flexibility, innovativeness and cooperation in resolving potential problems?
Choose an item.
Overall Management Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, and unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Small Business Subcontracting and Labor Standards

Met regulatory and contractual labor standards?
Choose an item.
Successfully contracted with small and socio-economically disadvantaged businesses?
Choose an item.
Quality and adherence to applicable subcontracting plans?
Choose an item.
Overall Small Business Subcontracting and Labor Standards Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of exceptional, marginal, and unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Regulatory Compliance

Met building and life safety codes?
Choose an item.
Overall Regulatory Compliance Rating
Choose an item.
Overall Recommendation:
Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to perform in accordance with the contract’s most significant requirements, I would recommend them for similar contracts:
Choose an item.
Overall Comments:

V. RETURN:

Return by
6:00 PM PST 08/22/2024
Name
Robert Barnes
Title
Contract Specialist
Organization
National Park Service
Email
Robert_j_barnes@nps.gov

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .