B08 - 3GEN FLIR DCB LRIP - Attachment 0001 - PWS_final.pdf

Contract: W909MY-22-R-0001 Attachment 0001

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

FOR

LOW RATE INITIAL PRODUCTION (LRIP)

OF THE

THIRD GENERATION FORWARD LOOKING INFRARED (3GEN FLIR)

DEWAR COOLER BENCH (DCB)

SOLICITATION: W909MY-22-R-0001

17 September 2021

Prepared By

Third Generation Forward Looking Infrared Product Manager Ground Sensors (PM GS)

Fort Belvoir, VA 22060

Table of Contents

1.0 Scope

1.1. Background

1.2. System Description

2.0 Applicable Documents

2.1. Government Documents

2.1.1. Specifications

2.1.2. Order of Precedence

3.0 Requirements

3.1. General Requirements

3.1.1. Program Management Requirements

3.1.2. Meetings and Reviews

3.1.3. Monthly Status Reports

3.1.4. Data Management

3.1.5. Government Furnished Equipment (GFE)

3.1.6. Base Procurement

3.1.7. Procurement Options

3.1.8. Hardware Acceptance

3.2. Logistics and Provisioning

3.2.1. Item Unique Identification (IUID)

3.2.2. Safety, Health, and Environment

3.2.3. Inspection & Acceptable, Packaging, Labeling, Shipment, and Storage ... 14

3.3. Systems Engineering

3.3.1. Configuration Management

3.3.2. Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) Management Program and Plan

3.3.3. Quality Assurance

3.4. Support Services

3.4.1. Technical and Engineering Services

3.4.2. Test Services

3.4.3. Logistics and Provisioning Services

1.0 Scope

This Performance Work Statement (PWS) specifies the requirements the Contractor shall meet in support of the Third Generation Forward Looking Infrared (3GEN FLIR) Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) Dewar Cooler Bench (DCB) Program. The objective of this effort is to manufacture and deliver 3GEN FLIR DCBs to support the Abrams M1A2 System Enhancement Program Version 4 (SEPv4) and the Next Generation Combat Vehicle (NGCV) / Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle (OMFV). The Period of Performance (PoP) is 48 months.

The general requirements for the effort are identified in Section 3.0 and its sub-paragraphs. Program Security Management and Safety requirements are identified in Appendix B.

The Contractor shall provide 3GEN FLIR DCBs as detailed and defined in this PWS.

3GEN FLIR DCBs delivered under this effort shall meet all requirements identified in the 3GEN FLIR Performance Specification.

The Contractor shall provide engineering & technical, test, and logistics services.

Services will be funded under cost reimbursable Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs) within the contract.

1.1. Background

The 3GEN FLIR is the next generation of reconnaissance, surveillance, and target acquisition (RSTA) sights to restore sensor overmatch through significant improvements in range and resolution. The 3GEN FLIR program incorporates High Definition (HD) dual band Mid-Wave Infrared and Long-Wave Infrared (MWIR/LWIR) sensing technology advances into a common B-Kit for RSTA capabilities in day-night and degraded battlefield environments. The 3GEN FLIR B-Kit provides the ability to detect threats at greater distances under a full spectrum of conflict and battlefield conditions.

3GEN FLIR enhances the platforms’ effectiveness and survivability by providing greater situational awareness promoting combat effectiveness and reducing fratricide. This contract produces a common DCB for integration into the 3GEN FLIR B-Kit. DCBs manufactured under this contract will be provided as Government Furnished Property (GFP) to the 3GEN FLIR B-Kit Contractor for installation into the B-Kit. B-Kits will be provided to PM Abrams for integration into the Abrams M1A2 System Enhancement Program Version 4 (SEPv4). This contract also includes options for providing DCBs for the Next Generation of Combat Vehicles (NGCV) Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle (OMFV) variant.

1.2. System Description

The DCB comprises an Integrated Dewar Electronics Cooler Assembly (IDECA) and a mechanical bench into which it is integrated. The IDECA is composed of a Dewar (a vacuum-sealed container) housing a High-Definition (HD) MWIR/LWIR FPA and variable aperture mechanism (VAM); an integrated cryo-cooler; and electronics to control the FPA, VAM, and cryo-cooler, and to interface with other 3GEN FLIR B-Kit components. The DCB is defined by a Government performance specification, an ICD, and drawing against which it will be tested. An image of the 3GEN FLIR DCB is shown in Figure 1 below.

Figure 1: 3GEN FLIR DCB

2.0 Applicable Documents

The following documents form a part of this PWS to the extent specified herein.

2.1. Government Documents

2.1.1. Specifications

MIL-PRF-A3347043 Performance Specification for the 3GEN FLIR Dewar Cooler Bench (DCB)

MIL-PRF-A3347057 Classified Performance Specification for the 3GEN FLIR

DCB

Copies of these documents are available online at https://mycmsportal.com/login.aspx.

2.1.1.1. Standards

MIL-STD-129 Military Marking for Shipment and Storage MIL-STD-130N Identification Marking of U.S. Military Property, 16 Nov 2012 MIL-STD-1686 Electrostatic Discharge Control Program for Protection of Electrical and Electronic Parts, Assemblies and Equipment (Excluding Electrically Initiated Explosive Devices) MIL-STD-2073-1E Department of Defense Standard Practice for Military Packaging

Standards can be viewed or downloaded at the Acquisition Streamlining and Standardization Information System (ASSIST)-Online Website https://assist.dla.mil/online/start.

2.1.1.2. Handbooks

MIL-HDBK-61B Configuration Management Guidance, 7 Apr 2020

Handbooks can be viewed or downloaded at the ASSIST-Online Website https://assist.dla.mil/online/start.

2.1.1.3. Drawings

A3347045 3GEN FLIR Dewar Cooler Bench (DCB) Mechanical Drawing

2.1.1.4. Interface Control Documents

A3347044 3GEN FLIR DCB Interface Control Document

2.1.1.5. Other Documents

DOD 4100.39-M, Volume 10 Federal Logistics Information System (FLIS) Procedures, Multiple Application References / Instructions / Tables and Grids

Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 OSHA's Title 29, Part 1910, Code of Federal Regulation (CFR), EPA's Title 40

CFR §116.4 and the standards/regulations promulgated by the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)

DoDI 5000.83, Technology and Program Protection to Maintain Technological Advantage

DoDM 5200.01 DoD Information Security Program AR 381-12, Threat Awareness and Reporting Program AR 530-1, Operations Security DoDI 8500.01 Cybersecurity Procedures Overview CNSSI 1253 Security Control Overlays for Industrial Control Systems DoDI 8510.01 Risk Management Framework Defense Information System Agency (DISA) Security Technical Implementation

Guides (STIG) AR700-145 Item Unique Identification

2.1.1.6. Non-Government Documents

ASTM D3951-98 Standard Practice for Commercial Packaging ANSI/TA-STD-0016 Standard for Preparing a DMSMS Management Plan ANSI/NCSL Z540.1-1994 Requirements for operating a Calibration

Laboratory

EIA ISO/IEC 15288:2008 Systems and Software Engineering – System Life Cycle Processes

ANSI/GEIA-STD-0009-2008 Reliability Program Standard for Systems Design, Development, and Manufacturing

ISO 9001/2015 Quality Management Systems ISO 10012:2003 Measurement Management Systems ANSI Z540.1-2002 Requirement for the Calibration of Measuring and Test

Equipment NAS411 Rev 3 Hazardous Materials Management Program GEIA-STD-0005-1 Performance Standard for Aerospace and High Performance

Electronic Systems Containing Lead-Free Solder GEIA –STD-0005-2 Standard for Mitigating the Effects of Tin Whiskers in

Aerospace and High Performance Electronic Systems NIST SP 800-53 Rev 4 Security and Privacy Controls for Federal Information

Systems and Organizations

2.1.2. Order of Precedence

In the event of a conflict between the text of this PWS and the references cited herein, the text of this PWS shall take precedence. Nothing in this document supersedes applicable laws and regulations unless a specific exemption has been obtained.

3.0 Requirements

The Contractor shall provide all personnel, facilities, and material to execute this DCB production effort. The Contractor is encouraged to use commercial and industrial processes and practices that will reduce the DCB production and future operational support costs while meeting the requirements of this contract. The Contractor shall inform the Contracting Officer of any cost or schedule impacts associated with any direction provided by Government to change the requirements herein.

3.1. General Requirements

The Contactor shall deliver hardware that conforms to associated performance requirements. Services such as technical & engineering, test, and logistics services shall be performed in accordance with (IAW) requirements delineated in section 3.4 of this PWS.

3.1.1. Program Management Requirements

The Contractor shall use the management tools needed to effectively manage the work performed under this contract. All Government meetings and reviews for the 3GEN FLIR Program are to be held virtually/telephonically unless otherwise specified.

3.1.2. Meetings and Reviews

3.1.2.1. Post Award Meeting

The Government will schedule a Post Award Meeting that will be held via teleconference and will occur No Later Than (NLT) 30 calendar days after contract award. The purpose of the meeting is to ensure mutual understanding of the contract and all obligations and responsibilities of the Contractor. The Contractor shall present at the Post Award meeting the general approach, assumptions, guidelines, schedules, level of effort, surface problems, and areas that need clarification. Presentation materials and conference minutes for the Post Award Meeting shall be provided IAW Presentation Material, CDRL A001, and Conference Minutes, CDRL A002.

CDRL A001 Presentation Material CDRL A002 Meeting Minutes

3.1.2.2. Program Reviews

Program reviews shall be held no less than monthly while production is ongoing. These program reviews may be held via telephone, videoconference, or on-site at the Contractor facility. These reviews shall provide a working level forum to discuss contents of the Monthly Status Reports. The Contractor shall not provide dedicated presentation material for program reviews other than the Monthly Status Report delivered IAW Status Report CDRL A003. The Contractor shall provide Conference Minutes IAW Conference Minutes CDRL A002.

CDRL A002 Conference Minutes

3.1.2.3. Teleconferences

The Contractor shall utilize telephone conferences and video teleconferences with the Government to conduct informal and day-to-day discussions as required.

3.1.3. Monthly Status Reports

The Contractor shall prepare and submit a Monthly Status Report that addresses the overall status of the program. The Contractor shall submit a Monthly Status Report IAW Status Report CDRL A003. The Contractor and Government will review the latest Monthly Status Report during Program Reviews.

CDRL A003 Status Report

3.1.4. Data Management

The Contractor shall establish a system for management of all data required under this contract. The Contractor, in developing information furnished to the Government, shall maximize the re-use of existing data and technical information. Specific data management functions shall include schedule control for deliverables, maintenance of deliverables, approval of deliverable format, and the distribution and delivery of data products. The system shall include facilities for storage of all data developed or utilized for this acquisition. The system shall provide archived data for Government use. Upon request, the Government shall have access to data generated under this contract.

3.1.4.1. Data Requirements.

The CDRLs are listed at Appendix A. Refer to the CDRLs for preparation and submission instructions. The Contractor shall submit sensitive CDRLs and/or other sensitive/proprietary data to the Government via a secure information exchange such as encrypted email. Any other CDRLs or data necessary for transmittal in support of the effort shall be sent via an email client such as Outlook. The Contract shall not utilize systems that require the Government to obtain accounts, log into an account, or necessitate other burdensome requirements in order to receive the CDRLs or data. The system shall retain the CDRLs or data until Government disposition.

The Government’s rights in non-commercial technical data and software deliverables shall be governed by DFARS 252.227-7013 and DFARS 252.227-7014, respectively.

The Government's rights in commercial technical data deliverables shall be governed by DFARS 252.227-7015. All technical data (e.g. documents, drawings, computer aided design models, simulation and modeling) and software deliverables shall be properly marked in accordance with the marking requirements set forth in DFARS 252.227- 7013(f) and DFARS 252.227-7014(f). Technical data and software deliverables with non-conforming restrictive markings shall be rejected and corrected by the Contractor at the Contractor's expense, in accordance with DFARS 252.227-7013(h)(2) and DFARS 252.227-7014(h)(2) respectively.

The Contractor shall submit commercial software license agreements which will be reviewed and approved by the Contracting Officer for the Government. The Contractor shall not submit any commercial software license terms that conflict with federal procurement law or do not satisfy user needs. Commercial Software License terms that are unacceptable to the Government include (but are not limited to) indemnification provisions (and other types of provisions that include unauthorized or unbudgeted funding obligations), attorney's fees provision, state or foreign choice of law/jurisdiction provisions, binding arbitration provisions, and injunctive relief provisions.

In order to assert that the Government will only have limited rights to non-commercial technical data and restricted rights to non-commercial computer software, the Contractor shall be prepared to show evidence that (1) all components/parts of the product was developed exclusively with private funds; and (2) the Government is not entitled to Government Purpose Rights or Unlimited Rights IAW DFARS 252.227-7013 or DFARS 252.227-7014.

3.1.5. Government Furnished Equipment (GFE)

The Government and Contractor will determine if any GFE will be provided under the contract during the Post Award Conference.

3.1.6. Base Procurement

3.1.6.1. Long Lead Material (LLM)

The Contractor shall procure the LLM required to support the Procurement Option – Lot 1 or Lot 2 as exercised by the Government. LLM shall be defined as only those components that have the longest period of time for delivery and/or integration into the next higher assembly.

3.1.7. Procurement Options

The Government only intends to exercise one each of Procurement Option Lot 1 or Lot 2; Lot 3, Lot 4, Lot 5, or, Lot 6; and Lot 7 or Lot 8, respectively.

3.1.7.1. Procurement Option - Lot 1 - Abrams: 24 DCBs

If this Option is exercised by the Government, the Contractor shall manufacture, assemble, test and deliver a quantity of twenty four (24) 3GEN FLIR DCBs as set forth in Table 1.

Table 1: Procurement Option - Lot 1- Abrams: 24 DCBs

3.1.7.2. Procurement Option - Lot 2 - Abrams: 48 DCBs

If this Option is exercised by the Government, the Contractor shall manufacture, assemble, test and deliver a quantity of forty eight (48) 3GEN FLIR DCBs as set forth in Table 2:

Table 2: Procurement Option - Lot 2- Abrams: 48 DCBs

3.1.7.3. Procurement Option - Lot 3 - Abrams: 48 DCBs

If this Option is exercised by the Government, the Contractor shall manufacture, Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun DCB Qty 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 4

Spare DCB Qty 1 1

Cum Deliveries 1 2 3 4 5 7 9 11 13 16 20 24

Lot 1

3QFY24 4QFY24 1QFY25 2QFY25 3QFY25

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun DCB Qty 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 6 8

Spare DCB Qty 2 2

Cum Deliveries 2 4 6 8 10 14 18 22 26 32 40 48

3QFY25

Lot 2

3QFY24 4QFY24 1QFY25 2QFY25

assemble, test and deliver a quantity of forty eight (48) 3GEN FLIR DCBs as set forth in Table 3:

Table 3: Procurement Option - Lot 3 - Abrams: 48 DCBs

3.1.7.4. Procurement Option - Lot 4 - Abrams: 96 DCBs

assemble, test and deliver a quantity of ninety six (96) 3GEN FLIR DCBs as set forth in Table 4:

Table 4: Procurement Option - Lot 4 - Abrams: 96 DCBs

3.1.7.5. Procurement Option - Lot 5 - Abrams: 9 DCBs

assemble, test and deliver a quantity of nine (9) 3GEN FLIR DCBs as set forth in Table 5:

Table 5: Procurement Option - Lot 5 - Abrams: 9 DCBs

3.1.7.6. Procurement Option - Lot 6 - Abrams: 18 DCBs

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

DCB Qty 4 5 6 6 7 8 8

Spare DCB Qty 2 1 1

Cum Deliveries 6 6 7 6 7 8 8

2QFY26

Lot 3

3QFY25 4QFY25 1QFY26

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

DCB Qty 8 10 12 12 14 16 16 Spare DCB Qty 4 2 2 Cum Deliveries 12 12 14 12 14 16 16

Lot 4

3QFY25 4QFY25 1QFY26 2QFY26

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

DCB Qty 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 Spare DCB Qty 1 Cum Deliveries 1 1 1 1 1 2 2

3QFY25 4QFY25 1QFY26 2QFY26

Lot 5 assemble, test and deliver a quantity of eighteen (18) 3GEN FLIR DCBs as set forth in Table 6:

Table 6: Procurement Option - Lot 6 - Abrams: 18 DCBs

3.1.7.7. Procurement Option - Lot 7 - NGCV/OMFV: 23 DCBs

assemble, test and deliver a quantity of twenty three (23) 3GEN FLIR DCBs as set forth in Table 7:

Table 7: Procurement Option - Lot 7 - NGCV/OMFV: 23 DCBs

3.1.7.8. Procurement Option - Lot 8 - NGCV/OMFV: 46 DCBs

assemble, test and deliver a quantity of forty six (46) 3GEN FLIR DCBs as set forth in Table 8:

Table 8: Procurement Option - Lot 8 - NGCV/OMFV: 46 DCBs

3.1.8. Hardware Acceptance

The Contractor shall implement and maintain a hardware acceptance process that demonstrates compliance to the technical and all other contractual requirements. The hardware acceptance process shall address system and subsystem component requirement verification, in-process inspection, Environmental Stress Screening (ESS) and final Acceptance Testing (AT). The Contractor shall prepare and submit AT and

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

DCB Qty 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 Spare DCB Qty 2 Cum Deliveries 2 2 2 2 2 4 4

1QFY26 2QFY26

Lot 6

3QFY25 4QFY25

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

DCB Qty 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 Cum Deliveries 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4

Lot 7

3QFY24 4QFY24 1QFY25 2QFY25

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

DCB Qty 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 8 8 Cum Deliveries 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 8 8

Lot 8

3QFY24 4QFY24 1QFY25 2QFY25

ESS Test Plans IAW CDRL A004 and AT and ESS Test Procedures IAW CDRL A005.

The Contractor may leverage Government-approved AT and ESS test plans and procedures. The Contractor shall provide copies of all test plans and procedures at the Post Award Meeting for Government review and approval.

After Government approval, all changes to the AT and ESS procedures require Government approval prior to implementing the change(s). The Contractor shall inform the Government of the requested changes and when directed by the Government, submit the updated test procedure(s) to the Government for review and approval. The Contractor shall not perform any AT and/or ESS testing until the updated test procedure(s) are approved.

CDRL A004 Test Plan CDRL A005 Test Procedure

3.1.8.1. Hardware Acceptance Testing (AT)

The Contractor shall perform AT, using the latest Government-approved AT procedures, on all hardware prior to delivery to the Government. AT will ensure the hardware has been manufactured IAW the requirements identified in the 3GEN FLIR Performance Specification and is free of deficiencies in workmanship and materials.

3.1.8.2. Environmental Stress Screening (ESS)

All 3GEN FLIR hardware will undergo ESS using the latest Government-approved ESS procedures prior to acceptance testing and delivery to the Government. ESS shall be performed on all deliveries. ESS will ensure workmanship flaws and infant mortality are discovered prior to AT.

3.2. Logistics and Provisioning

3.2.1. Item Unique Identification (IUID)

The Contractor shall implement IUID requirements IAW with paragraphs 3.2.1.1, 3.2.1.2, and 3.2.1.3.

3.2.1.1. IUID Marking and Labeling

The Contractor shall mark parts identified in table 9 below with an ID Plate that contains the Unit Item Identification (UID) 2D Matrix Symbol (utilizing Construct 2 format) IAW MIL-STD 130N and DFARS 252.211-7003, and defined in the contract. All marking and labeling such as identification plates, tags, etching, or labels when used on equipment, parts, assemblies, subassemblies, units, sets, groups, or kits shall be as permanent as the normal life expectancy of the item. All marking and labeling shall be capable of withstanding the environment, test, cleaning, repair, and rebuild procedures specified for the item. Legibility shall be as required and verified for ready readability per MIL-

STD-130N. If the technical data has not specified the marking location, markings shall be located such that they are visible during maintenance operation, provided that sufficient space is available, and does not interfere with equipment operations.

Items Requiring IUID Markings Dewar Cooler Bench – PN A3347045 Dewar Assembly – PN TBD Cryocooler Assembly – PN TBD Cryocooler Control Module – PN TBD Mechanical Bench – PN TBD

Table 9: Items Requiring IUID Markings

3.2.1.2. IUID Registry

The Contractor shall register all delivered items for which the Government’s unit acquisition cost is $5,000 or more IAW DFARS 252.211–7003. The Contractor shall maintain an accurate, current list of IUIDs for all items delivered on this contract requiring an IUID. The list shall be available for inspection by the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) or other Government representative throughout the life of this contract.

3.2.1.3. IUID Plan

The Contractor shall provide an IUID plan as described above IAW IUID Plan, CDRL A006. The plan shall address how the Contractor will provide markings and labeling IAW MIL-STD-130 (latest version) and DFARS 252.211–7003, and registering IUID marked items IAW DFARS 252.211–7003.

CDRL A006 Item Unique Identification Plan

3.2.2. Safety, Health, and Environment

The Contractor shall ensure that 3GEN FLIR DCBs purchased or repaired on this contract present no uncontrolled safety hazards throughout their life cycle. The Contractor shall prepare and submit the Safety Assessment Report (SAR) IAW CDRL A007.

CDRL A007 Safety Assessment Report

3.2.2.1. Pollution Prevention Program

When hardware deliveries are required, the Contractor shall identify and eliminate or reduce (where elimination is not feasible) hazardous/toxic and environmentally unacceptable materials of the 3GEN FLIR components to be used throughout the program lifecycle which include selection, handling, manufacture, use, maintenance, and disposal. The Contractor shall ensure compliance with all regulatory requirements (Federal, State, and local environmental laws) applicable to hazardous and environmentally unacceptable materials during the accomplishment of all contractual activities throughout the life cycle of the effort. Upon determination of any non-compliance of the Contractor, Subcontractor or suppliers, to any Federal, State, or local environmental laws, the Government shall be notified immediately.

3.2.3. Inspection & Acceptance, Packaging, Labeling, Shipment, and Storage

3.2.3.1. Inspection and Acceptance

Inspection and Acceptance will be performed by the Government in accordance with the approved Acceptance Test Procedures and shall result in a Government-signed DD Form 250, Material Inspection and Receiving Report, indicating Government Inspection & Acceptance.

3.2.3.2. Packaging

3.2.3.2.1. Shipment of DCBs without Field Reusable Shipping Container

DCB deliveries to the B-Kit Integrator shall be shipped without Field Reusable Shipping Containers. The Contractor shall utilize best commercial practices when packaging hardware to prevent physical damage during shipment. The shipment shall be marked

IAW MIL-STD-129.

3.2.3.2.2. Shipment of DCBs with Field Reusable Shipping Container

Spare DCBs shall be shipped in Field reusable shipping containers to facilitate the return of damaged DCBs. The Contractor shall develop and provide field reusable shipping containers for Spare DCBs. The field reusable shipping containers shall be developed IAW MIL-STD-2073-1E (w/change), utilizing Level A, and Method 44 (Rigid Construction, other than metal). The Field Reusable Shipping Container shall be marked IAW MIL-STD-129.

3.2.3.2.3. Additional Packing Instructions

The Contractor shall prepare a packing list containing the contract number, serial number, and part number for each item and shall enclose the list in each container listing all items packed therein. A DD Form 250 indicating Government Inspection & Acceptance (I&A) signed by the Government shall also be included in the individual pack. Gross over pack, pallet consolidation, or comparable approaches may be used if multiple DCBs are being shipped to the same destination. All packed items shall have human readable serial numbers as well as scanner readable bar-coded serial number information permanently affixed to the outer wrap, ship to/mark for information and serial numbers to aid in asset tracking.

3.2.3.3. Labeling

All shipments shall be labeled IAW MIL-STD 129.

3.2.3.4. Shipment

The Contractor shall utilize best commercial practices for shipment of DCBs between the Contractor’s facility and Government designated facilities. The Government will provide the SHIP TO/MARK FOR address including DODAAC for the completed DD Form 1348-1, Issue Release/Receipt Document, and DD Form 1149, Requisition and Invoice/Shipping Document, with Customer Fund Code and the transportation fund site.

Potential ship to address include:

Raytheon Intelligence and Space, McKinney, TX Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Cyber, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (C5ISR) Center, Fort Belvoir VA (formerly

NVESD)

Product Manager Ground Sensors, Fort Belvoir, VA

3.2.3.5. Storage

The Contractor shall develop a Standard Operating Procedure to execute handling and storage of 3GEN FLIR DCBs. The Contractor shall establish and maintain procedures for storing hardware to protect the quality and prevent damage, loss, deterioration, degradation or substitution of products waiting to be delivered to the Platform. The Contractor shall be responsible for ensuring all stored items maintain serviceable condition.. The Contractor shall assume all costs for repairing defective systems arising from improper storage and otherwise.

The Contractor shall ensure assets susceptible to Electro-Static Discharge (ESD) will be handled IAW MIL-STD-1686. The Contractor shall wrap and seal all ESD-susceptible assets in a suitable ESD container when stored or shipped. The Contractor shall open and handle ESD sensitive assets at approved ESD stations to prevent damage.

3.3. Systems Engineering

The Contractor shall provide a System Engineering Management Plan (SEMP) that describes the Contractor’s efforts for planning, controlling, and conducting a fully integrated engineering effort for the DCB IAW CDRL A008. The SEMP shall also address the Contractor’s Configuration Management Plan (CMP); Quality Program Plan (QPP); Program Protection Implementation Plan; and Failure Reporting, Analysis, and Corrective Action System (FRACAS) to include conducting root cause investigation and failure review board.

CDRL A008 System Engineering Management Plan

3.3.1. Configuration Management

The Contractor shall perform Configuration Management (CM) IAW MIL-HDBK-61B Configuration Management Guidance. The Contractor shall maintain hardware and software CM and conduct hardware and software Configuration Control Board (CCB) meetings to support all changes to the configuration. The Contractor shall maintain a comprehensive CMP, documented in the SEMP, CDRL A008.

3.3.1.1. Configuration Baseline

For LRIP, the Contractor shall control and maintain the hardware and software baselines for the DCB design.

3.3.1.2. Engineering Changes and Variances

All changes to the baseline shall be submitted to the Government for:

Review and concurrence on classification of Engineering Change Proposals (ECP) (Class I or Class II as defined in Para 3.3.1.2.1. and 3.3.1.2.2.)

Approval of Class I ECP Concurrence of Class II ECPs

The Contractor shall prepare and submit ECPs to the Government for review and disposition prior to implementation IAW CDRL A009. Disposition of ECPs, ECP types, ECP priorities, ECP justification codes, etc., shall be IAW MIL-HDBK-61B, Configuration Management Guidance. Contractor defined ECP numbering and submittal methods are acceptable with prior Government concurrence. All previous and current baselines shall be documented and within the Contractor’s CMP.

CDRL A009 Engineering Change Proposal

3.3.1.2.1. Class I Engineering Change (Major)

A change with significant impacts, such as impacts to functional and physical interchangeability and supportability of the product (Class I change). A change that affects specified and approved requirements for product attributes, including safety, reliability, and supportability. A change, after establishment of the product baseline, i.e., baseline for implementation of the product design, that affects compatibility with interfacing products, including such products as test equipment, support equipment, software, and products furnished by a customer or that affects one or more of the following: An ECP which affects safety, significantly alters end use form, fit, function, or interface, or significantly impacts, but not limited to, any of the following requirements:

Delivered operation or servicing instructions Required calibration to the extent that product identification should be changed Interchangeability or substitutability of configuration items (CI), replaceable products, assemblies, or components Change to add a previously non-qualified supplier, where supplier selection is specified User skills or user physical attributes Operator or maintenance training Requires retrofit of delivered products: e.g. by product recall, modification kit installation, attrition, replacement during maintenance using modified spares.

A change that does not impact the above criteria, but does impact cost/price/delivery to customer(s), including incentives and fees, guarantees, and contracted deliveries and milestones.

3.3.1.2.2. Class II Engineering Change (Minor)

A change that has little or no significant impact (Class II change). A change that affects configuration documentation (released design information), product or processes but does not affect Major Change Criteria.

Contractor defined numbering and formatting of Class II Engineering Changes is approved. Class II Engineering changes shall be submitted IAW CDRL A009 Government for review and concurrence of classification. Implementation of Class II Engineering changes prior to Government concurrence is at the Contractor’s risk.

3.3.1.3. Value Engineering Change Proposals (VECP)

The Contractor is encouraged to pursue continuous improvement to the delivered product, particularly in the areas of reliability and life-cycle cost. Value Engineering Change Proposals (VECPs) are provided for within this contract and their use is strongly supported. All VECPs shall be submitted IAW CDRL A009.

CDRL A009 Engineering Change Proposal

3.3.1.4. Notice of Revision (NOR)

The NOR is a form that shall identify all documents used to define revisions to drawings, specifications, Model Based Definition (MBD) associated lists or other referenced documents which require revision after ECP approval. When required, the Contractor shall prepare a NOR showing the detailed changes that must be made to technical documentation. The Contractor shall submit an NOR with each ECP submittal IAW

CDRL A010.

CDRL A010 Notice of Revision

3.3.1.5. Specification Change Notice (SCN)

An SCN is a document used to propose, transmit, and record changes to a specification. The Contractor shall submit a SCN as required IAW SCN CDRL A011.

CDRL A011 Specification Change Notice

3.3.1.6. Request for Variance (RFV)

The Contractor shall not build items, or present items for acceptance that incorporate a known departure from requirements, unless an RFV has been approved by the Government. Authorized variances stemming from an approved RFV are a temporary departure from requirements and do not constitute a permanent change to the baseline.

The Contractor shall submit an RFV to the Government for review and disposition prior to implementation. Submission formats shall be IAW CDRL A012. Contractor defined RFV numbering and submittal methods are acceptable with prior Government concurrence. Where it is determined that a change should be permanent, an ECP must be processed IAW CDRL A009. All baselines variances shall be documented and within the Contractor’s CM program.

CDRL A012 Request for Variance

3.3.2. Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) Management Program and Plan

The Contractor shall execute a proactive DMSMS management program IAW this PWS and ANSI/TA-STD-0016 for the period of performance of this contract. The program shall address how the Contractor will identify part obsolescence issues, assess potential risks, develop an obsolescence strategy, and determine the most cost effective solution to part obsolescence issues. The Contractor’s plan to conduct the DMSMS/Obsolescence program shall be documented in a DMSMS Management Plan prepared and delivered IAW CDRL A013, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) Management Plan, ANSI/TA-STD-0016, and this PWS.

CDRL A013 Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) Management Plan

3.3.2.1. DMSMS/Obsolescence Bill of Materials (BOM); LRIP Phase

The Contractor shall submit and update semiannually a BOM for Logistics and Supply Chain Risk Management throughout LRIP. The BOM shall include the system breakdown to the part level for all electronic, electrical, and electro-mechanical parts, assemblies and software components in the design. The BOM shall also include data entries for the known or projected End of Life (EOL) and case status, if a DMSMS case has been established for the item. The Contractor shall ensure that the BOM accurately reflects the current approved design IAW the Contractor’s DMSMS management plan and contract configuration management procedures. The Contractor shall submit the DMSMS/Obsolescence BOM IAW CDRL A014.

CDRL A014 Bill of Materials (BOM) for Logistics and Supply Chain Risk Management

3.3.2.2. DMSMS Alerts

The Contractor shall monitor the parts and software identified on the BOM for availability and obsolescence issues. Should an availability or obsolescence issue be identified, the Contractor shall inform the Government via email within 15 days of discovering the DMSMS issue (5 days if there is an active Hardware procurement).

3.3.2.3. DMSMS Case Management

The Contractor shall establish individual DMSMS cases for all documented and projected DMSMS issues. DMSMS cases shall be used to plan and manage efforts to resolve and implement a solution to the DMSMS issue from identification to closure.

For each case, the Contractor shall develop candidate mitigation strategies. The mitigation strategies shall estimate the cost to implement as well as any benefits, including cost benefits, which the Government might accrue over a five year planning horizon commencing with the an estimated implementation date. Design changes shall be made in accordance with the Configuration Management requirements of this contract. The Contractor shall include DMSMS Case Management Reports in the Monthly Status Report IAW CDRL A003.

CDRL A003 Status Report

3.3.3. Quality Assurance

3.3.3.1. Quality Management

The Contractor shall provide the Government an overview of the Quality Management System at the Post-Award Conference. The Contractor shall address quality assurance developments at each program review. The Contractor shall maintain a QPP, documented in the SEMP, which is compliant with ISO 9001/2015. The QPP shall describe the methodology used throughout all phases of the program (production, test, delivery, and post-delivery support) to meet the quality requirements. The Contractor shall be responsible for verification of the quality of the work performed by suppliers, including any inspections and tests performed by the suppliers. The Contractor’s QPP shall describe any methods unique to this contract of supplier selection, retention, management, inspection, and test validation or other supplier controls. The Contractor shall address product acceptance requirements for suppliers and emphasis shall be placed on product verification at the supplier level in order to reduce the amount of incoming receiving inspection and test. The Government reserves the right to review/audit any suppliers of key/critical components. No review/audit of any suppliers by the Government will relieve the Contractor of the responsibility of managing suppliers.

3.3.3.2. Responsibility for Inspection

The Contractor shall be responsible for the performance of all inspection requirements specified herein. Except as otherwise specified elsewhere in the contract and with Government concurrence, the Contractor may use their own or any other facilities, that are suitable for the performance of the inspection requirements specified herein. The Government reserves the right to audit, perform, witness, or verify any of the inspections set forth herein.

3.3.3.3. Use of Contractor’s Inspection Equipment

The Contractor shall maintain a calibration system in accordance with IAW ANSI/NCSL Z540.1-1994, ISO 10012:2003 to ensure that all test/inspection, measurement, and diagnostic equipment, to include all accessories and ancillary equipment, are properly calibrated, identified by appropriate labeling, and are traceable to national measurement standards. The Contractor's gauges, measuring, and testing devices shall be made available for use by the Government when required to determine conformance with contract requirements. If requested by the Government, the Contractor's personnel shall be made available for the operation of such devices and for verification of their accuracy and condition.

3.3.3.4. Inspection and Test Records

The Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate records of all inspections and tests throughout the contract, and shall make those records available for review or audit by the Government upon request.

3.3.3.5. Use of Government Furnished Property / Government Furnished Equipment

The Contractor's quality program shall include procedures for the control, use, and maintenance of GFP/GFE. The Contractor shall report GFE into the GFE module within Wide Area Work Flow as well as report GFE in the IUID Registry within 14 days of receipt. The Contractor shall report to the Government any GFP/GFE that is found damaged, malfunctioning, or otherwise unsuitable for use after initial inspection of the

GFP/GFE, IAW CDRL A003.

CDRL A003 Status Report

3.3.3.6. Lead-Free Control Plan/Tin Whisker Mitigation.

The Contractor shall follow the guidelines set forth in GEIA-STD-0005-1, “Performance Standard for Aerospace and High Performance Electronic Systems Containing Lead- Free Solder” or its equivalent. The Contractor shall implement a means to mitigate tin whiskers IAW with GEIA-STD-0005-2, “Standard for Mitigating the Effects of Tin Whiskers in Aerospace and High Performance Electronic Systems” or its equivalent, at control level 2C or equivalent. Control level 2B may be implemented in lieu of 2C with the provision that Solder Alloy Sn60Pb40 or Sn63Pb37 is required for the assembly of all circuit cards.

3.4. Support Services

The Contractor shall provide engineering & technical, logistics, and repair services.

Services will be incrementally funded under the cost reimbursable Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) within the contract.

When services are directed by the Government, the Contractor shall include a Services Progress Report in the Monthly Status Report IAW CDRL A003 to inform the Government on the status of Services funded under this program.

CDRL A003 Status Report

3.4.1. Technical and Engineering Services

The Contractor shall provide Technical and Engineering services to include but not limited to the following:

Engineering efforts such as a study, hardware fabrication, or test Failure analysis occurring during B-Kit First Article Testing, Sight level testing and integration, platform-level testing and integration, or platform operation Performance and/or cost trade study and investigation Production cost reduction redesign and analysis Software upgrade and software maintenance support

3.4.1.1. Repair Services

The Contractor shall perform repairs on all parts of the DCB. Hardware returned post repair shall be identified by National Stock Number (NSN), and in cases where there is no NSN, item Part Number (P/N).

Requirements for Repairs

The implementation for services of repairs shall be accomplished in a two (2) phased approach. Phase I will be Test and Inspect (T&I) of the failed units and Phase II will be the implementation of the Government approved repairs. Only upon notification by the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) shall the Contractor proceed with Phase I and II efforts.

Phase 1: Test and Inspection (T&I)

The Contractor shall induct the failed assets upon receipt from the B-Kit Integrator. If there is evidence of damage to the shipping package or reusable container, or the item appears condemnable or has missing parts, then a joint inspection shall be performed by the Contractor and the Government representative (normally DCMA).

Following induction, the Contractor shall perform a T&I on the asset(s) IAW the Performance Specifications, ICDs, and applicable documents in section 2.0 to determine which of the following categories is applicable:

No Evidence of Failure (NEOF). When the T&I reveals NEOF, only Phase I T&I costs will apply as Phase II is not applicable.

Beyond Economical Repair (BER). When the Government COR has concurred with T&I findings that the cost to repair an item exceeds the Maintenance Expenditure Limit (MEL), the item is categorized as BER and shall be disposed IAW the established demilitarized (DEMIL) Code contained in DoD 4100.39-M, Volume 10. Table 38 Demilitarization Codes and Table 216 DEMIL Integrity Code http://www.dlis.dla.mil/PDFs/Procedures/vol10.pdf. BER is defined as 65% of the price as stipulated in the lowest range pricing category for the respective part number. The serial number of items being disposed shall be recorded and reported to the Government in the T&I Results and Repair Estimate Report IAW CDRL A015. If the disposition decision is to scrap the item, then the Contractor is authorized to salvage useable material or assemblies from the item being scrapped for use in repair of failed hardware returns. When the T&I reveals BER, only Phase I T&I costs shall apply to the contract as an allowable cost as Phase II is not applicable.

Repairable. The asset is damaged and needs to be repaired. The Contractor shall determine the extent of the repairs required, estimated turn-around time, phase 1 costs, and phase II costs. Phase II costs shall include: labor hours, labor categories, material costs, paint/touch up, marking, packaging, shipping, and any other direct costs.

The Contractor shall then submit a T&I Results and Repair Estimate Report IAW CDRL A015 that includes a summary of the T&I results, phase I costs, and phase II costs for those items determined to be repairable.

CDRL A015 Test & Inspection Results and Repair Estimate Report

Phase II: Repair Execution

The COR will review the T&I Results and Repair Estimate Report CDRL A015 that identifies the category of repair required for each failed part based on the test and inspection and provide disposition guidance and funding for each item.

Scope of the Phase II Repair

For those items determined to be repairable and upon Government direction, the Contractor shall clean the item to remove all foreign matter, such as dust, dirt, grease, loose solder, excess paint, corrosion, or other similar conditions. The Contractor shall not be required to conduct repairs on cosmetic defects, such as faded, chipped, scratched, dented, or nicked hardware, or any other cosmetic damage resulting from normal and customary use providing that the damage does not affect the usage or intended purpose of the unit; no bare metal shall be exposed. Touch up paint is acceptable. The Contractor shall clean all units that have been found or restored to a serviceable condition. The Contractor shall be required to replace all damaged markings and identifications IAW IUID requirements stated in Section 3.2.1.1. After repair is complete, the Contractor shall test the item to ensure that it meets all performance specifications. The Contractor shall use the existing test requirements in the Performance Specification, the Interface Specification, and the Quality Assurance Program.

Packing and Shipping. The Contractor shall package and ship the repaired assets in the same manner as applies to new production assets. A Government representative, normally DCMA, shall be notified of the repair completion and planned shipment by the Contractor or Subcontractor of the repaired part, and perform a random inspection at their discretion on the hardware. The Government reserves the right to require 100% inspection. A shipment tracking number shall be provided by the Contractor for all hardware returns to the Government; arrival at destination of returned hardware shall be confirmed.

Tracking and Reporting. Once an item has been repaired, tested, and approved by the DCMA representative or designee, the Contractor shall provide tracking and reporting information IAW Repair and Tracking Report CDRL A016.

CDRL A016 Repair and Tracking Report

3.4.2. Test Services

3.4.2.1. First Article Test (FAT)

For the purposes of this PWS, FAT is defined as a sub-set of the Initial Production Test called out in the DCB Performance Specification. FAT includes Initial Production Testing as listed in the Verification Cross-reference Matrix of the DCB Performance Specification. The FAT shall address any and all inspections, demonstrations, testing, and analysis required to validate that the product, including the design and the processes necessary to build to the design, meets the product baseline requirements.

The Contractor shall prepare and submit FAT Test Plans and Test Procedures IAW Test Plan CDRL A004 and Test Procedures, CDRL A005. In planning for the FAT, the Contractor shall use any existing test plans and procedures and update them as required. The Contractor shall provide production samples to be used during FAT. The Contractor shall provide a recommendation to the Government for approval on the quantity of DCBs needed to successfully execute FAT. The Contractor shall identify, for Government approval, the Software version to be loaded onto hardware to be tested during FAT. As part of FAT, the Contractor shall conduct scans IAW Appendix B1.2.

Upon completion of FAT, the Contractor shall provide the FAT Test Report to the Government IAW paragraph 3.3.3.4. The outcome of FAT shall be a qualified DCB based on the DCB Performance Specification. After successful completion of FAT and at the discretion of the Government, test samples may be refurbished/ reconditioned as necessary to meet specification requirements and then submitted to the Government as part of the production deliveries. In the event of a failure during a FAT, a Failure Summary and Analysis Report shall be prepared and submitted IAW paragraph 3.4.2.3 of this PWS.

CDRL A004 Test Plan CDRL A005 Test Procedures

3.4.2.2. Re-qualification Testing

The Contractor shall inform the Government when a change requires re-qualification.

Criteria/changes that could necessitate a re-qualification include (but are not limited to):

Hardware or software design changes Parts obsolescence Changes to manufacturing facility or processes or changes to material/supply/supplier When a component (any part listed as a deliverable in the contract) has not been manufactured within 12 months

Based upon a technical review of the change, the level of re-qualification will be determined by the Government and approved by the Government. The Contractor shall prepare a re-qualification test plan IAW Test Plan CDRL A004 and re-qualification test procedures IAW Test Procedures CDRL A005. The Contractor shall not initiate re-qualification prior to Government approval of the test plan and shall perform re-qualification IAW the Government approved test plan and procedures. In the event of a software design change, the Contractor shall conduct a software re-qualification test in addition to scans IAW Appendix B1.2. The Contractor shall prepare re-qualification reports paragraph 3.3.3.4. The cost of executing the aforementioned Component Re-qualification shall be proposed to the Government prior to execution unless the re-qualification is Contractor induced and its cost is not applied to the contract.

CDRL A004 Test Plan CDRL A005 Test Procedures

3.4.2.3. Failure Summary and Analysis Report

The Contractor shall notify the Government of any failures within 72 hours. Any occurrence of a failure, during FAT and component re-qualification, requires a Failure Summary and Analysis Report. The Contractor shall provide the Failure Summary and Analysis Report IAW CDRL A017 and include a summary of the analysis and identify root cause and corrective action of all materiel affected. The Monthly Status Report, CDRL A003, shall include a status of any open failures that are undergoing investigation. The Failure Summary and Analysis Report shall not be considered closed until the Government has concurred with the Failure Summary and Analysis Report.

CDRL A017 Failure Summary and Analysis Report

3.4.2.4. Government Testing

The Contractor shall participate in Government performed testing at Government testing facilities. Planned testing during LRIP may include:

Abrams Follow-on Operational Testing conducted at Yuma Proving Ground Abrams Follow-on Operational Testing conducted at Aberdeen Proving Ground

3.4.3. Logistics and Provisioning Services

When requested by the COR, the Contractor shall provide Logistics services to include but not limited to the following:

Field…