B-31995 JPMC EVSE Questions and Answers .docx
DOCX document 47 KB Posted
- Attached to
- JPMC Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
- Solicitation number
- 23-416CMS-BOPM4-B-31995
- Issued by
- Cook County, Illinois
About this file
This document is a set of questions and answers related to a Request for Proposal (RFP) issued by the State of Illinois Central Management Services for JPMC Electric Vehicle Charging Stations. The RFP seeks a company to provide electric vehicle charging stations, network, inspections, repair, and maintenance, as well as coordinate site analysis, preparation, installation, and validation. The RFP includes a schedule with a pre-submission conference on 8/23/2023 and a proposal due date of 10/27/2023. The contract term is for 9 years with no renewal option.
The RFP includes pricing terms for EVSE equipment, network fees, inspection/repair/maintenance, preliminary site analysis, and project management. There is a 7% Business Enterprise Program (BEP) participation goal, and the RFP provides details on BEP certification requirements. The State anticipates awarding to a single responsive and responsible Offeror, and there are no preferred vendors identified. The State will allow OCPP version 1.6 or later, and Energy Star compliance is required for Level 2 chargers while Level 3 chargers can have certification in process.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| B-31995 JPMC EVSE BEP Utilization Plan .pdf | ||
| B-31995 Vendor Disclosure Form.docx | DOCX document | |
| B-31995 IPG Active Registered Vendor Disclosure.docx | DOCX document | |
| B-31995 JPMC EVSE Certified BEP and VBP Directory.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| B-31995 JPMC EVSE Direct Solicitation Memo.docx | DOCX document | |
| B-31995 JPMC EVSE Exhibit A Potential Locations Listing.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| B-31995 JPMC EVSE Pre-Submission Conference Information~1.pdf | ||
| B-31995 NOA JPMC Electric Vehicle Charging Stations.pdf | ||
| B-31995 JPMC EVSE Exhibit B Territory Map with Counties.docx | DOCX document | |
| B-31995 JPMC Electric Vehicle Charging Stations Request for Proposal version 2 .docx | DOCX document | |
| Standard Illinois Certifications-v.23.1 .docx | DOCX document | |
| B-31995 JPMC EVSE Exhibit C Prevailing Wages by Territory and County Example.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STATE OF ILLINOIS
Central Management Services
JPMC Electric Vehicle Charging Stations Request for Proposal Questions and Answers
23-416CMS-BOPM4-B-31995
PLEASE NOTE: The Request for Proposal (RFP) document has been updated based upon some of the questions and responses. Those include Open Charge Point Protocol (OCPP) and Energy Star criteria, namely Section D.5.1 M3 and M6, rate adjustments being allowed for Preliminary Site Analysis Consulting and Project Manager for Years 4-7.
The revised RFP is available in the BidBuy solicitation and titled “B-31995 JPMC Electric Vehicle Charging Stations Requestion for Proposal version 2”.
| Q1. | I hope you can clarify for me on the RFP, are you also wanting to be quoted on charging | stations/devices, in addition to installation and maintenance? So, a turnkey solution? | ||
| A1. | Yes, the State is seeking a company that is able to provide the electric vehicle charging | stations (EVSE), the EVSE network, inspections, repair, and maintenance as well as | coordinate and manage the scope of activities for any site analysis, site preparation, | installation, and site validation. |
| Q2. | Is the intent to contract with a Charge Point Operator provider or are you looking for an | entity to manage a variety of EVSE provider(s) and the deployment of infrastructure and | O&M as that entity sees fit in conjunction with the state’s goals? |
| A2. | See response to Q1. |
| Q3. | Is Illinois looking for a charge point operator or would they be open to a single program manager who could support the 9-year term of the 3-phase project to provide stability and oversight to the delivery of the EV charging Infrastructure? | ||
| A3. | See response to Q1. | It is at the Offeror’s discretion to relay how that is done and best | meets the needs identified in the RFP as evidenced their technical proposal. |
| Q4. | Has Illinois considered charging-as-a-service model for this infrastructure, or would they prefer to pay for the CAPEX and O&M costs as they're incurred? | |
| A4. | The State is not requesting information for charge-as-a-service at this time. Also see | response to Q1-3. |
| Q5. | What is the schedule for the RFP for JPMC EV Charging Stations? | |
| A5. | 8/23/2023 @ 1:00 pm (Central) Pre-Submission Conference | |
| 10/27/2023 @ 10:00 am (Central) Proposal Due Date with the evaluation period | following | |
| Q6. | Is there a location where there is a schedule for is RFP? | |
| A6. | See response to Q5. |
| Q7. | I see that there is a pre-Submission conference on 8/23/23. Is this correct? |
| A7. | Yes. |
| Q8. | Is there a due date for question submissions? | ||||
| A8. | Questions may be submitted via email at any time up to the five (5) days following the | Pre-Submission Conference, namely August 30, 2023. All written questions received | and those presented during the Pre-Submission Conference, along with the State’s | responses will be memorialized on a Question and Answer document and posted to | the eprocurement system as an amendment. |
| Q9. | We were wondering if we have to wait until 5 days after the pre-submission meeting to | pose questions or if we can submit them at any time? |
| A9. | See response to Q8. |
| Q10. | Can you repeat when the questions are due? |
| A10. | See response to Q8. |
Q11. When are written questions due?
A11. See response to Q8.
Q12. Do you plan to post a link for the pre-bid conference recording on the BidBuy RFP posting page, once the pre-bid conference is complete? According to the documentation on BidBuy, the pre-bid conference will be recorded.
A.12. The Pre-Submission Conference is recorded only to ensure that all questions are transcribed as asked and enable the State to provide an accurate response.
Q13. Will this meeting be recorded and shared?
A13. See response to Q12.
Q14. Will this meeting be recorded and shared?
A14. See response to Q12.
| Q15. | We request an extension of the proposal due date of three weeks between receipt of | responses to questions and the proposal submittal due date. Four weeks would be | preferrable. | |||
| A15. | The bid opening due date and time would be extended if it best serves the interest of | the State. | ||||
| The bid due date and time has been updated. All proposals must be submitted in the | BidBuy system by 10:00 a.m. (Central) on October 27, 2023. We encourage Offerors to | allow adequate time prior to the solicitation end date to complete and submit in the event | technical assistance is needed. For technical issues, please contact the BidBuy Help | Desk at 866-455-2897 or at | il.bidbuy@illinois.gov |
| Q16. | Is the submission deadline 9/12/23? |
| A16. | See response to Q15. |
| Q17. | Are you considering providing multiple awards, awards for different sites or awarding out | different aspects of the proposal? | |
| A17. | The State anticipates awarding to a single responsive and responsible Offeror whose | offer best meets the specified criteria to enable a cohesive and efficient EVSE and fleet | management mechanism. |
| Q18. | How many contractors will be awarded contracts? |
A18. See response to Q17.
| Q19. | Has the state identified any preferred vendors? |
| A19. | There are no preferred vendors. |
| Q20. | Does the State require contractors who are headquartered in Illinois. If not, is there a | preference for this? |
| A20. | Award is based upon the responsive and responsible Offeror that best meets the needs | identified in the RFP. |
| Q21. | If a Subcontractor (not the Offeror) will be the only business performing actual | installations with the Offeror’s proposal, does the Offeror need to submit a Letter of | Bonding Capacity for only the Subcontractor’s Business or does the Offeror need to | submit a Letter of Bonding Capacity for the Offeror’s Business also? |
| A21. | Both the Offeror and the subcontractor performing the actual work are required to | submit | Letters of Bonding Capacity. |
| Q22. | If the Offeror (not the Subcontractor) will be the only business performing actual | installations with the Offeror’s proposal, does the Subcontractor need to submit Letter of | Bonding Capacity? |
| A22. | No. See response to Q21. | ||
| Q23. | Is any specific dollar value required for the Letter of Bonding Capacity? | ||
| A23. | There is no specific dollar value for the Letter of Bonding Capacity. |
| Q24. | Are the locations expected to be opened to the public? |
| A24. | The primary focus is toward the electrification infrastructure for the State’s fleet, and those locations are not anticipated to be open to the public. Governmental units and qualified not-for-profit agencies utilizing the resulting contract may choose to allow public access to charging stations. |
| Q25. | We would recommend that you have a separate RFP for fleets only. Fleets can take | better | advantage of charge management software and Automated Load Management | (ALM) to reduce costs and carbon intensity. |
| A25. | The primary focus is toward the electrification infrastructure for the State’s fleet. Section | D.5.10 | asks for fleet-related information. |
| Q26. | As a prominent EV charging network operator, we have actively supported the | development of OCPP (Open Charge Point Protocol) through our membership in the | Open Charge Alliance (OCA), the international body overseeing OCPP implementation | and standards development. Currently, OCPP version 1.6J is widely accepted within the | industry and has been adopted by major stakeholders, including EV charging station | manufacturers and network operators. | |
| While OCPP version 2.0.1 is expected to reach market maturity over the next few years, | it is important to ensure thorough implementation and widespread adoption before | considering it | as a mandatory requirement within procurement programs. Until then, we | recommend that charging station procurements continue to prioritize OCPP version | 1.6J. This approach ensures a competitive landscape for procuring charging | stations, as it aligns with the current industry standard. | |
| In light of this context, we kindly ask whether you would consider modifying the | provisions for | OCPP compliance to version 1.6J? This is consistent with other industry | programs, including the Federal government’s National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure | Formula Program (NEVI), which requires OCPP 1.6J at a minimum and has provided a | compliance pathway of 12-months from the date of installation for the protocol | compliance to be updated to OCPP 2.0.1. | |
| A26. | The State is willing to allow OCPP version 1.6 or later with the stipulation that assets | are able to be upgraded to 2.0 and later as the technology develops. There should be a | clear compliance pathway to bring assets to 2.0 and beyond. |
| Q27. | M3 specifies that solutions must conform to OCPP version 2.0 or later. Version 2.0.1 is | a relatively recent update and many available products on the market today still operate | on OCPP 1.6. A requirement for 2.0 or later would greatly reduce available options | while not adding any additional stranded asset protection. Will the Agency please | consider modifying this requirement to stipulate “OCPP 1.6 or later”? |
| A27. | See response to Q26. | ||||
| Q28. | Is OCPP 2.0 required at time of bid or just when the work begins? |
| A28. | See response to Q26. | ||||
| Q29. | ENERGY STAR standard and testing for DC fast charging is still relatively new and there | are not many DC fast chargers that have completed this certification, which in turn will | limit options available through this solicitation. Will the Agency consider modifying this | specification to require ENERGY STAR for AC Level 2 while making is desired for DC | fast chargers? Or that certification for DC fast chargers at least be in process? |
| A29. | The State will allow for Level 2 compliance with Energy Star and Level 3 certification can | be in process. The State may reexamine Energy Star compliance needs in three years. |
| Q30. | If there is a consortium of parties (with a prime), is the prime able to show compliance | with the charging infrastructure requirements e.g., up-time of 97% through a | subcontractor? |
| A30. | Yes. |
| Q31. | In Exhibit A, there are locations that didn’t mention how many charging ports needed. It | says TBD. | |||||
| A31. | As the State moves forward in its electrification project, more information on locations | and number of ports will be identified. | |||||
| Q32. | There is only minimal information about the individual sites, and they are subject to | change. | |||||
| A32. | Exhibit A is provided as an initial starting point of potential locations to show the scope is | state-wide and the number of EVSE varied. The actual sites and number of EVSE are | anticipated to | change and expand beyond this listing and will be based upon the need | at State-owned and leased properties. This listing does not include potential locations for | other | governmental units or qualified not-for-profit agencies. |
Q33. Visiting Sites: Is there contact info for each site to set up a site visit?
A33. Site visits are not necessary to respond to this RFP. Exhibit A is not the basis for the pricing line items in BidBuy. See responses to Q31 and Q32.
Q34. Are we allowed to make site visits?
A34. See responses to Q31, Q32, and Q33.
| Q35. | Will there be any diversity goals or encouragement of diversity goals? | ||
| A35. | Yes, there is a 7% Business Enterprise Program goal associated with this solicitation. | See Section A.23 of the RFP Instructions and the BEP Utilization Plan attachment for | details in achieving the participation goal. |
| Q36. | If a prospective subcontractor has a pending BEP certification with Illinois, can that entity | be counted toward the 7% requirement? | |
| A36. | Only subcontractors with active BEP certifications through the Illinois Commission on | Equity and Inclusion in at least one of the solicitation’s NIGP Codes by the bid opening | date can be used toward the BEP participation goal. |
Q37. If a subcontractor is a federally registered BEP firm, does that qualify with the State?
A37. See response to Q36. An Offeror may use a federally registered BEP firm as a subcontractor, but would not count towards the BEP participation goal.
| Q38. | Section A.23 Is the 7% BEP goal inclusive of the contract’s entire dollar value, including | all cost components, or is it the cost of labor and ancillary materials, excluding software | and EVSE equipment-related costs? Please clarify. | |
| A38. | The BEP Utilization percentage value would be based upon the Offeror pricing. For | example, if an Offeror’s pricing totaled $10 million, then the BEP participation goal at 7% | would be estimated as $700,000. The 7% may be split amongst several Illinois BEP- | certified subcontractors. |
Q39. Would you please provide the estimated annual contract value? It is not possible to calculate a BEP Utilization percentage, without knowing the estimated annual contract value.
A39. See response to Q38.
| Q40. | Section A.23 Based on the pre-conference call, we understand that only the listed NIGP | codes in the RFP can be considered by us when developing our Commitment to | Supplier Diversity response. (Example: Should we encounter a subcontracting need | outside the provided NIGP codes within the RFP (such as 9136, Construction, Concrete, | Pour-In-Place, Form, Place, Finish), these cannot be included when creating the plan to | meet or exceed the BEP requirement. Correct?). Please confirm or clarify, as needed. | |
| A40. | Firms being utilized to meet the 7% participation goal must be BEP-certified through the | Illinois Commission on Equity and Inclusion in at least one of the solicitation’s NIGP | Codes by the bid due date and time. During the resulting contract term, the available | BEP-certified firms may evolve. Any additional BEP-certified firms must be certified in | the solicitation’s NIGP Codes to count towards the participation goal. | ||
| This would not preclude other BEP-certified firms outside of the solicitation’s NIGP | Codes from being used on any EVSE project, but those firms could not be counted | towards the participation goal. |
| Q41. | Section A.23 Can we focus on the BEP types that will realistically be needed by us to | support this effort to comply with the Good Faith Effort requirement (rather than reaching | out to all the 699 certified BEP subcontractors listed since some are considerably less | relevant to this EV scope of work)? For efficiency and effectiveness in delivery, can a | Good Faith Effort constitute contacting those subs directly aligned to support the | breakdown of work anticipated for this Contract as it will be delivered? |
| A41. | In order to request a waiver and be considered as having completed a “good faith effort”, | you must, at minimum, contact 100% of all vendors certified in the NIGP Codes listed on | the Directory and enter their responses in the BEP Utilization Plan document. Please | see the Utilization Plan for additional information regarding what constitutes a good faith | effort. |
| Q42. | A.23 Please confirm that firms included in our plan need to be certified at the time of | proposal submittal to be counted towards the BEP participation goal. Entities, that have | submitted their application and requested expedited evaluation and that are registered | by the Federal government as falling under the appropriate categories, will not be | eligible for consideration when documenting compliance with BEP requirements. Is this | correct? Please clarify. |
| A42. | See response to Q40. |
Q43. Can we use other NIGP codes other than those listed in the solicitation, like construction or civil/site work?
A43. An Offeror may use NIGP Codes other than those listed in the solicitation to locate subcontractors. Only subcontractors BEP-certified by the Commission on Equity and Inclusion in the solicitation’s NIGP Codes can be counted toward the participation goal. See response Q36.
Q44. Is an out-of-state Offeror required to register with the State of Illinois Business Services to submit a response for this RFP.
A44. Per Section A.22.1.4 of the RFP and Section 20-43 of the Illinois Procurement Code, an Offeror must be authorized to transact business through the Illinois Secretary of State Business Services.
Q45. Is an out-of-state Offeror required to register with the IDHR to submit a response for this RFP?
A45. If an Offeror employed fifteen or more full-time employees at the time of submission of their response to this solicitation or any time during the previous 365-day period leading up to submission, it must have a current IDHR Public Contract Number or have proof of having submitted a completed application prior to contract award.
Q46. Is an out-of-state Offeror required to register with the Board of Elections to submit a response for this RFP?
A46. Generally, if an Offeror is an entity doing business for profit (i.e., sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, limited liability company or partnership, or otherwise) and has contracts with State agencies that annually total more than $50,000 or whose aggregate pending proposals that total more than $50,000, the Offeror is prohibited from making political contributions and must register with the State Board of Elections (BOE). 30 ILCS 500/20-160. Registration with BOE must occur prior to the bid opening.
Q47. Is IPG and BEP required for the offeror and the sub?
A47. BEP certification is only for those Offerors and subcontractors being counted toward the 7% participation goal.
BEP certification and IPG registration are not the same and Offerors and subcontractors are cautioned not to confuse the two.
Q48. Being registered with IPG is NOT a requirement for subcontractors, only the offeror, correct?
A48. Registration in the Illinois Procurement Gateway (IPG) is not required for any Offeror or subcontractor.
The Illinois Procurement Gateway (IPG) is a clearinghouse for companies to provide their standard certifications, financial disclosures, and conflicts of interest on an annual basis.
When responding to bid opportunities, those companies in the IPG may submit the “IPG Active Registered Vendor Disclosure”, which is a 3-page document.
| Those companies not registered in the IPG would need to submit “Vendor Disclosure”, a | 22-page document. | |
| Q49. | What is the contract timeline and expected value based on previous Illinois state | purchasing contracts? |
A49. The contract length is anticipated to be nine (9) years with no renewal option. As this is a new initiative for the State of Illinois, there is no previous cost data for reference.
Q50. If we win, how long is the contract good for?
A50. See response to Q49.
Q51. For clarification, if selected, how long is the approved status for the state in place?
A51. See response to Q49.
Q52. What is the expected number of EV Charging Stations to be purchased daily or weekly or monthly, throughout the contract award duration including all annual renewals?
A52. The number of EVSE purchased is at the discretion of each entity according to a location’s needs; there is no set number. There are no renewals available for the resulting contract.
Q53. Will State Agencies be required to purchase a specific number of EV Charging Stations through this contract, or will this contract simply be available for potential purchase as desired intermittently from State Agencies?
A53. See response to Q52.
| Q54. | If 6G is feasible - can different charge point operators/sub-contractors be used under | same Program manager across 9-year period? | ||
| A54. | The Offeror may utilize various charge point operators/subcontractors under the same | Project Manager. For purposes of the State-owned and State-leased locations, the | same charge point operator would be preferred due to consistency and efficiency in a | network for fleet management. |
| Q55. | The two projects that we need to provide as examples, do they need to be US based? | |||
| A55. | The project examples under D.5.2 are left to the discretion of the Offeror. |
| Q56. | What is the 9-year schedule driven by? Are funds released in increments? | ||||
| A56. | There is no specific schedule during the contract term other than prioritizing State-owned | and State-leased locations. The State anticipates that invoicing would be directly | related to the Statements of Work individualized for each EVSE project. Entities | utilizing this contract would be responsible for funding and any payments related to | their EVSE program. |
Q57. What is the duration for Phase I?
A57. Phase I could extend from one to several years. As noted in the RFP, phases may overlap and run concurrently provided the awarded Offeror has the capacity and qualified resources to do so.
| Q58. | Do we know the expected timing of each phase? Are there some high-level milestones? | When is the project expected to kick off? | ||
| A58. | The phases are a general order of priority and are not considered condition precedent as | phases may run concurrently. Governmental units and qualified not-for-profit agencies | that may use the resulting contract will determine milestones and their kickoff for | initiating a EVSE project. |
| Q59. | Can we focus on sites with 1-5 chargers first? |
| A59. | The order of locations would be determined by the entity and based upon level of need. |
| Q60. | Is there an incentive to complete the project earlier? | |
| A60. | This RFP is not considered a singular project. It is anticipated that each location would | be an EVSE project in and of itself. |
| Q61. | Will any of the locations have adequate power for the allotted chargers and any future | needs? | ||
| A61. | Power needs for each location plus any future power needs would be assessed during | the preliminary site analysis. The State makes no guarantee on the availability or | adequacy of power for the potential locations in Exhibit A, additional sites, or locations | needed by other entities that may use the resulting contract. |
| Q62. | In Lou of site visits are contractors Advised to assume that sufficient power is available | at each site? If so, what are parameters for distance from Power to device? |
| A62. | The Preliminary Site Analysis at each location includes assessment of the electrical load | analysis, the site preparation necessary including parameters for distance from power to | device based upon regulations and industry standards. | |
| Q63. | Page 1 of the RFP, Paragraph 5, states that assistance is required for “Strategies in | addressing potential challenges”. Have any environmental or other potential risk factors | or specific challenges already been identified at the locations listed in the RFP for the EV | charger installations? Please explain/share. |
| A63. | Any potential challenges or issues are to be identified and addressed during the | Preliminary Site Analysis at each location. |
Q64. How can we provide accurate pricing if we can’t visit the sites and they may change. Costs are dependent on-site conditions, number of chargers required and availability of utilities.
A64. Exhibit A is not the basis for the pricing line items in BidBuy. Each entity that uses the resulting contract will have its own unique characteristics for an EVSE project and there is no way to predict those costs.
The line items in BidBuy are set up for a generic overview that could be applied to any EVSE project.
Q65. Will you provide standard assumptions to be provided so we can provide costs that are apples to apples for categories that are not known?
A65. See response to Q64.
Q66. Like distance to chargers. Will you allow Standard Assumptions so we can provide costs that are apple to apples for categories that are unknown.
A66. See response to Q64.
| Q67. | Section E.6 Under Clause C, it says that the awarded Offeror may provide an updated | MSRP no more frequently than once during any given twelve (12) month period. We | understand from this that we are allowed to revise the MSRP every twelve (12) months | period. Please confirm. |
| A67. | The awarded Offeror may submit an updated MSRP for EVSE and accessories every | twelve (12) months. |
| Q68. | Section E.6.3 Per RFP, network fees are per unit per month and are a fixed rate that | would be invoiced based upon the number of EVSEs the entity has in the network. | Based on this and Clause C, we understand that we are allowed to revise the network | fee every (12) twelve months during the contract duration. Please confirm. |
| A68. | E.6.1.c pertains only to the MSRP. |
| Q69. | Section E.6.4 Under Inspection, Repair and Maintenance, it requests a fee per unit | annually. Each level of EVSE may vary in the cadence of inspections. Based on this and | Clause C, we understand that we are allowed to revise the Inspection, Repair and | Maintenance fee every (12) twelve months period during the contract duration. Please | confirm. |
| A69. | E.6.1.c only pertains to the MSRP. |
| Q70. | Section E.6.5 Under Preliminary Site Analysis, it requests an hourly rate for the awarded | Offeror to consult with an entity for analyzing and planning out the location, site needs | and any future proofing for an EVSE project. The provided bid buy line item #14 doesn’t | have the provision for the yearly price escalation. Please confirm that we are allowed to | revise the hourly rate every (12) twelve months period during the contract. |
| A70. | The line items in BidBuy have been updated to allow for rate adjustment for the | Preliminary Site Analysis based upon Years 4-6 and Year 7-9. |
| Q71. | Section E.6.6 Per the RFP, Project Management is an hourly rate for the awarded | Offeror’s overall management of the activities necessary for any applicable stages from | site preparation through site validation and any upgrade and/or expansion projects for | EVSE. This rate will remain firm during the resulting contract. The provided bid buy line | item#15 doesn’t have the provision for the yearly price escalation. We request that we | be given the ability to revise the hourly rate every (12) twelve months period during the | contract. We are hoping not to have to add this cost uncertainty/risk to our pricing. | Please confirm or clarify, as needed. |
| A71. | The line items I BidBuy have been updated to allow for rate adjustments for Year 4-6 and | Years 7-9 for the Project Management. |
Q72. Section E.6.6 Under Site Preparation, Installation and Validation Services, please clarify/confirm the following:
1. Assumed, the minimum service hours will be eight (8) regular hours per day.
2. Mobilization of the personnel will be charged as per the agreed regular hourly rate.
3. Assumed the blended hourly rate does not include the per-diem and travel. Per-diem and travel will be invoiced at cost plus fee with verifiable documents receipts.
4. Site Preparation, installation and validation services hourly rate shall not include any materials such as wiring, transformer, conduit, receptables, panels, equipment, concrete works etc. please confirm.
5. The bidder/contractor allowed to invoice the material cost at cost plus fee with verifiable documents and receipts, please confirm.
6. Construction equipment such as trucks, excavators, forklift etc. will be invoiced at cost plus fee with verifiable documents receipts, please confirm.
| A72. | It is anticipated that services hours would be eight (8) per day. Due to prevailing wage | requirements, line items are included for overtime, holidays, etc. | ||
| The hourly rate would be used for mobilization. | ||||
| Any per-diem and travel would fall under expenses and are not allowed. | ||||
| Site preparation, installation and validation services do not cover materials. Electrical- | related materials are covered under Line Item 43 and all other materials and | equipment necessary for site preparation, installation and validation is Line Item 44 on | the bid. | |
| The awarded Offeror is to invoice materials and equipment at cost. The Illinois | Procurement Code does not allow for cost plus markup for materials and equipment. |
| Q73. | In Section 2: Pricing, what does the state consider to be "estimated" pricing and how will | final pricing be prepared for the winning contractor? | |||
| A73. | The resulting contract will be a joint purchase master contract and is open to | governmental units and qualified not-for-profit agencies. With that in mind, usage of the | resulting contract by any of those entities cannot be pre-determined and therefore the | cost can only be estimated. The pricing (such as hourly rates) will be used in the | resulting contract. |
| Q74. | Section E.3 What does the State mean by "Expenses are not allowed"? |
| A74. | Examples of expenses would include meals, gas, copying services, and travel. |
| Q75. | Is this prevailing wage? |
| A75. | Yes, this solicitation includes prevailing wage. Please refer to Sections D.6.2 and H.4. |
| Q76. | There is no excel pricing sheet included in the BidBuy document package. | ||||
| A76. | All pricing for evaluation must be entered into the BidBuy line items. Narrative | explanations of pricing can be entered into Section E of the RFP and attached to the | Quote being submitted in BidBuy. Offeror must ensure that the box is checked “Does | this attachment contain any pricing, | cost or discount information?” for Section E. |
| Q77. | Is there sufficient information in the RFP to provide accurate pricing? |
| A77. | The line items in BidBuy are geared toward evaluation measures. See response to Q72. |
Q78. What are the State’s expectations with regard to the level of detail included in the current Manufacturer’s Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) listing? Does the MSRP include accessories and services, such as warranties or will this be handled separately? Please clarify.
A78. Any accessories ordered as well as the five-year warranty noted under D.5.7 would be included with the MSRP. .
Q79. Section E.6.2 With regard to Clause b: The percentage discounts will remain firm during the resulting contract, although the MSRP may change. Do the discounts apply to the accessories and services?
A79. See response to Q78.
Q80. Section E.6.6 Is Project Management rate only for the PM or for a team (PM, engineer, procurement, financial, etc.) to manage all the office or Office/Field activities?
A80. The Project Management is intended to cover the Project Manager.
Q81. Section E.6.7 Regarding the blended hourly rates covering any prevailing wage trade blended "rate" for all the potential trades or a blended rate for a specific trade.
A81. The blended hourly rate would need to cover any potential trade.
Q82. Where are design costs to be included?
A82. Section E.6.7 is to cover all service components associated with site preparation, installation, and validation services.
Q83. Section E.6.7 Per the RFP, Statements of Work must have the detailed breakdown of all wage be calculated /presented?
A83. Statements of Work (SOW) are anticipated to be used as each individual EVSE project arises based on the needs of the entity, the location, and the Preliminary Site Analysis.
Q98. Section E.6.7 The RFP states that Statements of Work must have the detailed breakdown of all services, hourly rates, prevailing wage labor rates, hours, etc. that would be invoiced. The details on what we are to install and therefore to include in the Pricing are not provided. As a result, we are concerned that you may not be getting comparable offers. One approach worthy of considering is to provide a Sample Statement of Work (for the purpose of proposing) that you would like all bidders to respond to when preparing the Price. Please clarify.
Regardless, please confirm that we can add an attachment to the Pricing that explains the basis for Pricing.
A84. The State is not asking for any Statement of Work with the RFP pricing. The SOW is a contractual element. See response to Q83.
Q85. Section E.6.7 The RFP states that hourly rates are to be firm for Years 1-3 of the resulting contract and have built in increases for Years 4-6 and for Years 7-9.
However prevailing wages are adjusted at least on an annual basis. Assuming those adjustments occur, should the offeror reflect potential adjustments in our blended hourly rate?
A85. Yes.
| Q86. | Section E.6.3 Please confirm that markups on materials and subcontracts will be allowed | and do not fall under this clause E.6.3 of the RFP. Please clarify, as needed. |
| A86. | The awarded Offeror is to invoice materials and equipment at cost. The Illinois | Procurement Code does not allow for cost plus markup on materials or equipment. |
| Q87. | Section E.6.4-11 We are assuming that the work can be performed by non-union staff | given no indication to the contrary in the RFP. We are also assuming that, if the work | must be performed by union staff for a particular project or work assignment, appropriate | adjustments to rates will be allowed. Please confirm or clarify. | |
| A87. | It is the awarded Offeror’s responsibility to use experienced and qualified personnel to | perform services. Work performed under any trade titles must be paid at the most | current prevailing wage. The hourly rates entered for such line items must be able to | cover potential rate adjustment during the corresponding periods of Years 1-3, Years 4- | 6, and Years 7-9. Also see response to Q85. |
| Q88. | Section E.6.10 Can the pricing for additional services be provided when requested | instead of including price for services that are optional and may not be requested by the | entities using this contract? |
| A88. | Additional services and pricing are to be listed in Section E of the RFP and the average | hourly rate entered into the corresponding BidBuy line item for evaluation. |
| Q89. | E.6.4 Will the Agency consider multiyear terms paid upfront which provides a greater | discount? |
| A89 | Invoicing during the resulting contract would be paid based upon services rendered. |
| Q90. | E.6.3 indicates network fees are per unit per month. Will the Agency consider pricing on | an annual basis which is more common and more efficient to bill? Also, will the Agency | consider multiyear terms paid upfront which provides a greater discount? | |||
| A90. | The State is requesting pricing based upon per unit per month for evaluation purposes. | Section E.6.3 asks about how network fees are typically invoiced. If the Offeror provides | a discount on | annual invoicing, this should be explained in this section with the | discounted amount being entered into the corresponding BidBuy line item as a monthly | rate. |
| Q91. | You mentioned a 9-year contract. Will the original bid numbers be held for the entire 9 | years or is it more like typical IDOT jobs where we have the option to increase to a | certain percentage or remove from the contract. |
A91. The line items in BidBuy take increase of labor, supplies, etc into consideration.
Q92. Is the State also looking to leverage grant funding (e.g., CFI) for the deployment of this charging equipment?
A92. The State is not currently seeking grant funding for its State-owned and leased locations. However, other governmental units and qualified not-for-profit agencies may utilize grant funding for purchasing and deployment of their EVSE programs.
Q93. What is the estimated turnaround time for contract payments (15-days, 30-days, other)?
A93. For State Agencies, per Section F.2.1 of the RFP, payments, including late payment charges, will be paid in accordance with the State Prompt Payment Act and rules when applicable. 30 ILCS 540; 74 ILL. ADM. CODE 900. This shall be Vendor’s sole remedy for late payments by the State. Payment terms contained in Vendor’s invoices shall have no force or effect. Other governmental units and qualified not-for-profit agencies may have their own policies for payment terms.
| Q94. | What is the value of the contract? |
| A94. | There is no cost data for reference as this is a new initiative for the State. |
| Q95. | Is the budget divided by planning, install, maintenance? What percentage is allocated to | ongoing maintenance? | |
| A95. | The resulting contract is a joint purchase master contract that may be used by | governmental units and qualified not-for-profit agencies. How an entity divides its budget | for an EVSE program does not impact an Offeror’s ability to respond to the RFP. |
| Q96. | A.19 project references, we are assuming that the projects and references can be | provided for the team submitting and not just the prime. Please clarify if this is not the | case. |
| A96. | Offeror must provide references from established private firms or government agencies | other than the procuring Agency, who can attest to Offeror’s experience and ability to | perform the contract. References for subcontractors will not be reviewed. |
| Q97. | Section J We are respectfully asking if the third note (that “Reference for subcontractors | will not be reviewed”) can be waived for named Teaming Partners, specified in the | Technical portion of the proposal. |
| A97. | See response to Q96. |
| Q98. | Do the references have to be from customers in Illinois? | ||
| A98. | References may be from any private or public firm. The State prefers references | from | projects in similar size and scope. |
| Q99. | K.5 Can we assume that Category V is meant to include subs? Please confirm. |
| A99. | The Commitment to Diversity portion of the RFP pertains only to the Offeror. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .