ATTH 15 Survey Attachment.docx
DOCX document 52 KB Posted
- Attached to
- HUD Nationwide Construction Inspection Services
- Solicitation number
- SOLICITATION-86614121R00001
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 0003_Sol 86614121R00001.pdf | ||
| Sol_86614121R00001_Amd_0002.pdf | ||
| ATTH 18 HUD response to CIS Solicitation questions.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0001_86614121R00001.pdf | ||
| ATTH 4 CDR.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTH 2 Construction Inspection Services QASP .pdf | ||
| ATTH 9 Midwest FHA map.pdf | ||
| ATTH 3 Incentives Summary .docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTH 14 Sample Client Authorization_Letter.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTH 10 Northeast FHA map.pdf | ||
| ATTH 1 Construction Inspection Services PWS 09142021.pdf | ||
| ATTH 12 Southwest FHA map.pdf | ||
| ATTH 8 Sample Trip Report_HUD-95379.pdf | ||
| ATTH 13 West FHA map.pdf | ||
| ATTH 5 Project Description.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTH 11 Southeast FHA map.pdf | ||
| ATTH 17 SF330-16i.pdf | ||
| ATTH 16 TEP workbook.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| ATTH 6 Nondisclosure-Agreement-between-HUD-and-Contractor-Employee.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTH 7 HUD-95379 Trip Report .docx | DOCX document | |
| Sol_86614121R00001.pdf |
Show all 21
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment __
PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (relevant services performed in the 5 years prior to submission of proposal)
PRIME CONTRACTOR OR PARTNER/SUBCONTRACTOR NAME_____________________________
| CLIENT NAME * |
| POINT OF CONTACT NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE |
| TYPE OF SERVICES PROVIDED |
| CONTRACT NUMBER, VALUE OF CONTRACT AND DATE SERVICES PROVIDED |
| MAGNITUDE |
| PRINCIPAL PARTNERS/KEY PERSONNEL |
PPIRS
On File
| HUD Office of Public and Indian Housing |
| John Doe, PIH Office of Technical Assistance, 1234 7th St, Washington, DC 78945 202-555-1234 |
| Technical Assistance to public housing agencies |
| C-DEN-12345 $1,000,000 |
1/07 - 1/09
John Smith, Project Manager; Jane Doe, TA Specialist; John Smith Jr, Accounting Specialist
* If performance was as a subcontractor, this will be the name of the prime contractor.
Attachment __ - Past Performance Survey
PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY
SOLICITATION NUMBER:
This past performance survey is to be completed on the designated contractor or key personnel as designated below:
PAST PERFORMANCE PROJECT IDENTIFICATON (To be filled out by the Offeror):
| CONTRACTOR OR KEY PERSONNEL NAME: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| CONTRACT or ORDER NUMBER: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| PROJECT TITLE: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| TOTAL PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE, INCLUDING OPTIONS |
| Click here to enter text. |
PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION (To be filled out by the Reference):
| NAME: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| TITLE: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| AGENCY or CUSTOMER: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| PHONE: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| Click here to enter text. |
The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is procuring the services described in the box below. You have been selected by the contractor or key personnel identified above to provide past performance information to HUD to be used in evaluating the offeror’s proposal for this acquisition. Thank you for your input.
| Summarize the services acquired here. |
| If this past performance survey is related to key personnel, please summarize the level of interface you had with the designated key personnel throughout the life of the project you oversaw. |
For each of the Five (5) criteria listed below, the rater must choose One (1) Adjectival Rating by checking the box, as applicable. At a minimum, for any rating that is checked Exceptional, Very Good, Marginal or Unsatisfactory, please submit additional comments to substantiate the rating. If Cost Control is N/A, Please explain why.
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were highly effective
Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were effective
Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel appear or were satisfactory
Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor/Key Personnel has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s/Key Personnel’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Click here to enter text.
2. SCHEDULE
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were effective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel appear or were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor/Key Personnel has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s/Key Personnel’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Click here to enter text.
3. COST CONTROL
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were effective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel appear or were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor/Key Personnel has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s/Key Personnel’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Not Applicable
Click here to enter text.
4. BUSINESS RELATIONS
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were effective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel appear or were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor/Key Personnel has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s/Key Personnel’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Click here to enter text.
5. MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were effective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel appear or were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor/Key Personnel has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s/Key Personnel’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Click here to enter text.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .