Attch 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).doc

DOC document 42 KB Posted

Attached to
Air Handler Unit replacement - Wapato, WA Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
12905B24R0019
Issued by
Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) that is part of Request for Proposal (RFP) #12905B24R0019 for the USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS) to replace four air handler units at their Wapato, WA facility.

The PPQ requires the contractor to provide company and project details, including name, client, project description, period of performance, cost, and personnel. The client is then asked to rate the contractor's performance in areas such as technical, quality, schedule, and cost. The client must also indicate if they would use the contractor again. A separate section is included for the client's contracting point of contact to provide an overall assessment of the contractor's contractual performance. The completed PPQ must be returned to the USDA by October 15, 2024, and the USDA may follow up with the client after that date.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Past Performance Questionnaire Request For Proposal (RFQ) # 12905B24R0019 USDA-ARS-PWA Wapato, WA Air Handler Replacement of four units Attachment 5

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

The Contractor shall complete the company specific information on this form, contact their clients, forward this form to their clients and request that their clients complete it (verify/concur and score) and send it via email to robert.skipper@usda.gov

This will expedite the response from each referenced source.

SECTION 1: To be completed by the contractor Name of Contractor:

Name of client organization:

Project name and contract/task order number:

Brief description of support provided:

Total period of performance and dates Total cost/price:

Number of contractor personnel assigned to the project, by skill category:

Name and Title of Technical Point of Contact (POC) for the customer:

Address of Technical POC:

Email and telephone number of Technical POC:

Date the Technical POC was contacted for this PPQ:

Did you inform your client that a past performance questionnaire must be completed and returned to USDA by 10/15/2024, and that a USDA representative may contact him/her sometime after that date?

FORMCHECKBOX

Yes FORMCHECKBOX No

SECTION 2: To be completed by the customer.

Please BOLD the rating indicating your projects rating in the following areas:

1. Overall Technical Performance

Excellent
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Poor
N/A

2.

Quality of work

Excellent
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Poor
N/A

3.

Schedule Performance

Excellent
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Poor
N/A

4.

Cost Performance

Excellent
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Poor
N/A

5.

Did the contractor proactively identify risk areas, mitigate risks, and respond to emergency and critical situations? FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No

6.

Would you use this company again? FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No

SECTION 3: To be completed by the customer’s contracting office (If different from TPOC in section 1).

Name and Title of Contracting Point of Contact (POC):

Address of Contracting POC:

Telephone number of Contracting POC:

Date the Contracting POC was contacted for this PPQ:

Section 4: Please BOLD the rating your Contracting POC (or TPOC if there isn’t a contracting POC) indicated he/she would give your project if contacted:

1.

Overall Contractual Performance

Excellent
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Poor
N/A

2.

Would your Contracting POC use your company again? FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No

Contracting POC Signature (TPOC if contracting POC is N/A)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .