Attachments 1-16.pdf

Attachment 1 – Performance Requirements Summary

The following table summarizes Contractor service requirements into performance objectives that relate directly to mission essential items. The performance threshold briefly describes the minimum acceptable levels of service required for each requirement. These thresholds are critical to mission success.

Performance Metrics for Contractor Performance Assessment Record (CPAR)

E VG S M U

CPAR Category: QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE (1) Performance indicator: Document reviews Draft Plans, Reports, documents and electronic submittals [Plans, documents and reports are considered draft until accepted as final by GOV]

All contract-milestone documents accepted as submitted with no significant comments (comments that identify deviations from the PWS rule, regulation, or guidance documents).

GOV accepted one or more documents or sub-plans as submitted, but noted exceptions.

GOV provided no significant comments and did not require document resubmission.

One or more documents or sub-plans required revisions and document resubmission for acceptance prior to proceeding.

Resubmission of an entire document or sub-plan was not required.

One or more documents or sub-plans required revisions and document resubmission for acceptance prior to proceeding.

Resubmitted documents required two back checks on one or more document or sub-plan before Contractor satisfactorily resolved GOV comments.

Required Contractor resubmission of an entire document or sub-plan.

One or more documents or sub-plans did not comply with contract requirements, required two back checks on one or more document or sub-plan before Contractor satisfactorily resolved GOV comments, or GOV rejected more than one document or sub-plan.

Performance indicator: Project Execution

Conformance All work complies with generally accepted industry best practices, as well as all local, State, and Federal statutory and regulatory guidelines.

Meets the standard for excellent performance with the exception of minor differences or omissions that do not negatively impact the project execution or schedule.

Performs work in accordance with task order PWS, industry standards, and Federal, State, and local regulations and requirement with minor differences or omissions that may negatively impact project execution or schedule.

However the differences or omissions were successfully resolved prior to project completion.

Commits significant exception to best practices or major omission that requires additional work to resolve or minor delays to project milestones/ schedule

Commits multiple exceptions to best practices and/or major omissions that results in regulatory intervention, threat of fine or stop work, with major disruption in project milestones/ schedule.

Performance indicator: Monthly Reports Pay Applications 0% pay applications requiring revision.

5% pay applications requiring revision.

10% pay applications requiring revision.

15% pay applications requiring revision.

20% pay applications requiring revision.

Monthly Manhour Exposure Report

Yes No

E VG S M U

CPAR Category: SCHEDULE (2) Performance indicator: Timely completion of tasks

Final Plans, Reports, and Invoices

100% of submittals, reports, and invoices transmitted to/ accepted by

GOV

on/before required due date.

95% of submittals, reports, and invoices transmitted to/ accepted by GOV on/before required due date.

90% of submittals, reports, and invoices transmitted to/ accepted by

GOV

on/before required due date.

GOV accepts final invoice before POP end date.

80% of reports, and invoices transmitted to/ accepted by

GOV

on/before required due date.

GOV has to extend POP end date to no more than 30 days to accommodate delay.

<80% of reports, and invoices transmitted to/ accepted by GOV on/before required due date.

GOV has to extend POP end date to more than 30 days to

Performance indicator: Impacts to Schedule Impacts caused by Contractor or other causes identified, in writing to KO/COR in a timely manner to apply acceptable corrective actions.

Impacts and corrective actions clearly communicated within 24 hours of detection.

Impacts and corrective actions clearly communicated within 48 hours of detection.

Impacts and corrective actions clearly communicated within 5 business days of detection.

Impacts are identified by Customer, QA, or

KO/COR,

sources other than the Contractor OR Impacts and corrective actions communicated within more than 5 business days but less than 10 business days of detection.

Impacts are identified by Customer, QA, or KO/COR, sources other than the Contractor OR Impacts and corrective actions communicated more than 10 business days of detection.

Performance indicator: Final Project Execution Project Execution Milestones

100% of project milestones completed by Contractor and GOV accepts final invoice at least 30 days before POP

95% of project milestones completed by Contractor and GOV accepts final invoice before POP end date.

90% of milestones completed by Contractor and GOV accepts final invoice before POP end date.

80% of milestones completed by Contractor and GOV has to extend POP end date to no more than 30 days to

<80% of project milestones completed by Contractor and GOV has to extend POP end date more than 30 days to end date.

E VG S M U

Category: Management of Key Personnel (4) Performance indicator: Met contractual obligations Corrective Actions were timely and effective

Yes No

Performance indicator: Ethical Conduct Meetings and correspondences with project delivery team and other stakeholders

Yes No

Performance indicator: Personnel able to manage resources efficiently Instances when resource management had negative impact on project execution

0 1 2 3-4 5 or more

Performance indicator: Personnel competent, responsive and cooperative Key personnel competently answer inquiries, and are responsive and cooperative

100% 90% 80% 70% <70% of the time.

Performance indicator: Personnel knowledgeable and effective in their areas of responsibility Personnel assigned to tasks

All personnel proposed by Contractor were assigned to project, some personnel were substituted by higher qualified individuals.

All personnel proposed by Contractor were assigned to project OR some personnel were substituted by equally qualified individuals.

Not all personnel proposed by the Contractor were assigned to this project, and some personnel were substituted by lesser qualified individuals OR

GOV

requested, in writing, removal of assigned personnel for poor performance.

E VG S M U

CPAR Category: REGULATORY COMPLIANCE (5) Performance indicator: Proper Waste Characterization Unforeseen waste stream characterization identified, in writing, to KO/COR in a timely manner to apply acceptable corrective actions.

Impacts and corrective actions clearly communicated within 24 hours of detection.

Impacts and corrective actions clearly communicated within 48 hours of detection.

Impacts and corrective actions clearly communicated within 5 business days of detection.

Impacts are identified by Customer, QA, or

KO/COR,

sources other than the Contractor OR Impacts and corrective actions communicated within more than 5 business days but less than 10 business days of detection.

Impacts are identified by Customer, QA, or KO/COR, sources other than the Contractor OR Impacts and corrective actions communicated more than 10 business days of detection.

Performance indicator: Proper Waste Manifesting, Handling, Transport, and Disposal Conforms with applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations and requirements, to include work executed by subcontractors, vendors, and suppliers

No improper manifesting, handling, transport, or disposal of demolition debris

NOV

violations and infractions levied against KTR, land holder, and/or USACE for improper manifesting, handling, transport, or disposal of demolition debris resulting in an NOV, with full

NOV

violations and infractions levied against KTR, land holder, and/or USACE for improper manifesting, handling, transport, or disposal of demolition debris resulting in an NOV, with no cooperation to cooperation to mitigate damages to the environment mitigate damages to the environment

Performance indicator: Monthly/Quarterly Reports Monthly transmittal of delivery manifests for disposal of non-regulated C&D debris

Yes No

Performance indicator: Monthly/Quarterly Reports Monthly transmittal of delivery manifests for disposal of disposal of regulated/non-regulated wastes/items

Yes No

E VG S M U

Category: Safety (6) Performance indicator: Accidents and Violations Accidents, Contractor at fault

No Class A, B, C, or D accidents.

Contractor's Safety Program and Plan goes above and beyond the requirement of

EM 385-1-1.

No Class A, B, C, or D accidents.

Contractor's Safety Program and Plan meets the requirements of

EM 385-1-1.

No Class A, B, C accidents and not more than 1 Class D accidents.

Contractor's Safety Program and Plan meets the requirements of EM 385-1-1.

No Class A and B accidents.

Not more than 1 Class C accident and not more than 1 Class D accidents, or not more than 2 Class D accidents.

Contractor's Safety Program and Plan meets the requirements

Any Class A or B accidents.

Contractor's Safety Program and Plan does not meet the requirements of

EM 385-1-1.

of EM 385-1- 1.

Major safety violations

No major safety violations

1 major safety violation

2 or more safety violations

Minor safety violations

No minor safety violations

2 minor safety violations, that are immediately correctable.

4 minor safety violations, that are immediately correctable OR 2 minor safety violations that are correctable within 2 business days

>4 but <10 minor safety violations, that are immediately correctable OR >2 but <6 minor safety violations that not correctable within 2 business days

>10 minor safety violations, that are immediately correctable OR >6 minor safety violations that are not correctable within 2 business days

The following guidelines are provided for issuing ratings that are subjective in nature, these ratings will be supported by the weight of evidence documented during the government's surveillance efforts:

Exceptional (E): Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

Very Good (VG): Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

Satisfactory (S): Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal (M): Performance does not meet all contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The Contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory (U): Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problems for which the Contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Classes of Accidents:

Class A: Fatality or permanent total disability (Government Civilian, Military Personnel, and/or Contractor), or >$2,000,000 property damage.

Class B: Permanent partial disability or impatient hospitalization of 3 or more persons

(Government Civilian, Military Personnel, and/or Contractor), $500,000< $2,000,000 property damage.

Class C: Lost Workday (Contractor) or Lost Time (Government Civilians), $50,000< $500,000 property damage.

Class D: $2000 < $50,000 property damage.

Attachment 2 – Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan

1. Performance Requirements Summary

The table on the following page lists the PWS requirements/deliverables that the Government shall monitor. The absence of any contract requirement from the PRS/QASP must not detract from its enforceability nor limit the rights or remedies of the Government under any other provision of the contract, including the clauses entitled “Inspection of Services” and “Default.” The table defines the standard for each listed PWS service, cites the respective specification, provides the method of surveillance, and describes disincentives for not meeting acceptable standards.

2. Government Quality Assurance

The Contracting Officer (CO) has overall responsibility for overseeing the Contractor’s performance. The CO shall monitor day-to-day contract compliance and administration. The

COR shall assist the CO with their duties and is responsible of technical administration of the project. The COR also assures proper Government surveillance of the Contractor’s performance and shall monitor, record, and report on the technical performance of the Contractor on a day-today basis. The COR, along with USACE subject matter experts, shall assure the Contractor is meeting contract PWS standards, as well as all Federal, state, and local regulatory requirements.

The Government intends to use the following methods to monitor standards:

Inspection and review of all required documents and submittals.

Periodic inspection of work processes or output.

100% inspection at the completion of key work segments and deliverables.

Customer feedback.

3. Performance Evaluation

The Government shall evaluate Contractor performance to determine if its performance meets the requirements of the contract. The COR shall evaluate and report Contractor performance to the

Contracting Officer at each milestone and delivery per the project schedule. Contractor shall submit progress inspection reports as required. When the performance requirement is not met, the

Contracting Officer shall issue a contract discrepancy report (CDR) to the Contractor. The

Contractor must respond to the CDR and return it to the contracting officer within five (5) calendar days of receipt. Failure to meet acceptable performance standards may result in one or all of the following actions:

Temporary work stoppage awaiting corrective action.

Withdrawal of work

Terminate the task order.

Terminate the MATOC (basic) contract.

Required Service Paragraph

Number

Standard Method of

Surveillance

Incentive/Disincentive

Preparation and submittal of required project documents, forms, permit requests, and notifications.

6.5 Contractor shall

submit 90% of reports on time, with less than

10% requiring more than one revision.

100% inspection

CPARS Rating:

Exceptional = 100% of reports on time requiring zero revisions.

Unsatisfactory = less than 80% of reports on time and/or more that

20% requiring more than two revisions.

Submittals that do not meet acceptable performance standards may be rejected in whole or in part.

Contractor must resolve and correct deficiencies in reasonable time or will be subject to issuance of show cause and possible termination

Mobilization/demobil ization and work site setup, to include protection of personnel, xxx, land, and water resources.

6.5.3 Accomplish 90%

of mobilization/de mobilization tasks within timeframe allotted in project schedule

Periodic progress inspection

CPARS Rating:

Exceptional = 100% of project milestones completed by

Contractor within project milestone schedule.

Unsatisfactory = less than <80% of project milestones completed by Contractor within project milestone schedule.

Failure to perform work according to project execution schedule could result in assessment of liquidated damages for schedule delays, and may result in the issuance of show cause and/or possible contract termination.

Removal, capping, rerouting of all affected utilities

6.5.5 Meets site-

specific utility owner standard

Periodic progress inspection

Failure to correctly perform this service may disrupt installation utility services and negatively impact operations. Such an incident could result in assessment of liquidated damages for outages, and may result in the issuance of show cause and/or possible contract termination.

Abatement of

ACM/ORM

6.5.6, 6.5.7 No exceptions to reported

ACM/ORM

removal

100% inspection

Failure to perform this service in compliance with Federal, State, and local environmental, health, and safety regulations, will result in a less than satisfactory CPARS rating and/or a stop work order. Contractor must resolve and correct deficiencies in reasonable time or will be subject to issuance of show cause and possible termination for cause.

Demolition performed in accordance with accepted work plan

6.5.9 100% work required by PWS

100% inspection

Failure to perform this service in compliance with Federal, State, and local environmental, health, and safety regulations, will result in a less than satisfactory CPARS rating and/or a stop work order. Contractor must resolve and correct deficiencies in reasonable time or will be subject to issuance of show cause and possible termination for cause.

Debris disposal, diversion, and recycling

6.5.10 Meets material

handling and disposal requirements based on waste stream characterization

Periodic progress inspection

Failure to perform this service in compliance with Federal, State, and local environmental, health, and safety regulations, will result in a less than satisfactory CPARS rating and/or a stop work order. Contractor must resolve and correct deficiencies in reasonable time or will be subject to issuance of show cause and possible termination for cause.

Site Restoration 6.5.11 Meets requirements of

PWS and

SWPPP.

100% inspection

Failure to perform this service in compliance with Federal, State, and local environmental, health, and safety regulations, will result in a less than satisfactory CPARS rating and/or a stop work order. Contractor must resolve and correct deficiencies in reasonable time or will be subject to issuance of show cause and possible termination for cause.

Recurring

Deliverables/Submitt als

(daily/weekly/monthl y)

6.5.12 Contractor shall

submit 90% of reports on time, with less than

10% requiring more than one revision.

100% inspection

CPARS Rating:

Exceptional = 100% of reports on time requiring zero revisions.

Unsatisfactory = less than 80% of reports on time and/or more that

20% requiring more than two revisions.

Submittals that do not meet acceptable performance standards may be rejected in whole or in part.

Contractor must resolve and correct deficiencies in reasonable time or will be subject to issuance of show cause and possible termination

ATTACHMENT 3

EXPERIENCE REPORTING FORM

Project Experience Tracking Number: of

a. Project Title:

b. Name of Offeror:

c. Role of Offeror (Prime, Joint Venture Partner, Key Subcontractor, Subcontractor, etc.):

d. Contract Number and Location of Project:

e. Contracting Agency/Office:

f. Contract Type and Pricing Arrangement:

g. Contract Cost (to include breakdown of costs by optional performance period):

h. Contract Dates: Began: Completed:

i. Description of Work (e.g. BOS, O&M Services at Medical Facilities, O&M Services at non-medical facilities):

j. Detailed Description of Work Self-Performed as the Prime (to include what trades & specialties directly provided and percentage of total cost):

k. Describe any Work Subcontracted to Others as the Prime (to include names, addresses, and values):

l. Reference Contact Information (to include POC name, address, phone, and email address):

m. Describe how the work referenced is relevant to the immediate acquisition. If only portions of the contract are relevant, specify which portions of the contract are relevant to the immediate acquisition:

n. Contract Performance Evaluation Rating, if known:

o. Describe past performance in terms of schedule, budget, quality control, safety, problems (if any) and corrective actions taken relative to this project:

p. Were You Ever Terminated for Convenience or for Default, Issued a Cure or Show Cause Notice, Have an Option that was Not Exercised for Performance Reasons or Assessed Liquidated Damages? If “yes”, provide explanation:

If the Role of the Offeror is Joint Venture Partner, Key Subcontractor, Subcontractor, etc. please continue to q) through w). Do not continue if the Role of the Offeror is Prime. Refer to your answer in c).

q. Offeror’s Subcontract Amount:

ATTACHMENT 3

EXPERIENCE REPORTING FORM

r. Subcontract Percentage of Total Prime Contract as listed in g) above:

s. Description of Work (e.g. BOS, O&M Services at Medical Facilities, O&M Services at non-medical facilities):

t. Detailed Description of Work Self-Performed by the Offeror (to include what trades & specialties directly provided and percentage of total cost):

u. Describe any Work Subcontracted to Others by the Offeror (to include names, addresses, and values):

v. Reference (Client or Prime) Contact Information (includes POC name, address, phone, and email address):

w. If work supported involves multiple facilities and types, identify the percentage of total facilities square footage attributed to medical treatment facilities.

ATTACHMENT 4

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0) CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC/USACE requests that the client completes this questionnaire and submits directly back to the offeror.

The offeror will submit the completed questionnaire to USACE with their proposal, and may duplicate this questionnaire for future submission on USACE solicitations. Clients are highly encouraged to submit questionnaires directly to the offeror. However, questionnaires may be submitted directly to USACE. Please contact the offeror for USACE POC information. The Government reserves the right to verify any and all information on this form.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable No information or did not apply to your contract Ra Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance

E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;

responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?

(Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

Small Business Commitment Proposal (Format) Attachment 5

All Offerors (both large and small businesses) are required to complete a Small Business Commitment Proposal. Offerors should propose the level of participation of small businesses (as a small business prime and/or small business subcontractors) in the performance of the acquisition relative to the objectives/goals set forth in the evaluation of this area.

(a) Check the applicable size and categories for the PRIME offeror only -- Check all applicable boxes:

{ } Large Prime { } Historically Black Colleges or Universities and Minority Institutions (HBCU/MI) or

{ } Small Business Prime; also categorized as a

{ } Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) { } Woman-Owned Small Business (WOSB) { } Historically Underutilized Zone (HUB Zone) Small Business { } Veteran Owned Small Business (VOSB) { } Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB)

(b) Submit the total combined percentage of work to be performed by both large and small businesses (include the percentage of work to be performed both by Prime and Subcontractors):

Example: If Prime proposes a price of $1,000,000 (including all options), and small business(es) will provide $250,000 in services/supplies as a prime or subcontractor, the % planned for small businesses is 25%; and 75% for large business equaling 100%.

Total Percentage planned for Large Business(es) _______% = $ _______

Total Percentage planned for Small Business(es) _______% = $ _______

100%

(c) Please indicate the total percentage of participation to be performed by each type of subcategory small business. The percentage of work performed by Small Businesses that qualify in multiple small business categories may be counted in each category:

Example: Victory Prop Mgt (WOSB and SDVOSB) performing 2%; and Williams Group (SDB, HubZ and WOSB) performing 3%. Results equate to: SDB 3%; HubZone 3%;

When combined, Large and Small Business totals must equal 100%.

WOSB 5%; SDVOSB 2%; VOSB 2%;). SDVOSBs are also VOSBs automatically; however VOSBs are not automatically SDVOSBs.

Small Disadvantaged Business _________% HUB Zone Small Business _________% Woman Owned Small Business _________% Service Disabled Veteran Owned SB _________% Veteran Owned Small Business _________%

(d) List principle supplies/services to be performed by Small Businesses:

Example: If a Small Business qualifies also as a WOSB and a SDVOSB, and you can add them to each category below in which they qualify.

Name of Company

(Include CAGE Code) Anticipated NAICS Code for

Each Subcontractor (1) Type of Service/Supplies

Prime Offeror:

Large Business:

Small Business:

SDB:

WOSB:

HUBZone Small:

VOSB:

SDVOSB:

Notes:

(1) Pursuant to Sections 8(d) of the Small Business Act, a business is considered small for Government procurements if it does not exceed the size standard for the NAICS code that the prime contractor believes best describes the product or services being acquired. In other words, the size of the prime’s suppliers is determined by the applicable NAICS code of their joint venture, teaming partner, or subcontract, which may or may not be the same NAICS code as the one for your prime contract with the Government.

(e) Describe the extent of commitment to use small businesses (for example, what types of commitments if any are in place for this specific acquisition either – small business prime, written contract, verbal, enforceable, non-enforceable, joint venturing, mentor-protégé, etc.)

Provide documentation regarding commitments to small business for this effort. Copies of such agreements should be provided as part of your small business participation plan and will not count against the page limitation for this volume.

(f) Provide the process and any past performance of the Offeror in complying with the requirements of the clauses at FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns; and for all large business Offerors, FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan

Additional Important Note for Other Than U.S. Small Businesses ONLY.

Small Business Subcontracting Plan is Required (FAR 52.219-9)

Separate from Small Business Commitment Document, other than U.S. Small Business offerors must also submit a subcontracting plan meeting the requirements of FAR 52.219-9 and DFARS 252.219-7003 (or DFARS 252.219-7004 if the offeror has a comprehensive subcontracting plan). Other than U.S. Small Businesses must submit acceptable subcontracting plans to be eligible for award. Subcontracting Plans shall reflect and be consistent with the commitments offered in the Small Business Commitment Document.

https://www.acquisition.gov/far/html/52_217_221.html#wp1136058 https://www.acquisition.gov/far/html/52_217_221.html#wp1136058 http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfars/html/current/252219.htm#252.219-7003 http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfars/html/current/252219.htm#252.219-7004

ATTACHMENT 6

LETTER OF COMMITMENT FOR KEY SUBCONTRACTOR

(USE COMPANY LETTERHEAD)

TO: Contracting Officer

SUBJECT: Letter of Commitment for Proposed Contract for ____________________

Dear Sir or Madam:

I hereby make the unequivocal commitment that, in the event of an award of a contract to (Fill in name of Proposer), that (insert name of key subcontractor) will fulfill the duties of (state role on a project).

If anything changes, the Contracting Officer must be notified.

Sincerely, (Authorized Official of Proposer)

Date: __________

W912DY-18-R-0063

Attachment 7 – Small Business Decision Matrix Project: Example Project

Risk Factors:

Size/Dollar

Value:

Multiple Mobilizations, varying site restorations, long duration

$1,581,842

Complexity - 40% Risk - 40% Examples (or similar complexities) Rank Examples (or similar risk) Rank

337 Development Services 1 Short duration, adequate infrastructure 1

ACM/ORM Assessment

Location, close to large city, airports, easy access to material and personnel

ACM/ORM Assessment + Medical Level 1 Assessment

Short duration without adequate infrastructure

ACM/ORM Assessment + Medical Level 2 Assessment

Long duration with adequate infrastructure

Demolition of simple structures with complete ACM/ORM Assessment already completed

0-6 months fieldwork duration without adequate infrastructure

ACM/ORM Assessment and Demolition of Simple Structures

6-12 months fieldwork Long duration with adequate infrastructure

Demolition of complex structures with complete ACM/ORM Assessment and or Medical Assessment already completed

Over 12 months fieldwork Long duration with adequate infrastructure, multiple mobilizations

ACM/ORM Assessment, Medical Assessment, and Demolition of Complex Structures

Negative publicity, High political visibility, reporting

Demolition of "Hardened" Structures 9 Remote locations with complex logistics 9 Demolition of extremely complex, damaged, and or hazardous, structures

Remote locations with complex logistics

Rank Evaluation

Composite Rank 6.2 Resulting decision is - Unrestricted

Process:

* Requirements will be reviewed to determine if they will be competed as Small Business or Unrestricted

* Complexity (40%), Size (20%), and Risk (40%) will be considered

* Each factor will receive a rating from 1 – 10

* Any requirement that receives a combined factor rating of 5 or below will be considered for competition by Small Business

* After the current year, the PDT may adjust the decision point either up or down

Size - 20% Examples Rank

< 50k 1

< 100k

< 250k

< 600k

< 750k

< 1M

< 1.5M

< 2M

< 3M 9

>4M

Attachment 8– Monthly Progress Report Format

FORMAT FOR MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT (Attach All Required Documentation)

MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT FOR: (MONTH / YEAR)

CONTRACTOR:

CONTRACT NUMBER/TASK ORDER: PROJECT TITLE:

LOCATION:

Contractor’s Project Manager: (Name/phone number) Customer Point of Contact: (e.g., DPW or USACE QA): (Name / phone number) Site Supervisor: (Name / phone number)

Basic Award: Mod 1: Mod 2:

Date: Date: Date:

Type: Type: Type:

Amount: Amount: Amount:

Schedule Status (ahead/behind): Describe pertinent points; attach updated schedule

ACTIVITY PERCENT

COMPLETE

CURRENT

COMPLETION

DATE

ORIGINAL

COMPLETION

DATE

Work Plans and Related Docs

Mob/Demob & Site Setup

ACM/ORM Abatement/ Removal:

Bldg/Groups of Bldgs

XXX1

XXX2

XXX3

Utility Cut/Cap/De-Energize:

Bldg/Groups of Bldgs

XXX1

Demolition:

XXX1

Site Restoration / Cleanup:

XXX1

Site Restoration / Cleanup:

XXX1

Debris Disposal: C & D

ACM ORM

Diversion/Re-use

Estimated Tons Tons this Month Tons to Date

Salvage Credits Estimated $ Value this Month

Value to Date

Final Report

DATE MOBILIZED TO SITE:

DATE EXECUTION STARTED:

WORK SCHEDULED THIS MONTH:

WORK SCHEDULED NEXT 30-60 DAYS: RECYCLING ACTIVITY:

SAFETY ISSUES/EVENTS: MISCELLANEOUS/TRAVEL:

REMARKS:

Attachment 9 -Technical Exhibit 3 – Work Plans, Sub-Plans, and Appendices

FRP-20-001

DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION

Title: Work Plans, Sub-Plans, and Appendices

Number: FRP-20-001 Approval Date: 20200503

Revision No. 002 DATE: 20200503

AMSC Number: 00 Limitation: None

DTIC Applicable: N GIDEP Applicable: N

Office of Primary Responsibility: CEHNC-ISF-FRP

Applicable Forms:

Use/Relationship: Work Plans will be used to describe the goals, methods, procedures, and personnel used for field activities for all Facilities Reduction Program abatement, demolition, and recycling/reuse activities.

Requirements:

1.0 Work Plans shall be submitted in electronic and hard copy formats as directed in each Task Order. The plan shall be printed on standard size (8 ½ by 11 inch) white paper, with drawings folded, if necessary, to this size or to fit within pockets of this size. Pages of 8 ½ by 11 inches or up to 11 by 17 inches are preferred. Pages shall be sequentially numbered. Drawings shall be of engineering quality in drafted form with sufficient detail to show interrelations of major features. When drawings are required, data may be combined to reduce the number of drawings. All attachments and appendices shall be identified and referenced in the text of the plan, and conveyed within the Table of Contents. The last page of the Table of Contents shall contain a list of Acronyms or Abbreviations used within the document. The plan shall be legible and suitable for reproduction, in both digital and print format.

2.0 Chapters shall be numbered sequentially. Within each chapter, each page shall be numbered sequentially, starting with the specific chapter number. Within each chapter, the paragraphs shall be numbered sequentially starting with the chapter number and using a decimal system, with each section and paragraph having a unique decimal designation. Within each chapter, any figures, tables, and charts shall be numbered sequentially starting with the chapter number. Printed Copies of the Work Plans shall be bound in a three- ring binder. Binders shall hold pages firmly while allowing easy removal, addition, or replacement of pages.

3.0 Appendices shall be lettered alphabetically. Sequence is Appendix, Tab, Enclosure.

Within each appendix, each page shall be numbered sequentially starting with the appendix letter, e.g., Appendix A-1, or Appendix A-1, Tab A, Encl 1.

4.0 A title sheet will be provided on the front of the binder and also inside the binder which includes the name of the project (site), contractor's name and address, the Corps of Engineers’ contract number, Task Order number, and project number, the date of the plan, and the title of the plan. The contractor’s name/logo shall not dominate the title sheet. The Corporate Quality Management representative shall sign the title sheet. The version of the work plan (i.e., draft, final, etc.) shall be clearly identified on the title sheet.

5.0 Each page of the work plan shall contain a dated footer and the Corps of Engineers’ contract/Task Order number. When revisions to the work plan are required, a revision date, revision number, Corps of Engineers’ contract/Task Order, and amendment/modification number (if applicable) shall be included in the date footer. A dated summary page listing all revised pages shall be submitted with each revision. This summary page shall be identified as such and placed directly behind the title page. All revisions to the Work Plan shall be highlighted in yellow and the text bolded to match the information shown in the summary changes page.

6.0 Work Plan Outline – Chapter, sections, or appendices not used for a specific project shall be marked: “Not required for this project.” However, the correct chapter, section or appendices placeholder shall be left within the document for reference.

6.1 Chapter 1 – Introduction. At a minimum the following information shall be included:

6.1.1 Project Authorization (Contract No., Delivery Order No., etc.) A copy of the actual award PWS and any Modification will be shown in Appendix A – Performance Work Statement.

6.1.2 General Information deemed appropriate by the contractor.

6.1.3 Site(s) Location and description(s)

6.1.4 Topography – Flat, Gentle Rolling, or special conditions required.

6.1.5 Climate – Specific to the time of year in which field activities will be occurring.

6.2 Chapter 2 – Project Management Plan

6.2.1 Project Management (Home Office) and Field Supervision/Superintendents

6.2.2 Organization Chart (Home Office and Field) for this project.

6.2.3 Personnel – Duties and Responsibilities

6.2.3.1 Program Manager (Home Office)

6.2.3.2 Project Manager (Home Office)

6.2.3.3 Project Manager/Superintendent (Project Site)

6.2.3.4 Health and Safety Officer (Home or Project Site)

6.2.3.5 Contractor Quality Control Officer (Home or Project Site)

6.2.4 Project Management Team – Contact Information

6.2.5 Resumes for Superintendent/SSHO/CQC and alternates with appropriate training certifications

6.3 Chapter 3 -- Physical Security and Visitor Control

6.3.1 Installation access requirements for personnel

6.3.2 Approved gates/routes

6.3.3 Site controls

6.3.4 Vetting of all employees for criminal warrants

6.4 Chapter 4 – Description of the Work

6.4.1 Detailed sequence of work and work processes

6.4.2 Equipment and subcontractors

6.4.3 Planning and project management to meet schedule

6.4.4 Permits required with NLT dates

6.5 Chapter 5 – Hazardous and Potentially Hazardous Material Removal – ACM

Abatement and ORM Removal

6.5.1 List by Building/Structure Number and indicate same in Schedule

6.5.2 Subcontractors, disposal facilities and locations, ACM/ORM quantities to be abated, NOI permit, etc. (Appendix J - location for the detailed methods, certifications, equipment, etc ).

6.5.3 Provide short description of expected means and methods to be employed.

6.6 Chapter 6 – Utility Disconnect, Cut, and Cap

6.6.1 Coordination and responsibility for actions

6.6.2 Electricity

6.6.3 Water

6.6.4 Sanitary Sewer

6.6.5 Natural Gas, Propane, or other Heating Fuels

6.6.6 Communications/Fire Alarm Systems

6.6.7 Cut and Cap plans and drawings

6.7 Chapter 7 – Demolition Activities

6.7.1 Pre-Demolition Activities

6.7.2 General Structure Demolition: methods, site specific impacts to work, unusual hazards, disposal locations, sequence of operations by Building # / Groups of Buildings

6.7.3 Demolition of Concrete

6.7.3.1 Concrete and Asphalt Recycling

6.7.3.2 Concrete and Asphalt Re-Use

6.7.4 Dust Control

6.8 Chapter 8 – Waste Management and Diversion Plan

6.8.1 Recycle facilities and locations

6.8.2 C & D facilities and locations

6.8.3 Anticipated quantities by type of materials

6.8.4 Haul routes

6.9 Chapter 9 – Site Restoration

6.9.1 Sequence of work by Building/Group of Buildings

6.9.2 Materials: seed/sod, equipment, water requirements, etc.

6.9.3 Finished condition of sites

6.10 Chapter 10 – References

6.11 Appendices

The work plan shall contain the following documents in the order shown as appendices:

6.11.1 Appendix A - Performance Work Statement and Modifications as Awarded with initial bid cost at NTP

6.11.2 Appendix B - Site Maps

6.11.3 Appendix C – Quality Control Plan Quality Control Personnel Resume(s)/Letter

Appointing CQC Personnel for this Project

6.11.4 Appendix D - Environmental Protection Plan/Erosion and Sedimentation Control sub-plan.

6.11.5 Appendix E – Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)

6.11.6 Appendix F – Project Schedule (as detailed as required for RMS)

Note: The awarded proposal submitted by the Contractor contained cost line items, which should match cost line items created in RMS, which then have Project Schedules and milestones for completion and subsequent payment. Minimal milestones shown shall be Delivery Order Award Date, Work Plan & APP submission date, Work Plan & APP Acceptance Date (also known as NTP for Demo), Abatement by Building, Completion of Demo by building/group of buildings (to include Site Restoration), and then Submission of Final Demolition Report. This should be a cost-loaded schedule that shows all tasks that required for each major milestone and all work breakdown structure (WBS) and durations. Mobilization, abatement by building, demolition by building and site restoration by groups should each be shown as separate activities with planned start and planned finish dates and columns for actual start and actual finish.

6.11.7 Appendix G - Contractor Forms, Permits, or Templates for collecting and recording the following data:

6.11.7.1 Quality Control Log

6.11.7.2 Safety Meeting Attendance Log

6.11.7.3 Site Visitors Log and Daily Sign-In/Sign-Out Log

6.11.7.4 Safety Inspections Log

6.11.7.5 Daily Report

6.11.7.6 Weekly Report

6.11.7.7 Monthly Report

6.11.7.8 Meeting Minutes

6.11.7.9 Work Phase Checklist (Contractor Specific)

6.11.7.10 Underground Service Alert / Dig permit(s)

6.11.7.11 Demolition Permit(s)

6.11.7.12 Asbestos Removal Notifications (NESHAP Notification)

6.11.7.13 Other Hazardous Materials or Regulated Materials Removal Notifications

6.11.7.14 Excavation Permits

6.11.7.15 Underground Tank Removals

6.11.7.16 Sewer Caps

6.11.7.17 Street and Sidewalk Closure Permits

6.11.7.18 Extended Work Hours Permit

6.11.8 Appendix H - Engineering Survey (OSHA 1926.850(a) and EM 385-1- 1, 23.A.01a(1))

6.11.9 Appendix I – Accident Prevention Plan, to include ACM/ORM training/state level certifications/health documents, etc. See Attachment 5, Accident Prevention Plan Checklist.

6.11.10 Appendix J– Asbestos Abatement/ORM Removal and Disposal Plan, to include details of means and methods

6.11.11 Appendix K - Existing Condition Project Photographs

6.11.12 Appendix L - As-Built Drawing or Floor Plans

6.11.13 Appendix M – Work Plan comments and responses as complete at NTP.

End of DID FRP-20-001

CESO Form A-02 MAR 15

Attachment 10

Form A-02 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Accident Prevention Plan Checklist

Date of Inspection

Location (Plant or Facility) Contract Number

Contractor Name Project Name

Inspector Name (Print) Inspector Signature

This checklist serves as a guide only, it does not replace or eliminate the need to comply with the requirements set forth in Engineering Manual 385-1-1, Safety and Health Requirements Manual, dated 30 N o v 2014. The references included in this checklist correspond to the applicable sections of EM 385-1-1.

Item Description Yes No N/A Remarks (Any NO or N/A item)

a. Signature sheet

1. Includes the name, title, signature, telephone number, and qualifications of the Plan Preparer (Qualified person, i.e. corporate safety staff person, QC)

2. Includes the name, title, signature, telephone number, and qualifications of the Plan Approver (e.g. owner, company president, regional vice president) (HTRW activities require approval of a Certified Industrial Hygienist, a Certified Safety Professional may approve the plan for operations involving UST removal where contaminants are known to be petroleum, oils, or lubricants).

3. Includes the name(s), title(s), signature(s), telephone number(s), and qualifications for Plan Concurrence (provide concurrence of other applicable corporate and project personnel (contractor)) (e.g.