Attachment X - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 479 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA483026R0002
About this file
This is a Past and Present Performance Questionnaire for the COCESS (Contractor Operated Civil Engineer Supply Store) solicitation at Moody Air Force Base, Georgia (Solicitation FA483026R0002). The document is source selection sensitive information classified under RFO 2.101 and RFO 3.104, issued in November 2025.
The questionnaire is designed to be completed in two parts: Section I is completed by the contractor submitting the questionnaire and requests general information including the offeror's name, CAGE code, UEI number, program title, contract specifics (type, value, period of performance, CPARS status), contract environment, description of services as prime or subcontractor, and technician experience in years. Section II requires the respondent (reference contact) to validate the contractor's submitted information and provide contact details. Section III requests performance ratings on a six-point scale (Exceptional, Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, Neutral) across 15 performance criteria including transition management, contractual compliance, personnel attraction and retention, security clearance management, organizational capability, technician qualifications, emergency response, regulatory compliance, hazardous waste handling, overall performance, contract enforcement actions, and contractor recontract worthiness. The respondent must provide narrative explanations for any Marginal or Unsatisfactory ratings. Completed forms should be submitted to Contracting Officer Mary Twitty (mary.twitty.1@us.af.mil) and Contract Specialist Samuel Garfunkel (samuel.garfunkel.1@us.af.mil).
View the file
Other files
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation: FA483026R0002Source Selection Sensitive Information IAW RFO 2.101 and RFO 3.104 Title: CONTRACTOR OPERATED CIVIL ENGINEER
SUPPLY STORE (COCESS)
Attachment X
Past and Present Performance Questionnaire November 2025
SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation
TO:
You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for the COCESS contract at Moody AFB, GA.
Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, I can be contacted at
Please submit the completed questionnaire to the Government Contract Officer identified on the attached questionnaire.
Contractor Signature
Source Selection Sensitive Information IAW RFO 2.101 and RFO 3.104 Solicitation: FA483026R0002 Title: CONTRACTOR OPERATED CIVIL ENGINEER SUPPLY STORE (COCESS)
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
To Be Completed by the Contractor
A. Offeror Information:
Name (Company/Division):
CAGE Code: UEI Number:
If Other than the Prime Offeror, Identify Prime Offeror:
B. Program Title:
C. Contract Specifics:
Contracting Agency or Customer:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Contract FFP Task Order or Purchase Order, Cost Reimbursable or Other Contractual Arrangement
Period of Performance (include options):
Contract Dollar Value:
Has the contract been entered into the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS)?
Yes or No
Contract Environment:
Performance on an Air Force or Air Reserve Base Performance on a DoD Installation Performance at a Federal, State, County or City facility Other Performance Location
D. Description of Contract as Prime or Subcontractor Indicate the type of services provided and highlight portions considered most relevant to the COCESS acquisition.
E. Technician Experience: Years
Title: CONTRACTOR OPERATED CIVIL ENGINEER SUPPLY STORE (COCESS)
II. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
To Be Completed by the Respondent
A. Contact Information Name of Respondent: Title:
Address:
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
Email Address:
B. Is the information provided by the Contractor in Section I, General Information accurate? Yes No If not explain which information is not accurate (use separate page if needed):
C. SEND COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO EMAIL ADDRESSES BELOW:
Contracting Officer: Mary Twitty, mary.twitty.1@us.af.mil Contract Specialist: Samuel Garfunkel, samuel.garfunkel.1@us.af.mil mailto:amanda.richardson.13@us.af.mil
Title: CONTRACTOR OPERATED CIVIL ENGINEER SUPPLY STORE (COCESS)
III. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION:
To Be Completed by the Respondent
Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, N) that most accurately describes the Contractor’s performance or situation or N/A if performance in this area is not applicable to the effort addressed.
PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
E G S M U N
Exceptional Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Neutral
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeded many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeded some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
Title: CONTRACTOR OPERATED CIVIL ENGINEER SUPPLY STORE (COCESS)
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: CONTRACT #:
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
Contractor Performance or Situation E G S M U N N/A
1. How well did the Contractor implement an orderly transition from the incumbent Contractor?
2. How well did the Contractor comply with contractual terms and conditions including the preparation and timely/accurate submission of any required documents?
3. How well did the Contractor attract and retain qualified and fully trained personnel at all levels within their organization to ensure contract compliance?
4. How well did the Contractor manage personnel clearances in order to regularly service secured locations?
5. How well does the Contractor’s organization provide the necessary manning, training, equipment, and supplies to meet contractual requirements?
6. How would you rate the Contractor’s technician skills/ expertise, knowledge, and qualifications?
7. Rate Contractor’s ability to respond to emergencies.
8. How willing was the Contractor to improve and correct noncompliance issues or concerns?
9. How well did the Contractor comply with all Federal, State, EPA, OSHA and local regulatory requirements?
10. How well did the Contractor handle, remove, document, and properly dispose of hazardous /non-hazardous wastes.
11. How well did the Contractor meet any special performance requirements, if applicable? If the Contractor did not perform any special requirements, rate as N/A.
12. How would you rate the overall performance of the Contractor under this contract?
13. Was the Contractor ever issued a default, cure or show cause notice, Notice of Violation under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
YES/NO
14. Would you award another contract to this Contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” YES/NO
15. If a Government Contract, is the Contractor rated in CPARS? YES/NO
Title: CONTRACTOR OPERATED CIVIL ENGINEER SUPPLY STORE (COCESS)
Remarks (provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings):
| I. GENERAL INFORMATION: |
| II. RESPONDENT INFORMATION: |
| C. SEND COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO EMAIL ADDRESSES BELOW: |
| Contracting Officer: Amanda Richardson, amanda.richardson.13@us.af.mil |
| Contract Specialist: |
| You have been identified as a point of contact for a past andor present performance: |
| Please submit the completed questionnaire to the Government Contract Officer: |
| Name CompanyDivision: |
| UEI Number: |
| undefined: |
| If Other than the Prime Offeror Identify Prime Offeror: |
| B Program Title: |
| Contracting Agency or Customer: |
| Contract Number: |
| Firm Fixed Price FFP Contract: |
| FFP Task Order or Purchase Order: |
| Cost Reimbursable or Other Contractual Arrangement: |
| Period of Performance include options: |
| Has the contract been entered into the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System CPARS: |
| Yes or: |
| No: |
| Performance on an Air Force or Air Reserve Base: |
| Performance on a DoD Installation: |
| Performance at a Federal State County or City facility: |
| Other Performance Location: |
| Prime or: |
| Subcontractor: |
| Years: |
| Name of Respondent: |
| Title: |
| Address: |
| Telephone Number: |
| Fax Number: |
| Email Address: |
| B Is the information provided by the Contractor in Section I General Information accurate: |
| Yes: |
| CONTRACTORS NAME: |
| CONTRACT: |
| EHow well did the Contractor implement an orderly transition from the incumbent Contractor: |
| GHow well did the Contractor implement an orderly transition from the incumbent Contractor: |
| SHow well did the Contractor implement an orderly transition from the incumbent Contractor: |
| MHow well did the Contractor implement an orderly transition from the incumbent Contractor: |
| UHow well did the Contractor implement an orderly transition from the incumbent Contractor: |
| NHow well did the Contractor implement an orderly transition from the incumbent Contractor: |
| NAHow well did the Contractor implement an orderly transition from the incumbent Contractor: |
| EHow well did the Contractor comply with contractual terms and conditions including the preparation and timelyaccurate submission of any required documents: |
| GHow well did the Contractor comply with contractual terms and conditions including the preparation and timelyaccurate submission of any required documents: |
| SHow well did the Contractor comply with contractual terms and conditions including the preparation and timelyaccurate submission of any required documents: |
| MHow well did the Contractor comply with contractual terms and conditions including the preparation and timelyaccurate submission of any required documents: |
| UHow well did the Contractor comply with contractual terms and conditions including the preparation and timelyaccurate submission of any required documents: |
| NHow well did the Contractor comply with contractual terms and conditions including the preparation and timelyaccurate submission of any required documents: |
| NAHow well did the Contractor comply with contractual terms and conditions including the preparation and timelyaccurate submission of any required documents: |
| EHow well did the Contractor attract and retain qualified and fully trained personnel at all levels within their organization to ensure contract compliance: |
| GHow well did the Contractor attract and retain qualified and fully trained personnel at all levels within their organization to ensure contract compliance: |
| SHow well did the Contractor attract and retain qualified and fully trained personnel at all levels within their organization to ensure contract compliance: |
| MHow well did the Contractor attract and retain qualified and fully trained personnel at all levels within their organization to ensure contract compliance: |
| UHow well did the Contractor attract and retain qualified and fully trained personnel at all levels within their organization to ensure contract compliance: |
| NHow well did the Contractor attract and retain qualified and fully trained personnel at all levels within their organization to ensure contract compliance: |
| NAHow well did the Contractor attract and retain qualified and fully trained personnel at all levels within their organization to ensure contract compliance: |
| EHow well did the Contractor manage personnel clearances in order to regularly service secured locations: |
| GHow well did the Contractor manage personnel clearances in order to regularly service secured locations: |
| SHow well did the Contractor manage personnel clearances in order to regularly service secured locations: |
| MHow well did the Contractor manage personnel clearances in order to regularly service secured locations: |
| UHow well did the Contractor manage personnel clearances in order to regularly service secured locations: |
| NHow well did the Contractor manage personnel clearances in order to regularly service secured locations: |
| NAHow well did the Contractor manage personnel clearances in order to regularly service secured locations: |
| EHow well does the Contractors organization provide the necessary manning training equipment and supplies to meet contractual requirements: |
| GHow well does the Contractors organization provide the necessary manning training equipment and supplies to meet contractual requirements: |
| SHow well does the Contractors organization provide the necessary manning training equipment and supplies to meet contractual requirements: |
| MHow well does the Contractors organization provide the necessary manning training equipment and supplies to meet contractual requirements: |
| UHow well does the Contractors organization provide the necessary manning training equipment and supplies to meet contractual requirements: |
| NHow well does the Contractors organization provide the necessary manning training equipment and supplies to meet contractual requirements: |
| NAHow well does the Contractors organization provide the necessary manning training equipment and supplies to meet contractual requirements: |
| EHow would you rate the Contractors technician skills expertise knowledge and qualifications: |
| GHow would you rate the Contractors technician skills expertise knowledge and qualifications: |
| SHow would you rate the Contractors technician skills expertise knowledge and qualifications: |
| MHow would you rate the Contractors technician skills expertise knowledge and qualifications: |
| UHow would you rate the Contractors technician skills expertise knowledge and qualifications: |
| NHow would you rate the Contractors technician skills expertise knowledge and qualifications: |
| NAHow would you rate the Contractors technician skills expertise knowledge and qualifications: |
| ERate Contractors ability to respond to emergencies: |
| GRate Contractors ability to respond to emergencies: |
| SRate Contractors ability to respond to emergencies: |
| MRate Contractors ability to respond to emergencies: |
| URate Contractors ability to respond to emergencies: |
| NRate Contractors ability to respond to emergencies: |
| NARate Contractors ability to respond to emergencies: |
| EHow willing was the Contractor to improve and correct noncompliance issues or concerns: |
| GHow willing was the Contractor to improve and correct noncompliance issues or concerns: |
| SHow willing was the Contractor to improve and correct noncompliance issues or concerns: |
| MHow willing was the Contractor to improve and correct noncompliance issues or concerns: |
| UHow willing was the Contractor to improve and correct noncompliance issues or concerns: |
| NHow willing was the Contractor to improve and correct noncompliance issues or concerns: |
| NAHow willing was the Contractor to improve and correct noncompliance issues or concerns: |
| EHow well did the Contractor comply with all Federal State EPA OSHA and local regulatory requirements: |
| GHow well did the Contractor comply with all Federal State EPA OSHA and local regulatory requirements: |
| SHow well did the Contractor comply with all Federal State EPA OSHA and local regulatory requirements: |
| MHow well did the Contractor comply with all Federal State EPA OSHA and local regulatory requirements: |
| UHow well did the Contractor comply with all Federal State EPA OSHA and local regulatory requirements: |
| NHow well did the Contractor comply with all Federal State EPA OSHA and local regulatory requirements: |
| NAHow well did the Contractor comply with all Federal State EPA OSHA and local regulatory requirements: |
| EHow well did the Contractor handle remove document and properly dispose of hazardous nonhazardous wastes: |
| GHow well did the Contractor handle remove document and properly dispose of hazardous nonhazardous wastes: |
| SHow well did the Contractor handle remove document and properly dispose of hazardous nonhazardous wastes: |
| MHow well did the Contractor handle remove document and properly dispose of hazardous nonhazardous wastes: |
| UHow well did the Contractor handle remove document and properly dispose of hazardous nonhazardous wastes: |
| NHow well did the Contractor handle remove document and properly dispose of hazardous nonhazardous wastes: |
| NAHow well did the Contractor handle remove document and properly dispose of hazardous nonhazardous wastes: |
| EHow well did the Contractor meet any special performance requirements if applicable If the Contractor did not perform any special requirements rate as NA: |
| GHow well did the Contractor meet any special performance requirements if applicable If the Contractor did not perform any special requirements rate as NA: |
| SHow well did the Contractor meet any special performance requirements if applicable If the Contractor did not perform any special requirements rate as NA: |
| MHow well did the Contractor meet any special performance requirements if applicable If the Contractor did not perform any special requirements rate as NA: |
| UHow well did the Contractor meet any special performance requirements if applicable If the Contractor did not perform any special requirements rate as NA: |
| NHow well did the Contractor meet any special performance requirements if applicable If the Contractor did not perform any special requirements rate as NA: |
| NAHow well did the Contractor meet any special performance requirements if applicable If the Contractor did not perform any special requirements rate as NA: |
| EHow would you rate the overall performance of the Contractor under this contract: |
| GHow would you rate the overall performance of the Contractor under this contract: |
| SHow would you rate the overall performance of the Contractor under this contract: |
| MHow would you rate the overall performance of the Contractor under this contract: |
| UHow would you rate the overall performance of the Contractor under this contract: |
| NHow would you rate the overall performance of the Contractor under this contract: |
| NAHow would you rate the overall performance of the Contractor under this contract: |
| NAYESNO: |
| NAYESNO_2: |
| NAYESNO_3: |
| Remarks provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings 1: |
| Remarks provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings 2: |
| Remarks provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings 3: |
| Remarks provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings 4: |
| Remarks provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings 5: |
| Remarks provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings 6: |
| Remarks provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings 7: |
| Remarks provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings 8: |
| Remarks provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings 9: |
| Remarks provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings 10: |
| Remarks provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings 11: |
| Remarks provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings 12: |
| Remarks provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings 13: |
| Remarks provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings 14: |
| Remarks provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings 15: |
| Remarks provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings 16: |
| Remarks provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings 17: |
| Remarks provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings 18: |
| Remarks provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings 19: |
| Remarks provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings 20: |
| Remarks provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings 21: |
| Remarks provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings 22: |
| Remarks provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings 23: |
| Remarks provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings 24: |
| Remarks provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings 25: |
| Remarks provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings 26: |
| Remarks provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings 27: |
| Remarks provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings 28: |
| Remarks provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings 29: |
| Remarks provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings 30: |
| Remarks provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings 31: |
| 1_2: |
| 2_2: |
| 3_2: |
| 4_2: |
| 5_2: |
| Text1: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .