Attachment L5-PPQ.pdf
PDF 597 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Secondary Power C-61 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA2823-22-R-0011
About this file
This document includes a past performance questionnaire and federal contract opportunity for secondary power services at Eglin Air Force Base. The opportunity seeks design and construction services to route new electrical service from a 500kVA transformer to a new 1,200A panelboard, including installation of new metering equipment, conduits, wiring, panelboard, manual transfer switch, and support structure. Offerors must provide a price breakdown using the 50 Division Cost Estimate worksheet and meet with a civil servant contact by April 1st to visit the site. Questions are due by March 15th and the period of performance is 238 days after notice to proceed. The Air Force Materiel Command Test Center is listed as the agency and Chelco is noted as the existing utility provider.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| R-0011 Questions as of 6-22-2022.pdf | ||
| R-0011 Questions as of 6-22-2022.pdf | ||
| R-0011 Questions as of 6-21-2022.pdf | ||
| Solicitation - FA282322R0011.pdf | ||
| Attachment L6 Cover Letter.pdf | ||
| Section M_Final 22VH11.pdf | ||
| main base to c-61.pdf | ||
| Attachment L1-50DC 22-VH11.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 3 Section L_Instr to Off_FTFA 22-VH11.pdf | ||
| SOW FTFA 22VH11.pdf | ||
| Attachment L3 Past Perf Information Sheets.pdf | ||
| Attachment L4 Consent Form.pdf | ||
| Attachment L2-FRQ.pdf | ||
| 2022 Davis Bacon Wage Building Rate.txt | TXT text file |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT L5
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Request for Proposal: FA2823-22-R-0011 Secondary Comm Power C-61, Eglin AFB, FL 32542
FTFA 22-VH11,
1. Name of Contractor:
Contract or Identifying Number:
Title/Description of Contract:
2. Brief description of scope of work:
EVALUATION: Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.
A. Did the contractor have any non-conformance issues? If so, what kind?
B. Did the contractor have adequate resources to complete the required performance?
C. Were there issues with the subcontractor’s testing lab and/or material suppliers?
D. Did the contractor submit required documents on time and answer questions in a timely manner?
FA2823-22-R-0011 FTFA 22-VH11
Assessment Definition Substantial Confidence
(SC)
Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, this customer has a high expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort for us again.
Satisfactory Confidence
(SAT)
Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, this customer has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort for us again.
Limited Confidence
(LC)
Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, this customer has a low expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort for us again.
No Confidence
(NC)
Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, this customer has no expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort for us again.
Unknown Confidence (Neutral) (UC)
No recent/relevant performance record is available or the Offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.
Based upon the assessment definitions above, indicate your assessment of the contractor’s performance on your contract described on Attachment A. Your assessment should consider the contractor’s performance in accordance with the contractual requirements. Circle all that apply.
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: __________________________ CONTRACT NO.: _______________________
01 Contractor developed realistic progress schedules & completed the project within the established schedule.
SC SAT LC NC UC
02 Contractor provided submittals in a timely manner. Submittals were well researched and clearly identified the proposed item.
SC SAT LC NC UC
03 Contractor provided timely and accurate payrolls with no known labor violations (Davis-Bacon Act) or labor claims.
SC SAT LC NC UC
04 Contractor provided experienced managers and supervisors, with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
SC SAT LC NC UC
05 Contractor hired quality subcontractors and effectively managed them.
SC SAT LC NC UC
06 Contractor identified problems as they occurred. Suggested approaches to problems. Displayed initiative and cooperation to solve problems. Provided adequate information and pricing for change orders and negotiated them in good faith.
SC SAT LC NC UC
07 Contractor provided effective quality control, which resulted in a quality-finished product.
SC SAT LC NC UC
08 Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain in comments section, SC SAT LC NC UC
09 Would you hire this contractor again? If no, explain in comments section
SC SAT LC NC UC
OVERALL RATING: ______________________________
BRIEF EXPLANATION OF OVERALL RATING GIVEN:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
Name of Person Completing Evaluation:
Base/Company: Date:
Position Title/Grade: Phone:
Email: Fax:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .