Attachment L5-Past Performance Question (PPQ).pdf
PDF 787 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Replace and Improve HVAC System in Bldg 12722 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA282322R0007
About this file
This document includes a solicitation for replacing and improving the HVAC system in Building 12722 at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida. The solicitation is set aside for small businesses and seeks a contractor to completely demolish the existing HVAC system, including air cooled chillers, AHUs, chilled water and hot water piping, and pumps, and install a new complete HVAC system including AHUs, a fully redundant chiller system and pump sets. Offerors must propose using the provided 50 Division Cost Estimate worksheet and provide pricing and past performance information by the closing date of September 30, 2022. The work must be completed within 426 days after notice to proceed.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions and Answers .pdf | ||
| FA282322R00070002.pdf | ||
| Section_L_21 April 2022.pdf | ||
| Att 4_FTFA 20-RC03_Drawings_Final_Updated.pdf | ||
| FA282322R00070001.pdf | ||
| Section_M.pdf | ||
| Att 4_FTFA 20-RC03 Drawings.pdf | ||
| Solicitation - FA282322R0007.pdf | ||
| Att 3_Specifications.pdf | ||
| Att 2_WD.pdf | ||
| Attachment L6 Cover Letter.pdf | ||
| Attachment L2-FRQ.pdf | ||
| Attachment L4 Consent Form.pdf | ||
| Attachment L3 Past Performance Information (PPI).pdf | ||
| Attachment L1-50DC.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Att 1_SOW-12722.pdf |
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT L5
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Request for Proposal: FA2823-22-R-0007 HVAC Project, Bldg. 12722, Eglin AFB, FL 32542 FTFA 20-RC03,
1. Name of Contractor:
Contract or Identifying Number:
Title/Description of Contract:
2. Brief description of scope of work:
EVALUATION: Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.
A. Did the contractor have any non-conformance issues? If so, what kind?
B. Did the contractor have adequate resources to complete the required performance?
C. Were there issues with the subcontractor’s testing lab and/or material suppliers?
D. Did the contractor submit required documents on time and answer questions in a timely manner?
FA2823-22-R-0007 FTFA 20-RC03
Assessment Definition Substantial Confidence
(SC)
Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, this customer has a high expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort for us again.
Satisfactory Confidence
(SAT)
Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, this customer has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort for us again.
Limited Confidence
(LC)
Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, this customer has a low expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort for us again.
No Confidence
(NC)
Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, this customer has no expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort for us again.
Unknown Confidence (Neutral) (UC)
No recent/relevant performance record is available or the Offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.
Based upon the assessment definitions above, indicate your assessment of the contractor’s performance on your contract described on Attachment A. Your assessment should consider the contractor’s performance in accordance with the contractual requirements. Circle all that apply.
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: __________________________ CONTRACT NO.: _______________________
01 Contractor developed realistic progress schedules & completed the project within the established schedule.
SC SAT LC NC UC
02 Contractor provided submittals in a timely manner. Submittals were well researched and clearly identified the proposed item.
SC SAT LC NC UC
03 Contractor provided timely and accurate payrolls with no known labor violations (Davis-Bacon Act) or labor claims.
SC SAT LC NC UC
04 Contractor provided experienced managers and supervisors, with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
SC SAT LC NC UC
05 Contractor hired quality subcontractors and effectively managed them.
SC SAT LC NC UC
06 Contractor identified problems as they occurred. Suggested approaches to problems. Displayed initiative and cooperation to solve problems. Provided adequate information and pricing for change orders and negotiated them in good faith.
SC SAT LC NC UC
07 Contractor provided effective quality control, which resulted in a quality-finished product.
SC SAT LC NC UC
08 Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain in comments section, SC SAT LC NC UC
09 Would you hire this contractor again? If no, explain in comments section
SC SAT LC NC UC
OVERALL RATING: ______________________________
BRIEF EXPLANATION OF OVERALL RATING GIVEN:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
Name of Person Completing Evaluation:
Base/Company: Date:
Position Title/Grade: Phone:
Email: Fax:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .