Attachment_L_-_Past_Performance_Evaluation_Form.pdf
PDF 817 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- DCAM-26-CS-RFP-0006
- Issued by
- District of Columbia
About this file
This is a Past Performance Evaluation Form issued by the Government of the District of Columbia, Department of General Services (DGS) for the Design-Build Services for the New River Terrace Recreation Center project (Solicitation Number DCAM-26-CS-RFP-0006). The form is a structured assessment tool designed to evaluate contractor performance across five key categories: Quality of Services/Work, Timeliness of Performance, Cost Control, Business Relations, and Customer Satisfaction. Evaluators are required to provide the offeror name, contract number, contract amount, contract period of performance, type of service received, and detailed remarks supporting ratings for either excellent or unacceptable performance. Completed evaluations must be submitted to arad.rahimi@dc.gov at DGS's Contracts & Procurement Department located at 3924 Minnesota Avenue, NE, Washington, D.C. 20019.
The form employs a standardized rating scale from 0 (Unacceptable) to 4 (Excellent), with a plus designation option, requiring evaluators to score contractor performance based on specific criteria including compliance with contract requirements, budget adherence, schedule adherence, technical excellence, responsiveness to inquiries, and effectiveness of small and disadvantaged business subcontracting programs. Evaluators must include their name, title, telephone number, email address, signature, and date. The rating guidelines provide detailed definitions for each performance level, establishing clear benchmarks for assessing whether nonconformances, cost issues, or delays require major or minor agency resources to ensure contract requirements are met, thereby enabling consistent and objective evaluation of contractor performance on this District of Columbia design-build project.
View the file
Other files
Show all 27
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES
Offeror Name: ________________________
Performance Element Excellent* Good Acceptable Poor Unacceptable**
Quality of Services/
Work
Timeliness of
Performance
Cost
Control
Business
Relations
Customer
Satisfaction
1. Name of Evaluating Organization: ___________________________________________
2. Name & Title of Evaluator: ____________________________________________
3. Telephone Number of Evaluator: ______________________
4. E-mail address of Evaluator: ___________________________
5. Signature of Evaluator: _______________________________ Date: ___________
6. Describe type of service received: _______________________________________
7. Contract Number ______________________ Contract Amount ___________
8. Contract Period of Performance _____________________________
*Remarks on Excellent Performance: Provide data supporting this observation.
(Continue on separate sheet if needed)
** Remarks on Unacceptable Performance: Provide data supporting this observation.
(Continue on separate sheet if needed)
Solicitation Number: DCAM-26-CS-RFP-0006
DESIGN-BUILD SERVICES FOR NEW
RIVER TERRACE RECREATION CENTER
Please submit completed evaluation to arad.rahimi@dc.gov
Contracts & Procurement
Department of General Services 3924 Minnesota Avenue, NE, Washington D.C. 20019
GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES
RATING GUIDELINES
Summarize Contractor performance in each of the rating areas. Assign each area a rating of 0 (Unacceptable), 1 (Poor), 2 (Acceptable), 3 (Good), 4(Excellent), or ++ (Plus). Use the following instructions as guidance in making these evaluations.
Quality Timeless Business Product/Service Cost Control of Performance Relations
-Compliance with -Within budget (over/ -Meet Interim milestones -Effective management contract requirements under target costs) -Reliable -Businesslike correspondence
-Accuracy of reports -Current, accurate, and -Responsive to technical -Responsive to contract -Appropriateness of complete billings directions requirements personnel -Relationship of negated -Completed on time, -Prompt notification of contract
-Technical excellence costs to actual including wrap-up and problems -Cost efficiencies -contract administration -Reasonable/cooperative -Change order issue -No liquidated damages -Flexible assessed -Pro-active -effective contractor recommended solutions -Effective snail/small disadvantaged business Subcontracting program
0. Zero Nonconformances are comprises Cost issues are comprising Delays are comprising Response to inquiries, technical/ the achievement of contract performance of contract the achievement of contract service/administrative issues is requirements, despite use of requirements. requirements, Despite use not effective and responsive.
Agency resources of Agency resources.
1, Unacceptable Nonconformances require major Cost issues require major Delays require major response to inquiries, technical/ Agency resources to ensure Agency resources to ensure Agency resources to ensure service/administrative issues is achievement of contract achievement of contract achievement of contract marginally effective and requirements. requirements. requirements. responsive.
2. Poor Nonconformance require minor Costs issues require minor Delays require minor Responses to inquiries, technical/ Agency resources to ensure Agency resources to ensure Agency resources to ensure service/administrative issues is achievement of contract achievement of contract achievement of contract somewhat effective and requirements. requirements. requirements. responsive.
3. Acceptable Nonconformances do not impact Cost issues do not impact Delays do not impact Responses to inquires, technical/ achievement of contract achievement of contract achievement of contract service/administrative issues is requirements. requirements. requirements. usually effective and responsive.
4. Good There are no quality problems. There are no cost issues. There are not delays. Responses to inquiries, technical/ service/administrative issues is effective and responsive,
5. Excellent The contractor has demonstrated an exceptional performance level in some or all of the above categories.
Contracts & Procurement
Department of General Services 3924 Minnesota Avenue, NE, Washington D.C. 20019
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .