Attachment L-02 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 561 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Replace Magnolia DFAC AHUs
- Solicitation number
- FA301026R0008
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire for solicitation FA301026R0008, issued by the 81st Contracting Squadron at Keesler Air Force Base, Mississippi. The questionnaire is sent to references listed by offerors to evaluate contractor performance on previous or ongoing contracts relevant to the current procurement.
The solicitation concerns replacing three Air Handling Units (AHUs) located in mechanical rooms at Magnolia Dining Facility on Keesler AFB, Mississippi. References must complete and email the questionnaire to A1C Ty Le at ty.le@us.af.mil no later than 11:00 AM CST on June 3, 2026, using a corporate or government email account. The form requires respondents to provide contact information for both the offeror and the person completing the evaluation, details about the referenced contract (contract number, value, and period of performance), and a brief description of work performed under that contract. The questionnaire evaluates contractor performance across five criteria: Quality of Work, Schedule (timeliness and ability to resolve timeliness problems), Management (ability to manage all aspects of work), Regulatory Compliance (including safety regulations, Davis-Bacon Act, and labor standards), and Overall Rating. Each criterion uses a six-point scale: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, or Not Applicable. Respondents must provide explanatory comments with specific details for each evaluation category, with additional pages available if needed.
View the file
Other files
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE
QUESTIONNAIRE Solicitation No.
FA301026R0008
Please complete this questionnaire and email to: ty.le@us.af.mil
We are currently preparing our proposal for the 81st Contracting Squadron, Keesler AFB, MS, Solicitation Number: FA301026R0008 for replacing three AHU's located in the mechanical rooms at Magnolia Dining Facility on Keesler AFB, MS. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency or company under the previous or ongoing contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.
This Questionnaire is due to A1C Ty Le no later than 11:00 AM CST on June 3, 2026. The Questionnaire must be submitted directly to the Contracting Officer from a corporate or government email account.
If you will be unavailable on June 3, 2026, for verification (if necessary) of this past performance evaluation, please indicate another point of contact (POC) for the Contracting Officer to contact.
Thank you.
POC/Alternate POC Name:
POC/Alternate POC Phone Number:
POC/Alternate POC Email Address:
Name of Offeror:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
CONTRACT REFERENCED
Contract Number (including Task Order number if applicable):
Contract Value (including all modifications):
Period of Performance:
Name of Person Completing Questionnaire:
Agency/Company:
Title:
Phone:
Email:
Attachment L-02
FA301026R0008
Brief Description of Work Required in the Referenced Contract:
EVALUATION
Please rate the contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives giving specific details would be appreciated. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. Evaluation Definitions:
The following definitions should be used in assessing Contractor performance.
Exceptional: Performance EXCEEDS MANY contractual requirements. Performance being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good: Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. Performance being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory: Performance MEETS contractual requirements. Performance being evaluated contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal: Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. Performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginal effective or were not fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory: Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirements. Performance contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Not Applicable (N/A): Performance information is not recent or relevant as defined in the solicitation. Unable to provide assessment.
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
QUALITY
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet work requirements and the overall quality of the work?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A Quality of Work
Comments:
SCHEDULE
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide end-products timely?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A Timeliness Ability to Resolve Timeliness Problems
MANAGEMENT
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to manage all aspects of the work?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A Managing Work Aspects
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet all regulatory requirements? Examples would include safety regulations, Davis-Bacon Act and other labor standards.
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A Complying with Regulations
OVERALL RATING OF CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
What is your overall rating of the Contractor’s performance on the contract being assessed.
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
General Comments:
| We are currently preparing our proposal for the 81st Contracting Squadron Keesler AFB MS Solicitation: |
| POCAlternate POC Name: |
| POCAlternate POC Phone Number: |
| POCAlternate POC Email Address: |
| Name of Offeror: |
| Phone Number: |
| Email Address: |
| Contract Number including Task Order number if applicable: |
| fill_10: |
| Period of Performance: |
| Name of Person Completing Questionnaire: |
| AgencyCompany: |
| Title: |
| Phone: |
| Email: |
| Brief Description of Work Required in the Referenced Contract: |
| Exceptional: |
| Very Good: |
| Satisfactory: |
| Marginal: |
| Unsatisfactory: |
| Not Applicable NA: |
| ExceptionalQuality of Work: |
| Very GoodQuality of Work: |
| SatisfactoryQuality of Work: |
| MarginalQuality of Work: |
| UnsatisfactoryQuality of Work: |
| NAQuality of Work: |
| CommentsRow1: |
| ExceptionalTimeliness: |
| Very GoodTimeliness: |
| SatisfactoryTimeliness: |
| MarginalTimeliness: |
| UnsatisfactoryTimeliness: |
| NATimeliness: |
| ExceptionalAbility to Resolve Timeliness Problems: |
| Very GoodAbility to Resolve Timeliness Problems: |
| SatisfactoryAbility to Resolve Timeliness Problems: |
| MarginalAbility to Resolve Timeliness Problems: |
| UnsatisfactoryAbility to Resolve Timeliness Problems: |
| NAAbility to Resolve Timeliness Problems: |
| CommentsRow1_2: |
| ExceptionalManaging Work Aspects: |
| Very GoodManaging Work Aspects: |
| SatisfactoryManaging Work Aspects: |
| MarginalManaging Work Aspects: |
| UnsatisfactoryManaging Work Aspects: |
| NAManaging Work Aspects: |
| CommentsRow1_3: |
| ExceptionalComplying with Regulations: |
| Very GoodComplying with Regulations: |
| SatisfactoryComplying with Regulations: |
| MarginalComplying with Regulations: |
| UnsatisfactoryComplying with Regulations: |
| NAComplying with Regulations: |
| CommentsRow1_4: |
| ExceptionalRow1: |
| Very GoodRow1: |
| SatisfactoryRow1: |
| MarginalRow1: |
| UnsatisfactoryRow1: |
| General CommentsRow1: |
| undefined: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .