Attachment K Evaluation Criteria Template HI EDSS.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 60 KB Posted Feb 11, 2025

Attached to: P25001422 Hawaii Electronic Disease Surveillance System
Solicitation number: P25001422
Issued by: Honolulu County, Hawaii

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI · Feb 12, 2025

This is an evaluation criteria template for the Hawaii Department of Health (DOH) Division/Agency DOCD for their EDSS project. The evaluation template outlines a 220-point scoring system divided into four main categories: Experience and Staffing (60 points, 27.27%), Project Approach - Methodology (65 points, 29.55%), Proposed Approach - System (50 points, 22.73%), and Cost (45 points, 20.45%). The template includes detailed scoring breakdowns for up to 5 evaluators to assess multiple bids.

The evaluation form allows scoring on an excellence scale (Excellent 100%, Good 75%, Average 50%, Below Average 25%, Poor 0%) for the technical components. The cost scoring uses a formula based on the lowest bid ((Low Bid/Offeror Bid) x Total Points). The template includes specific scoring criteria for various subcategories including experience and capabilities, staffing models, personnel qualifications, project management requirements, OCM requirements, DDI requirements, M&O requirements, transition requirements, and various technical and functional requirements.

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
Attachment F High Level Inclusive Architecture for EDSS Modernization Page 1.pdf	PDF	Feb 11, 2025
Attachment J1 Contract Form.pdf	PDF	Feb 11, 2025
Attachment C Sample Table of Contents.pdf	PDF	Feb 11, 2025
Attachment H General Conditions.pdf	PDF	Feb 11, 2025
EDSS RFP Addendum 01.pdf	PDF	Feb 11, 2025
Attachment G Reference Form.pdf	PDF	Feb 11, 2025
EDSS RFP Final.pdf	PDF	Feb 11, 2025
Attachment B Proposal Submission Checklist.pdf	PDF	Feb 11, 2025
Attachment A Proposal Identification Form OF1.pdf	PDF	Feb 11, 2025
Attachment E DOH Drafted EDSS RTM.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Feb 11, 2025
Attachment I IT Special Conditions.pdf	PDF	Feb 11, 2025
Attachment J2 Contract Form.pdf	PDF	Feb 11, 2025
EDSS RFP Addendum 02.pdf	PDF	Feb 11, 2025
Attachment D Proposal Offer Form OF2.pdf	PDF	Feb 11, 2025

Show all 14

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Evaluation Criteria Chart

Evaluation Criteria
Experience and Staffing		60	27.27%
Offeror's experience and proposed resources' experience relevant to the Scope of Work and associated requirements
	Experience and Capabilities	20	9.09%
	Proposed Staffing Model and Resumes	20	9.09%
	Personnel Qualifications	20	9.09%

Project Approach - Methodology		65	29.55%
Offeror's proposed approach and methodology to perform the services and fulfill requirements in the Scope of Work to deliver the solution
	Executive Summary	5	2.27%
	Supporting Tools Requirements	5	2.27%
	Project Management Requirements	10	4.55%
	OCM Requirements	5	2.27%
	DDI Requirements	10	4.55%
	M&O Requirements	10	4.55%
	Transition Requirements	5	2.27%
	Proposed Deliverables	5	2.27%
	Project Plan & Schedule	10	4.55%

Proposed Approach - System		50	22.73%
Offeror's proposed system is suited to meet EDSS requirements
	Proposed Solution Description	5	2.27%
	Functional Requirements	10	4.55%	Plan
	Technical Requirements	10	4.55%	Tasks
	Interface Requirements	5	2.27%	Sample Project
	All Other Requirements & Sample Project	20	9.09%	Sample Project

Cost		45	20.45%
Offeror's proposed pricing information in alignment with the DOH needs
	See cost normalization table	45	20.45%

TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS 220 100.00%

Evaluation Criteria Breakdown

Experience and Staffing Cost Project Approach - Methodology Proposed Approach - System 0.27272727272727271 0.20454545454545456 0.29545454545454547 0.22727272727272727

Evaluation Summary Abstract

EVALUATION SUMMARY ABSTRACT

Department: Health

Division/Agency: DOCD

TOTAL OVERALL SCORE
Bid #	Max Points	Evaluator #1	Evaluator #2	Evaluator #3	Evaluator #4	Evaluator #5	AVERAGE POINTS
Experience and Staffing	60
Experience and Capabilities	20
Proposed Staffing Model and Resumes	20
Personnel Qualifications	20
Proposed Approach - Methodology	65
Executive Summary	5
Supporting Tools Requirements	5
Project Management Requirements	10
OCM Requirements	5
DDI Requirements	10
M&O Requirements	10
Transition Requirements	5
Proposed Deliverables	5
Project Plan & Schedule	10
Proposed Approach - System	50
Proposed Solution Description	5
Functional Requirements	10
Technical Requirements	10
Interface Requirements	5
All Other Requirements & Sample Project	20
Cost	45
Total Score	220						ERROR:#DIV/0!
Bid #2	Max Points	Evaluator #1	Evaluator #2	Evaluator #3	Evaluator #3	Evaluator #3	AVERAGE POINTS
Experience and Staffing	60
Experience and Capabilities	20
Proposed Staffing Model and Resumes	20
Personnel Qualifications	20
Proposed Approach - Methodology	65
Executive Summary	5
Supporting Tools Requirements	5
Project Management Requirements	10
OCM Requirements	5
DDI Requirements	10
M&O Requirements	10
Transition Requirements	5
Proposed Deliverables	5
Project Plan & Schedule	10
Proposed Approach - System	50
Proposed Solution Description	5
Functional Requirements	10
Technical Requirements	10
Interface Requirements	5
All Other Requirements & Sample Project	20
Cost	45
Total Score	220						ERROR:#DIV/0!
Bid #3	Max Points	Evaluator #1	Evaluator #2	Evaluator #3	Evaluator #3	Evaluator #3	AVERAGE POINTS
Experience and Staffing	60
Experience and Capabilities	20
Proposed Staffing Model and Resumes	20
Personnel Qualifications	20
Proposed Approach - Methodology	65
Executive Summary	5
Supporting Tools Requirements	5
Project Management Requirements	10
OCM Requirements	5
DDI Requirements	10
M&O Requirements	10
Transition Requirements	5
Proposed Deliverables	5
Project Plan & Schedule	10
Proposed Approach - System	50
Proposed Solution Description	5
Functional Requirements	10
Technical Requirements	10
Interface Requirements	5
All Other Requirements & Sample Project	20
Cost	45
Total Score	220						ERROR:#DIV/0!

Bid #4	Max Points	Evaluator #1	Evaluator #2	Evaluator #3	Evaluator #3	Evaluator #3	AVERAGE POINTS
Experience and Staffing	60
Experience and Capabilities	20
Proposed Staffing Model and Resumes	20
Personnel Qualifications	20
Proposed Approach - Methodology	65
Executive Summary	5
Supporting Tools Requirements	5
Project Management Requirements	10
OCM Requirements	5
DDI Requirements	10
M&O Requirements	10
Transition Requirements	5
Proposed Deliverables	5
Project Plan & Schedule	10
Proposed Approach - System	50
Proposed Solution Description	5
Functional Requirements	10
Technical Requirements	10
Interface Requirements	5
All Other Requirements & Sample Project	20
Cost	45
Total Score	220						ERROR:#DIV/0!
Bid #5	Max Points	Evaluator #1	Evaluator #2	Evaluator #3	Evaluator #3	Evaluator #3	AVERAGE POINTS
Experience and Staffing	60
Experience and Capabilities	20
Proposed Staffing Model and Resumes	20
Personnel Qualifications	20
Proposed Approach - Methodology	65
Executive Summary	5
Supporting Tools Requirements	5
Project Management Requirements	10
OCM Requirements	5
DDI Requirements	10
M&O Requirements	10
Transition Requirements	5
Proposed Deliverables	5
Project Plan & Schedule	10
Proposed Approach - System	50
Proposed Solution Description	5
Functional Requirements	10
Technical Requirements	10
Interface Requirements	5
All Other Requirements & Sample Project	20
Cost	45
Total Score	220						ERROR:#DIV/0!

Evaluation Form 1

INDIVIDUAL EVALUATION FORM

Bidder/Firm Name:

Department:

Division/Agency:

CRITERIA	Excellent	Good	Average	Below Average	Poor	Total Possible Points	SCORE
	100%	75%	50%	25%	0%

1	Experience and Staffing	60	45	30	15	0	60
	Comments:

2	Project Approach - Methodology	65	48.75	32.5	16.25	0	65
	Comments:

3	Proposed Approach - System	50	37.5	25	12.5	0	50
	Comments:

6	Cost	Bid #1	Bid #2	Bid #3	Bid #4	Bid #5	45
((Low Bid/Offeror Bid) x Total Points)
		ERROR:#DIV/0!	ERROR:#DIV/0!	ERROR:#DIV/0!	ERROR:#DIV/0!	ERROR:#DIV/0!
								0
	TOTAL						220	0
Evaluator:

Evaluation Form 2

INDIVIDUAL EVALUATION FORM

Bidder/Firm Name:

Department:

Division/Agency:

CRITERIA	Excellent	Good	Average	Below Average	Poor	Total Possible Points	SCORE
	100%	75%	50%	25%	0%

1	Experience and Staffing	60	45	30	15	0	60
	Comments:

2	Project Approach - Methodology	65	48.75	32.5	16.25	0	65
	Comments:

3	Proposed Approach - System	50	37.5	25	12.5	0	50
	Comments:

4	Cost	Bid #1	Bid #2	Bid #3	Bid #4	Bid #5	45
((Low Bid/Offeror Bid) x Total Points)									SAMPLE
		ERROR:#DIV/0!	ERROR:#DIV/0!	ERROR:#DIV/0!	ERROR:#DIV/0!	ERROR:#DIV/0!
								0
	TOTAL						220	0
Evaluator:

Evaluation Form 3

INDIVIDUAL EVALUATION FORM

Bidder/Firm Name:

Department:

Division/Agency:

CRITERIA	Excellent	Good	Average	Below Average	Poor	Total Possible Points	SCORE
	100%	75%	50%	25%	0%

1	Experience and Staffing	60	45	30	15	0	60
	Comments:

2	Project Approach - Methodology	65	48.75	32.5	16.25	0	65
	Comments:

3	Proposed Approach - System	50	37.5	25	12.5	0	50
	Comments:

4	Cost	Bid #1	Bid #2	Bid #3	Bid #4	Bid #5	45
((Low Bid/Offeror Bid) x Total Points)									SAMPLE
		ERROR:#DIV/0!	ERROR:#DIV/0!	ERROR:#DIV/0!	ERROR:#DIV/0!	ERROR:#DIV/0!
								0
	TOTAL						220	0
Evaluator:

Evaluation Form 4

INDIVIDUAL EVALUATION FORM

Bidder/Firm Name:

Department:

Division/Agency:

CRITERIA	Excellent	Good	Average	Below Average	Poor	Total Possible Points	SCORE
	100%	75%	50%	25%	0%

1	Experience and Staffing	60	45	30	15	0	60
	Comments:

2	Project Approach - Methodology	65	48.75	32.5	16.25	0	65
	Comments:

3	Proposed Approach - System	50	37.5	25	12.5	0	50
	Comments:

4	Cost	Bid #1	Bid #2	Bid #3	Bid #4	Bid #5	45
((Low Bid/Offeror Bid) x Total Points)									SAMPLE
		ERROR:#DIV/0!	ERROR:#DIV/0!	ERROR:#DIV/0!	ERROR:#DIV/0!	ERROR:#DIV/0!
								0
	TOTAL						220	0
Evaluator:

Evaluation Form 5

INDIVIDUAL EVALUATION FORM

Bidder/Firm Name:

Department:

Division/Agency:

CRITERIA	Excellent	Good	Average	Below Average	Poor	Total Possible Points	SCORE
	100%	75%	50%	25%	0%

1	Experience and Staffing	60	45	30	15	0	60
	Comments:

2	Project Approach - Methodology	65	48.75	32.5	16.25	0	65
	Comments:

3	Proposed Approach - System	50	37.5	25	12.5	0	50
	Comments:

4	Cost	Bid #1	Bid #2	Bid #3	Bid #4	Bid #5	45
((Low Bid/Offeror Bid) x Total Points)									SAMPLE
		ERROR:#DIV/0!	ERROR:#DIV/0!	ERROR:#DIV/0!	ERROR:#DIV/0!	ERROR:#DIV/0!
								0
	TOTAL						220	0
Evaluator:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Feb 12, 2025.