Attachment J3 - Past Performance Questionnaire - 2 pages.docx
DOCX document 40 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 030ADV26R0045
- Issued by
-
Library of Congress
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template designed to evaluate contractor performance for the Library of Congress Researcher Engagement Services contract (Solicitation Number 030ADV26R0045). The questionnaire collects structured feedback from government or company personnel who have worked with the contractor on previous projects to assess suitability for providing researcher assessment, engagement, and analysis services.
The questionnaire uses a five-point rating scale (Outstanding, Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory) plus a Not Applicable option to evaluate ten performance criteria: overall contract management, quality of products and services, project phase management effectiveness, schedule timeliness and compliance, timely report submission, quality of subcontracted efforts, key personnel competence, personnel communication effectiveness, cost performance, and whether major requirements were terminated or rescheduled due to contractor inability to perform. Respondents must provide narrative explanations for any Marginal, Unsatisfactory, or Not Applicable ratings and supplement evaluations with input from others in their organization. Completed questionnaires must be returned via email to Lianne Carroll (lcarroll@loc.gov) with a copy to James Robinson (jarobinson@loc.gov) no later than 12:00 PM Eastern on September 21, 2026. The questionnaire requests general company information including point of contact, contract number, contract type, period of performance, approximate dollar value, and contract description.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment J3 -- 030ADV26R0045 (pp. 2)
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
The purpose of this questionnaire is to gather information on the contractor named below to determine their suitability to provide services for the Library of Congress (Library). Your prompt completion of this questionnaire is sincerely appreciated as it is critical to the completion of the proposal evaluation process.
Contractor: [Name of Contractor]
1. Please complete this questionnaire based on the following guidance:
a) Handwritten responses are acceptable.
b) Using the ratings below, please assess the contractor’s performance on the project identified in the email. The assessment should reflect only performance for which the contractor is/was responsible. The following is a definition of the rating levels:
| RATING |
| DEFINITION |
| Outstanding |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor did not/has not yet identified corrective actions. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions were ineffective. |
2. Please provide narrative explanations for any Marginal, Unsatisfactory or N/A ratings and supplement your evaluation of the contractor’s performance with judgement of others in your organization.
3. The Contractor submitted a proposal to the Library for the provision of RESEARCHER ENGAGEMENT SERVICES. Past performance is of considerable importance to this acquisition. Therefore, input from current or previous customers of the contractor is very important.
We greatly appreciate you taking the time to complete this form. Please provide an honest assessment and return via email to Lianne Carroll at lcarroll@loc.gov with a copy to James Robinson at jarobinson@loc.gov no later than noon (12:00 PM – Eastern) September 21, 2026.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Please provide the following information for your company:
Name:
Point of Contact Name and Title:
Telephone Number.
Contract Number if applicable:
Contract Type:
Period of Performance:
Approximate dollar value for the contract:
Contract Description:
QUESTIONS
The following correspond with the following descriptive values provided on the questionnaire cover page:
| O |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| Outstanding |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Not Applicable |
| O |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
1. How would you rate the overall management of the contract?
2. How would you rate the quality of the products and services provided by the contractor?
3. How effective was the contractor in managing all phases the project?
4. How would you rate the Contractor’s timeliness and compliance with the project schedule?
5. How timely was the contractor in submitting required reports?
6. How would you rate the Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts? (If applicable)
7. How competent were key personnel and personnel provided for the project?
8. How well did key personnel communicate with Government/company personnel?
9. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to perform the services within contract costs?
10. Were any major contract requirements been terminated or rescheduled as a result of the contractor’s inability to perform? If yes, please explain.
Comments:
4/14/17
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .