Attachment J-7 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 34 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Screening Information Request (SIR) for Instrument Landing System (ILS) Installation Demonstrations
- Solicitation number
- 693KA8-24-R-00024
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire to be completed by the Agency/Organization/Company providing past performance information on a contractor. It requests details on the contractor's adherence to delivery schedules, timeliness and accuracy of reports and documentation, ability to solve performance problems, responsiveness to change orders, subcontractor management, technical assistance, support of operational issues, invoicing, and cost accounting and performance reporting. The questionnaire uses an adjectival rating scale to assess the contractor's performance on these various criteria.
The related federal contract opportunity is a Screening Information Request (SIR) for Instrument Landing System (ILS) Installation Demonstrations, issued as a partial Small Business Set-Aside by the Federal Aviation Administration. The FAA requires the replacement of MK1D ILS systems with ILS-420 systems at a general aviation airport in Kansas, Illinois, or Indiana. The FAA may award up to three individual contracts in response to this SIR, with each contract covering the ILS replacement work at a single project site. The SIR provides instructions for submitting questions and proposals, with a proposal due date of September 10, 2024.
View the file
Other files
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT J-7 – Past Performance Questionnaire
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Agency/Organization/Company Identification
Name: (Offeror’s Client, Please identify your information in this section.)
Point of Contact Name/Phone Number:
Contractor Information
Contractor Name:
Contract Number:
To be completed by Agency/Organization/Company
Contract Type:
FFP
CPIF
CPAF
CPFF
T&M
Other
Competitively Awarded:
Yes
No
Non-Competitively Awarded:
Yes
No
Period Of Performance:
Initial Contract Value:
Current Contract Value:
Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience?
If yes, please explain.
Product Description and or Service Provided:
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE (continued)
Please check the box next to the description, which best describes the performance of the Contractor and its subcontractors on this contract. Use blank area below questions for justifications especially when the adjectival description selected is the fourth or least desirable.
1. To what extent did the Contractor adhere to contract delivery schedules?
| Justification |
| Always met schedule |
Occasionally had delays of less than 30 days
Experienced one or more delay of greater than 30 days
Never met schedule
2. To what extent did the Contractor submit required reports and documentation in a timely manner?
| Justification |
| Considerably surpassed minimum requirements |
Exceeded minimum requirements
Met minimum requirements
Less than minimum requirements
3. To what extent were the reports and documentation from the Contractor accurate and complete?
| Justification |
| Considerably surpassed minimum requirements |
Exceeded minimum requirements
Met minimum requirements
Less than minimum requirements
4. To what extent was the Contractor able to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from the Contracting Organization?
| Justification |
| Considerably successful |
Generally successful
Little success
No success
5. How responsive was the Contractor to contract change orders?
| Justification |
| Considerably surpassed minimum requirements |
Exceeded minimum requirements
Met minimum requirements
Less than minimum requirements
6. To what extent did the Contractor coordinate, integrate, and provide for effective subcontractor management?
| Justification |
| Considerably surpassed minimum requirements |
Exceeded minimum requirements
Met minimum requirements
Less than minimum requirements
7. To what extent did the Contractor provide timely technical assistance when requested?
| Justification |
| Considerably surpassed minimum requirements |
Exceeded minimum requirements
Met minimum requirements
Less than minimum requirements
8. To what extent did the Contractor provide effective support to minimize or mitigate operational problems?
| Justification |
| Considerably surpassed minimum requirements |
Exceeded minimum requirements
Met minimum requirements
Less than minimum requirements
9. To what extent did the Contractor submit invoices in a timely and accurate manner?
| Justification |
| Always |
Most of the time
Some of the time
Seldom
10. To what extent did the Contractor's Cost Accounting and Performance Reporting provide accurate insight into Cost and Performance progress?
| Justification |
| Always |
Most of the time
Some of the time
Seldom
11. To what extent did the Contractor deliver the product at the original agreed upon price?
| Justification |
| Always |
Most of the time
Some of the time
Seldom
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .