Attachment J-1 - Past Performance Questionnaire 10-18-2024 (2 Pages).docx
DOCX document 43 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 030ADV25Q0017
- Issued by
-
Library of Congress
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire related to a federal contract opportunity for a Media Intelligence/Public Relations Web-Based Software/System being solicited by the Library of Congress. The purpose of the questionnaire is to gather information on a contractor's past performance to determine their suitability to provide the required services. The questionnaire requests ratings and narrative feedback on the contractor's overall contract management, quality of products/services, project management effectiveness, schedule compliance, reporting timeliness, subcontractor management, personnel qualifications, cost performance, and any major requirements terminated or rescheduled. Input from current or previous customers of the contractor is requested to be provided by Noon on November 12, 2024 to support the proposal evaluation process. The federal contract opportunity has a Solicitation Number of 030ADV25Q0017 and is for the Library of Congress to acquire a comprehensive suite of media intelligence/public relations web-based software/system to enable media research, monitoring, information dissemination, impression evaluation, and analytics.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment J-1 -- 030ADV25Q0017
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
10-18-24 (2 Pages)
The purpose of this questionnaire is to gather information on the contractor named below to determine their suitability to provide services for the Library of Congress (Library). Your prompt completion of this questionnaire is sincerely appreciated as it is critical to the completion of the proposal evaluation process.
Contractor: (Provide Contractor’s Name)
1. Please complete this questionnaire based on the following guidance:
a) Handwritten responses are acceptable.
b) Indicate, using the ratings below, the contractor’s performance on the project identified in the email. Assessments should reflect only performance for which contractor is/was responsible. The following is a definition of the rating levels:
| RATING |
| DEFINITION |
| Outstanding |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
2. Please provide narrative explanations for any Marginal, Unsatisfactory or No ratings and supplement your knowledge of the contractor’s performance with judgement of others in your organization.
3. The contractor submitted a proposal to the Library for the provision of a Media Intelligence/Public Relations Web-Based Software/System. Past performance is of considerable importance to this acquisition. Therefore, input from current or previous customers of the contractor is very important.
We greatly appreciate you taking the time to complete this form. Please provide an honest assessment and return via email to Olexiy Levchuk at olevchuk@loc.gov with a copy to Brian Curl at bcurl@loc.gov no later than Noon (12:00 PM – Eastern) November 12, 2024.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Please provide the following information for your company:
Name:
Point of Contact Name and Title:
Telephone Number.
Contract Number if applicable:
Contract Type:
Period of Performance:
Approximate dollar value for the contract:
Contract Description:
QUESTIONS
The following correspond with the following descriptive values provided on the questionnaire cover page:
| O |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| Outstanding |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Not Applicable |
| O |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
1. How would you rate the overall management of the contract?
2. How would you rate the quality of the products and services provided by the contractor?
3. How effective was the contractor in managing all phases the project?
4. How would you rate the Contractor’s timeliness and compliance with the project schedule?
5. How timely was the contractor in submitting required reports?
6. How would you rate the Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts? If applicable
7. How competent were key personnel and personnel provided for the project?
8. How well did key personnel communicate with Government/company personnel?
9. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to perform the services within contract costs?
10. Were any major contract requirements been terminated or rescheduled as a result of the contractor’s inability to perform? If yes please provide an explanation
Comments:
4/14/17 09/12/2022 1
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .