Attachment J-006 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 196 KB Posted
- Attached to
- U. S. Senate Web Dev 4
- Solicitation number
- 2026-R-038
- Issued by
-
United States Senate
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template used for source selection evaluation of contractors in federal procurement solicitation 2026-R-038. The form is designated as SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION under 41 U.S.C. 423 and must be completed and submitted within five days of receipt to acquisitions@saa.senate.gov.
The questionnaire is divided into two main sections: Section A collects contract and evaluator information from both the contractor and the evaluator/agency representative, including company name, contract number, contract type, project title, performance period, evaluator role, and a brief description of work performed (with URL requirement for developed websites). Section B through F contains structured performance assessments using a six-point rating scale (EX—Exceptional, VG—Very Good, S—Satisfactory, MG—Marginal, US—Unsatisfactory, N/A—Not Applicable). Evaluated categories include: Quality of Products and Services (problem anticipation, resolution, thoroughness, accuracy, overall quality); Quality of Capabilities (personnel expertise, ongoing support, solutions effectiveness); Quality of Deliverables (project management, testing and QA, training, software maintenance); Schedule (services and products delivery); Cost and Budget Control (cost estimates and budget management); Customer Satisfaction (requirements gathering, documentation, user interaction, responsiveness); and Management of Key Personnel (retention, replacement, transition). Sections G and H request yes/no responses regarding software/website acceptability and contractor rehire likelihood. The final section requests detailed comments identifying specific strengths, weaknesses, and troublesome performance areas.
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment J-006 | Past Performance Questionnaire
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection. When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly. Please complete this Questionnaire and send within five (5) days of receipt by email to: acquisitions@saa.senate.gov
SOLICITATION NUMBER: 2026-R-038
A. TO BE COMPLETED BY CONTRACTOR: Contract/Project/Task Order Information. Please complete the general contract information below:
Name of Company/Contractor: ____________________________________________________
Contract/Task Order Number: _____________________________________________________
Contract Type: _________________________________________________________________
Project Title: ___________________________________________________________________
Performance Period: _____________________________________________________________
B. TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR: Evaluator/Agency Information
Company/Agency Name: _________________________________________________________
Name of Person Completing Questionnaire: __________________________________________
Signature of Person Completing Questionnaire: _______________________________________
Your Role in this Contract: _______________________________________________________
Your Phone Number: ___________________________________________________________
Your Email Address: ____________________________________________________________
Time Period of Your Involvement with Contractor: ____________________________________
Brief Description of Work (please include the URL of the site the Contractor developed for you):
For each question posed below, please circle the response code which best reflects your experience with the Contractor:
EX
Exceptional -- Performance meets all contract/task order requirements and exceeds many.
The Contractor’s performance on the project was accomplished with few/no minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VG
Very Good--Performance meets all contract/task order requirements and exceeds some.
The Contractor’s performance on the project was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
S Satisfactory -- Performance meets all contract/task order requirements. The Contractor’s performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear to be or were satisfactory.
MG
Marginal -- Performance does not meet some contract/task order requirements. The Contractor’s performance indicates a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective action(s). The Contractor’s proposed actions are only marginally effective or were only partially implemented.
US
Unsatisfactory-- Performance does not meet most/any contract/task order requirements.
The Contractor’s performance indicates a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
N/A Not Applicable or Not Observed
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Solicitation# 2026-R-038
A.1 QUALITY OF PRODUCTS AND SERVICES: Assess the Contractor’s performance regarding contract/task order requirements and specifications, problem identification, and corrective actions.
Problem Anticipation/Prevention EX VG S MG US N/A
Problem Resolution EX VG S MG US N/A
Thoroughness EX VG S MG US N/A
Accuracy EX VG S MG US N/A
Overall Quality EX VG S MG US N/A
Comments:
A.2 QUALITY OF CAPABILITIES
Expertise and Knowledge of Personnel assigned to the contract/task order EX VG S MG US N/A
Ability to provide ongoing application support EX VG S MG US N/A
Ability to provide applicable and effective solutions
EX VG S MG US N/A
Comments:
A.3 QUALITY OF DELIVERABLES: Assess the Contractor’s delivery of goods and services in the following categories:
Project Management EX VG S MG US N/A
Testing and Quality Assurance EX VG S MG US N/A
Training EX VG S MG US N/A
Software Maintenance EX VG S MG US N/A
B SCHEDULE: Assess the ability of the Contractor to deliver goods and services according to forecasted milestones and delivery schedules.
Services EX VG S MG US N/A
Products EX VG S MG US N/A
C COST AND BUDGET CONTROL: Assess the Contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling contract/task order cost.
Performed within Estimates EX VG S MG US N/A
Budget Control EX VG S MG US N/A
Comments:
D CUSTOMER SATISFACTION: Assess the Contractor’s accuracy and quality of proposal submission, history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, responsiveness.
Requirements Gathering EX VG S MG US N/A
Documentation EX VG S MG US N/A
Interaction with Users EX VG S MG US N/A
Responsiveness with Users EX VG S MG US N/A
Comments:
E MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL: Assess the Contractor’s performance in selecting, retaining, supporting, and replacing, when necessary, Key Personnel.
Met Contract Requirements EX VG S MG US N/A
Retention EX VG S MG US N/A
Replacement Speed and Quality EX VG S MG US N/A
Transition to New Key Personnel EX VG S MG US N/A
F OVERALL ASSESSMENT EX VG S MG US N/A
G. Has the software/website developed for you by this Contractor been acceptable?
( ) Yes ( ) No
If no, what was the reason(s)?
H. Would you contract with this firm again? ( ) Yes ( ) No
If no, why not?
PLEASE PROVIDE ANY FURTHER COMMENTS TO IDENTIFY:
1. Specific strength/weaknesses related to Parts A-H above.
2. Areas of performance that were troublesome.
| Name of CompanyContractor: |
| ContractTask Order Number: |
| Contract Type: |
| Project Title: |
| Performance Period: |
| CompanyAgency Name: |
| Name of Person Completing Questionnaire: |
| Your Role in this Contract: |
| Your Phone Number: |
| Your Email Address: |
| Time Period of Your Involvement with Contractor: |
| Brief Description of Work please include the URL of the site the Contractor developed for you: |
| A1Row1: |
| A1Row2: |
| A1Row3: |
| A1Row4: |
| A1Row5: |
| Comments: |
| A2Row1: |
| A2Row2: |
| A2Row3: |
| Comments_2: |
| A3Row1: |
| A3Row2: |
| A3Row3: |
| A3Row4: |
| Comments_3: |
| BRow1: |
| BRow2: |
| Comments_4: |
| CRow1: |
| CRow2: |
| DRow1: |
| DRow2: |
| DRow3: |
| DRow4: |
| ERow1: |
| ERow2: |
| ERow3: |
| ERow4: |
| Comments_8: |
| G Has the softwarewebsite developed for you by this Contractor been acceptable Yes No If no what was the reasons: |
| H Would you contract with this firm again Yes No If no why not: |
| PLEASE PROVIDE ANY FURTHER COMMENTS TO IDENTIFY 1 Specific strengthweaknesses related to Parts AH above 2 Areas of performance that were troublesome: |
| Comments_5: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .