Attachment IV - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 23 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FY 24 NOAA Ship Oscar Dyson Drydock Repairs
- Solicitation number
- 1305M223QNMAN0084
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire template for evaluation of contractors providing drydock repairs services. The questionnaire is to be completed by references for contractors bidding on solicitation 1305M223QNMAN0084 for FY24 drydock repairs of the NOAA ship Oscar Dyson. The questionnaire includes ratings scales to evaluate quality of service, schedule, and management on previous relevant contracts. Responses are due to Shawn.Griscom@noaa.gov by June 2, 2023. The solicitation is issued by the Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for drydock repairs of the NOAA ship Oscar Dyson to take place in fiscal year 2024.
View the file
Other files
Show all 30
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment III
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
REFERENCE CONTRACT #: _______________________________
(the contract the evaluation is based on) Evaluator’s Name:___________________________ Evaluator’s email: ____________________ Evaluator’s Phone Number: _______________ Evaluator’s Agency or Company Name: ____________________________ Send Completed Questionnaire to Shawn.Griscom@noaa.gov no later than 4:00 PM EST on June 2, 2023.
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
| RATING |
| ADJECTIVAL RATING |
| DEFINITION |
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective. |
| VERY GOOD |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective. |
| SATISFACTORY |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
Comments:
Attachment III
2. SCHEDULE
Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance). (Check the appropriate rating box.)
| RATING |
| ADJECTIVAL RATING |
| DEFINITION |
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective. |
| VERY GOOD |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective. |
| SATISFACTORY |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the |
Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Comments:
3. MANAGEMENT
Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
| RATING |
| ADJECTIVAL RATING |
| DEFINITION |
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective. |
| VERY GOOD |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective. |
| SATISFACTORY |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the |
Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Comments:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:
Rater’s Name:
Rater’s Signature:
Date:
Send Completed Questionnaire to Shawn.Griscom@noaa.gov no later than 4:00 PM EST on June 2, 2023.
Page of Source Selection Information
1305M219QNMAN0242
Page of Source Selection Information
1305M219QNMAN0242
Source Selection Information
1305M223QNMAN0084
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .