Attachment III - Specific Relevant Contracts Sheet.docx

DOCX document 21 KB Posted

Attached to
Social Media Management and Engagement Consulting
Solicitation number
W911SD24R0141
Issued by

About this file

This document is an Attachment III - Specific Relevant Contracts Sheet that provides instructions for contractors to submit documentation of their past performance on contracts similar in nature, size, and complexity to the services being procured under the Solicitation W911SD24R0141 for Social Media Management and Engagement Consulting.

The key details required include the contract number, award date, contract type, original and final (or projected) pricing and delivery schedule, contact information for the Government procuring and administrative contracting officers, and a narrative explanation of the relevance of each contract to the proposed effort. Contractors must also provide any documentation of negative performance, such as cure notices or discrepancy reports, and explain any delivery schedule revisions. The goal is for the contractor to demonstrate their ability to successfully perform work of the same size, scope, and complexity as the current solicitation.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment W911SD-24-R-0141 U00001.pdf PDF
Attachment II - Sample Consent Letter.docx DOCX document
Attachment I-Past Performance Assessment.pdf PDF
W911SD-24-R-0141.pdf PDF
Addendum 52.212-1.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT III

Specific Relevant Contracts Sheet

The contractor shall provide documentation outlining the contractor’s past performance with contracts, as a prime or major subcontractor, which is the same or similar in nature, size, and complexity to the services being procured under this Solicitation. The submittal shall include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance and how it was determined that the work performed previously was the same or similar in nature, size, and complexity to the work specified by this solicitation. Contractors are required to explain what aspects of the contracts are deemed relevant to the proposed effort, and to what aspects of the proposed effort they relate.

1. Contract Number, Award Date and Contract type.

2. Price/Cost – original awarded AND final (or projected final, if contract is current).

3. Delivery Schedule – original AND final (or projected final, if the contract is current).

4. Contact Information - Address and telephone number for the Government (or commercial) procuring contracting activity AND contract administrative activity (if applicable). Name, telephone number, fax number and e-mail address for the following:

5. Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)

6. Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)

7. Government or commercial technical representative or COR: Identify in specific detail for each contract listed, why or how you consider that effort relevant or similar to the effort required by this solicitation. In determining relevancy, consideration should be given but not limited to such things as product/service similarity, product/service, size and complexity, contract type, contract environment, division of company proposing, and subcontractor interaction.

8. Narrative explanation on each contract listed describing the objectives achieved and the following data: any cost growth or schedule delays encountered. For any Government contracts which did not/do not meet original requirements with regard to cost, schedule, or technical performance, a brief explanation of the reason(s) for such shortcomings and any demonstrated corrective actions taken to avoid recurrence. Contractors may include a discussion of efforts accomplished by the contractor to resolve problems encountered on prior contracts as well as past efforts to identify and manage program risk. Merely having problems does not automatically equate to a Limited or a No Confidence rating, since the problems encountered may have been on a more complex program, or an contractor may have subsequently demonstrated the ability to overcome the problems encountered. The contractor is required to clearly demonstrate management actions employed in overcoming problems and the effects of those actions, in terms of improvements achieved or problems rectified. This may allow the contractor to be considered a Substantial Confidence or Satisfactory Confidence candidate.

9. Negative Performance Documentation. A copy of any cure notices, show cause letters or contract discrepancy reports received on each contract listed and a description of any corrective action by the contractor or proposed subcontractor.

10. Completion Date/Delivery Schedule. The contractor shall list each time the delivery schedule was revised and provide an explanation of why the revision was necessary.

1. Contract Number Award Date Contract type

2. Completion Date/Delivery Schedule.

Original completion/delivery date

Revised completion/delivery date

3. Price/Cost – original awarded price

4. Modified Price/Cost -

5. Completion Date or Delivery Schedule – original AND final (or projected final, if the contract is current).

6. Changed Dates -

7. Contact Information - Address and telephone number for the Government (or commercial) procuring contracting activity AND contract administrative activity (if applicable). Name, telephone number, fax number and e-mail address for the following:

8. Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO).

Address: Phone Number:

Fax Number:

E- Mail Address:

9. Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO).

Address: Phone Number:

Fax Number:

E- Mail Address:

10. Government or commercial technical representative or COR.

Address: Phone Number:

Fax Number:

E- Mail Address:_____________________________________________________________________

11. Relevancy Description.

12. Narrative explanation.

13. Negative Performance Documentation.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .