Attachment H1 - Historic preservation.pdf

Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation Decision Support System

FPS/ Intrusion Detection System and VSS Replacement/ 212 third Avenue South Minneapolis Minnesota 55401 - Project Approved

Status In Preparation (06/21/2024) Environmental Review (06/21/2024) Senior Environmental Review (07/08/2024) Proponent Review (07/08/2024) Project Approved (07/08/2024)

Project Information General

Name: FPS/ Intrusion Detection System and VSS Replacement/ 212 third Avenue South Minneapolis Minnesota 55401

DSS ID: DSS-DHS HQ-2024-19798

Security: LES-Law Enforcement Sensitive Description: The project involves replacing the existing perimeter intrusion detection system and complete removal of the old video surveillance system and installation of a new video surveillance system. Building was constructed in 1913. SEM will upload the SOW documents provided by the proponent.

Funded through IRA?: No Funded through the IIJA?: No Critical Infrastructure?: No Adopting Another Agency Catex, or CATEX Determination?: No Project Types:

· Administrative & Regulatory Activities - Awarding of contracts for technical support services, ongoing management and operation of government facilities, and professional services that do not involve unresolved conflicts concerning alternative uses of available resources. (CATEX A5)

· Operational Activities - Acquisition, installation, maintenance, operation, or evaluation of security equipment to screen for or detect dangerous or illegal individuals or materials at existing facilities and the eventual removal and disposal of that equipment in compliance with applicable requirements to protect the environment.(CATEX *B8)

· Operational Activities - Acquisition, installation, operation, or evaluation of physical security devices, or controls to enhance the physical security of existing critical assets and the eventual removal and disposal of that equipment in compliance with applicable requirements to protect the environment. (CATEX *B9)

FPS/ Intrusion Detection System and VSS Replacement/ 212 third Avenue South Minneapolis Minnesota 55... (LES-Law Enforcem

Page 1 of 113 Printed On 7/17/2024 8:47:58 AM

Existing EA/EIS?: No Requires EA/EIS?: No Project Priority: Normal Federal Assistance: No Estimated Project Cost: $285,545

Component Component: DHS HQ - DHS Headquarters

Dates FY Funding: 2025 Proposed Project Start: 05/01/2025 Proposed Project End: 07/01/2025 Review Start: 06/20/2024

Project Location Site Specific: 212 Third Avenue South , Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55401

Team Document Preparer, Megan McKnight, megan.mcknight@associates.fps.dhs.gov Collaborator-Document Preparation, Heather Batson, heather.d.batson@fps.dhs.gov Environmental Reviewer, Heather McDuff, heather.mcduff@hq.dhs.gov Senior Environmental Reviewer, Jennifer Hass, jennifer.hass@hq.dhs.gov Proponent, Noel Cotts, noel.cotts@fps.dhs.gov

Categorical Exclusions A5 - Awarding of contracts for technical support services, ongoing management and operation of government facilities, and professional services that do not involve unresolved conflicts concerning alternative uses of available resources.

B8* - Acquisition, installation, maintenance, operation, or evaluation of security equipment to screen for or detect dangerous or illegal individuals or materials at existing facilities and the eventual removal and disposal of that equipment in compliance with applicable requirements to protect the environment. Examples of the equipment include, but are not limited to:

(a) Low-level x-ray devices,

(b) Cameras and biometric devices,

(c) Passive inspection devices,

(d) Detection or security systems for explosive, biological, or chemical substances, and

(e) Access controls, screening devices, and traffic management systems.

B9* - Acquisition, installation, operation, or evaluation of physical security devices, or controls to enhance the physical security of existing critical assets and the eventual removal and disposal of that

FPS/ Intrusion Detection System and VSS Replacement/ 212 third Avenue South Minneapolis Minnesota 55... (LES-Law Enforcem

Page 2 of 113 Printed On 7/17/2024 8:47:58 AM

1.

2.

equipment in compliance with applicable requirements to protect the environment. Examples include, but are not limited to:

(a) Motion detection systems,

(b) Use of temporary barriers, fences, and jersey walls on or adjacent to existing facilities or on land that has already been disturbed or built upon,

(c) Impact resistant doors and gates,

(d) X-ray units,

(e) Remote video surveillance systems,

(f) Diver/swimmer detection systems, except sonar,

(g) Blast/shock impact-resistant systems for land based and waterfront facilities,

(i) Column and surface wraps, and

(j) Breakage/shatter-resistant glass.

Required Conditions Any change to the Proposed Action that may cause a physical interaction with the human environment will require re-evaluation for compliance with NEPA and other EP&HP requirements before the action can proceed.

This review addresses NEPA and other EP&HP requirements as described in DHS Directive 023-01.

This review may identify the need for additional federal, state, and/or local permits, approvals, etc.

required for the Proposed Action. However, this review may not satisfy those requirements and the Proponent is responsible for ensuring that all other appropriate federal, state, and/or local permits, approvals, etc. have been obtained.

Decision Documents Record of Environmental Consideration (REC), 12.34kB

Attachments Paul D. Wellstone (MN0036) IDS SoW.pdf, 1.40MB Paul D. Wellstone (MN0036) VSS SoW.pdf, 1.32MB

Comments There are no comments.

EPHP Review Environmental Resources

FPS/ Intrusion Detection System and VSS Replacement/ 212 third Avenue South Minneapolis Minnesota 55... (LES-Law Enforcem

Page 3 of 113 Printed On 7/17/2024 8:47:58 AM

Is the Proposed Action a piece of a larger action or connected to another action? -- No Please explain how you came to this determination. : Per location and SOW.

Will the Proposed Action have a potentially significant effect on public health or safety? Areas to consider include, but are not limited to: environmental justice considerations; air quality; noise impacts; hazardous wastes and/or contamination; wastewater; potable water; and changes in modes or safety of transportation. -- No Explain how the proposed action would not have a potentially significant effect on public health or safety. : Per location and SOW.

Would the proposed action place a disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effect on minority populations and low-income populations? -- No Will the Proposed Action have a potentially significant effect on species or habitats protected by the Endangered Species Act, Marine Mammal Protection Act, Migratory Bird Treaty Act, Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, or Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act? -- No Provide a conclusion under which statute the determination was made (e.g., no effect, NLAA, LAA, for ESA, etc.), how the determination was made, why it is considered significant, and copies of any consultation (informal and/or formal). : Per location and SOW.

Attachments: FWS, NMFS, or Wildlife Agency Consultation: (No files uploaded yet.)

What is your Endangered Species Act (ESA) finding and determination? -- No effect Explain how the determination was made (e.g., are species present in the area but your proposed action will have no effect? why?). Although not required, recommend attaching any consultation or correspondence conducted.: Per location and SOW.

Attachments: ESA consultation: (No files uploaded yet.)

What is your Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) finding and determination? -- N/A Explain why MMPA is not applicable to your proposed action (i.e is your proposed action entirely within a building with no species present?). Recommend attaching any relevant supporting information.: Per location and SOW.

Attachments: MMPA information: (No files uploaded yet.)

Would the proposed action adversely affect a species protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act or Migratory Bird Treaty Act or habitat for such species? -- No Explain how the determination was made (e.g., are species present in the area but your proposed action will have no adverse effect or no significant effect? why?). Although not required, recommend attaching any consultation or correspondence conducted.: Per location and SOW.

Attachments: BGEPA MBTA consultation: (No files uploaded yet.)

What is your Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (essential fish habitat) finding and determination? -- N/A Attachments: EFH information: (No files uploaded yet.)

FPS/ Intrusion Detection System and VSS Replacement/ 212 third Avenue South Minneapolis Minnesota 55... (LES-Law Enforcem

Page 4 of 113 Printed On 7/17/2024 8:47:58 AM

Will the Proposed Action have a potentially significant effect on an environmentally sensitive area?

Examples include, but are not limited to: areas having special designation or recognition such as prime or unique agricultural lands, coastal zones, designated wilderness study areas, wild and scenic rivers, 100-year floodplains, wetlands, sole source aquifers, Marine Sanctuaries, National Wildlife Refuges, National Parks, National Monuments, etc. -- No Special Flood Hazard Area (i.e. floodplains) -- N/A Explain why this resource is not applicable to your proposed action (e.g. is your proposed action located entirely within a building and no resources are present?): Project is located in an unshaded x zone on FEMA Firm panel 04019C2276L, effective 6/16/2011.

Jurisdictional wetlands and Other Waters of the U.S. -- N/A Explain why this resource is not applicable to your proposed action (e.g. is your proposed action located entirely within a building and no resources are present?): Per location and SOW.

Coastal Barrier Unit -- N/A Explain why this resource is not applicable to your proposed action (e.g. is your proposed action located entirely within a building and no resources are present?): Per location and SOW.

Coastal Zone Management Area -- N/A Explain why this resource is not applicable to your proposed action (e.g. is your proposed action located entirely within a building and no resources are present?): Per location and SOW.

Section 10 navigable waterway -- N/A Explain why this resource is not applicable to your proposed action (e.g. is your proposed action located entirely within a building and no resources are present?): Per location and SOW.

Sole Source Aquifers and Wellheads -- N/A Explain why this resource is not applicable to your proposed action (e.g. is your proposed action located entirely within a building and no resources are present?): Per location and SOW.

Prime Farmland -- N/A Explain why this resource is not applicable to your proposed action (e.g. is your proposed action located entirely within a building and no resources are present?): Per location and SOW.

Designated land (i.e., Wilderness Area, Wild and Scenic River, Marine Sanctuary, National Park, National Monument, National Natural Landmark, Wildlife Refuge, and Wilderness Area -- N/A Explain why this resource is not applicable to your proposed action (e.g. is your proposed action located entirely within a building and no resources are present?): Per location and SOW.

Will the Proposed Action result in the potential violation of a Federal, State, or local law or requirement imposed to protect the environment? -- No Please summarize determination. : Per location and SOW.

Will the Proposed Action have an effect on the quality of the human environment that is likely to be highly controversial in terms of scientific validity, likely to be highly uncertain, or likely to involve unique or unknown environmental risks? -- No Required: Please explain. : Per location and SOW.

FPS/ Intrusion Detection System and VSS Replacement/ 212 third Avenue South Minneapolis Minnesota 55... (LES-Law Enforcem

Page 5 of 113 Printed On 7/17/2024 8:47:58 AM

Will the Proposed Action employ new or unproven technology that is likely to involve unique or unknown environmental risks, where the effect on the human environment is likely to be highly uncertain, or where the effect on the human environment is likely to be highly controversial in terms of scientific validity? -- No Required: Please explain.: Per location and SOW.

Will the Proposed Action establish a precedent for future actions that have significant effects? -- No Please explain how you came to this determination. : Per location and SOW.

Is the Proposed Action significantly greater in scope or size than normally experienced for its particular category of action? -- No Required: Please summarize determination.: Per location and SOW.

Will the Proposed Action have the potential to result in the significant degradation of existing poor environmental conditions? Will the Proposed Action initiate a potentially significant environmentally degrading influence, activity, or effect in areas not already significantly modified from their natural condition? -- No Please explain how you came to this determination. : Per location and SOW.

Is the Proposed Action related to other actions with individually insignificant but cumulatively significant impacts? -- No Please explain how you came to this determination. : Per location and SOW.

Are there any other requirements for the protection of the environment that need to be considered for this proposed action? -- No

HHistoric Preservation & Cultural Resources Is the Proposed Action a piece of a larger action or connected to another action? -- No Please explain how you came to this determination. : Per location and SOW.

Will the Proposed Action have a potentially significant effect on public health or safety? Areas to consider include, but are not limited to: environmental justice considerations; air quality; noise impacts; hazardous wastes and/or contamination; wastewater; potable water; and changes in modes or safety of transportation. -- No Explain how the proposed action would not have a potentially significant effect on public health or safety. : Per location and SOW.

Would the proposed action place a disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effect on minority populations and low-income populations? -- No Will the Proposed Action have a potentially significant effect on species or habitats protected by the Endangered Species Act, Marine Mammal Protection Act, Migratory Bird Treaty Act, Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, or Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act? -- No Provide a conclusion under which statute the determination was made (e.g., no effect, NLAA, LAA, for ESA, etc.), how the determination was made, why it is considered significant, and copies of any consultation (informal and/or formal). : Per location and SOW.

FPS/ Intrusion Detection System and VSS Replacement/ 212 third Avenue South Minneapolis Minnesota 55... (LES-Law Enforcem

Page 6 of 113 Printed On 7/17/2024 8:47:58 AM

Attachments: FWS, NMFS, or Wildlife Agency Consultation: (No files uploaded yet.)

What is your Endangered Species Act (ESA) finding and determination? -- No effect Explain how the determination was made (e.g., are species present in the area but your proposed action will have no effect? why?). Although not required, recommend attaching any consultation or correspondence conducted.: Per location and SOW.

Attachments: ESA consultation: (No files uploaded yet.)

What is your Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) finding and determination? -- N/A Explain why MMPA is not applicable to your proposed action (i.e is your proposed action entirely within a building with no species present?). Recommend attaching any relevant supporting information.: Per location and SOW.

Attachments: MMPA information: (No files uploaded yet.)

Would the proposed action adversely affect a species protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act or Migratory Bird Treaty Act or habitat for such species? -- No Explain how the determination was made (e.g., are species present in the area but your proposed action will have no adverse effect or no significant effect? why?). Although not required, recommend attaching any consultation or correspondence conducted.: Per location and SOW.

Attachments: BGEPA MBTA consultation: (No files uploaded yet.)

What is your Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (essential fish habitat) finding and determination? -- N/A Attachments: EFH information: (No files uploaded yet.)

Will the Proposed Action have a potentially significant effect on an environmentally sensitive area?

Examples include, but are not limited to: areas having special designation or recognition such as prime or unique agricultural lands, coastal zones, designated wilderness study areas, wild and scenic rivers, 100-year floodplains, wetlands, sole source aquifers, Marine Sanctuaries, National Wildlife Refuges, National Parks, National Monuments, etc. -- No Special Flood Hazard Area (i.e. floodplains) -- N/A Explain why this resource is not applicable to your proposed action (e.g. is your proposed action located entirely within a building and no resources are present?): Project is located in an unshaded x zone on FEMA Firm panel 04019C2276L, effective 6/16/2011.

Jurisdictional wetlands and Other Waters of the U.S. -- N/A Explain why this resource is not applicable to your proposed action (e.g. is your proposed action located entirely within a building and no resources are present?): Per location and SOW.

Coastal Barrier Unit -- N/A Explain why this resource is not applicable to your proposed action (e.g. is your proposed action located entirely within a building and no resources are present?): Per location and SOW.

Coastal Zone Management Area -- N/A Explain why this resource is not applicable to your proposed action (e.g. is your proposed action located entirely within a building and no resources are present?): Per location and SOW.

FPS/ Intrusion Detection System and VSS Replacement/ 212 third Avenue South Minneapolis Minnesota 55... (LES-Law Enforcem

Page 7 of 113 Printed On 7/17/2024 8:47:58 AM

Section 10 navigable waterway -- N/A Explain why this resource is not applicable to your proposed action (e.g. is your proposed action located entirely within a building and no resources are present?): Per location and SOW.

Sole Source Aquifers and Wellheads -- N/A Explain why this resource is not applicable to your proposed action (e.g. is your proposed action located entirely within a building and no resources are present?): Per location and SOW.

Prime Farmland -- N/A Explain why this resource is not applicable to your proposed action (e.g. is your proposed action located entirely within a building and no resources are present?): Per location and SOW.

Designated land (i.e., Wilderness Area, Wild and Scenic River, Marine Sanctuary, National Park, National Monument, National Natural Landmark, Wildlife Refuge, and Wilderness Area -- N/A Explain why this resource is not applicable to your proposed action (e.g. is your proposed action located entirely within a building and no resources are present?): Per location and SOW.

Will the Proposed Action result in the potential violation of a Federal, State, or local law or requirement imposed to protect the environment? -- No Please summarize determination. : Per location and SOW.

Will the Proposed Action have an effect on the quality of the human environment that is likely to be highly controversial in terms of scientific validity, likely to be highly uncertain, or likely to involve unique or unknown environmental risks? -- No Required: Please explain. : Per location and SOW.

Will the Proposed Action employ new or unproven technology that is likely to involve unique or unknown environmental risks, where the effect on the human environment is likely to be highly uncertain, or where the effect on the human environment is likely to be highly controversial in terms of scientific validity? -- No Required: Please explain.: Per location and SOW.

Will the Proposed Action establish a precedent for future actions that have significant effects? -- No Please explain how you came to this determination. : Per location and SOW.

Is the Proposed Action significantly greater in scope or size than normally experienced for its particular category of action? -- No Required: Please summarize determination.: Per location and SOW.

Will the Proposed Action have the potential to result in the significant degradation of existing poor environmental conditions? Will the Proposed Action initiate a potentially significant environmentally degrading influence, activity, or effect in areas not already significantly modified from their natural condition? -- No Please explain how you came to this determination. : Per location and SOW.

Is the Proposed Action related to other actions with individually insignificant but cumulatively significant impacts? -- No Please explain how you came to this determination. : Per location and SOW.

FPS/ Intrusion Detection System and VSS Replacement/ 212 third Avenue South Minneapolis Minnesota 55... (LES-Law Enforcem

Page 8 of 113 Printed On 7/17/2024 8:47:58 AM

Are there any other requirements for the protection of the environment that need to be considered for this proposed action? -- No Will the proposed action have a potentially significant effect on a district, highway, structure, or object that is listed, or eligible for listing, on the National Register of Historic Places, a historic or cultural resource, traditional or sacred site, or result in the destruction of a significant scientific, cultural, or historic resource? -- No Attachments: HR - Consultation: (No files uploaded yet.)

What is the National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 effect determination? -- No effect Please explain how you came to this determination. : Building was constructed in 1913.

Per GSA consultation, "Sections H.3 (VSS SOW) and H.2 (IDS SOW) contain appropriate language to address potential historic preservation, NHPA, and Section 106 review issues."

SME will attach consultation correspondence.

Attachments: Section 106 consultation: GSA S106 Consultation.pdf (GSA S106 Consultation.pdf, 851.34kB) Does the proposed action limit access to, and ceremonial use of, Indian sacred sites on federal lands, by Indian religious practitioners, and/or adversely affect the physical integrity of such sites. -- No

FPS/ Intrusion Detection System and VSS Replacement/ 212 third Avenue South Minneapolis Minnesota 55... (LES-Law Enforcem

Page 9 of 113 Printed On 7/17/2024 8:47:58 AM

DDHS Record of Environmental Consideration (REC) for Categorically Excluded Actions under NEPA

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this Record of Environmental Consideration (REC) is to provide a record that the potential for impacts to the quality of the human environment has been considered in the decision to implement the Proposed Action described below, in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) and DHS Directive 023-01 and Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01 on implementation of NEPA. DHS integrates the NEPA process with review and compliance requirements under other Federal laws, regulations, Executive Orders, and other requirements for the stewardship and protection of the human environment, as reflected in Section II (8) of this REC. Signature of the DHS Proponent on this REC demonstrates that they have considered the potential for impacts to the human environment in their decision to implement the Proposed Action as required by NEPA, and are committing to any conditions listed in Section IV of this REC that may be required for implementation of the project. When completed, the form is to be signed by the Preparer, the Environmental Approver, and the Action Proponent. The completed REC becomes a part of the administrative record for the Proposed Action.

SECTION I - Description of Proposed Action

1. Name of Component Authorizing the Proposed Action:

DHS Headquarters

2. Title of Proposed Action:

FPS/ Intrusion Detection System and VSS Replacement/ 212 third Avenue South Minneapolis Minnesota 55401

3. Identifying Number of Proposed Action:

DSS-DHS HQ-2024-19798

4. Estimated Start Date and Useful Life of Proposed Action:

Start Date: 05/01/2025 - End Date: 7/1/2025

5. Location of Proposed Action:

Site Specific: 212 Third Avenue South , Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55401

6. Description of Proposed Action:

The project involves replacing the existing perimeter intrusion detection system and complete removal of the old video surveillance system and installation of a new video surveillance system. Building was constructed in 1913. SEM will upload the SOW documents provided by the proponent.

SECTION II - Analysis of Extraordinary Circumstances

7. Proposed Action is not a piece of a larger action Proposed Action is a piece of a larger action

Remarks:

8. For A through K, check the appropriate box and provide an explanation when appropriate. Include a summary of any coordination or consultation that occurred with a resource or regulatory agency, if relevant.

Yes No A. Will the Proposed Action have a potentially significant effect on public health or safety?

Remarks:

FPS/ Intrusion Detection System and VSS Replacement/ 212 third Avenue South Minneapolis Minnesota 55... (LES-Law Enforcem

Page 10 of 113 Printed On 7/17/2024 8:47:58 AM

Yes No B. Will the Proposed Action have a potentially significant effect on species or habitats protected by the Endangered Species Act, Marine Mammal Protection Act, Migratory Bird Treaty Act, Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, or Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act?

Remarks:

Yes No C. Will the Proposed Action have a potentially significant effect on a district, highway, structure, or object that is listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)?

Will the Proposed Action have a potentially significant effect on a historic or cultural resource, traditionalor sacred site, or result in the destruction of a significant scientific, cultural, or historic resource?

Remarks:

Yes No D. Will the Proposed Action have a potentially significant effect on an environmentally sensitive area?

Remarks:

Yes No E. Will the Proposed Action result in the potential violation of a Federal, State, or local law or requirement imposed to protect the environment?

Remarks:

Yes No F. Will the Proposed Action have an effect on the quality of the human environment that is likely to be highly controversial in terms of scientific validity, likely to be highly uncertain, or likely to involve unique or unknown environmental risks?

Remarks:

Yes No G. Will the Proposed Action employ new or unproven technology that is likely to involve unique or unknown environmental risks, where the effect on the human environment is likely to be highly uncertain, or where the effect on the human environment is likely to be highly controversial in terms of scientific validity?

Remarks:

Yes No H. Will the Proposed Action establish a precedent for future actions that have significant effects?

Remarks:

Yes No I. Is the Proposed Action significantly greater in scope or size than normally experienced for its particular category of action?

Remarks:

Yes No J. Does the Proposed Action have the potential to result in significant degradation of existing poor environmental conditions? Will the Proposed Action initiate a potentially significant environmentally degrading influence, activity, or effect in areas not significantly modified from their natural condition?

Remarks:

Yes No K. Is the Proposed Action related to other actions with individually insignificant but cumulatively significant impacts?

Remarks:

SECTION III - Categorical Exclusion (CATEX) Determination

FPS/ Intrusion Detection System and VSS Replacement/ 212 third Avenue South Minneapolis Minnesota 55... (LES-Law Enforcem

Page 11 of 113 Printed On 7/17/2024 8:47:58 AM

9. This action is not expected to result in any significant adverse environmental impacts as described in the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). The proposed action has been thoroughly reviewed by the DHS Headquarters and it has been determined, by the undersigned, that this action is categorically excluded under current DHS CATEX AA5,B8*,B9* from further environmental documentation, in accordance with Section 3 of DHS Directive 023-01, Environmental Planning Program since implementation of this action:

I. Clearly fits within one or more of the categories of excludable actions listed in Appendix A of DHS Instruction 023-01-001-01;

II. Is not a piece of a larger action which has been segmented into smaller parts in order to avoid a more extensive evaluation of the potential for significant environmental impacts;

III. Does not involve any extraordinary circumstances, as defined in DHS Instruction 023-01-001-01, Section V(B)(2), that would create the potential for a normally excluded action to have a significant environmental effect.

SECTION IV - Conditions

10. The following conditions are required to implement the Proposed Action:

Any change to the Proposed Action that may cause a physical interaction with the human environment will require re-evaluation for compliance with NEPA and other EP&HP requirements before the action can proceed.

This review addresses NEPA and other EP&HP requirements as described in DHS Directive 023-01. This review may identify the need for additional federal, state, and/or local permits, approvals, etc. required for the Proposed Action. However, this review may not satisfy those requirements and the Proponent is responsible for ensuring that all other appropriate federal, state, and/or local permits, approvals, etc. have been obtained.

SECTION V - Signatures

11a. Preparer of this REC Name:

Megan McKnight

Digitally signed by Megan McKnight at

06/21/2024 11:25 AM

Megan McKnight

Date:

06/21/2024

11b. Environmental Approver of this REC Name:

Jennifer Hass

Digitally signed by Jennifer Hass at 07/08/2024

10:30 AM

Jennifer Hass

Date:

07/08/2024

11c. Action Proponent

FPS/ Intrusion Detection System and VSS Replacement/ 212 third Avenue South Minneapolis Minnesota 55... (LES-Law Enforcem

Page 12 of 113 Printed On 7/17/2024 8:47:58 AM

Name:

Noel Cotts

Digitally signed by Noel Cotts at 07/08/2024

11:16 AM

Noel Cotts

Date:

07/08/2024

FPS/ Intrusion Detection System and VSS Replacement/ 212 third Avenue South Minneapolis Minnesota 55... (LES-Law Enforcem

Page 13 of 113 Printed On 7/17/2024 8:47:58 AM

Preview of Attachments The following pages will display this project's attachments that are of these file types:

.jpg /.jpeg

.png

.gif

.txt

.pdf

The attachments of compatible file types from this project are:

Paul D. Wellstone (MN0036) IDS SoW.pdf Paul D. Wellstone (MN0036) VSS SoW.pdf

Note:

All project attachments can be downloaded at the 'File Upload/Manage Attachments' page.

Page 14 of 113 Printed On 7/17/2024 8:47:58 AM

FPS/ Intrusion Detection System and VSS Replacement/ 212 third Avenue South Minneapolis Minnesota 55401

Page 14 of 113 Printed On 7/17/2024 8:47:58 AM