Attachment E - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 656 KB Posted

Attached to
Video Surveillance System (VSS) at the Paul D. Wellstone Federal Building
Solicitation number
70RFP425QE5000017
Issued by

About this file

The document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a federal contract opportunity related to a Video Surveillance System (VSS) installation at the Paul D. Wellstone Federal Building in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The questionnaire is designed to collect detailed feedback from previous project references about a contractor's performance, soliciting comprehensive evaluations across multiple dimensions including professionalism, customer service, problem resolution, project management, quality control, and overall performance effectiveness.

The questionnaire, issued by the Department of Homeland Security's Federal Protective Service under solicitation number 70RFP425QE5000017, requires respondents to provide narrative comments on eight specific performance areas and includes a final overall performance rating categorization (Highly Acceptable, Acceptable, or Unacceptable). The form requests information about the project's scope, contract value, performance period, and seeks a definitive recommendation on whether the contractor would be rehired, with space for detailed explanatory comments to substantiate the rating.

View the file

Other files

Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

U.S. Department of Homeland Security Federal Protective Service 701 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19106

ATTACHMENT E

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation: 70RFP425QE5000017

NAME OF CONTRACTOR REQUESTING THE REFERENCE: ________________________

The purpose of this questionnaire is to obtain information regarding the quality of the above-named Contractor’s past performance relative to a contract, completed or in progress, at your company/agency. The Federal Protective Service is considering this Contractor for the installation of a Video Surveillance System (VSS) in Minnesota, MN. We would greatly appreciate your input regarding the quality of the Contractor’s past performance.

Handwritten or typed responses are sufficient. It is requested that the individual(s) responsible for the administrative oversight of the project (e.g. security specialist, COR, COTR, etc.) respond to this questionnaire.

More than one copy of the questionnaire may be submitted if responses from more than one individual are appropriate.

Upon completion of the survey, PLEASE EMAIL Nikki Finney at nikki.finney@fps.dhs.gov. If you have any questions, please submit in writing to both addresses listed. We appreciate your efforts on our behalf.

CONTRACT NO. OR PROJECT TITLE: _____________________________________

PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:_________________________________________

TOTAL PROJECT VALUE:_________________________________________

NAME: ________________________________________________________

TITLE: ________________________________________________________

COMPANY: ________________________________________________________

ADDRESS: ________________________________________________________

TELEPHONE: ________________________________________________________

EMAIL: ________________________________________________________

mailto:danielle.dimedio@fps.dhs mailto:nikki.finney@fps.dhs.gov

Solicitation 70RFP425QE5000017

Please provide a brief description of the scope of this project so that we determine any similarities to this contract:

QUESTIONS

PERFORMANCE:

Please provide your comments on the Contractor’s performance in the following areas:

1. Discuss the Contractor’s overall level of professionalism and attentiveness.

Comments:

2. Discuss the Contractor’s overall level of customer service and responsiveness.

Comments:

3. Contractor in identifying and resolving problems—was the Contractor proactive or reactionary?

Comments:

4. Discuss the Contractor’s ability to provide sufficient supervision/staffing to ensure effective and successful performance.

Comments:

5. How effectively does the Contractor respond to problems presented to them by owner and tenant representatives?

Comments:

6. Discuss the Contractor’s overall management of the project.

Comments:

7. Discuss the Contractor’s quality control of the project.

Comments:

8. Please describe any special, unique and/or complex requirements of the project, and how well the Contractor was able to handle those complex requirements.

Comments:

12. If you had a choice, would you hire this Contractor again? Why or why not?

13. In summary, would you describe the quality of the Contractor's services and overall performance as:

a. _____ Highly Acceptable – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is substantially less than the level expected from a competent vendor.

b. _____ Acceptable – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is no more than the level expected from a competent vendor.

c. _____ Unacceptable – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is greater than the level normally expected from a competent vendor.

ATTACHMENT E
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Solicitation: 70RFP425QE5000008
NAME OF CONTRACTOR REQUESTING THE REFERENCE: ________________________
CONTRACT NO. OR PROJECT TITLE: _____________________________________
QUESTIONS
PERFORMANCE:
1. Discuss the Contractor’s overall level of professionalism and attentiveness.
2. Discuss the Contractor’s overall level of customer service and responsiveness.
3. Contractor in identifying and resolving problems—was the Contractor proactive or reactionary?
4. Discuss the Contractor’s ability to provide sufficient supervision/staffing to ensure effective and successful performance.
5. How effectively does the Contractor respond to problems presented to them by owner and tenant representatives?
6. Discuss the Contractor’s overall management of the project.
7. Discuss the Contractor’s quality control of the project.
8. Please describe any special, unique and/or complex requirements of the project, and how well the Contractor was able to handle those complex requirements.
12. If you had a choice, would you hire this Contractor again? Why or why not?
13. In summary, would you describe the quality of the Contractor's services and overall performance as:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .