Attachment F - Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan rev 1-14-2026.docx
DOCX document 25 KB Posted
- Attached to
- B533--Potable Water Testing
- Solicitation number
- 36C25926Q0307
About this file
This is a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) for monitoring contractor performance on potable water testing services at the Salt Lake City VA Medical Center. The QASP establishes methods and standards to ensure the contractor meets all requirements specified in the Statement of Work, with performance objectives organized into five key areas: Microbial Testing, Chemical Testing, Water Quality Testing, Reporting, and Compliance with Legal and Regulatory Requirements.
The QASP defines specific performance standards and acceptable quality levels across multiple service areas. Sample collection and testing must comply with established schedules (quarterly/monthly requirements) with 100% review of testing logs. Regulatory compliance requires 100% review of compliance records. Report timeliness is set at 95% for submission within specified timeframes, while report clarity and accuracy is required at 90% through periodic surveillance and random review. Emergency retest response time must meet 100% compliance with specified timeframes. Quality assurance methods include monthly random inspections of testing logs and reports, quarterly compliance audits, customer feedback collection from the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR), performance meetings, documentation reviews, and verification of proper sample holding times and temperatures. The COR is responsible for monitoring performance and serving as the primary point of contact; the Quality Assurance Evaluator conducts inspections and audits; and the contractor must maintain compliance with all regulatory requirements and submit detailed test results to the COR and appropriate state authorities within specified timeframes. Corrective action procedures are established for performance deficiencies, progressing from notification and corrective action plans through re-inspections and formal performance meetings if issues persist.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C25926Q0307 0002.docx | DOCX document | |
| 852.219-75 VA Notice of Limitations on Subcontracting - Certificate of Compliance for Services and Construction.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25926Q0307 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment I - Campus Map.pdf | ||
| Past Performance Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment G - EPA Quick Guide to Drinking Water Sample Collection.pdf | ||
| Wage Determination 2015-5489.pdf | ||
| Attachment E - WSMT Legionella Reporting Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment H - DDW-2022-035825 - BacT Repeat rev 1-14-2026.pdf | ||
| Attachment B Lead and Copper Sampling Plan.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment D - Bacteria Testing Plan rev 1-14-2026 02.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment C - DBP Testing Plan rev 1-14-2026.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment A - Legionella Sampling Plan rev 1-14-2026 02.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25926Q0307_1.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) Purpose The purpose of this Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) is to define the methods and standards used to monitor and evaluate the contractor's performance in accomplishing the requirements specified in the Statement of Work (SOW) for Potable Water Testing at the Salt Lake City VA Medical Center.
Performance Objectives Comment by O'Bryan, Jacqueline L.: I have plans for Legionella, Lead and Copper, DBP, and Bacteria. How do they fit into 1-4 below? Should we rearrange the plans to fit the below categories? Comment by Keene, Joshua R.: Legionella is microbial, bacteria is microbial, there is lead and copper is water quailty, DBP is chemical.
The performance objectives are designed to ensure that the services provided meet the required standards for quality, timeliness, and compliance with all federal, state, and local regulations. The key performance areas include:
1. Microbial Testing
2. Chemical Testing
3. Water Quality Testing
4. Reporting
5. Compliance with Legal and Regulatory Requirements Performance Requirements Summary
| Performance Objective | Comment by O'Bryan, Jacqueline L.: Needs to reference the specific location in the SOW and what the task is. | Comment by Keene, Joshua R.: Not sure what is meant by this. |
| Performance Standard | ||
| Acceptable Quality Levels (AQL) | ||
| Surveillance Method | Comment by O'Bryan, Jacqueline L.: Not all of the Methods listed here match the Methods listed immediately after this table. | Comment by Keene, Joshua R.: Not sure what is meant by this. |
| Compliance with schedule | ||
| Samples collected & tested as per schedule | Comment by O'Bryan, Jacqueline L.: Requires specific timeline. | Comment by Keene, Joshua R.: That is the quarterly/monthly testing requirements |
| 100% | ||
| Review of testing logs |
| Accuracy and completeness of testing |
| All tests conducted accurately and completely as per standards |
| 100% |
| Random sample testing |
| Compliance with regulatory requirements |
| Adherence to all legal and regulatory requirements |
| 100% |
| Review of compliance records |
| Timeliness of reports | ||
| Reports provided within specified timeframes | ||
| 95% | ||
| Timeliness review | Comment by O'Bryan, Jacqueline L.: Periodic Timeliness Review? | Comment by Keene, Joshua R.: Whether they are submitting results on time. I.e. within the month or quarter. |
| Clarity and accuracy of reports | ||
| Reports are accurate and clear | ||
| 90% | ||
| Periodic SurveillanceRandom report review | Comment by O'Bryan, Jacqueline L.: Periodic Surveillance | Comment by Keene, Joshua R.: Done. |
| Emergency retest response time |
| Samples retested within specified time |
| 100% |
| Review of emergency test logs |
Methods of Quality Assurance
1. Random Inspection: Monthly random inspection of testing logs and reports to ensure compliance with standards and schedule.
2. Customer Feedback: Collection and review of feedback from the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) to gauge satisfaction with services provided.
3. Compliance Audits: Quarterly audits of compliance with federal, state, and local regulations.
4. Performance Reporting: Performance meetings with the contractor to discuss performance, identify any issues, and implement corrective actions.
5. Documentation Review: Thorough review of all documentation and reports provided by the contractor for accuracy and completeness.
6. Samples Collection Times: All Samples shall be within their holding times and holding temperatures to avoid retesting.
Responsibilities
· Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR): The COR will monitor the contractor’s performance through random inspections, audits, and review of reports. The COR will also act as the primary point of contact for the contractor.
· Contractor: The contractor will ensure all testing and reporting is carried out as per the SOW, maintain compliance with all regulatory requirements, and provide the necessary materials and equipment.
· Quality Assurance Evaluator (QAE): The QAE will conduct the random inspections and compliance audits, compile performance data, and report findings to the COR.
Reporting The contractor is responsible for providing detailed reports on the testing results and any issues encountered. These reports must be submitted to the COR within the specified time frames. The contractor must also submit results to the appropriate state authorities as required. Comment by O'Bryan, Jacqueline L.: Every plan requires a specific timeline Comment by Keene, Joshua R.: They have to follow the testing/reporting schedule. I.e. the monthly/quarterly testing.
Corrective Actions If performance standards are not met, the following actions will be taken:
1. Notification: The contractor will be notified of the deficiencies.
2. Action Plan: The contractor will be required to submit a plan to correct the deficiencies within a specified time frame.
3. Re-inspection: Follow-up inspections will be conducted to ensure corrective actions have been implemented.
4. Performance Meetings: If deficiencies continue, formal meetings will be held to discuss and resolve the issues.
Approval The QASP is approved by the Contracting Officer and the COR. It will be reviewed and updated as necessary to ensure it remains relevant and effective.
Approved by:
Contracting Officer:
Contracting Officer Representative:
Quality Assurance Evaluator:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .