Attachment F - Past Performance Questionnair_Virtual Pharmacy.docx

DOCX document 20 KB Posted

Attached to
Q526--VISN04 - Multi-Station - Virtual Pharmacy Services - Closes 23Feb @ 0900 Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
36C24421Q0153
Issued by
Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 4

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Q526--VISN04 - Multi-Station - Virtual Pharmacy Services - Closes 23Feb @ 0900, newest first.
File Type Posted
36C24421Q0153_2.docx DOCX document
Attachment A - PWS - Amend 1.pdf PDF
Q_A Set 2.docx DOCX document
Attachment B - Price Schedule - Amend 1.docx DOCX document
Q_A Set 1.docx DOCX document
36C24421Q0153_1.docx DOCX document
Attachment G - Records Management Language.docx DOCX document
Attachment D - 36C24421Q0153_1 - SF1449.docx DOCX document
Attachment C _ Service Contract Act Wage Determinations.docx DOCX document
Attachment H - VA Privacy Training.pdf PDF
Attachment B - Price Schedule.docx DOCX document
Attachment A - PWS.pdf PDF
36C24421Q0153 - Combo.docx DOCX document
36C24421Q0153.docx DOCX document
Attachment E - QASP.docx DOCX document
Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT F

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION NUMBER – 36C24421Q0153

Virtual Pharmacy Services-VISN 04

PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND PAST PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT. ONCE EVALUATION IS COMPLETED, SUBMIT FORM TO CYNTHIA.LAEMMERHIRT AND REFERENCE ABOVE SOLICITATION NUMBER AND CONTRACTOR NAME IN SUBJECT LINE:

I. CONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION:

Contractor:

Contract Number:

Period of Performance:

Negotiated price or cost at award:

Current estimated contract dollar amount:

Describe service acquired:

II. EVALUATOR INFORMATION:

Name:

Organization:

Phone Number:

(i.e., Contracting Officer, Program Manager, Contract Specialist/Administrator, Contracting Officer's Technical Representative, etc.)

Time on Contract:

III. ASSESSMENT ELEMENTS: Narrative statements are vital. Please provide a narrative for each element below and then an adjectival rating under pars. III.A2, III.B.2, III.C.2, and an overall Past/Present Performance adjectival rating under par. III.F based on the attached Adjectival Rating Descriptions. Attach additional pages if there is insufficient space in the comment space.

A. Quality of Services

1. Narrative: Address the Contractor’s ability to provide qualified personnel (including experienced managers and/or supervisors), necessary equipment, which is properly maintained, quality control for performance of your contract, and contractor’s compliance with contractual terms and conditions.

2. Rating for Quality of Services: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):

|_| Excellent |_|Good |_|Satisfactory |_|Marginal |_|Unsatisfactory

B. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

1. Narrative: Address the Contractor’s ability to meet the contract’s specific response times and Contractor’s timeliness in providing any administrative reports/documents required by your contract.

2. Rating for Timeliness of Performance: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):

C. BUSINESS RELATIONS

1. Narrative: Address Contractor’s willingness to improve and correct noncompliance issues and concerns. Describe Contractor’s ability to correct problems and prevent or mitigate potential problems in a timely manner. Does Contractor display initiative and flexibility? Do Contractor personnel promote a strong working relationship with your agency/organization? Are Contractor personnel courteous and responsive? Do Contractor personnel interface effectively with your staff?

2. Rating for Business Relations: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):

D. IDENTIFY THE CONTRACTOR’S OVERALL STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES:

E. GIVEN THE CHOICE, WOULD YOU AWARD TO THIS CONTRACTOR AGAIN?

YES |_| NO |_|

If no, please explain:

F. CONTRACTOR’S OVERALL PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE RATING:

(Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):

PERFORMANCE ADJECTIVAL RATINGS: Choose the appropriate adjective that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance based on the descriptions below.

EXCELLENT
GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .