Attachment C - Technical Criteria.pdf
PDF 531 KB Posted
- Attached to
- UTARNG Environmental Assessment of Limited Army Aviation Support Facility at Cedar City Utah
- Solicitation number
- RR25-12
- Issued by
- Iron County, Utah
About this file
This document is Attachment C - Technical Criteria for a state and local contract opportunity posted by the Utah Army National Guard (UTARNG) for an Environmental Assessment of a Limited Army Aviation Support Facility in Cedar City, Utah. The key technical criteria for this opportunity include the offeror's company history and mission, their experience with NEPA analysis particularly related to aviation and/or military projects, their proposed project management methodologies, and their approach to risk and resource management. Offerors must agree to the specifications, requirements, and project timeline outlined in the Scope of Work, and affirm prior experience completing NEPA analysis. The technical criteria account for 900 out of the total 1,000 possible points, with the remaining 100 points allocated to the cost proposal.
The state and local contract opportunity is specifically for UTARNG's Environmental Assessment of a Limited Army Aviation Support Facility in Cedar City, Utah, located in Iron County. No additional details are provided regarding pricing terms, set asides, incumbents, funding requirements or sources, or other salient information.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RR25-12 Interactive Scoresheet Informational Only.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| 1257030-event.pdf | ||
| Attachmnet B - Scope of Work.pdf | ||
| Attachment A - Terms and Conditions for Goods & Services (Agency Contract).docx | DOCX document | |
| Changing Your Time Zone 2022.pptx | PPTX presentation | |
| Claim of Business Confidentiality 12.7.20.pdf | ||
| Attachment D - Cost Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment C – Technical Criteria
For ease of evaluation, the proposals must provide a point-by-point response, addressing in detail each area of the evaluation criteria, including addressing how the point-by-point response addresses the issues discussed in this RFP. The criteria are not intended to limit a proposal's content or exclude any relevant or essential data. Offerors are at liberty and are encouraged to expand upon the criteria to demonstrate the Offeror’s capability to provide the State with a solution.
Minimum Mandatory Requirements
● Offeror MUST agree to specifications, requirements, and project timeline in the Scope of Work.
● Contractor understands clause in Terms & Conditions stating contractor may not assign, sell, transfer, subcontract or sublet rights, or delegate any right or obligation under this Contract, in whole or in part, without the prior written approval of the State Entity.
● Contractor affirms prior experience completing NEPA analysis.
Scoring Criteria
1. Company History and Mission (Points Possible - 100) - Offeror to submit a detailed description of company history, qualifications, and mission.
• How many years has your company been involved in these types of projects?
• Please supply a history of your company detailing any items that are pertinent to this solicitation.
• Can you provide information related to the staff on your team including their certifications and experience?
• Please detail your company’s mission and vision for projects meeting this Scope of Work
2. NEPA Experience (Points Possible – 400) - Offeror to submit a detailed description of NEPA experience.
● Describe your company's experience with NEPA, particularly as it relates to aviation and/or military related NEPA projects.
● How many years does your company have conducting NEPA analysis?
● Provide an overview of your NEPA department, including its size, structure, and key staff. Provide details on key staff NEPA experience.
Attachment C – Technical Criteria
3. Project Management (Points Possible – 200) - Offeror to submit a detailed description of how they will meet the following requirements:
● What project management methodologies or frameworks do you typically use?
● Describe your plan to complete the project within the project timeline.
● Describe your approach to developing and managing a project schedule.
● How do you plan to keep the UTARNG project POC and stakeholders informed of progress?
● Describe your escalation process for resolving project issues.
○ How do you determine when to escalate an issue and to whom?
4. Risk and Resource Management (Points Possible – 200) - Offeror to submit a detailed description of how they will meet the following requirements:
• What is your process for identifying and mitigating project risks?
• Describe how you monitor risks throughout the project lifecycle and provide an example of a risk you successfully mitigated.
• How do you handle unexpected changes or scope creep during a project?
• Provide an example of how you managed change to avoid project delays.
• Describe your approach to resource allocation and management.
i. How do you ensure that resources are available when needed to keep the project on track?
Technical & Cost Scoring Summary:
(Points Possible - 100) (Points Possible – 400) (Points Possible – 200) (Points Possible – 200)
1. Criteria 1 - Company History and Mission
2. Criteria 2 - NEPA Experience
3. Criteria 3 - Project Management
4. Criteria 4 - Risk and Resource Management
Total Points Possible via Technical Criteria = Total Points Possible via Cost = Total Points Possible =
1,000
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .