Attachment A SOW.pdf

Effective Date: April 20, 2021 418-XO-GXSSOW-0057 Expiration Date: Five years from date of last signature BaselineVersion 1.0 Responsible Organization: GeoXO Flight Project/Code 418 i

Check the GeoXO portal at https://goesportal.ndc.nasa.gov to verify correct version prior to use.

Geostationary Extended Observations (GeoXO) Sounder (GXS)

Statement of Work (SOW) Signature page

Prepared by:

Electronically approved 04/08/2021

Kevin Tewey Date GeoXO Flight Project, System Engineer NASA GSFC, Code 418

Reviewed by:

Electronically approved 04/14/2021

Alexander Krimchansky Date GeoXO Flight Project, Sys. Eng. Mgr.

NASA GSFC, Code 599

Approved by:

Electronically approved 04/16/2021

Monica Todirita Date GeoXO Flight Project, Deputy Project Manager NOAA GSFC, Code 418

Approved by:

Electronically approved 04/20/2021

Jason H. Hair Date GeoXO Flight Project, Project Manager NASA GSFC, Code 418

/GeoXO Flight Project GXS Sounder

GXSSOW

418-XO-GXSSOW-0057, RM Version, GEO-XO hyperspectral radiometric Sounder (GXS) Phase A Study Statement of Work (SOW)

Version: 1.0 Printed by: rkhoover Printed on: Friday, April 23, 2021

No filter applied.

No sort applied.

Generated from DOORS 9.6.1.11

Contents

1 1Introduction

1.1 1Top-Level Summary of Work Required

1.2 1Guiding Assumptions about the Eventual Flight Program

1.3 2Study Milestone Schedule

1.4 2Applicable and Reference Documents

2 4Tasks

2.1 4Trade Studies

2.2 4Sounder Design Concept Development and Related Analyses

2.3 6Technology Assessment and Demonstration

2.4 7Management Planning

3 8Reviews, Reporting, and Deliverable Products

3.1 8Status Meetings and Reviews

3.2 8Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)

4 11Appendix A: Acronyms

Project: GeoXO Flight Project GXS Sounder Module: GXSSOW Baseline Version: 1.0

Contents ii

Page 1 of 11 Printed Friday, April 23, 2021

Object Identifier

GXSSOW1

GXSSOW2

GXSSOW3

GXSSOW4

GXSSOW15

GXSSOW16

Object Number

1.0-1

1.1

1.1.0-1

1.2

1.2.0-1

418-XO-GXSSOW-0057, RM Version, GEO-XO hyperspectral radiometric Sounder (GXS) Phase A Study Statement of Work (SOW)

1 Introduction The Sounder will be an infrared (IR) sounding instrument that is planned to fly on the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Geostationary and Extended Orbits (GEO-XO) program’s series of geostationary satellites. The Sounder will meet, as a minimum, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) requirements as defined in this Statement of Work (SOW), the Sounder Performance and Operation Requirements Document (PORD), the Sounder Unique Instrument Interface Document (UIID), the General Interface Requirements Document (GIRD), and the Instrument Mission Assurance Requirements (IMAR). For this procurement, in the case of any conflicting requirements, the PORD requirement takes precedence.

This SOW specifies the vendor requirements for performing definition-phase studies and design development as part of Sounder formulation activities.

1.1 Top-Level Summary of Work Required

The details of the deliverables are described in later sections. At the top level, the Government requires:

a) A Sounder Design that satisfies the baseline requirements defined in the PORD, UIID, GIRD, and IMAR

Enhancements to the design beyond the baseline requirements are encouraged if they can be implemented on the specified delivery timeline. The list of potential enhancements that the Government has identified are documented in the PORD Appendix.

b) An Assessment of Sounder performance against requirements specified in the

PORD

c) Trade Studies as specified in section 2.1

d) Technical Analysis as described in section 2.2

e) Notional Development Schedule as described in section 2.4.0-5

f) Cost Analysis as described in section 2.4.0-6

g) Technology Readiness Level (TRL) Assessment and a Technology Development Plan as described in section 2.3.0-1

h) Identification of Development Risks as defined in section 2.4.0-1

i) As applicable, performance of any work awarded for Technology Development and/or Risk Mitigation effort(s)

1.2 Guiding Assumptions about the Eventual Flight Program

The Flight hardware development cost and schedule estimates shall be based on the following assumptions:

a) 1 Engineering Development Unit (EDU).

Page 2 of 11 Printed Friday, April 23, 2021

Object Identifier

GXSSOW16

GXSSOW22

GXSSOW23

GXSSOW24

GXSSOW5

Object Number

1.2.0-1

1.3

1.3.0-1

1.4

1.4.0-1

418-XO-GXSSOW-0057, RM Version, GEO-XO hyperspectral radiometric Sounder (GXS) Phase A Study Statement of Work (SOW)

b) 2 Flight Units and spare parts. A notional delivery schedule is shown in the following table (all dates are for the Government Fiscal Year):

MILESTONE DATE

(assume 1st day of quarter)

Flight Contract Award Q3 FY23 Flight Model 1 Pre-Ship Review (PSR1) Q2 FY30 Launch 1 Readiness Date Q3 FY32 Flight Model 2 PSR (PSR2) Q2 FY32 Launch 2 Readiness Date Q4 FY34

c) No Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) will be provided.

d) Mission durations: See PORD. All requirements must be met at the End of Life.

e) The following instrument-level reviews will be held for the first flight build:

SRR, IBR, PDR, CDR, PER, PSR. Subsequent flight builds will hold a PER and PSR. Review pre-requisites, content, and success criteria are documented in

NPR 7123.1.

1.3 Study Milestone Schedule

The Contractor shall execute the study in accordance with the following milestone schedule. Requirements and deliverables for these milestones are described in Section 3.

Milestone Schedule Kickoff Meeting Within two weeks of award Monthly Progress Reviews Kickoff + 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10 months Mid-Term Review Kickoff + 6 months Final Study Review Kickoff + 11.5 months Final Report Package Kickoff + 12 months Risk Mitigation Report (as applicable)

Kickoff + 20 months

Technology Development Report (as applicable)

Kickoff + 20 months

1.4 Applicable and Reference Documents

Page 3 of 11 Printed Friday, April 23, 2021

Object Identifier

GXSSOW5

Object Number

1.4.0-1

418-XO-GXSSOW-0057, RM Version, GEO-XO hyperspectral radiometric Sounder (GXS) Phase A Study Statement of Work (SOW)

Reference Number Title Applicable Documents 418-XO-GXSPORD-0031 GXS Performance and Operational Requirements

Document 418-XO-GXSUIID-0030 GXS Unique Instrument Interface Document 418-XO-GXIGIRD-0025 GXI General Interface Requirements Document 418-XO-GXIMAR-0026 GeoXO Instrument Mission Assurance Requirements

Reference Documents NPR 7123.1 NASA Systems Engineering Process and Requirements

SP-2016-6105 NASA Systems Engineering Handbook GPR 7120.4D GSFC Guideline for Performing Risk Assessments

CCSDS 120.2-G-1 Lossless Multispectral and Hyperspectral Image Compression

CCSDS 122.1-B-1 Spectral Preprocessing Transform for Multispectral and Hyperspectral Imager Compression

CCSDS 123.0-B-2 Low-complexity Lossless and Near-Lossless Multispectral and Hyperspectral Image Compression

Page 4 of 11 Printed Friday, April 23, 2021

Object Identifier

GXSSOW25

GXSSOW26

GXSSOW27

GXSSOW28

GXSSOW29

GXSSOW32

GXSSOW35

GXSSOW37

GXSSOW38

GXSSOW41

GXSSOW42

GXSSOW43

GXSSOW44

Object Number

2.0-1

2.1

2.1.0-1

2.1.0-2

2.1.0-3

2.1.0-4

2.1.0-5

2.1.0-6

2.2

2.2.0-1

2.2.0-2

2.2.0-3

418-XO-GXSSOW-0057, RM Version, GEO-XO hyperspectral radiometric Sounder (GXS) Phase A Study Statement of Work (SOW)

2 Tasks The Contractor will analyze the Sounder requirements, perform trade studies to justify design decisions, develop a conceptual design for the Sounder, and perform all other tasks as specified below.

2.1 Trade Studies

The Contractor will perform the following trade studies:

Day-Night Band (DNB) Trade Study: The Contractor shall study incorporating into the instrument a DNB capability meeting the DNB requirements in the PORD Section 6. The trade study will include a description of system and operational impacts, focal plane technology, a technology readiness assessment, and any relevant heritage. Associated cost, schedule, and risks will be defined. The results of this trade study are due at the Midterm Review. (CDRL 1)

Data Compression Trade Study: Should the projected data rate exceed the requirement in the UIID, the Contractor shall evaluate compression options to meet the data rate requirement. Lossy compression algorithms will be considered. The contractor can also propose on-instrument processing for data rate reduction. In the trade study, the Contractor will weigh the data quality against data rate and disclose any impact on performance, electronics and/or software, cost, schedule, and development risk. (CDRL

2) After the kickoff, the Government will provide standard scenes to be assessed in the trade study.

Enhanced Performance Options from PORD Section 7 Trade Study: The Contractor may choose to augment the baseline sounder with any of the enhancements listed in the PORD Appendix. If the Contractor chooses to implement any of the enhanced performance options, the Contractor shall document the associated cost, schedule, and risk weighed against predicted performance associated with each design enhancement beyond the baseline requirements. (CDRL 3)

Temporal Refresh Trade Study: The Contractor shall conduct a trade study to determine the implications of increasing the temporal refresh while maintaining compliance to all other specifications defined in the PORD. Associated cost, schedule, and risks will be defined. (CDRL 4)

Detector Management Trade Study: The Contractor shall study the best method for handling of dead pixels and other detector defects and damage, as well as propose operational or data processing methods to address detector degradation over life of mission. (CDRL 5)

2.2 Sounder Design Concept Development and Related Analyses

The Contractor shall develop a Sounder design concept and perform associated engineering analyses to justify design parameters, tolerances, and design/performance margins. (CDRL 6)

The Contractor shall provide a quantitative comparison of the sounder performance against the performance requirements in Section 03 of the PORD. (CDRL 7)

The Contractor shall provide a summary of compliance to the Level 3 instrument requirements (PORD, UIID, GIRD, and IMAR), including initial engineering analyses showing compliance to environmental requirements. (CDRL 8)

Page 5 of 11 Printed Friday, April 23, 2021

Object Identifier

GXSSOW45

GXSSOW46

GXSSOW100

GXSSOW47

GXSSOW48

GXSSOW49

GXSSOW50

GXSSOW51

Object Number

2.2.0-4

2.2.0-5

2.2.0-6

2.2.0-7

2.2.0-8

2.2.0-9

2.2.0-10

2.2.0-11

418-XO-GXSSOW-0057, RM Version, GEO-XO hyperspectral radiometric Sounder (GXS) Phase A Study Statement of Work (SOW)

The Contractor shall analyze the radiometric performance of the instrument concept including the development of a preliminary radiometric model and an end-to-end radiometric accuracy/uncertainty budget. (CDRL 9, 10, and 11)

The Contractor shall review all requirements listed as "TBR" and either concur or suggest new requirement values. (CDRL 12)

The Contractor shall quantify potential cost, schedule, and risk impacts of any suggested TBR requirement changes. (CDRL 12)

The Contractor shall define a calibration methodology (both pre-launch and on-orbit).

Included in this effort will be a description of planned observations, and an examination of calibration FOV impacts as it is not possible to guarantee a clear FOV in any direction other than down the instrument optical axis (as described in the UIID). The planned calibration observations will identify the known spacecraft accommodation dependencies.

(CDRL 13)

The Contractor shall describe the systems approach to meeting all INR and coregistration requirements in the PORD. Such descriptions, including an error budget, will span relevant flight hardware characteristics, operational aspects, and ground processing. (CDRL 14)

The Contractor shall describe the algorithms to be used on the GEO-XO ground system for decompression and processing to data Level 1b, as described in the PORD. (CDRL 15)

The contractor shall review optical safe zones of operation, zones of reduced data quality (ZRDQ), initial stray light performance, and provide stray light mitigation concepts. (CDRL 16 and 17)

The Contractor shall identify what operational scans are possible with the concept system and propose efficient combinations of Sounding Disk, Superregional, and Mesoscale scans that will be compatible with temporal refresh requirements. The complexity of commanding required to change coverage and the impact to data should be minimized. (CDRL 18)

Page 6 of 11 Printed Friday, April 23, 2021

Object Identifier

GXSSOW52

GXSSOW53

GXSSOW54

GXSSOW55

GXSSOW56

GXSSOW57

GXSSOW58

GXSSOW59

GXSSOW61

Object Number

2.2.0-12

2.2.0-13

2.2.0-14

2.2.0-15

2.2.0-16

2.3

2.3.0-1

2.3.0-2

2.3.0-3

418-XO-GXSSOW-0057, RM Version, GEO-XO hyperspectral radiometric Sounder (GXS) Phase A Study Statement of Work (SOW)

The Contractor shall provide an initial analysis, and a state diagram, of the instruments ability to support engagement and disengagement of all cases/modes including the following: (CDRL 19)

⦁ Safe Mode – a thermally and optically safe configuration supported for an indefinite duration

⦁ Storage Mode – a power positive mode that may engage heaters during spacecraft storage

⦁ Outgas Mode – a configuration that sublimates and evaporates contaminants from instrument hardware to prevent contamination from jeopardizing instrument performance

⦁ Diagnostic Mode – a fully functional configuration where operational and telemetry data may be more or less selectively downlinked, or downlinked in a non-compressed form exceeding operational data rate limits, for the purposes of initial validation or to determine the cause of a shortfall in performance. In-flight calibration will also be performed during diagnostic mode.

⦁ Normal Operations – a fully functional configuration employed for operation data collection.

The Contractor shall describe a reliability approach (planned redundancy, parts selection, etc.) to meet the required lifetime. (CDRL 20)

The Contractor shall identify single-point failures and fault critical elements. As part of this analysis the Contractor will describe the fault tolerant/graceful degradation features of the design. (CDRL 21)

The Contractor shall develop a Master Equipment List (MEL). The MEL will document the mass, power, and TRL of each major component. A template for the MEL will be provided by the Government. (CDRL 22)

The Contractor shall provide descriptions of any simulation and analytical tools used in the assessment of the design and/or performance, including the heritage and validation of the tools. (CDRL 23)

2.3 Technology Assessment and Demonstration

The Contractor shall assess the technology readiness of all components of the instrument design. (CDRL 24)

The Contractor shall provide a detailed Technology Development Plan (TDP), including a schedule, explaining how all technologies will achieve TRL 6 by the instrument PDR. If the study effort includes Technology Development effort, the TDP and associated schedule will clearly identify all of the work covered by the Technology Development.

(CDRL 25)

If the study effort includes Technology Development effort, the Contractor shall implement the Technology Development effort under contract, brief the status of this effort at the reviews described in Section 3, and provide a final report detailing the work done, any associated results, and the level to which the technology has been developed.

(CDRL 26)

Page 7 of 11 Printed Friday, April 23, 2021

Object Identifier

GXSSOW62

GXSSOW63

GXSSOW64

GXSSOW65

GXSSOW66

GXSSOW102

GXSSOW101

GXSSOW67

GXSSOW72

Object Number

2.3.0-4

2.3.0-5

2.4

2.4.0-1

2.4.0-2

2.4.0-3

2.4.0-4

2.4.0-5

2.4.0-6

418-XO-GXSSOW-0057, RM Version, GEO-XO hyperspectral radiometric Sounder (GXS) Phase A Study Statement of Work (SOW)

The Contractor shall develop a Model Philosophy and Plan that describes test plans, schedule, and cost of development for an end-to-end Engineering Development Unit and a test regime proposed by the Contractor. (CDRL 27)

The Contractor shall document the flight hardware and software heritage as well as any relevant differences between the claimed heritage and the proposed design (for example, on-orbit environment, mission duration, requirements, etc.). (CDRL 28)

2.4 Management Planning

The Contractor shall identify and rank risks to the development of the Sounder and describe associated mitigations. The likelihood and criticality of risks will be ranked on a 5x5 matrix per GPR 7120.4D. The Contractor will identify alternate implementation paths for all high-risk items. (CDRL 29)

If the study effort includes Risk Mitigation effort, the Contractor shall implement the Risk Mitigation effort under contract, brief the status of this effort at the reviews described in section 3, and provide a final report detailing the work completed, associated results, and the level to which the risk has been mitigated. (CDRL 30)

The contractor shall suggest mitigation activities to perform early in the implementation phase that would reduce downstream risks in the event that the target launch date slips 1-3 years prior to the start of Phase-B. (CDRL 31)

The Contractor shall define a Spares Philosophy approach for procuring and maintaining an adequate supply of spare parts and subassemblies to minimize cost, schedule, and performance risks caused by part damage or shortages. (CDRL 32)

The Contractor shall develop an implementation phase schedule. The Contractor will assume two scenarios; A) parts for the 2 flight instruments and spares to be procured at the same time, and B) just in time procurement of parts for each flight unit. The schedule will show the following major instrument reviews: SRR, IBR, PDR, CDR, MRRs, TRRs, PER, and PSR, achievement of TRL6, development of the instrument physical EDU and other model(s), long-lead (> 1 year) procurements, I&T and V&V activities, and the top three critical paths. The schedule will identify any flight hardware procurements that are started ahead of the completion of the EDU (or equivalent). The schedule is required to meet the program level milestones shown in 1.2.0-1. (CDRL 33)

The Contractor shall provide parametric cost estimates for the development and production of the flight model instruments, spare hardware recommended in the Spares Philosophy and Plan (section 2.4.0-5), and the engineering model tests recommended in the Model Philosophy and Plan (section 2.3.0-4). A separate estimate will be provided for each of the procurement scenarios in Section 2.4.0-5. The costs will be separately identified for each model, flight unit, required GSE (ground support equipment), and technology development(s) and organized by WBS element. The costs will in fixed year dollars and shown phased by Government fiscal year and quarter. The Contractor will state what parametric model was used in the analysis and provide any inputs to the model beyond the MEL (reference 2.2.0-15). The Contractor will describe the heritage of the model. (CDRL 34)

Page 8 of 11 Printed Friday, April 23, 2021

Object Identifier

GXSSOW77

GXSSOW78

GXSSOW79

GXSSOW80

GXSSOW83

GXSSOW87

GXSSOW90

GXSSOW93

GXSSOW95

GXSSOW96

Object Number

3.0-1

3.1

3.1.0-1

3.1.0-2

3.1.0-3

3.1.0-4

3.1.0-5

3.2

3.2.0-1

418-XO-GXSSOW-0057, RM Version, GEO-XO hyperspectral radiometric Sounder (GXS) Phase A Study Statement of Work (SOW)

3 Reviews, Reporting, and Deliverable Products The Contractor will perform the reviews and reporting tasks and provide deliverable products as specified below. The Contracting Officer's written determination that Government requests for action (RFA's) or requests for information (RFI's) regarding the deliverable reviews and products have been closed out will constitute acceptance of the deliverable.

3.1 Status Meetings and Reviews

Kickoff Meeting: The Contractor shall support a kickoff meeting within 2 weeks of the Authorization to Proceed to provide a team introduction, summary of the proposed work for the study, proposed study schedule, and a high-level introduction to the initial imager design concept. The Contractor will plan for a 2-hour virtual meeting. The Contractor will deliver a soft copy of the Kickoff chart set 24 hours prior to the meeting. (CDRL 35)

Monthly Progress Review (MPR): Contractor shall present the results of the work performed since the previous Review and discuss relevant technical and programmatic issues and findings. The topics expected to be covered are listed in the CDRLs table in section 3.1.6. The MPRs will be planned as 4-hour virtual meetings. The Contractor will deliver a soft copy of the MPR chart set 24 hours prior to the meeting. (CDRL 36)

Midterm Review (MTR): The Contractor shall present a comprehensive midterm study review. This review will be held at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, pending travel restrictions. The Contractor will plan on a one and a half day review. The topics expected to be covered are listed in the CDRLs table in section 3.2. The Contractor will deliver a soft copy of the MTR chart set 72 hours prior to the meeting. (CDRL 37)

Final Study Review (FSR): The Contractor shall present a comprehensive final study review. The Contractor will plan on a one and a half day review at the Contractor’s facility. If possible, the Government will travel to attend the review in-person, pending travel restrictions. The topics expected to be covered are listed in the CDRLs table in section 3.2. The Contractor will deliver a soft copy of the FSR chart set 72 hours prior to the meeting. (CDRL 38)

Final Report Package (FRP): Any CDRLs or open actions that were not delivered and approved by the Government Contracting Officer prior to the FSR shall be submitted in the Final Report Package. The FRP is due 2 weeks after the FSR. (CDRL 39)

3.2 Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)

The Contractor shall deliver the data products specified in Table 2. Most deliveries will be integrated into major review briefing charts. Deliveries specified in other forms does not preclude that data from being summarized in briefing charts.

Page 9 of 11 Printed Friday, April 23, 2021

Object Identifier

GXSSOW96

Object Number

3.2.0-1

418-XO-GXSSOW-0057, RM Version, GEO-XO hyperspectral radiometric Sounder (GXS) Phase A Study Statement of Work (SOW)

Table 2: CDRLs

SU = Status Update; UAN = Updates as Necessary

ID Deliverable/Task Form Kickoff MPR MTR FSR FRP SOW Ref

1 DNB Trade Report Briefing Charts

SU Final UAN UAN 2.1.0-2

2 Data Compression Trade Report

Briefing Charts

SU Prelim Final UAN 2.1.0-3

3 PORD Enhancements Trade Report (if applicable)

Briefing Charts

SU Prelim Final UAN 2.1.0-4

4 Temporal Refresh Trade Report

Briefing Charts

SU Prelim Final UAN 2.1.0-5

5 Detector Management Trade Report

Briefing Charts

SU Prelim Final UAN 2.1.0-6

6 Sounder Design Briefing Charts + Models

SU Prelim Final UAN 2.2.0-1

7 Predicted performance

vs. PORD

Briefing Charts

SU Prelim Final UAN 2.2.0-2

8 Level-3 Requirement Compliance

Spreadsheet SU Prelim Final UAN 2.2.0-3

9 Radiometric Performance Assessment

Briefing Charts

SU Prelim Final UAN 2.2.0-4

10 Radiometric Math Model

Model SU Prelim Final UAN 2.2.0-4

11 Radiometric budget Spreadsheet SU Prelim Final UAN 2.2.0-4 12 Suggested values for

TBRs Briefing Charts

SU Final UAN UAN 2.2.0-5, 2.2.0-6

13 Calibration Methodology

Briefing Charts

SU Prelim Final UAN 2.2.0-7

14 INR and Coregistration Approach

Briefing Charts

SU Prelim Final UAN 2.2.0-8

15 Level 1b Algorithm Description

Briefing Charts

SU Prelim Final UAN 2.2.0-9

16 ZRDQ Review and Straylight Mitigation concept

Briefing Charts

SU Prelim Final UAN 2.2.0-10

17 Initial Straylight Model Model SU Prelim Final UAN 2.2.0-10 18 Scan Concept Briefing

Charts SU Prelim Final UAN 2.2.0-11

19 Modes Analysis Briefing Charts

SU Prelim Final UAN 2.2.0-12

20 Reliability Approach Briefing Charts

SU Prelim Final UAN 2.2.0-13

21 Single-Point Failures & Fault Critical Elements

Briefing Charts

SU Prelim Final UAN 2.2.0-14

Page 10 of 11 Printed Friday, April 23, 2021

Object Identifier

GXSSOW96

Object Number

3.2.0-1

418-XO-GXSSOW-0057, RM Version, GEO-XO hyperspectral radiometric Sounder (GXS) Phase A Study Statement of Work (SOW)

ID Deliverable/Task Form Kickoff MPR MTR FSR FRP SOW Ref 22 MEL Spreadsheet SU Prelim Final UAN 2.2.0-15 23 Analytical Tools Audit Briefing

Charts SU Final UAN UAN 2.2.0-16

24 TRL Assessment Briefing Charts

SU Final UAN UAN 2.3.0-1

25 Technology Development Plan

Briefing Charts

SU Prelim Final UAN 2.3.0-2

26 Tech Development Report (if applicable)

Briefing Charts

SU SU SU SU 2.3.0-3

27 EDU Model Philosophy & Plan

Briefing Charts

SU Prelim Final UAN 2.3.0-4

28 Heritage Assessment Briefing Charts

SU Final UAN UAN 2.3.0-5

29 Risk Assessment Briefing Charts

SU Prelim Final UAN 2.4.0-1

30 Risk Mitigation Effort Report (if applicable)

Briefing Charts

SU SU SU SU 2.4.0-2

31 Launch Delay Risk Mitigation Suggestions

Briefing Charts

SU Prelim Final UAN 2.4.0-3

32 Spares Philosophy and Plan

Briefing Charts

SU Prelim Final UAN 2.4.0-4

33 Flight Implementation Schedule

MS Project + Briefing Charts

SU Prelim Final UAN 2.4.0-5

34 Flight Cost Estimate Spreadsheet SU Prelim Final UAN 2.4.0-6 35 Kickoff Meeting Briefing

Charts Charts due 24 hours before

3.1.0-1

36 MPR Charts Briefing Charts

24 hrs before

MPR

3.1.0-2

37 MTR Charts Briefing Charts

72 hrs before

MTR

3.1.0-3

38 FSR Charts Briefing Charts

72 hrs before

FSR

3.1.0-4

39 Final Report Package NA 2 wks post

FSR

3.1.0-5

Page 11 of 11 Printed Friday, April 23, 2021

Object Identifier

GXSSOW97

GXSSOW98

Object Number

4.0-1

418-XO-GXSSOW-0057, RM Version, GEO-XO hyperspectral radiometric Sounder (GXS) Phase A Study Statement of Work (SOW)

4 Appendix A: Acronyms CDR Critical Design Review CDRL Contract Data Requirement List CO Contracting Officer DNB Day-Night Band EDU Engineering Development Unit FM Flight Model FRP Final Report Package FSR Final Study Review GeoXO Geostationary Extended Observations GFE Government Furnished Equipment GIRD General Interface Requirements Document GPR Goddard Procedural Requirements GSE Ground Support Equipment GSFC Goddard Space Flight Center NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NPR NASA Procedural Requirements IBR Integrated Baseline Review IMAR Instrument Mission Assurance Requirements IMS Integrated Master Schedule INR Image Navigation and Registration IR Infra-Red LRD Launch Readiness Date MEL Master Equipment List MPR Monthly Progress Review MRR Manufacturing Readiness Review MTR Mid-Term Review NPR NASA Procedural Requirements PDR Preliminary Design Review PER Pre-Environmental Review PORD Performance and Operation Requirements Document Qx FYz Quarter x of Fiscal Year z PSR Pre-Shipment Review RFA Request for Action RFI Request for Information SOW Statement of Work SRR System Requirements Review SU Status Update TBR To Be Reviewed TDP Technology Development Plan TRL Technology Readiness Level TRR Test Readiness Review UAN Update as Necessary UIID Unique Instrument Interface Document ZRDQ Zones of Reduced Data Quality

Effective Date: April 20, 2021 418-XO-GXSSOW-0057 Expiration Date: Five years from date of last signature BaselineVersion 1.0 Responsible Organization: GeoXO Flight Project/Code 418

Check the GeoXO portal at https://goesportal.ndc.nasa.gov to verify correct version prior to use.

Document Change Record (DCR)

CCR GeoXO#: X00013 Rev: Title: 418-XO-GXOSW-0057: GeoXO SOW baseline Contract # N/A GOES S/C: GeoXO Effectivity: Instruments CCB Status: Approved Doc #: 418-XO-GXSSOW-0057 CCB Date: 04/20/2021 Doc Version: 1.0 Contract Mod#: N/A DOORs Version: 1.0 Doc Change Date: April 20, 2021 DOORs ID #: 1.0