Attachment A - Performance Work Statement.pdf

Attachment A

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS)

AIR EMISSIONS (STACK) TESTING

PART 1

GENERAL INFORMATION

1. General: This is a non-personnel services contract to perform air emissions (stack) compliance testing. The Government shall not exercise any supervision or control over the contract service providers performing the services herein. Such contract service providers shall be accountable solely to the Contractor who, in turn is responsible to the Government.

1.1 Description of Services:

The Contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, tools, materials, vehicles, supervision, and other items and services necessary to perform air emissions compliance testing.

The DC Department of the Energy & Environment (DOEE) has issued air permits for the nickel and chromium plating lines (Title V), and this permit requires that new emissions compliance tests be completed (See Attachment 3- Permits). Testing will require collection of samples in accordance with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) methods. Samples will be collected from exhaust ducts after the pollution control scrubbers that are installed on the nickel and chromium plating lines.

1.2 Scope:

The Contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, tools, materials, vehicles, supervision, and other items and services necessary to perform air emissions compliance testing on the nickel electroforming and chrome electroplating lines located at BEP’s District of Columbia Facility (DCF). Testing must be performed in accordance with permit requirements and applicable EPA regulations, using appropriate test methods.

1.3 Period of Performance: The Period of Performance reads as follows:

The period of performance shall be one (1) year from contract award. The testing dates and times shall be scheduled and coordinated with the COR and must be completed within one year of contract award.

1.4 General Information:

1.4.1 Quality Assurance: The government shall evaluate the contractor’s performance under this contract in accordance with the Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan. This plan is a Government only document primarily focused on what the Government must do to assure that the contractor has performed in accordance with the requirements of the contract.

1.4.2 Federal Government Holidays: Contractor is not required to perform services on holidays.

New Years Day 1st day of January Martin Luther King Jr.'s Birthday 3rd Monday of January Presidents Day 3rd Monday of February Memorial Day Last Monday of May Juneteenth 19th day of June

Independence Day 4th day of July Labor Day 1st Monday of September Columbus Day 2nd Monday of October Veterans Day 11th day of November Thanksgiving Day 4th Thursday of November Christmas Day 25th day of December

1.4.3 Hours of Operation: The contractor is responsible for conducting business, between the hours of 7:00 am to 5:30 pm Monday through Friday except Federal holidays or when the Government facility is closed due to local or national emergencies, administrative closings, or similar Government directed facility closings. In addition, the D-200 Plating Room typically operates from 7:00 am to 2:30 pm Monday through Friday. Sampling shall be coordinated with Plating Production Supervisors in order to minimized disruption to normal operations and schedule. The Contractor must at all times maintain an adequate workforce for the uninterrupted performance of all tasks defined within this PWS when the Government facility is not closed for the above reasons.

1.4.4 Place of Performance: Service is to be provided at the following locations:

Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP) District of Columbia Facility (DCF) 301 14th Street, S.W.

Washington, D.C. 20228

1.4.5 Type of Contract: The government will award a Firm-Fixed Price contract.

1.4.6 Post Award Conference/Periodic Progress Meetings: The Contractor agrees to attend any post award conference convened by the contracting activity or contract administration office in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation Subpart 42.5, Post Award Orientation. The Contracting Officer, COR, and other Government personnel, as appropriate, may meet periodically with the contractor to review the contractor's performance. At these meetings the Contracting Officer will apprise the contractor of how the government views the contractor's performance and the contractor will apprise the Government of problems, if any, being experienced. Appropriate action shall be taken to resolve outstanding issues. These meetings shall be at no additional cost to the Government.

1.4.7 Contracting Officer Representative (COR): The COR will be identified by separate letter. The COR monitors all technical aspects of the contract and assists in contract administration. The COR is authorized to perform the following functions: assure that the

Contractor performs the technical requirements of the contract; perform inspections necessary in connection with contract performance; maintain written and oral communications with the Contractor concerning technical aspects of the contract; monitor Contractor's performance and notify both the Contracting Officer and Contractor of any deficiencies; and provide site entry of Contractor personnel. A letter of designation issued to the COR, a copy of which is sent to the Contractor, states the responsibilities and limitations of the COR, especially with regard to changes in cost or price, estimates or changes in delivery dates. The COR is not authorized to change any of the terms and conditions of the resulting order.

1.4.8. Key Personnel:

The follow personnel are considered Key Personnel by the government: the one (1) Project Manager and the two (2) Site Technicians. The Contractor shall provide a Project Manager who shall be responsible for the performance of the work. The continued full-time availability of Key Personnel shall be formally confirmed in writing to the Government at the time of award.

Qualifications for all key personnel are listed below:

The Project Manager Minimum Experience:

Five (5) years related trade/stack testing field sampling experience. Must be certified as a Qualified Source Testing Individual (QSTI) by the Source Evaluation Society (SES) or a Qualified Individual (QI) under ASTM D7036 and have prior experience with the applicable test methods and stack testing for electroplating facilities. The Project Manager shall have full authority to act for the Contractor on all contract matters relating to daily operation of this Contract. The Project Manager shall be available between 8:00 a.m. to 4:30p.m., Monday thru Friday except Federal holidays or when the government facility is closed for administrative reasons.

Minimum Education:

Bachelor’s degree in the related area

Site Technician Minimum Experience:

One (1) year experience in the related field.

Minimum Education:

High School Diploma

1.4.9. Non Personal Service Statement: Contractor employees performing services under this order will be controlled, directed, and supervised at all times by management personnel of the Contractor. Contractor management will ensure that employees properly comply with the performance work standards outlined in the performance work statement. Contractor employees will perform their duties independent of, and without the supervision of, any Government official. The tasks, duties, and responsibilities set forth in the contract may not be interpreted or implemented in any manner that results in any contractor employee creating or modifying Federal policy, obligating the appropriated funds of the United States Government, overseeing the work of Federal employees, providing direct personal services to any Federal employee, or otherwise violating the prohibitions set forth in Parts 7.5 and 37.1 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). The Government will control access to the facility and will perform the inspection and acceptance of the completed work.

1.4.10. Requirements for Handling Sensitive, Classified and/or Proprietary Information:

The Contractor shall not do the following unless the BEP has granted written approval:

a. Release any information related to this contract to the public, media or other unauthorized persons or organizations

b. Release any information related to the contractual work and relationship between the BEP and the BEP’s Contractor for any and all information

c. Post any information on a public website related to this contract and the contractual work between the BEP and the BEP’s Contractor for any and all information.

1.4.11. Travel: As applicable, the Contractor shall obtain prior written approval from the COR before making any travel arrangements. Costs incurred by Contractor personnel on official company business are allowable, subject to the limitations contained at FAR 31.205-46 Travel Cost. Costs for travel transportation will be based on actual incurred costs. Costs for lodging, meals and incidentals expense will be based on Federal Travel Regulations prescribed by the General Services Administration, for travel in the contiguous United States available at http://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/104877. Costs incurred for lodging, meals, and incidental expenses shall be considered to be reasonable and allowable only to the extent that they do not exceed on a daily basis the maximum per diem rates in effect at the time of travel.

Documentation to support actual costs incurred shall be allowable only if the following information is documented—

• Date and place (city, town, or other similar designation) of the expenses.

• Purpose of the trip

• Name of person on trip and that person’s title or relationship to the Contractor

Airfare costs in excess of the lowest priced airfare available to the Contractor during normal business hours are unallowable except when such accommodations require circuitous routing, require travel during unreasonable hours, excessively prolong travel, result in increased cost that would offset transportation savings, are not reasonably adequate for the physical or medical needs of the traveler, or are not reasonably available to meet mission requirements. However, in order for airfare costs in excess of the above airfare to be allowable, the applicable condition(s) set forth above must be documented and justified.

PART 2

DEFINITIONS & ACRONYMS

2. DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS:

2.1. DEFINITIONS:

http://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/104877

2.1.1. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR. The official Government representative delegated authority by the Contracting Officer to administer a contract. This individual is normally a member of the appropriate Contracting/Procurement career field and advises on all technical contractual matters.

2.1.2. CONTRACTOR. A supplier or vendor awarded a contract to provide specific supplies or services to the government. The term used in this contract refers to the prime.

2.1.3. CONTRACTING OFFICER. A person with authority to enter into, administer, and/or terminate contracts, and make related determinations and findings on behalf of the government.

Note: The only individual who can legally bind the government.

2.1.4. CONTRACTING OFFICER'S REPRESENTATIVE (COR). An employee of the U.S. Government appointed by the contracting officer to administer the contract. Such appointment shall be in writing and shall state the scope of authority and limitations. This individual has authority to provide technical direction to the Contractor as long as that direction is within the scope of the contract, does not constitute a change, and has no funding implications.

This individual does NOT have authority to change the terms and conditions of the contract.

2.1.5. DEFECTIVE SERVICE. A service output that does not meet the standard of performance associated with the Performance Work Statement.

2.1.6. DELIVERABLE. Anything that can be physically delivered, but may include non-manufactured things such as meeting minutes or reports.

2.1.7. GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED PROPERTY (GFP) OR GOVERNMENT

PROPERTY (GP). Property in the possession of, or directly acquired by, the Government and subsequently made available to the Contractor.

2.1.8. KEY PERSONNEL. Contractor personnel that are evaluated in a source selection process and that may be required to be used in the performance of a contract by the Key Personnel listed in the PWS. When key personnel are used as an evaluation factor in best value procurement, an offer can be rejected if it does not have a firm commitment from the persons that are listed in the proposal.

2.1.9. PHYSICAL SECURITY. Actions that prevent the loss or damage of Government property.

2.1.10. QUALITY ASSURANCE. The government procedures to verify that services being performed by the Contractor are acceptable in accordance with established standards and requirements of this contract.

2.1.11. QUALITY ASSURANCE SPECIALIST. An official Government representative concerned with matters pertaining to the contract administration process and quality assurance/quality control. Acts as technical advisor to the Contracting Officer in these areas.

2.1.12. QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP). An organized written document specifying the surveillance methodology to be used for surveillance of contractor performance.

2.1.13. QUALITY CONTROL. All necessary measures taken by the Contractor to assure that the quality of an end product or service shall meet contract requirements.

2.1.14. SUBCONTRACTOR. One that enters into a contract with a prime contractor. The Government does not have privity of contract with the subcontractor.

2.1.15. WORK DAY. The number of hours per day the Contractor provides services in accordance with the contract.

2.1.16. WORK WEEK. Monday through Friday, except for Federal holidays unless specified otherwise.

2.2. ACRONYMS

ACOR Alternate Contracting Officer's Representative CFR Code of Federal Regulations COR Contracting Officer Representative FAR Federal Acquisition Regulation CO Contracting Officer OCI Organizational Conflict of Interest POC Point of Contact PRS Performance Requirements Summary PWS Performance Work Statement QA Quality Assurance QASP Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan

PART 3

GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT, AND SERVICES

3. GOVERNMENT FURNISHED ITEMS AND SERVICES:

3.1. Services: None anticipated.

3.2 Facilities: The BEP DCF will provide access to facility areas the contractor must access to complete the sample effort. These include the plating rooms and the utility rooms in the Main Building where sample ports are installed in the plating line exhaust ducts.

If contractor will need to park a vehicle at BEP during testing, parking must be coordinated in advance through the BEP COR.

3.3 Utilities: Electricity is available to run sampling pumps and electronic equipment in the Main Building utility rooms where the sample ports are installed. BEP does not anticipate this sampling effort will require the use of other utilities.

3.4 Equipment: None anticipated.

3.5 Materials: Copies of prior testing reports and sampling protocols will be provided after award.

PART 4

CONTRACTOR FURNISHED ITEMS AND SERVICES

4. CONTRACTOR FURNISHED ITEMS AND RESPONSIBILITIES:

4.1 General: The Contractor shall furnish all supplies, equipment, facilities and services required to perform work under this contract that are not listed under Section 3 of this PWS.

4.2. Materials: The Contractor shall furnish all materials required to perform work under this contract which are not listed under Section 3 of this PWS.

4.3. Equipment: The Contractor shall furnish all equipment required to perform work under this contract which are not listed under Section 3 of this PWS.

4.4 Key Personnel: BEP anticipates that this contract will require a Project Manager, who will be responsible for drafting the project schedule, performing the initial site visit, managing the development of the test protocol, leading the on-site compliance sampling, preparing test report, and revising the test report as required based on comments received from BEP. The Project Manager must have relevant education and experience with applicable test methods and stack testing for electroplating facilities. BEP prefers that the Project Manager be an SES certified QSTI. In addition to the Project Manager, BEP anticipates that two field service technicians may be required to support the on-site compliance sampling effort. One technician may be required to track operational data in the plating room, which is located on the 2nd floor of the Main Building, while the testing is being conducted. The other technician may be required to support exhaust duct gas sampling that is conducted on the 5th floor of the Main Building. The technicians may also support Project Manager in the drafting of the test protocol and test report.

PART 5

SPECIFIC TASKS

5.1 Specific Tasks.

5.1.1 Project Timeline/Schedule: The Contractor will submit a timeline schedule showing the length of time that the Contractor requires to complete the general and specific requirements this effort within 3 business days after award. The timeline schedule shall include milestones and completion dates.

5.1.2 Site Visit/Meeting/Survey: The Contractor will schedule a preliminary site visit/meeting/survey with the BEP COR to assist in the development of the test protocol. The site visit will occur within 10 days after award. This is expected to require one day of on-site at BEP

DCF.

5.1.3 Test Protocol: The Contractor shall submit to the BEP COR, for review and approval, a first draft test protocol within thirty (30) calendar days after the Site Visit/Meeting/Survey incorporating in detail the requirements covered in this PWS and the referenced Operating Permits and applicable regulations.

The EPA test methods shown in Attachment 7 were used during compliance sampling conducted in 2016 on the chrome and nickel lines. BEP anticipates some or all of these methods may be required for this effort. The contractor is responsible for verifying sampling methods required based on applicable regulations, BEP permits, and plating line equipment and configuration.

5.1.3.1 The BEP COR shall review the draft test protocol and provide comments to the Contractor no later than 15 calendar days after receiving the protocol. The Contractor shall revise the test protocol as appropriate and resubmit it to the BEP COR fifteen (15) calendar days after receiving BEP comments.

5.1.3.2 BEP shall submit the revised draft test protocol to the DOEE Air Quality Division (AQD).

DOEE AQD is allowed 30 days to review and approve the test protocol. If comments are received from DOEE, the Contractor will discuss the comments with BEP, recommend appropriate responses, and will edit the test protocol as agreed with the BEP COR in response to the DOEE comments to finalize the test protocol. The Contractor shall submit the Final Test Protocol to the BEP COR fifteen (15) calendar days after receiving DOEE comments.

When the test protocol requires off-site laboratory analyses, the Contractor shall use a laboratory accredited under the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) and impose substantial quality assurance/quality control requirements on the laboratory, to assure that the data has been generated in strict adherence to the methodology outlined in the test protocol.

5.1.4 On-Site Compliance Testing: The contractor shall perform compliance testing in accordance with the final test protocol. The testing dates and times shall be scheduled and coordinated with the COR, and must be completed within one year of contract award. Testing shall commence after DOEE provides written approval of the test plan. Testing is expected to require 2 to 3 days of on-site work. During the testing the contractor shall be responsible for supplying and setting up all required sampling and testing equipment, performing preliminary measurements, conducting sampling runs, recovering collected samples, disassembling the equipment, and analyzing the samples in strict adherence to the approved test protocol. All tests shall be conducted under maximum equipment operating conditions, as agreed upon with the BEP COR and scheduled, as equipment is available for operation.

Tests conducted during prior (2016) compliance testing are listed in Attachment 7. The contractor is responsible for verifying sampling methods required based on applicable regulations, BEP permits, and plating line equipment and configuration. Two sample ports are installed on each exhaust duct. Attachment 8 provides a description and schematic diagrams of the sample ports that are installed on the nickel and chromium plating line exhaust ducts. These sample ports are located on the ducts in a room within the Main Building. They are approximately eight (8) to nine (9) feet above the floor level. BEP believes they are accessible via a step ladder or lift.

5.1.4.1 The Contractor's test program shall cover the following Emission Control Units in accordance with DOEE Title V Permit:

5.1.4.1.1 Nickel plating line, room D-200 and wet packed bed scrubber 15000 PBS - Determine total nickel and sulfuric acid mist emissions from the scrubber. Review the work practice standards, operating and maintenance plan, and the plating operations in accordance with full compliance with the NESHAP/MACT standard for plating and polishing as specified in 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart WWWW.

During prior testing, total nickel emissions were measured using US EPA Method 29 with three sample runs, and the total sampling time for each run was 60 minutes; sulfuric acid mist emissions were measured using US EPA Method 8 with three sample runs, and the total sampling time for each run was 60 minutes. The contractor is responsible for verifying sampling methods required based on applicable regulations, BEP permits, and plating line equipment and configuration.

5.1.4.1.2 Chromium plating line, room D-200 and composite mesh pad scrubber 6900 CMP- Determine total chromium and sulfuric acid mist emissions from the scrubber. Review the work practice standards, operating and maintenance plan, and the plating operations in accordance with full compliance with the NESHAP/MACT standard for chromium plating as specified in 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart N. Note: BEP’s chromium plating line is configured with both affected sources (plating tanks) and non-affected sources (de-chrome and degreasing tanks) venting to a common mesh pad scrubber. Therefore, the chromium plating line is subject to the special compliance provisions at 40 CFR 63.344(e) (3). These provisions affect the minimum sample time required per test run, and the analysis of compliance with standards. Test results must be compared to site specific allowable mass emission rate of the system AMRsys emission limits calculated based on 40 CFR 63.344(e)(3). For the 63.344(e)(3) calculations, the three affected sources (plating tanks) each have a duct inner diameter of 246 mm, and the three non-affected sources (de-chrome and degreasing tanks) each have a duct inner diameter of 196.4 mm).

During prior testing, sulfuric acid mist emissions were measured using US EPA Method 8 with three sample runs, and the total sampling time for each run was 60 minutes. For total chromium, emissions were measured using US EPA Method 306. 40 CFR 63.344(e)(3)(ii) provides a formula for determining total sample time per test run using Method 306 when emissions from multiple affected and non-affected sources are controlled by a common add-on air pollution control device.

Based on duct sizes from affected and non-affected sources, BEP calculates a total sample time per test run of 196.2 minutes. The contractor is responsible for verifying sampling methods required based on applicable regulations, BEP permits, and plating line equipment and configuration.

5.1.5 Test Report: The Contractor shall develop and provide both a draft and final test report that includes a description of the work performed, discussion of actual process operations and test results, methodologies used, difficulties encountered, and exceptions to standard methodologies, if any. The report shall include the content required in DOEE Title V Permit, and the content required in 40 CFR Part 63 Subparts N and WWWW. That content includes, but may not be limited to, the following information:

a. Process description

b. Sampling location description(s)

c. A description of sampling and analytical procedures and any modifications to standard procedures or difficulties encountered

d. A statement that the owner and operator have reviewed the Contractor’s report and agrees with the findings. (This may be a signature page in the report for BEP to sign, accepting the report, when it is finalized).

e. A summary of results with respect to each permit condition, and recommendations, as appropriate.

f. A statement of compliance or non-compliance with each permit condition.

g. Quality assurance procedures and results

h. Records of operating conditions during the test, preparation of standards, and calibration procedures

i. Raw data sheets from field sampling and field laboratory analysis

j. Documentation of calculations

k. Any other information required by the test method

l. Any recommendations for re-testing schedules and or improved record keeping

5.1.5.1 Test Results Emission Rate Units: All final emission test results for the nickel line shall be reported in pounds per hour (lbs/hr). Final emission results for sulfuric acid from the chromium plating line shall be reported in lbs/hr. Final emission results for chromium from the chromium plating line shall be reported in lbs/hr, milligrams/dry standard cubic meter (mg/dscm), grains/dry standard cubic foot (gr/dscf), and in milligrams/hour (mg/hr) for comparison to the site specific AMRsys emission limits.

5.1.5.2 Draft Test Report: The Contractor shall submit the Draft Sampling Report to the BEP COR no later than fifteen (15) calendar days after the completion of on-site testing.

5.1.5.3 Final Test Report: The Contractor shall edit the Draft Sampling Report as appropriate, to incorporate edits or corrections noted by BEP, and submit a Final Sampling Report no later than thirty five (35) calendar days after the completion of on-site testing.

PART 6

APPLICABLE PUBLICATIONS

6. APPLICABLE PUBLICATIONS (CURRENT EDITIONS)

6.1. Applicable Publications: The Contractor shall comply with and perform all services associated with the contract in accordance with any and all applicable Regulations/Publications/Codes. The Contractor is solely responsible for ensuring it is complying with and performing in accordance with any such amendments, supplements to such Regulations/Publications/Codes as well as any and all superseding documents issued or enacted during the life of the contract. Below is a listing of some of the applicable Regulations/Publications/Codes:

a) 29 CFR 1910, General Industry Standards.

b) 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A.

c) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Compendium of Methods for the Determination of Toxic Organic Compounds in Ambient Air, Methods TO1 through TO14 published from 1984 through 1988.

d) NESHAP/MACT standard for chromium plating, 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart N and Metal Fabrication and Finishing Source Categories Subpart XXXX

e) NESHAP/MACT standard for Plating and Polishing Operations, 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart

WWWW.

f) Title V Permit to Operate Nickel Electroforming/Plating Line for Intaglio Printing Plates and Dies (Attachment 3 - Permits)

g) Title V Permit to Operate a Hard Chromium Electroplating Line for Intaglio Printing Plate Manufacture (Attachment 3 - Permits)

h) Scrubber 15000 Description (Attachment 4 – Scrubber Descriptions), 3 pages

i) Scrubber 1500 On-Board Description ( Attachment 4 – Scrubber Descriptions) 2 pages

j) Scrubber 6900 CMP Description ( Attachment 4 – Scrubber Descriptions) 3 pages

k) Nickel and Chromium Plating Line Drawings (Attachment 5)

l) EHS Contractor Requirements Boilerplate, EMS Document 75D-07.0-04 (Attachment 6).

m) Title 20 District of Columbia Municipal Regulations.

n) Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) of 1970.

o) BEP Safety and Health Regulations and Directives

PART 7 – TECHNICAL EXHIBIT LISTING

Technical Exhibit List:

Technical Exhibit 1 – Performance Requirements Summary (PRS) Technical Exhibit 2 – Deliverables Schedule

TECHNICAL EXHIBIT 1 - PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY

The Contractor tasks requirements summarizes the performance objectives that relate directly to mission essential items. The performance threshold briefly describes the minimum acceptable levels of work required for each requirement. These thresholds are critical to mission success.

Performance Objective

Performance Standard

Performance Threshold

Method of Surveillance

The Contractor shall provide Project Timeline IAW Section

5.1.1 of PWS.

Services provided within required timeline.

100% satisfactory and timely completion

100% inspection by

COR

The Contractor shall provide 1st Draft Test Protocol IAW Section 5.1.3 of

PWS.

Services provided within required timeline. 1st Draft Test Protocol shall be technical correct, shall include all required test methods, and will require minimal editing.

100% satisfactory and timely completion

100% Inspection by

COR

The Contractor shall provide Revised Draft Test Protocol IAW Section

5.1.3.1 of PWS.

Services provided within required timeline. All BEP comments on the prior draft test protocol incorporated, as agreed between

100% satisfactory and timely completion

100% Inspection by

COR

BEP and Contractor.

The Contractor shall provide Final Test Protocol IAW Section 5.1.3.2 of

PWS.

Services provided within required timeline.

100% satisfactory and timely completion

100% Inspection by

COR

The Contractor shall conduct On-Site Compliance Testing IAW Section 5.1.4 of

PWS.

Services provided within required timeline. Sampling scheduled to minimize disruption to BEP production.

All sampling completed in one multi-day sampling effort.

100% satisfactory and timely completion

100% Inspection by

COR

The Contractor shall provide Draft Sampling Report IAW Section 5.1.5 of

PWS.

Services provided within required timeline. Draft Sampling Report shall be technically correct, shall include information specific in this PWS, and shall require minimal editing.

100% satisfactory and timely completion

100% inspection by

The Contractor shall provide Final Sampling Report IAW Section 5.1.5 of

PWS

Services provided within required timeline. All BEP comments on the prior draft sampling report incorporated, as agreed between BEP and contractor.

100% satisfactory and timely completion

100% inspection by

TECHNICAL EXHIBIT 2 – DELIVERABLES

This attachment lists any reports or documentation that is required as deliverable to include the frequency, # of copies, medium/format and who/where it is to be submitted. A deliverable is anything that can be physically delivered but may include non-physical things such as meeting minutes. Note: All PWS deliverables should be included in this exhibit.

# Deliverable Due Date

Deliverable Recipient (include contact information)

Deliverable Format

1 Project Timeline Schedule

Three (3) business days after award

CO/COR Electronic Copy

2 1st Draft Test Protocol

Thirty (30) calendar days after the Site Visit/Meeting/Survey

CO/COR Electronic Copy

3 Revised Draft Test Protocol

Fifteen (15) calendar days after receiving BEP comments.

CO/COR Electronic Copy

4 Final Test Protocol

Fifteen (15) calendar days after receiving DOEE comments.

CO/COR Electronic Copy

5 Compliance Testing Before August 2024 CO/COR On site sampling

6 Draft Sampling Report

No later than fifteen

(15) calendar days after the conclusion of testing.

CO/COR Electronic Copy

7 Final Sampling Report

No later than thirty five (35) calendar days after the conclusion of testing.

CO/COR Electronic Copy

PART 8 – ATTACHMENTS

Attachment 3 – Permits (provided separately) Attachment 4 – Scrubber Descriptions (provided separately) Attachment 5 – Nickel and Chromium Plating Line Drawings (provided separately) Attachment 6 - EHS Contractor Requirements Boilerplate, EMS Document 75D-07.0-0 4 (provided separately) Attachment 7 – EPA Test Methods Used During 2016 Stack Testing on Nickel and Chromium Plating Lines (provided separately) Attachment 8 – Description of Nickel and Chromium Exhaust Duct Sample Ports (provided separately)

TECHNICAL EXHIBIT 1 - PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY