Attachment_A_-_Evaluation_Criteria.pdf

ATTACHMENT A

EVALUATION CRITERA

Emphasis should be placed upon providing information concerning project approach, similar projects the proposer has recently performed, availability and qualifications of key team members.

The qualifications may include additional information, as deemed appropriate, subject to the overall length restriction established in the Qualifications Requirements.

The committee panel reviewing the SOQs and Proposals will consist of members from SJCOG, City of Manteca and Caltrans staff. The panel will review and evaluate the SOQ and Proposals based on the criteria listed and maximum points allotted.

CRITERIA POINTS

Approach and Understanding

Project Team Qualifications and Experience

Relevant project experience (last 7 years) 20

Quality Assurance/Control 10

TOP 3 PROPOSERS ONLY

Detail Scope of Work 35

Adherence to the Original Schedule of Work 25

Risk Mitigation 25

Presentation and Interview (if applicable) 15

Maximum Points Available = 180

Approach and Understanding:

• Describes familiarity of project and demonstrates understanding of work completed to date and project objectives moving forward.

• Roles and Organization of Proposed Team are adequate and appropriate disciplines for project success. Some or all of team members have previously worked together on similar project(s); Overall organization of the team is relevant to the project needs.

• The Project Team is managed by an individual with appropriate experience in similar project and is appropriately committed to the project.

• Team successfully addresses Site Planning and Programming efforts, responds to project issues, and has adequate capability to perform both volume and quality of needed work within project schedule milestones.

• The Project Team have experience working in the public sector and knowledge of public sector procurement process, and the nature of public sector work and its decision-making process.

Project Team Qualifications & Experience

• Relevant experience, specific qualifications, and technical expertise of the firm and sub-consultants to conduct the work as outlined in the scope of services.

• Roles of Key Individuals proposed have relevant experience for their role in the project and is appropriately staffed.

Relevant Project Experience

• Project experiences (5 examples) provided showcases similarity to this project scope and represents experiences of the project manager and/or project team.

Quality Assurance/Control

• Quality Assurance and Quality Control measures are well defined, show responsible staff and process to assure services and products meet or exceed industry standard, are performed in a timely manner and provides value on the project.

• Describe how the process meets Caltrans, and other stakeholders’ requirements.

• Methods to control cost and hours expended to manage project budget and/or savings.

Detail Scope of Work

• Understanding of the scope of work, lists approaches and methods appear achievable in the timeframes set forth.

• Listed recommendations and supplemental tasks which will enhance project outcome.

• Deliverables are appropriate to schedule and scope set forth in above requirements.

Schedule of Work

• Schedule shows completion of the work within or preferably prior to the overall time specified in the RFQ-RFP.

• The schedule serves as a project timeline, stating all major milestones and required submittals for project management, State/Federal and local compliance.

• The schedule addresses all knowable phases of the project, in accordance with the general requirements of this RFQ-RFP.

Presentation and Interview

• Team presentation conveying project understanding, communication skills, innovative ideas, critical issues and solutions, and interrelationship.

• Team responses to various interview panel questions